Reading view
Winter Storms Spark Travel Warnings for Millions of Americans
6-Year-Old's Innocent Question About Husbands Goes Viral
Mom Thinks She's Playing White Noise for Toddler, Then Realizes Her Mistake
Full List of Major Retailers That Shut Stores in 2024
$11 Billion Railway Linking Asian Countries Gets 2025 Green Light
US Citizen Imprisoned in Russia Receives New 15-Year Espionage Sentence
Opinion: Two Years On, PokΓ©mon Scarlet & Violet Are Still the Worst Best PokΓ©mon Games Ever
Dog Found Abandoned Outside Facing Third Christmas Without A Forever Home
Hunter Biden China Photos Emerge After Joe Biden Pardons Son
I tried my regular Starbucks latte with 5 different kinds of milk. There's only one I won't be ordering again.
- I tried my regular Starbucks latte with 2%, soy, coconut, almond, and oat milk.
- The only option I wouldn't order again was almond milk, but at least it doesn't cost extra anymore.
- I've been drinking 2% lattes for years, but soy is undeniably my go-to.
I used to pay extra to have my daily lattes made with a non-dairy alternative. At the time, I preferred the taste and often felt better on days I didn't consume as much dairy.
However, the cost of the substitution β often around $0.80 a drink β added up quickly. Eventually, I abandoned the habit and started ordering my lattes with 2% milk.
Luckily, Starbucks stopped charging extra for alternative milks in November, so I decided to give them all another try.
I ordered my standard 2%-milk latte alongside ones made with soy, coconut, almond, and oat milk. Then, I tried them all with and without sugar to compare.
Here's how the lattes stacked up.
I wasn't sure if I'd really taste much of a difference between the coffee drinks, so I also brought along a friend who has received training in discerning tastes from a professional sommelier and recipe developer.
He found the 2% latte boring and lacking "personality." Adding sugar made the taste more interesting, but he didn't think he'd order it again.
I've been drinking lattes made with 2% milk for years, and I wouldn't buy one (sometimes two) daily if I didn't like the taste.
This was almost like the experiment's control group for me β something to compare the others to.
Although it didn't end up being the best of the bunch, it's a good choice for purists like me.
When I was drinking non-dairy lattes, soy milk was my preferred alternative. I was really looking forward to seeing if it was as tasty as I remembered.
Luckily, it didn't disappoint β I knew I was onto something back then.
My friend described the drink as smoky with chocolate notes. Although I hadn't noticed that before, I'm starting to think the hints of flavor may be why I'm drawn to it.
Sugar detracted from the taste of this one for me, which is also a plus since I'd rather not add it.
I strongly associate coconut with tropical drinks, so I wasn't sure how I'd feel about a coconut-milk latte. However, I was pleasantly surprised.
In my friend's words, the coconut milk had a dry, caramel taste with a slight acidity.
Adding sugar really brought out the coconut flavor, which can be a good thing or a bad thing, depending on your tastes.
For me, a stronger coconut taste was welcome. However, my friend isn't a big fan of coconut and preferred this drink without sugar.
I like snacking on almonds and was looking forward to a latte with a nutty taste.
Unfortunately, I didn't like it.
There was a distinct almond quality, but it felt a bit watered down. I didn't think the milk added much flavor to the latte, and my friend agreed.
We both thought that adding sugar would dramatically improve the taste, it didn't.
I enjoy Starbucks' iced brown-sugar oak-milk shaken espresso on warm days, so I was looking forward to seeing how oat milk translates into a hot drink.
Unfortunately, I was a little underwhelmed.
My friend said the oat-milk latte almost had a "cigar-smoke flavor," and neither of us liked that very much.
When I added sugar, the flavor was much better β mostly because it largely covered up the oat milk, making it taste closer to a 2% latte.
Although I'll still order it occasionally, the 2%-milk latte is no longer my go-to at Starbucks. After just one sip, I knew I'd be going right back to soy.
The delicious β perhaps chocolaty β flavor is perfect without any added sweetener.
Even though the coconut-milk latte wasn't my favorite drink, it was a close second. The tropical, caramelly flavors really work.
With sugar added, the oat-milk drink was also OK, but I didn't like the almond-milk latte and won't be ordering it again.
Tears as Woman Finds Google Earth Photos of Late Grandpa Playing With Her
Dog Returned to Shelter Within Month Finds Home Just in Time for Christmas
Pet Cam Captures Dog and Cat's Ingenious System To 'Outsmart' Owner
What Is Trembita? Ukraine's Homemade Missile Capable of Reaching Moscow
Mom Takes Monthly Videos of Son Growing OlderβThen Realizes a Twist
Owner 'In a Panic' Over Missing Black LabradorβThen Realizes Her Mistake
Hysterics As Plan To Get Free Cruise Cabin Upgrade Backfires Spectacularly
Holiday Feasting in the Age of Ozempic | Opinion
My dad's 'go-to gift' tradition taught me an important money lesson that changed the way I spend
- My dad started a gift-giving tradition years ago that he coined the 'go-to gift.'
- He lets the recipient choose, but they have to pitch him on how they'll use the gift.
- It encourages conscious spending and prioritizing quality.
My dad doesn't like spending money β and he wouldn't mind me writing that.
He also doesn't like having excessive things. He keeps his space neat and tidy and buys only what he needs. An early lesson he instilled was the difference between a "want" and a "need," and he taught my brothers and me to spend only on the latter.
Gift-giving presents a challenge to my minimalist, money-conscious father, as it often involves spending money and spending money on things. He could opt not to buy us anything, of course, but he's more of a softie than he lets on.
His solution for his three kids, at least, is what he's coined the "go-to gift."
The concept is this: For any gift-giving event, such as a birthday or Christmas, he'll buy one "go-to gift" only after the receiver has successfully pitched him on why he should buy it.
I can pitch anything, within reason, but I have to convince him that I'll use it or that it'll add value to my life. As he likes to say, "Anything goes β¦ as long as it's utilitarian."
His strategy is useful for him and me: He feels better about how he's spending his money, and I have to spend time thinking about what I value and what items or experiences could have an additive effect.
In 2021, ahead of a particularly busy road racing schedule, including the Boston and New York City marathons, I pitched him on a pair of carbon-plate running shoes. One year, he subsidized my gym membership for six months. This year, he's buying me a case of tennis balls. The activity-focused gifts are a relatively easy sell for my dad, who values health and movement just as much as I do.
He hasn't flat-out turned anything down yet, but when I asked for a pair of high-quality joggers one year, he had a few follow-up questions. That was in 2017, and I like to remind him that I still own and wear them seven years later.
Around the holidays, when his gift-giving tradition is particularly top of mind, it reminds me to spend consciously β to think before I swipe my credit card and ask myself why I'm purchasing what I'm about to purchase. Sometimes, I can justify it; other times, I can't.
The second money lesson folded into his tradition is to buy quality. Rather than trying to "save money" in the moment by buying the cheapest version of an item, I'd rather spend extra on something that will last longer and save me in the long run β something like the joggers that are still kicking after seven years and hundreds of wash cycles.