Supreme court rules against Trump over bid to force California to set aside ballots
The court did not issue an explanation for its ruling, which is customary in cases that come to it on an emergency basis.
The survey took place before Democratic Congresswoman Haley Stevens announced that she would back Rogers in the contest – a vital seat for her party to retain in their quest for control of the Senate.
The ruling follows several lower courts siding with California officials, who argued the federal government was seeking to interfere in state elections.
How this summary was made: extractive summary — built from the sources' own reporting. It is drawn only from the reporting of the sources listed below — read the originals for full detail. How we summarize →
Advertisement
Every article behind this summary — 2 articles from 1 outlet
The Guardian WorldNovember 3, 2026, 3:24 AM UTC →
The Guardian WorldNovember 3, 2026, 12:50 AM UTC →
Get stories like this in your inbox.
Subscribe — it's freeOne free email at 6am — your topics, deduplicated, five minutes. No account, no paywall.