Outlook.com bounces legit emails as Microsoft's authentication crackdown goes sideways
The company's consumer email services are affected, and it appears that if a domain doesn't have working SPF or if it has a missing DMARC record, then Outlook.com and its ilk will treat it as suspicious and not accept emails.
- A moderator in Microsoft's support forum acknowledged the bug and said it was "classified as a service degradation." "Microsoft is actively investigating the underlying cause of this email delivery issue, and engineering teams are actively analyzing service telemetry and customer-provided data to identify the source of the issue." Still.
- Although some customers insist their DMARC, SPF, and DKIM settings are compliant, many more have reported that once they set them to Microsoft's preferences, email began flowing once more.
- The troubles began at the end of last week and appear to be the result of Microsoft tightening the rules (or at least attempting to do so) for accepting emails.
A validation error has stopped Outlook.com from accepting legitimate emails.
In 2025, Microsoft announced new rules designed to strengthen email authentication for domains sending more than 5,000 emails per day.
- Other users have reported errors highlighting a lack of DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) information.
- Earlier today, several users in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa were affected by another Microsoft whoopsie – a "recent service change" that caused some connections to be abruptly terminated.
- The problem appears widespread and, according to reports from affected users, can result in non-delivery reports with error codes related to SPF (Sender Policy Framework) validation failures.
- According to complainants in the Outlook forum, a single email with just one line might now be rejected.
- Outlook on the web, as well as the Purview and Defender portals were all affected.
How this summary was made: extractive summary — built from the sources' own reporting. It is drawn only from the reporting of the sources listed below — read the originals for full detail. How we summarize →