Reading view
James Corden TV Return Praised: 'Perfect'
Florida Condo Crisis Faces Major Deadline
Top 10 MCU Characters Ranked by Power Level
Senior Russian Officers Eliminated in Combined HIMARS-Drone Strike: Kyiv
Azerbaijan Demands Apology From Russia Over 'Downed' Passenger Plane
Panama President Dismisses Donald Trump Threat: 'Nonsense'
OpenAI confirms plans to separate its non-profit and for-profit arms
OpenAI confirmed Friday its plan to restructure its operations in a move that will separate its large and growing business from the non-profit board that currently oversees it.
Why it matters: The plan, which faces opposition from Elon Musk and others, builds upon comments Chairman Bret Taylor made at Axios's recent AI+ Summit in San Francisco.
Zoom in: OpenAI offered details in a blog post on Friday on how the board is looking to restructure its for-profit and non-profit arms.
- The non-profit would have a significant ownership stake in the OpenAI business and would transform into a well-resourced entity that can pursue a range of scientific and philanthropic pursuits.
- OpenAI's business, meanwhile, would be transformed into a Delaware-chartered public benefit corporation.
What they're saying: "Our plan would result in one of the best resourced nonprofits in history," OpenAI said in the blog post.
- "The nonprofit's significant interest in the existing for-profit operation would take the form of shares in (OpenAI's business) at a fair valuation determined by independent financial advisors. This will multiply the resources that our donors gave manyfold."
- The new public benefit corporation, meanwhile, would be able to control its own destiny.
- "Our current structure does not allow the Board to directly consider the interests of those who would finance the mission and does not enable the nonprofit to easily do more than control the for-profit," OpenAI said.
Yes, but: Musk, one of those early donors, has sued to stop such a move, while Meta has asked California's attorney general to investigate.
North Korean soldier captured by Ukraine as it says Russia is trying to hide Pyongyang's losses
- A North Korean soldier was captured by Ukraine, per South Korean intelligence.
- The soldier later died from his injuries, the National Intelligence Service said.
- It comes after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Russia was trying to hide North Korean losses.
A North Korean soldier captured by Ukrainian forces has died from his injuries, South Korea's National Intelligence Service (NIS) said on Friday, per Yonhap news agency.
The NIS had earlier confirmed reports that an injured North Korean soldier had been taken prisoner by Ukraine.
"Through real-time information sharing with a friendly nation's intelligence organization, (we) confirmed the capture of a wounded North Korean soldier and plans to thoroughly examine the subsequent development," the NIS said in a statement.
The incident marked the first reported case of a North Korean combatant being taken alive during the ongoing war in Ukraine.
The soldier was reportedly seized on December 26 in Russia's Kursk region, into which Ukraine launched an offensive in August.
It comes after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said earlier this month that Russia was trying to "conceal losses" of North Korean troops fighting against Ukraine.
"After first combats with our warriors, Russians are trying⦠to literally burn the faces of North Korean soldiers killed in battle," Zelenskyy wrote on X, sharing a video seemingly showing the alleged act.
"There is not a single reason for North Koreans to fight and die for Putin. And even after they do, Russia has only humiliation for them," he continued. "This madness must be stoppedβstoped by a reliable and durable peace, as well as Russia's accountability for this cynical war."
Even after years of war, when we thought the Russians could not get any more cynical, we see something even worse.Russia not only sends the North Korean troops to storm Ukrainian positions, but also tries to conceal losses of these people.They tried to hide the presence of⦠pic.twitter.com/KYyGF1rxP8
β Volodymyr Zelenskyy / ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡ ΠΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ (@ZelenskyyUa) December 16, 2024
Pyongyang reportedly began sending troops to Russia in October, with up to 11,000 thought to have arrived in Kursk so far.
North Korea's elite "Storm" Corps have reportedly been at the forefront of the fighting in the region.
The NIS said more than 100 "Storm" troops had been killed and 1,000 more injured in their first battles for Russia.
The agency reportedly told lawmakers earlier this month that the elite troops β thought to be Pyongyang's best-trained and most heavily indoctrinated β are ill-prepared for drone attacks and the local terrain.
Zelenskyy said in December that preliminary estimates suggested over 3,000 North Korean soldiers had been killed or wounded in Russia's Kursk region.
These were the 27 cleanest cruise ships this year, according to the CDC
- The CDC randomly inspects and scores cruise ships to prevent the spread of stomach viruses.
- 27 cruise ships received a perfect score in 2024.
- Norovirus can spread quickly on packed vessels.
Not all cruise ships are created β or operated β equally.
In 2024, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 13 bacterial and viral outbreaks (mostly norovirus) on ships. However, not every floating resort is damned to become a floating petri dish.
Quite the opposite β in 2024, the public health agency awarded perfect sanitation scores to 27 vessels.
Norovirus, also known as the stomach flu, is the most common virus to afflict cruises. Crowded ships provide an ideal setting for the highly contagious bug to spread fast, often through contaminated water, food, surfaces, and people.
Just as quickly, it can ruin your vacation β the four predominant symptoms are vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, and stomach pain.
To help mitigate these incidents, the CDC's Vessel Sanitation Program regularly inspects cruise liners and scores them from zero to 100.
The reviews β which include checking heavily trafficked areas like pools and children's activity centers β are random and unannounced.
Vermin and improperly stored food are big no-nos. In addition to the obvious, inspectors also look behind the scenes for more nuanced details, such as the dishwasher's water temperature and the frequency at which the pool's hair and lint strainer is disinfected.
The CDC has performed 151 inspections in 2024, including repeat inspections on 23 ships. The majority scored above 95, and 27 (listed below) have received perfect marks:
- Celebrity Apex β Celebrity Cruises (inspected November 10)
- Seven Seas Grandeur β Regent Seven Seas Cruises (inspected October 23)
- Norwegian Jade β Norwegian Cruise Line (inspected October 21)
- Carnival Magic β Carnival Cruise Line (inspected October 13)
- Star Pride β Windstar Cruises (inspected September 29)
- Jewel of the Seas β Royal Caribbean International (inspected September 28)
- Serenade of the Seas β Royal Caribbean International (inspected September 10)
- Carnival Spirit β Carnival Cruise Line (inspected September 3)
- Zuiderdam β Holland America Line (inspected August 24)
- Viking Orion β Viking Ocean Cruises (inspected August 18)
- Seabourn Odyssey β Seabourn Cruise Line (inspected August 16)
- Norwegian Jewel β Norwegian Cruise Line (inspected July 24)
- Oceania Regatta β Oceania Cruises (inspected July 24)
- Radiance of the Seas β Royal Caribbean International (inspected July 21)
- MSC Meraviglia β MSC Cruises (inspected July 9)
- Norwegian Bliss β Norwegian Cruise Line (inspected June 22)
- MSC Seashore β MSC Cruises (inspected May 26)
- Norwegian Sky β Norwegian Cruise Line (inspected May 23)
- Brilliance of the Seas β Royal Caribbean International (inspected May 16)
- Viking Polaris β Viking (inspected April 2)
- Celebrity Equinox β Celebrity Cruises (inspected February 25)
- Norwegian Breakaway β Norwegian Cruise Line (inspected September 22)
- Norwegian Escape β Norwegian Cruise Line (inspected January 27)
- Explora I β MSC Cruises (inspected January 25)
- Disney Fantasy β Disney Cruise Line (inspected January 24)
- Celebrity Ascent β Celebrity Cruises (inspected January 7)
- Norwegian Gem β Norwegian Cruise Line (inspected January 2)
In 2023, 24 vessels racked a perfect score.
'Deadpool' director says he got paid $225,000 for the movie, which launched a franchise worth over $2.9 billion
- Tim Miller was paid $225,000 for directing the first "Deadpool" movie in 2016.
- The superhero movie raked in $782 million at the box office.
- It launched a huge franchise, which is worth $2.9 billion after 2024's "Deadpool & Wolverine."
Back in 2016 Tim Miller directed "Deadpool", launching a lucrative global superhero franchise β work he said earned him a relatively small $225,000.
The violent, R-rated movies star Ryan Reynolds as the titular foul-mouthed superhero. According to TheNumbers.com, the franchise is now worth over $2.9 billion after the riotous success of the third film, "Deadpool & Wolverine."
Collider reported that Miller discussed his salary during a recent panel at the CCXP convention in Brazil, which took place from December 5-8.
He said: "You guys might not know, but it's not really a profitable thing to be a first-time director in Hollywood, and I'll tell you exactly. I got $225,000 to direct 'Deadpool.' I know it sounds like a lot of money, but for two years of work, that's not a ton of money."
Miller said he was grateful for the opportunity, but joked that at the time, his agent told him: "'Dude, you make more on an episode of 'The Walking Dead!'"
The director went on to say that there's a misconception about typical salaries in Hollywood. "I think a lot of people think that everyone's getting paid millions and millions in Hollywood. It's just not the case, not always," he said.
The minimum salary for members of the Director's Guild of America in 2024 is $237,670 for a guaranteed shoot of 10 weeks.
In July 2024, Reynolds said he "let go of getting paid" for "Deadpool" because it was a passion project for him and he wanted to see it on the big screen. The film was a risk because of its violence and profanity, which meant that younger fans and families couldn't go see it.
Regardless, it still made $782 million worldwide, according to Box Office Mojo. For Miller, that success overrides the small salary.
He said: "You know what I feel? Nothing but pride. I mean, I feel like every time I walk down the aisles out there on the floor of CCXP and I see all these Deadpool figurines, I think they wouldn't be here if we hadn't made that film. And I feel uniquely fortunate that I could be part of it."
Miller's work on "Deadpool" propelled his career forward. He directed 2019's "Terminator: Dark Fate" as well as episodes of Netflix's "Love, Death, and Robots." He also created the animated anthology video game series, "Secret Level," for Amazon Prime Video.
He also joked that he should've negotiated a merchandise deal into his contract.
"Then my second thought is, I wish my director deals had a piece of the merchandising so that I could get some money from all of that."
Rob Mitchell, the director of theatrical insights at Gower Street Analytics, told Business Insider that backend and merchandise deals allow actors and directors to take on "riskier" projects that earn more if the project is successful.
He said: "The most famous one is Jack Nicholson's deal on the original 'Batman' film that he got a huge payday out of. He took a salary cut, but took a backend and made an absolute fortune of it. That isn't uncommon, that would happen with big stars in riskier projects."
The DOGE crowd and MAGA loyalists are in a messy feud over immigration
- Pro-Trump tech leaders and MAGA loyalists are feuding over how to overhaul US immigration.
- A debate over high-skill immigration intensified between the two groups in recent days.
- The debate came after Trump's appointment of an Indian-born tech leader as a senior policy advisor.
President-elect Donald Trump's backers in Silicon Valley are at odds with his MAGA loyalists over a key issue: immigration.
In recent days, Elon Musk and others in the tech sector have increasingly shared support for visas that allow companies to hire highly-skilled workers from overseas. The move has riled up Trump backers in favor of stricter immigration rules in the process.
The recent debate came after Trump offered Sriram Krishnan, a Chennai-born, Indian-American investor, a role as a senior policy advisor for artificial intelligence β a move that triggered heated criticisms online.
Krishnan, who was recently in London leading an expansion of venture capital firm A16z's β previously lived in the US, where he completed stints at Microsoft, Twitter, and Meta from 2005.
Criticisms have largely come from anonymous accounts online β one X post asked if anyone had voted "for this Indian to run America," prompting a defense from Trump's AI and crypto czar David Sacks.
They also prompted a wider debate on the merits of the H-1B visa commonly used to employ skilled workers from other countries.
Sriram has been a U.S. citizen for a decade. Heβs not βrunning America.β Heβs advising on A.I. policy. He will have no influence over U.S. immigration policy. These attacks have become crude, and not in the holiday spirit. Iβm signing off now. Have a merry Christmas.π https://t.co/H3Ro6JfiRF
β David Sacks (@DavidSacks) December 25, 2024
Tech leaders such as Musk, who have been deeply critical of illegal immigration, have used the saga to defend immigration that prioritizes the transfer of high-skilled foreign workers into American companies.
On Thursday, Musk said his priority was bringing in top engineering talent legally β saying it is "essential for America to keep winning."
"Thinking of America as a pro sports team that has been winning for a long time and wants to keep winning is the right mental construct," he wrote on X.
Musk's co-lead at the Department of Government Efficiency, Vivek Ramaswamy, also took to X on Thursday. He argued that tech companies often hire foreign-born engineers, saying it allowed them to avoid what he called an American culture that has "venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long."
"A culture that celebrates the prom queen over the math olympiad champ, or the jock over the valedictorian, will not produce the best engineers," he wrote in an almost 400-word post.
In a later post, he said immigration rules should be reformed more effectively to funnel talent to the US. The H-1B system was not effective, he said, and "should be replaced with one that focuses on selecting the very best of the best."
Marc Benioff, the boss of Salesforce, also weighed in, offering a solution to keep the "best and brightest" foreign students in the US after graduation: "Can we staple a US green card to every degree earned at an American university?"
Can we staple a US green card to every degree earned at an American university? Instead of sending the best and brightest top talented graduates away after theyβve been admitted to our top schools and graduated with a world-class education, letβs keep them in the USA to fuel ourβ¦ https://t.co/I6wVKNkdef pic.twitter.com/P1cMiqcZyd
β Marc Benioff (@Benioff) December 26, 2024
The pro-immigration messages haven't gone down well with everyone in the Trump pack.
Former Florida congressman Matt Gaetz, who Trump briefly put forward to be his Attorney General, wrote an X post on Thursday saying that tech figures should butt out.
When Republicans embraced them, he said, "We did not ask them to engineer an immigration policy."
Meanwhile, far-right activist and Trump supporter Laura Loomer used several posts to express strong opposition to H-1B visas and her concerns over the "replacement of American tech workers by Indian immigrants."
Where Trump will land on the issue remains to be seen. Immigration lawyers have warned tech workers that a "storm is coming" with the arrival of a second Trump term, and suggested those who have left to get back before it's too late.
The debate signals a deep divide between different groups of Trump supporters as he prepared to take office.
Putin Dashes Allies' Hopes Over Russian Gas Exports to Europe
Workplace Diversity Ranking Highlights Companies That Invest in People
Holiday Weather Updates: Storms and Conditions Put Travelers on High Alert
Insanity Defense Is Luigi Mangione's Only Option: Attorney
Indeed's Apprenticeship Program Shows Success of Diversity in Tech
China Launches Giant Amphibious Assault Warship for Growing Navy
My husband and I both work 4-day workweeks. We'd rather have less money and more family time.
- My husband and I are both from hardworking families, and we both used to work a lot.
- After having our third child, our priorities changed, and we now both work 4-day workweeks.
- We have less money but more time to spend with our family, and we're happier.
I first met my husband Sam when he was 24 and I was 21. Back then, he worked six days a week. At the time, he had his own remedial massage business on the Gold Coast, in Australia, and he believed that as a young business owner, he had to put in long hours to succeed.
Sam was raised in a hardworking, middle-income Australian family. His dad worked for the government, and his mom worked in retail. They taught Sam about the importance of having a strong work ethic, budgeting, and investing wisely.
I was also raised in a family of hard workers. For as long as I can remember, my dad worked 12-hour days, five days a week, as an agricultural spare parts salesman, while my mom worked part-time in advertising to help support our family of six.
As soon as I could, I started working and got a job at the age of 14 at our local ice cream shop to earn my own money. I continued working throughout school and while I was at university. Before I'd even graduated, I'd already lined up an internship at the local newspaper.
We traveled together for years and worked full-time when we returned home
In our 20s, Sam and I traveled for several years and did odd jobs while overseas. When we returned to Australia in 2013, we were pretty broke, so we started working full-time again and trying to fill up the coffers, so to speak.
I got a job as a print journalist at a newspaper in Melbourne then started my own copywriting business, while Sam opened a remedial massage and myotherapy clinic in Melbourne (he'd closed the Gold Coast business in 2011 when we went travelling).
It was during the pandemic that our priorities really shifted. When the 2020 lockdowns began in Melbourne, Sam had to close his clinic, while I continued working from home as a copywriter. He homeschooled our kids. I took over as the main breadwinner for the family.
I was working extremely long hours, and while it was financially lucrative, deep down, I knew our family life was suffering. By that stage, we had two children, and I felt like I was missing out on quality time with them.
By late 2021, the pandemic lockdowns had stopped, and life was pretty much back to normal. Sam and I were both working full-time again. Then, I became pregnant with our third child. She was born in August 2022.
We knew something had to change and decided it was our work schedules
Around Christmastime that year, we chatted about what was important to us. We decided we'd rather have less money if it meant having more time with our three children, who were then 7, 4, and four months old.
So, in 2023, we made some big changes. When I went back to work after maternity leave, I cut my hours back to four days a week, and my husband also cut his work hours back to four days a week. Having our own businesses meant we could dictate our own rosters, so we were extremely lucky in that regard.
We're still both only working four days each week, and our system is working really well for us. My husband and I tend to tag-team with the kids. One or the other of us will take care of our youngest (who only goes to day care three days a week) in the mornings and then work in the afternoon. We also take turns doing school pick-ups, so our kids know that either mommy or daddy will always be at the school gate waiting for them at the end of the day.
Rather than paying for childcare, which is expensive, we get to be the ones to take them to extracurricular activities and birthday parties, do homework with them, and watch their swimming lessons or dance recitals. Those moments are invaluable to us.
Working four days a week means my husband and I have had to adjust our spending habits quite a lot. We've felt the cost-of-living pressures in the past couple of years and have had to learn to budget better. But we believe it's worth it.
We know we'll probably never have the flashiest house or the best cars. But what we will have are plenty of memories with our children while they're still young and want to spend time with us. For us, those memories are worth their weight in gold.
I stayed at the Hotel Bel-Air, which was named one of the best hotels in the world. My $3,500-a-night suite wasn't even the best part.
- I recently stayed at Hotel Bel-Air, one of the most legendary hotels in Los Angeles.
- The iconic pink hotel is full of Hollywood history and luxurious suites.
- I was most impressed by its new culinary vision, including a brand-new on-site bakery.
If Hotel Bel-Air's signature pink stucco walls could talk, they'd be full of Old Hollywood's secrets.
The luxury resort, located in one of Los Angeles' most exclusive neighborhoods, was beloved by the likes of Grace Kelly, Elizabeth Taylor, and Marilyn Monroe. Ronald Reagan's daughter said "I do" in the garden, and King Charles once said he slept better in a bed there than in any other hotel in the world.
Hotel Bel-Air's star-studded guest list is now private, but its reputation remains esteemed. It's ranked No. 35 on the World's 50 Best Hotels list β one of just four resorts from the US to make the cut.
I've always wanted to see if Hotel Bel-Air was worth the hype. And with a brand-new culinary program led by a Michelin-starred chef, I knew it'd be the perfect time to visit.
As I walked across the bridge connecting the valet to the lobby, I admired the hotel's massive garden. The air smelled of jasmine, and swans were gliding across the lake. A waterfall was softly burbling in the distance. It was all incredibly lush and idyllic.
Hotel Bel-Air's signature pink stucco walls have remained unchanged since the 1940s, even through the hotel's major renovations.
The playful and cheerful hue transported me to the Mediterranean, as did the Spanish archways. Palm trees swayed in every direction, their fronds framing the nearby canyons. Dozens of pink and fuchsia flowers added bright pops of color, while a koi pond filled with orange and white fish shimmered under the sunlight.
Rooms at the Hotel Bel-Air start at $900 a night, while my suite was priced at $3,500. (Business Insider received a media rate for the one-night stay.)
As I walked into my 600-square-foot suite, I was immediately struck by the change in vibe. The bright pink and green hues that filled the hotel's exterior had been swapped for deep earthy tones like olive green and burnt sienna.
The shift in design initially took me by surprise and was more subtle than I expected. But it's clear that the canyon suite is meant to be a peaceful sanctuary.
Plus, when you're confident in your natural glamour, you can be low-key about it. Isn't that the true meaning of quiet luxury?
Christoph Moje, the hotel's general manager, told BI that the "refined interiors of the Canyon Suite are aligned with the hotel's overarching design aesthetic, which is to provide guests with a welcoming yet luxurious environment that is the perfect retreat from LA's busy scene."
"Its look and feel is contemporary and fresh while also reflective of old-world glamour and understated elegance, much like Hotel Bel-Air itself," Moje added.
The bedroom's color palette was the same as the living room's, and a wood-paneled ceiling added warmth to the space.
The leather bed frame had built-in book lights, which I thought were a cute touch. The king bed was topped with one of the plushest comforters I've ever slept with.
A retractable glass wall in the living room offers a full view of the huge patio, which features sun beds, lounge chairs, and a fireplace. It was easily my favorite part of the suite.
Hotel Bel-Air's culinary director, Joe Garcia, told me there were two dishes that would never be removed from The Restaurant's menu: the chopped salad inspired by Nancy Reagan and the tortilla soup.
I opted for the soup, which debuted at The Restaurant in 1980. The delicious broth is light on the tongue but rich in flavor, with just a hint of creaminess thanks to the sour cream and knobs of avocado. The roasted chicken is tender and plentiful, while the wisps of saffron add a luxurious touch.
Hotel Bel-Air's pool was once a horse-riding ring, hence its distinct oval shape.
The water is always heated to 82 degrees, and tall palm trees provide ample shade and a postcard-perfect backdrop.
The Living Room is hands down my favorite part of the Hotel Bel-Air.
It's a beautifully decorated space with stylish but comfortable velvet couches and chairs. A fire is always roaring in the center of the room, while big windows offer views of the fairy lights that twinkle from the trees at night.
Chef Garcia told me The Living Room was conceptualized following requests from locals and guests who wanted a place at the hotel where they could get glammed up and enjoy cocktails. So, Garcia set out to create a playful menu that still fit the atmosphere.
"I wouldn't put chicken wings on the menu," he said. "You're sitting on a $70,000 sofa."
The Restaurant's bread and desserts are clearly in good hands with executive pastry chef Christophe Rull, a world-renowned chocolatier who helped open the hotel's patisserie, the only bakery in Bel-Air.
I quickly learned that Rull's dedication to his customers is unparalleled. When one local wanted their almond croissant baked a certain way, Rull personally went to his house to try to get the flavor just right.
Rull's croissant skills are also on display at The Restaurant, where he offers a savory garlic version with perfect flakiness. I was also a huge fan of his truffle brioche, which instantly melted in my mouth.
Garcia had big shoes to fill when he became Hotel Bel-Air's culinary director in December 2023, following an 11-year stint by the legendary Wolfgang Puck.
But the chef told me he was up for the challenge, shifting The Restaurant's fusion-leaning menu to dishes that feel more seasonal and show off his classical French training.
I loved the indulgent white truffle pasta and the lamb chops served alongside an elegant ratatouille. The Michelin-caliber dinner was delicious and creative.
The five-star hotel obviously isn't in everyone's price range, but Hotel Bel-Air isn't just coasting on its reputation.
The brand-new culinary program, plus the delicious patisserie and beautiful lounge, have infused the space with vitality and turned the resort into a dining destination.
Whether you're looking for an Old Hollywood escape or just want some delicious food and cocktails, the Hotel Bel-Air should be on everyone's LA bucket list.