AI & Tech

More autonomy, fewer NDAs: Volunteers have new requests for brain implant trials

After its latest device struggled to perform, brain-computer interface startup Synchon halted clinical trials.

✦ Extractive summary — built from the sources' own reporting•From 3 sources•1 min read•Updated November 13, 2026, 2:40 PM UTC
Key points
  • Today’s stories have me wondering what it must be like to study the human brain: Every new discovery is a breathtaking revelation, and also a reminder of how little we know, and how far the horizon of full understanding still is.
  • It feels a little like looking at the universe, only what is infinite is, in the most literal sense, ourselves.
  • Get your daily dose of health and medicine every weekday with STAT’s free newsletter Morning Rounds.

Brain implant volunteers want more respect: Ian Burkhart, who had a brain implant for seven-and-a-half years, helped develop new guidelines pushing for trial participants to have the option to be recognized as genuine research collaborators and listed as coauthors on scientific papers.

Burkhart took part in two years-long clinical trials over the seven-and-a-half-year period he had the electrode array implanted in his brain.

Additional details
  • Teams have developed brain implants that can be used to control robotic limbs and computers, and even to “speak.” The people who volunteer for trials of those devices play a vital role in that research, and they ought to be recognized for their contributions, says Ian Burkhart, who had one implanted in his own brain back in 2014.
  • “These are people who have a device embedded in their brain, are in trials sometimes for years and years … [and contribute] a significant investment of time, of the body, and of intellectual effort.” Burkhart was left paralyzed from the chest down following a diving accident in 2010, when he was 19 years old.
  • Around four years later, he volunteered to become the first person to trial a brain implant designed for hand control.
  • Your brain data should be yours: The guidelines argue that participants' neural data is personal information, and that NDAs or embargoes should not block someone from sharing their own brain data with their doctor.
  • The guidelines call for researchers to fund and plan removals carefully, giving participants real time to prepare " data-chronoton-post-id="1148474" data-chronoton-expand-collapse="1" data-chronoton-analytics-enabled="1"> Scientists have been working on ways to decode brain activity for decades.

How this summary was made: extractive summary — built from the sources' own reporting. It is drawn only from the reporting of the sources listed below — read the originals for full detail. How we summarize →

Advertisement

Every article behind this summary — 3 articles from 3 outlets