• Cybertruck owners told BI about their experiences facing growing hostility and verbal harassment.
• The negative sentiment comes as anti-Elon Musk protests and calls to boycott Tesla have cropped up across the US.
• Despite harrowing incidents, some Cybertruck owners said they still experience mostly positive interactions.

Crude drawings of genitalia on your vehicle. Drivers getting out of their cars at stoplights to scream at you. A paintball gun letting loose in your direction. 18-wheelers refusing to let you merge.

It's not easy driving the most controversial vehicle in the world.

Business Insider spoke to 10 Cybertruck owners about their recent experiences with the vehicle. While some of the owners said their interactions are mostly positive, others said they've seen a notable spike in harassment or a continuation of negative interactions they encountered long before the "Tesla Takedown" protests began.

The Cybertruck has sparked mixed reactions since its release more than a year ago, with some owners previously describing getting flipped off as a right of passage of sorts.

But, for some owners, hostility has become more frequent and extreme in recent weeks as anti-Elon Musk protests and Tesla boycott movements gain momentum in response to Musk's political involvement with the Trump administration and DOGE.

Some of it has made headlines. There have been a number of vandalism incidents involving Molotov cocktails, suspected arson, and even gunshot damage at Tesla dealerships and charging stations, with some leading to arrests. Cybertruck owners have posted photos on social media showing graffiti on their trucks.

At the wheel of the vehicle most associated with Musk, the 10 Cybertruck drivers detailed some of the incidents they've encountered in recent months.

Insults, intimidation, and road rage

One Cybertruck owner who requested anonymity to speak freely told BI that his recent experiences have been "unsettling and disheartening."

The longtime Tesla owner said he was recently washing his new Cybertruck in his driveway when a stranger drove by and opened the car door to shout offensive remarks before speeding off. In addition to being yelled at, he said he's also recently been flipped off and honked at. The owner said his recent experiences led him to write a letter to his congressman.

"No one in America should feel threatened or targeted simply for driving a vehicle," the Cybertruck owner said.

None of the Cybertruck owners BI spoke to encountered the kind of lasting damage to their vehicles that has made headlines recently, like broken windows at a Mardi Gras parade. Still, several said they've seen strangers get too close for comfort.

Steven Minnick, a Cybertruck owner from New Jersey, said he recently went skiing in Vermont and came back to drawings of genitalia on his vehicle and derogatory insults.

While the drawings on the stainless steel washed off, Minnick said the crude drawing on his bumper was "scratched into the plastic," and didn't come off after several washes. He said it's now almost gone after using chemicals and buffing pads to remove it.

"I was kind of shocked," Minnick said, adding that he counted about 12 middle fingers, a thumbs down, and an "L," from people when driving through Vermont. He said he usually only gets flipped off once every couple of weeks in New Jersey.

Tommy Huynh, a Cybertruck owner, told BI that he's watched people on Sentry Mode flick the car with their finger when he's parked. He also said his Cybertruck got shot with a paintball gun in early January, although he said he hasn't noticed a particular increase in negative interactions since Trump's reelection.

After seeing repeated instances of vandalism in the media and online, some owners have become uncomfortable with leaving their vehicles unattended. One Cybertruck owner from Pennsylvania told BI he recently went to an auto show and left his Cybertruck at home because he thought someone "might do something" to it.

Solo Arnett recently got a Cybertruck and said he had an 18-wheeler truck refuse to let him merge when he was on the highway. Another Cybertruck owner said he's experienced two recent instances of people getting out at traffic lights and screaming at him to get out of the truck.

"The Cybertruck just seems to send people over the edge a bit," the owner, who asked to remain anonymous, told BI. "It makes no sense, I'm not Elon!"

In the months since Musk's endorsement of Trump and work with DOGE, some Tesla owners have decided to sell their vehicles due to the brand's close association with the company's CEO.

"Arrested Development" and "Ozark" actor Jason Bateman, for example, said last year that he got rid of his Tesla after Musk's endorsement of President Donald Trump because he felt like he was "driving around [with] a Trump sticker with that car."

Some Tesla owners have purchased bumper stickers proclaiming "I Bought This Before We Knew Elon Was Crazy."

Other Cyberturck owners told BI that they've been taunted verbally or in social settings.

Jay O'Brien, a Cybertruck owner from Kansas City, said he hears people talking in parking lots as he walks to and from his truck. At a recent trivia night, he also said several players made jokes about the Cybertruck parked outside.

O'Brien said most of the interactions are still "more good than bad" though, and that he found some of the jokes about Tesla funny.

Some Cybertruck drivers say they aren't phased

The Pennsylvania Cybertruck owner said within a week of the new administration, he started to notice increased negative interactions. He said he feels like it's now become cool and socially acceptable to flip off Tesla owners.

Several other owners told BI they haven't noticed a major difference in negativity since the election, and some said they've mainly seen it online.

Huynh and Minnick said that, for the most part, they've experienced a continued level of negativity from before and after the election, and while Minnick's experience in Vermont caught him off guard, it was isolated to that trip.

The Pennsylvania Cybertruck owner also added that even though the negative interactions he's experienced have increased, people's reactions mostly remain positive, with children, in particular, expressing excitement at seeing the electric truck.

For some owners, the positive moments are a bright spot amid the challenges that can come with driving the EV.

Arnett recalled an exchange in the last week when a man approached his Cybertruck and asked for a video with it for his bedridden son, who the man said is a huge fan.

"I let him get in the truck and everything. It was a touching experience," Arnett said.

Are you a Tesla owner who has recently experienced harassment or vandalism? We want to hear from you. Contact this reporter via a non-work email at [email protected] or through the secure messaging app Signal at aalt.19.

• In a letter to the US government, OpenAI slammed its fast-rising Chinese rival, DeepSeek.
• "While America maintains a lead on AI today, DeepSeek shows that our lead is not wide and is narrowing," OpenAI wrote.
• The letter also outlined policy recommendations to secure America's lead in AI.

OpenAI has launched an attack on its fast-rising Chinese rival, DeepSeek.

In a 15-page letter to the US government on Thursday, OpenAI called DeepSeek's latest model, R1, a "noteworthy" development — one that signals China's growing AI ambitions and underscores the tightening competition between the rival countries.

"While America maintains a lead on AI today, DeepSeek shows that our lead is not wide and is narrowing," Chris Lehane, OpenAI's vice president of global affairs, wrote to the Office of Science and Technology Policy.

Founded in 2023 by Chinese entrepreneur Liang Wenfeng, DeepSeek shook up the AI industry and the US stock market with its low-cost reasoning model, R1, unveiled in January. The company said its R1 model rivals top competitors, like ChatGPT's o1, but at a fraction of the cost.

The company behind ChatGPT didn't hold back its criticism of the Chinese model. Lehane warned that using DeepSeek in critical infrastructure and other high-risk applications poses a "significant risk" because DeepSeek could be pressured by the Chinese government to manipulate its models.

The US Navy has warned service members against using DeepSeek, and Taiwan banned it in government agencies in February over security concerns.

"Because DeepSeek is simultaneously state-subsidized, state-controlled, and freely available, the cost to its users is their privacy and security," Lehane wrote.

Lehane also said DeepSeek's AI is "more willing" to generate responses for illicit and harmful activities, including identity fraud and intellectual property theft.

"The Chinese Communist Party views violations of American intellectual property rights as a feature, not a flaw," he wrote.

Lehane warned that China would use AI as a geopolitical tool by offering DeepSeek to countries needing AI tools and infrastructure funding — a move aligned with its existing Belt and Road initiative. For over a decade, China has used this program to spend more than $1 trillion on infrastructure programs globally.

OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman called DeepSeek's R1 an "invigorating" competitor in January, saying it would push his company to release "better models" faster.

Securing America's lead in AI

OpenAI's letter also outlined policy recommendations to secure America's lead in AI.

The letter was written in response to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy's request for public input in February.

In January, President Donald Trump signed an executive order calling for the US to "sustain and enhance America's global AI dominance" while revoking the Biden administration's order demanding greater transparency from AI companies.

His administration is now tasked with developing an AI Action Plan by July.

Lehane on Thursday proposed a series of "freedom-focused" policies, including a regulatory strategy that would relieve American AI developers from complying with "overly burdensome state laws."

The company also said the US government could make it easier for AI companies to train on copyrighted material, arguing that strict copyright laws could slow innovation and restrict access to training data.

OpenAI and its peers have been criticized for using copyrighted content to train models. Authors and news outlets, including The New York Times, have sued OpenAI, saying the startup is breaking copyright law.

Lehane proposed a copyright strategy that would protect creators' rights while safeguarding America's AI leadership and national security.

"The federal government can both secure Americans' freedom to learn from AI, and avoid forfeiting our AI lead to the PRC by preserving American AI models' ability to learn from copyrighted material," he said.

Here a DOGE, there a DOGE, everywhere a DOGE.

Republican and libertarian leaders in at least 18 states, counties, and towns across America are dreaming up their own versions of the headline-grabbing federal initiative — and more could follow.

The push is happening through executive orders and legislative action as governors, state lawmakers, and business executives promise to root out what they view as waste and fraud within state governments. And they've adopted quirky names, including the GOAT committee in Wisconsin and FLOGE in Florida. One state even has a BullDOGEr on the case.

Assemblyman Alex Sauickie of New Jersey, a Republican who sponsored a DOGE bill in his state, said efficiency in spending was king. "We're going to have to make those decisions and say, 'Hey, we can't be funding minor league ballparks or tennis courts or dominoes clubs with taxpayer money,'" he said. The state auditor would lead the group, alongside 20 members of the public.

Democratic leaders are more circumspect. Those who spoke with Business Insider view the DOGE clones as attempts by the right to appeal to President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, who is viewed as DOGE's de facto face. And many expressed fear over the prospect of losing funding at both the federal level and the state level.

Democratic Rep. Anna Eskamani of the Florida House of Representatives said: "We are seeing conservative politicians just be thirsty for Elon Musk."

Oklahoma, Iowa, North Carolina, oh my

In Oklahoma, Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt announced the launch of DOGE-OK early last month during his State of the State address.

"Once there was this national push for DOGE, the governor wanted to make sure that we've turned over all the rocks that need to be turned over in our state government," Abegail Cave, Stitt's communications director, told BI.

Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds of Iowa, meanwhile, signed an executive order last month to create a state DOGE. Emily Schmitt, a business executive tapped to lead the effort, didn't offer up many details, since efforts are still in the early days — a common theme among many of the officials who spoke with BI. But she said it planned to prioritize efficient spending and technology like artificial intelligence.

Over 1,000 miles away in North Carolina, Republican Rep. Keith Kidwell of the state's House of Representatives said that his mini-DOGE could examine how to restructure agencies like the Department of Motor Vehicles or modernize computer systems — as long as there's a return on investment for taxpayers. Kidwell has even adopted a nickname to show his support: the BullDOGEr, a wink at his reputation as Bulldog of the House.

"I'm not trying to go on a witch hunt," Kidwell said. "I'm going on a tax hunt."

'Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery'

Experts said that they largely viewed these initiatives as efforts to mimic what's happening in Washington.

"Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery," said Richard Briffault, a law professor at Columbia University who studies state and local governments. He said that many of the states looking to establish mini-DOGEs already have long-serving Republican governors — Reynolds, for instance, has been governor since 2017 — and red legislatures.

"Why can't these issues be addressed through the usual executive oversight?" he said. "It does have a kind of gimmicky feel to it."

Alicia Andrews, the chair of Oklahoma's Democratic Party, pointed to Stitt's six years as governor in a majority-Republican state. "If there's wasteful spending, it happened on his watch," she said. And North Carolina's House Democratic leader, Robert Reives, told BI that residents had been complaining about the DMV for years.

Stitt and Reynolds say their tenures are a selling point. Stitt said he'd "been DOGE-ing in Oklahoma since January of 2019," while Reynolds said her state was "doing DOGE before DOGE was a thing." And when Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida announced the creation of a Florida DOGE task force, he said: "We were DOGE before DOGE was cool."

Still, many officials said that they wouldn't have proposed mini-DOGEs if it weren't for Musk and Trump.

Without a federal DOGE, "there would be no cry from the public to create one in South Carolina," Republican Sen. Larry Grooms of the South Carolina Senate, a cosponsor of his state's DOGE bill, said.

"It's not unusual for states to mimic good ideas at the federal level," Republican Assemblyman Christopher DePhillips, another sponsor of New Jersey's DOGE bill, said. And while he expressed worry that some of the "dysfunctional" elements of the federal DOGE effort might tarnish his bill, others were more than happy with the connection.

Republican Rep. Tiffany Esposito of Florida's House of Representatives, who introduced a separate state DOGE — or FLOGE — said that she'd be thrilled if Musk called her.

"I would like to talk about a lot of things with Elon," she said. He's "arguably the most successful person in our country," she added.

A county and town DOGE

In Wisconsin, Republican state Rep. Amanda Nedweski chairs a DOGE-inspired initiative called the Assembly Committee on Government Operations, Accountability, and Transparency — or GOAT.

Nedweski said that the federal DOGE may inspire even more downstream copycats. "Now even at the school district level, there's a public demand for: 'We need a school district DOGE,'" she said.

Take Weston Wamp, the mayor of Hamilton County, Tennessee, who created a DOGE-inspired task force made up of six people he appointed, including himself. He said they'd meet regularly to discuss and make recommendations around ways to cut costs — cataloging chronically empty job positions, for example, or using property assets better. He described it as "most akin to a spring cleaning."

Mayor Aron Lam of Keenesburg, a libertarian, established a local DOGE advisory committee in his small Colorado town at the suggestion of party leadership. It's made up of three people who applied, with input from the town manager and treasurer, and plans to provide recommendations on how to save taxpayer dollars and make the town more efficient.

In the past few weeks, Lam told BI, almost 60 people from towns nationwide had reached out to him about establishing their own mini-DOGEs.

"The efforts that Elon Musk started, and that President Trump really supported and started to implement that at the federal level," he said, were "certainly inspirational."

A double whammy

Matt Grossmann, a political science professor at Michigan State University, said that the mini-DOGEs' focus on cost cutting could backfire. "No one's for waste, fraud, and abuse," he said. "But obviously, one person's waste is another person's vital program."

Megan Ellyia Green, the president of the Board of Alderman in St. Louis, said that the possibility of losing both federal funding from DOGE and state funding from Missouri's mini-DOGE initiative weighed on her. "We're expecting everything except for, basically, police to be on the chopping block," she said.

For Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman of Missouri's upper chamber, the Republican chair of the state's DOGE group in the Senate, the money that could end up in taxpayers' pockets is worth it.

"When you do this kind of upheaval, you're going to crack a few eggs," she said.

Have a tip? Contact reporter Nicole Einbinder via Signal at neinbinder.70 or via email at [email protected]. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here's our guide to sharing information securely.

• New Census Bureau data showed what moving looked like across the country last year.
• Among big counties, two Georgia locations had the highest share of net movers coming in.
• Losing population due to people moving out was common in California, Illinois, and Iowa.

Tons of Americans are moving to Dawson and Jackson counties in Georgia, based on new data.

The Census Bureau released on Thursday data showing net domestic migration — or how many people moved into a county from elsewhere in the US minus those who left that county — for the 3,144 counties and county-equivalents in the US, alongside new population estimates. The data covered the year between July 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024.

You can hover over the map below to see what those net moving rates looked like after taking into account a county's population. The adjusted figure allows for better comparison between locations of varying sizes.

Many of California's counties experienced negative net domestic migration. That was also the case for Iowa and Louisiana. Maine had the opposite experience, with all of its counties experiencing more people moving in than out domestically.

More counties in Tennessee, Virginia, and Florida had positive net domestic migration than negative.

Business Insider looked at rates for the counties with populations of at least 20,000 people and identified which ranked the highest for positive and negative net domestic migration. Rates were adjusted by 2023 populations.

Among the large counties with more people moving in than out domestically, Dawson and Jackson counties in Georgia took the top two spots. Almost of the top 10 were places in the South.

Other Southern counties ranked highly among the big counties with negative net domestic migration rates per 1,000 people. The top three were all in Mississippi. A few other places in the South were among the top 10 for negative rates.

Do you have a story to share about moving? Contact this reporter at [email protected].

• BI spoke with four people who use social media to share different perspectives on their jobs.
• Through dances and skits, these individuals showcase community, passion, and purpose.
• Grocery store associates make videos to fight boredom while a teacher highlights diversity in STEM.

Every day, Linisha Smith clocks in at 5 a.m. to restock the aisles at a Safeway in Seattle. After three decades of shelving, it was starting to get boring.

That's when Smith and her two coworkers, Brian Bosch and Melissa Turner, started filming 40-second TikTok videos during their 10-minute breaks. The three of them that make the core cast of #breakroomchronicles.

Business Insider spoke to four people who use social media to share different perspectives on their jobs through skits and dance videos, while also showcasing community, passion, and purpose.

Grocery store workers dance through boredom at work

Three years, more than 400,000 followers, and 11.8 million likes later, the #breakroomchronicles trio has amassed a robust audience by wearing props like neon green boa scarves and frumpy wigs as they dance and lip-sync to songs.

"When I'm with these guys my day goes by quickly," said Turner, 47. "It makes the environment happy.

Sometimes the three of them get recognized at work or are called to the checkout area to take pictures with fans. Bosch, 67, said one customer told him the videos were popular in Uganda.

"We get a lot of comments saying, 'You guys hiring? I should apply,' " Smith said.

A nurse shows healthcare workers aren't just burned out

Mary Kat Wardlow began training to be a nurse two years ago and noticed a lot of healthcare workers shared content about hating their jobs. More than a quarter of nurses planned to leave the field by 2027, per a 2022 survey of nearly 335,000 nurses published in 2023 by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing.

When she started posting "day in the life" videos about working as an orthopedic nurse with older patients at a hospital in Chicago, she said other healthcare professionals online gravitated toward her positive attitude.

"You get to take care of people when it's possibly some of the worst days of their lives," Wardlow said of her work as a nurse. Despite the hard days where she can be on her feet for an entire 12-hour shift, she is deeply grateful for her work. "I feel like I'm really making a difference in people's lives."

Wardlow shares videos about her work-life balance or dance routines with her coworkers to over 12,700 followers. She enjoys seeing the response from the larger nursing community, especially peers her own age.

"I love seeing the newer nurses being like, 'Oh, this is so inspiring. This is what we want to see as we're entering our nursing careers,' " the 23-year-old said.

A science teacher highlights diversity and playfulness in STEM

It was the beginning of the pandemic lockdown and associate professor of chemistry and neuroscience André Isaacs was transferring his courses online. Several people recommended he check out TikTok to better understand his Gen Z students.

At first, he used it to cope, he said. Then it became a way to excite his followers about science. He wants to change the narrative around stuffy scientists sitting alone surrounded by research. Many of his videos show Isaacs and his students at the College of the Holy Cross wearing lab coats amid beakers and flasks.

Isaacs now has over half a million followers on TikTok and one of his most popular videos, which parodies Kendrick Lamar's recent Super Bowl performance, has over 400,000 likes on Instagram.

"Diversity is our greatest asset, even if the government disagrees… They not like us! POC in STEM are here to stay," the caption for the Super Bowl-inspired video reads, pulling lyrics from Lamar's song "Not Like Us."

That's the other side of Isaacs' goofy dances: his passion for highlighting diversity in STEM and championing science communication.

"As a Black queer immigrant, I remember growing up, I didn't see a whole lot of role models or people who look like me in STEM," Isaacs said.

A teacher uses skits to inspire his high school students

Two years ago, high school marketing teacher Berhanu Dallas did not even have Instagram. Today, his account — which was started by his students — has over 1.4 million followers.

The 36-year-old Forest Park High School teacher became a social media hit once his students started pitching him skit ideas to showcase life inside the classroom. Many of the videos feature comical skits where he eats an apple his students picked from the trash can or is mocked for having dry skin.

Parents and school administrators know it's all in good fun and have given him good feedback, Dallas said. He thinks that's because the videos show a side of school life where students are engaged and excited about school.

"There's this perception that students are rude and disrespectful," Dallas said. "I really wanted to start a channel to show people a different side of teaching. A teacher that loves being in the classroom and students that love being in the classroom as well."

Dallas films with his students on Fridays after school and on the weekends. But the extra work is worth it for Dallas who uses student participation in the videos as an opportunity to engage them toward academic success.

How do you find meaning and purpose in your work? Reach out to this reporter at [email protected].

• Big Tech's secretive electricity deals with utilities may raise costs for Americans, Harvard researchers reported.
• Data centers could consume 12% of US electricity by 2028, up from 4% in 2023.
• Researchers call for more scrutiny of contracts to protect consumers from higher bills.

Tech companies racing to secure power for their data centers have struck dozens of secretive electricity deals with utilities that could cost average Americans a "staggering" amount, Harvard research found.

With data center construction on the rise and utility costs top-of-mind for many Americans, the Harvard Electricity Law Initiative reviewed 40 special contracts that state regulators have approved between utilities and data centers. If these contracts offer discounted electricity rates to data centers, and new power grid infrastructure is needed to serve them, other customers may end up paying for the shortfall through higher utility bills.

But it's nearly impossible to know the exact price tag of any cost shifts because the terms of these special contracts are hidden from public view, the report found. State regulators usually approve utilities' requests for confidentiality, limiting public scrutiny. That means billion-dollar contracts are getting approved without a transparent accounting of the costs and benefits, researchers said.

"When we have potentially billions of dollars going through these secret contracts where there's just not a lot of investigation about what's going on, we think there's reason to be suspicious that utilities may be offering discounts that are subsidized by everybody else," said Ari Peskoe, director of The Harvard Electricity Law Initiative and coauthor of the paper with Eliza Martin, a legal fellow.

The report lands as data center construction is booming, in part to serve Big Tech's artificial intelligence race. Some AI data center complexes need as much power as entire cities and by 2028, the industry could account for 12% of US electricity consumption — up from 4% in 2023, according to federal estimates. The trend is leading some citizens, state policymakers, and at least one utility to try to shield households from rising bills.

Utilities and tech companies have told Business Insider that the contracts they negotiate should cover the costs of any power grid upgrades required to serve data centers. Lucas Fykes, director of energy policy for the Data Center Coalition, which represents companies including Amazon Web Services, Google, Microsoft, and Meta, said in an emailed statement that the industry is committed to paying its full cost of service.

Fykes added that the Harvard research overlooks a finding in Virginia — the world's largest data center market — that the industry is paying the appropriate costs for its energy use. In December, an independent study commissioned by Virginia's Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission found that rates "appropriately allocate costs to the customers responsible for incurring them, including data center customers."

The report also said that data centers' increased energy demand will likely increase costs for everyone, including residents and businesses. A large amount of new power plants and transmission lines will be built that otherwise wouldn't be needed, if not for data centers. A typical residential customer in Virginia could see an extra $14 to $37 each month on their utility bill by 2040. The report said creating a separate category for data centers and changing the way costs are allocated across customers could help insulate households from statewide cost increases.

Peskoe recommended greater scrutiny and regulation of special contracts, as well.

"We didn't realize how extensive these secret contracts were," Peskoe said. "The more we dug, the more we kept finding."

Regulators are required to protect the public from 'cutthroat' practices. Researchers are skeptical.

State and federal regulators allow most utilities to spread the cost of power grid upgrades across their customer base. This is typically done through what's known as a rate case increase, a lengthy and public process at state public utility commissions. Consumer advocates, environmental and industrial groups, and other outside parties regularly intervene.

By contrast, most of the special contracts that Peskoe and Martin reviewed were approved by public utility commissions with "only cursory analysis" and little or no public evidence to back up claims that data center energy costs would be isolated from other customers' bills. While regulators in many states are required to protect the public from "cutthroat" practices that harm ratepayers, Peskoe said he's skeptical.

Peskoe said state regulators can face political pressure to approve big economic investments already touted by elected officials for their economic impacts. He added that utilities have a long history of "exploiting their monopolies" to attract competitive lines of business.

Peskoe pointed to an antitrust lawsuit that a small non-profit utility brought against Duke Energy. Court documents revealed that Duke offered Fayetteville, North Carolina, a special contract with a $325 million discount and acknowledged that it would lose $100 million on the deal, but planned to recoup those losses by raising rates on other customers. Duke Energy, which argued its conduct was legitimate price competition and lawful, petitioned the Supreme Court to review the case in February.

Duke declined to comment, and the Edison Electric Institute, a trade group that represents investor-owned utilities, didn't return a request for comment.

While the case doesn't involve data centers, Peskoe said it illustrates how utilities compete for big energy customers and can hide how they pass those costs onto other customers.

The Harvard study said states could have stricter rules for special contracts, similar to those in Kentucky, where public utility commissioners only allow utilities to offer discounted rates for five years, and there must be more than enough power supply available on the system. The rate also must exceed the utility's costs to serve the customer, the study said.

Have a tip or a story to share? Contact this reporter via Signal at cboudreau.37 or via email at [email protected]. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device. Here's our guide to sharing information securely.

• China criticized CK Hutchinson's sale of its Panama port stake, sending shares falling 6.7%.
• The deal is seen as US power politics, sparking national interest concerns in China.
• Analysts view the sale as strategic, reducing geopolitical risks for CK Hutchinson.

China has taken aim at another company it's not happy with, sending its share price sliding.

On Thursday, China's Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office reposted a commentary from state-owned Ta Kung Pao — a Hong Kong media outlet — that criticized Hong Kong's CK Hutchinson for its decision to sell a major stake in two Panama ports to a consortium led by New York-based BlackRock.

CK Hutchison's shares fell as much as 6.7% on Friday morning — the most since September 2022 — and were 6.2% lower at 2:58  p.m. local time. Its market value is about $23 billion.

The $22.8 billion deal was announced last week after US President Donald Trump hit out at Chinese influence at the Panama Canal and threatened to regain control over the key shipping waterway.

The news came after another multinational company was caught in the ongoing US-China dispute.

On Thursday, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said it had communicated with Walmart over reports that the retail giant had asked suppliers to cut wholesale prices to offset higher US tariffs. A social media account linked to state TV first reported the news and warned that Walmart would face repercussions if the company insisted on squeezing suppliers.

Companies cautioned to 'think carefully'

Ta Kung Pao said the Panama deal demonstrates that the US is using "state power" to encroach on the legitimate rights and interests of other countries and that it's "power politics packaged as 'business behavior.'"

It also criticized CK Hutchinson for being "spineless" and "profit-seeking." The deal disregards national interests and "betrays and sells out all Chinese people," according to the commentary.

It advised companies to "think carefully about what position and side they should stand on."

The company did not immediately respond to a Business Insider request for comment.

Founded by Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing — once Asia's richest man, CK Hutchinson said last week its decision was "purely commercial in nature and wholly unrelated to recent political news reports concerning the Panama Ports."

The development demonstrates how private companies and their business dealings are increasingly getting caught in the crosshairs of intensified US-China geopolitical tensions.

Ta Kung Pao said in its commentary that the US would use the port deal for "political purposes and promote its own political agenda."

"China's shipping and trade here will inevitably be subject to the US," it added.

Despite investor concerns over the deal following Tung Ka Pao's commentary, analysts see the deal as positive for CK Hutchinson.

"It's an astute deal selling to a buyer, ostensibly backed by the Trump administration, at the top of the market, knowing global trade could fall under a new tariff regime," wrote David Blennerhassett, an analyst at Quiddity Advisors who publishes on the Smartkarma platform, on Thursday.

He added that he doesn't expect the company to reverse its decision to sell the ports following the commentary.

Analysts at CreditSights wrote last week that not only is CK Hutchinson selling its assets at an attractive price, it's also removing geopolitical risks associated with its Panama ports.

• Match Group's CEO said apps "have felt like a numbers game" for users — and he wants to change that.
• The company plans to address user frustrations and improve safety on its platforms.
• Match Group faces user decline amid a broader shift away from online dating platforms.

Users on apps like Tinder and Hinge think that parent company Match Group is too driven by metrics, said Match's new CEO.

"Too often, our apps have felt like a numbers game rather than a place to build real connections," Spencer Rascoff wrote in a letter to employees that he posted on LinkedIn on Thursday. "That needs to change."

Rascoff said that he wants to bring the focus back to users. He's creating a channel for employees to confidentially share their "unvarnished feedback" on products and zeroing in on trust and safety.

On an earnings call last month, Rascoff said the company is working on an "ecosystem cleanup" by tackling bad actors, which he said would benefit the business.

"I've heard incredible stories of love," Rascoff wrote in Thursday's letter. "But I've also heard frustration — from users searching for real, meaningful matches and expecting more from the experience."

Rascoff, who joined Match as CEO last month, cofounded real estate platform Zillow and was the CEO for over a decade.

The company did not respond to a request for comment.

Rascoff's overhaul follows a broader sentiment shift away from online dating. Swiping fatigue and the rising costs of going on dates are leading many users to ditch apps for outlets that allow in-person connections.

Between May 2023 and the end of 2024, more than half a million users left Tinder, according to a report from the UK-based online behavior research group Ofcom.

Match had 9.5 million paying users across platforms in the quarter ending in December, a 5% drop from the same period a year ago.

Match's stock is down nearly 10% in the last year, while rival Bumble is down 55%.

• Dario Amodei, the cofounder and CEO of Anthropic, says AI could be coding most software soon.
• AI could be "writing essentially all of the code" in 12 months, Amodei said.
• Amodei said he expected AI to have a similar impact "in every industry."

Dario Amodei, the CEO of AI startup Anthropic, said on Monday that AI, and not software developers, could be writing most of the code in our software in a year.

"I think we will be there in three to six months, where AI is writing 90% of the code. And then, in 12 months, we may be in a world where AI is writing essentially all of the code," Amodei said at a Council of Foreign Relations event on March 10.

Amodei said software developers will still have a role to play in the near term. This is because humans will have to feed the AI models with design features and conditions, he said.

"But on the other hand, I think that eventually all those little islands will get picked off by AI systems. And then, we will eventually reach the point where the AIs can do everything that humans can. And I think that will happen in every industry," Amodei said.

Amodei, who used to work at OpenAI, cofounded Anthropic in 2021. The company has received billions of dollars in funding from tech giants like Google and Amazon.

This isn't the first time Amodei has spoken publicly about the seismic impact AI could have on the world.

Last month, Amodei said in an interview with The New York Times that people still aren't recognizing the effect AI could have on their lives and livelihoods.

"I think people will wake up to both the risks and the benefits to a much more extreme extent than they will before over the next two years," Amodei said in an interview on the Times' "Hard Fork" podcast, which aired on February 28.

Representatives for Amodei at Anthropic did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

To be sure, Amodei isn't the only one who has recognized AI's ability to displace software developers.

Garry Tan, the president and CEO of startup incubator Y Combinator, said in an X post on March 5 that one-quarter of the founders in their 2025 winter batch were relying heavily on AI to code their software.

"For 25% of the Winter 2025 batch, 95% of lines of code are LLM generated. That's not a typo," Tan wrote.

IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said last year that she expected AI to impact roughly 40% of global jobs.

"Roughly half the exposed jobs may benefit from AI integration, enhancing productivity. For the other half, AI applications may execute key tasks currently performed by humans, which could lower labor demand, leading to lower wages and reduced hiring," Georgieva wrote in a blog post in January 2024.

"In the most extreme cases, some of these jobs may disappear," she added.

• A federal judge has ruled that fired workers in 18 government agencies must be reoffered jobs on Monday.
• That includes the USAID, CFPB, and Departments of Veterans Affairs and Education.
• The ruling is temporary and lasts only two weeks for now.

A federal judge ruled on Thursday that probationary employees in 18 agencies fired by the Trump administration must be reinstated for at least two weeks.

Senior US District Judge James Bredar is now the second federal judge to rule against the mass layoffs after US District Judge William Alsup made a similar decision earlier on Thursday in a separate lawsuit.

In the earlier case, Alsup had ordered from San Francisco that the Trump administration has to reoffer jobs to thousands of fired workers across six Cabinet departments.

Bredar's new temporary restraining order — from the Maryland district court — goes much wider.

His ruling targets 12 departments, including the Departments of Agriculture, Education, Veterans Affairs, Health and Human Services, Transportation, State, and Homeland Security. It did not cover the Defense Department, though Alsup's ruling did.

Additionally, Bredar ordered reinstatement at six other agencies, including the US Agency for International Development and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, both of which have been under immense pressure from the White House.

Bredar and Alsup didn't buy into the Trump administration's stated reason for firing employees without notice: that the workers' individual performance or conduct wasn't good enough.

"Here, the terminated probationary employees were plainly not terminated for cause," Bredar wrote in his memo.

"The sheer number of employees that were terminated in a matter of days belies any argument that these terminations were due to the employees' individual unsatisfactory performance or conduct," he added.

Many of these cuts were made under the recommendations of the White House's DOGE office, which has spearheaded President Donald Trump's effort to reduce the federal workforce.

Reinstating jobs will be tough, but appropriate, judge says

Bredar, an Obama appointee, wrote that the 18 departments and agencies he named must reinstate their employees by Monday, March 17, at 1 p.m. ET.

Under this ruling, the terminations are to be suspended for 14 days.

Bredar added that he knew this would likely be a mammoth effort.

"When, as is likely the case here, the Government has engaged in an illegal scheme spanning broad swaths of the federal workforce, it is inevitable that the remediation of that scheme will itself be a significant task," he wrote.

His ruling came as part of a lawsuit filed by a combined 20 Democratic state attorneys general against multiple branches of the federal government over employee terminations.

Their legal challenge argues that the Trump administration ignored protocol and bypassed federal laws requiring employers to notify state governments when conducting mass layoffs.

With their lawsuit proceeding, Bredar wrote in his memo that the court would likely soon consider a longer-term decision regarding the return of the probationary workers.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment about Bredar's ruling sent outside regular business hours by Business Insider.

But White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt blasted Alsup's ruling on Thursday.

"A single judge is attempting to unconstitutionally seize the power of hiring and firing from the Executive Branch," she said in a statement. "The President has the authority to exercise the power of the entire executive branch — singular district court judges cannot abuse the power of the entire judiciary to thwart the President's agenda. If a federal district court judge would like executive powers, they can try and run for President themselves."

Thursday's rulings are among the first in a mounting series of high-profile legal challenges and orders seeking to regulate DOGE's sweeping moves.

The agency was recently told by multiple judges to comply with requests for information about its operations.

As DOGE leads federal employee cuts, job terminations in the US government hit 172,017 in February, the highest monthly level since the COVID-19 pandemic triggered a wave of layoffs in June 2020.

• Kate Hudson, 45, thinks that being a part of a big blended family has its own upside.
• Her three kids, who have three different dads, get to have "so much family," she said on a podcast.
• "They've got multiple grandmas, multiple grandpas, multiple dads, and moms," Hudson said.

Kate Hudson, 45, wants you to know that being in a big blended family has its perks too.

During an episode of "The Martha Stewart Podcast" released on Wednesday, the "How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days" actor spoke about her three kids and the dynamics of her blended family.

"There's a positive to it," Hudson told host Martha Stewart. "It's like they have so much family. They've got multiple grandmas, multiple grandpas, multiple dads, and moms."

"And then they'll pick and choose who they really really connected with and kind of forge those relationships," Stewart interjected, to which Hudson agreed.

Hudson has three children with three different fathers. Her eldest son, Ryder, whom she shares with her ex-husband Chris Robinson, was born in 2004. In 2011, she welcomed her second son, Bingham, with her ex-fiancé, Muse frontman Matt Bellamy. In 2018, she gave birth to her daughter, Rani, whom she shares with her current fiancé, Danny Fujikawa.

Together, they've built "a really strong unit," Hudson said.

"Being able to continue having such a great connection with the family — like the whole family, including my exes and their partners — it is actually great," she added.

Hudson herself comes from a blended family. Her mother is actor Goldie Hawn while her father is musician Bill Hudson. She has one biological brother, one step-brother, three half-brothers, and two half-sisters.

Kurt Russel, Hawn's partner of over 40 years, has played a big role in Hudson's life. Last Father's Day, Hudson captioned a photo of the two together on Instagram: "I love my Pa so much! What a man, lucky me."

According to a survey by the US Census Bureau published in 2022, the percentage of children living with at least one stepparent increased from 6.2% to 7% between 2007 and 2019.

In a personal essay for Business Insider, writer Sara Lyle — who is blending a family of three sons — shared some tips on how she's navigating the changes in family dynamics. She says one of the most important things is to include children in any life-changing decisions, so it can help lessen their anxiety and validate their importance within the family unit.

A representative for Hudson did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent by BI outside regular hours.

• LVMH is trying to keep Bernard Arnault, 76, in charge for nearly another decade.
• The company proposed changing its bylaws to raise the age limit of its chairman and CEO to 85.
• The luxury giant had already changed the limit once in 2022 when it was raised from 75 to 80.

French luxury giant LVMH is trying to keep Bernard Arnault, 76, in charge for nearly a decade more.

LVMH is trying to amend its company bylaws to raise the age limit for its chairman and CEO to 85, per its company filings.

If shareholders agree to the change during the annual general meeting on April 17, Arnault could continue to helm the company for another nine years. He has been the chairman and CEO of LVMH since 1989.

If the vote is successful, it will be the second time the luxury tycoon pushes back his retirement. In 2022, when Arnault was 73, LVMH raised the age limit from 75 to 80.

Bloomberg reported that the first time the change went through, famed investor Warren Buffett, the then-93-year-old head of Berkshire Hathaway, wrote to Arnault, telling him he had set the new age limit too low.

Arnault has made several leadership reshuffles in the brands he owns, including moving his children around.

On Wednesday, LVMH said in a statement that Arnault's second-youngest son, 30-year-old Frédéric Arnault, would be the new CEO of Loro Piana, an Italian cashmere brand under LVMH.

The company statement said he would start his new role on June 10. Before the promotion, he led LVMH's watches division.

Other leadership shake-ups included Damien Bertrand, the current CEO of Loro Piana, being promoted to deputy CEO of Louis Vuitton, and Pierre-Emmanuel Angeloglou being appointed deputy CEO of Dior.

According to his LinkedIn, Angeloglou is currently the managing director of LVMH's fashion group and the CEO of Fendi.

All five of Arnault's children hold leadership positions in LVMH, with four of them sitting on the board of directors.

Representatives for LVMH did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider, sent outside regular business hours.

• Bluesky CEO Jay Graber recently wore a T-shirt that appeared to take a dig at Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
• The company began selling the same shirt online on Thursday afternoon.
• A Bluesky spokesperson told BI that it sold out within 30 minutes.

Bluesky is taking another shot at the Mark Zuckerbergs of the tech world.

During the week of SXSW in Austin, Bluesky CEO Jay Graber donned a black T-shirt imprinted with a Latin phrase: "Mundus sine caesaribus" or "A world without Ceasars."

The shirt appeared to reference the Meta CEO, who wore a similar boxy, black T-shirt with a Latin phrase likening himself to Roman general Julius Caesar: "Aut Zuck aut nihil" or "Either Zuck or nothing."

On Thursday afternoon, Bluesky started slinging the same shirt Graber wore at the Austin conference. The shirt sold out within 30 minutes, according to Bluesky spokesperson Emily Liu.

Liu told BI that the shirt signaled the ethos of the social media platform.

"Jay wore the shirt onstage at SXSW to emphasize Bluesky's democratic approach, where a single CEO or company doesn't control your experience online — and looks like people resonated with that vision," Liu said in an email.

Graber said in a Bluesky post that sales of the shirt launched while she was on a flight and sold out before she landed.

The company declined to share how many shirts it sold.

Since Twitter rebranded to X after Elon Musk's 2022 takeover, some users have decamped to alternative social media platforms like Bluesky. Meta, the parent company of social platforms Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram, launched its X alternative, Threads, in 2023.

The migration continues a trend of online users seeking sites that conform closer to their political or cultural beliefs.

Bluesky, which was founded by Jack Dorsey in 2019, saw a surge in users after the election and registered 30 million users as of January, the company said.

• Starbucks cafés may soon have more power outlets.
• Brian Niccol, Starbucks' CEO, said the company was testing a store redesign with more seats and power outlets.
• This is the latest move in his "Back to Starbucks" plan to make the chain more warm and inviting.

You won't have to worry about your laptop running out of juice at Starbucks anymore if Brian Niccol, the company's CEO, has anything to say about it.

Niccol's latest move to get coffee drinkers to linger at the chain's cafes involves introducing more power outlets in stores.

The chain is testing a café redesign in the US, with the aim of making it a more comfortable and inviting place to hang out, the CEO said in a shareholder meeting on Wednesday.

"Imagine coffee houses that are comfortable and warm with expanded seating options, power outlets, and abundant food displays," Niccol told shareholders.

Niccol said the new design would also have clearly separated sections for those dining in-store and those picking up their to-go orders.

A Starbucks representative told BI earlier in March that it would add more seating to its cafés and start introducing shelves and risers to separate the café and mobile ordering sections.

This is the latest move in Niccol's "Back to Starbucks" plan, a game plan he developed when he joined Starbucks in September to turn the company around. Wednesday's shareholder meeting marked six months since he took the top job.

The executive has been working to solve challenges including long wait times, flaws in the customer experience, and issues with its mobile ordering system. Niccol said that mobile ordering "chipped away" at the brand's soul.

Starbucks' global comparable sales slid by 7% in the fourth quarter of 2024 compared to the same period a year before. Its performance improved in the first quarter of 2025, when global comparable sales decreased by 4% year-on-year.

A key pillar of Niccol's "Back to Starbucks" is rebranding the company as a cozy local coffeehouse where people can hang out.

His changes include introducing ceramic mugs for hot drinks in store, handwritten messages for customers, and self-serve condiment bars.

• Kelly Benthall saw work culture improve over her 30-year career, but the damage had already been done.
• Last year, she decided to retire early in order to improve her mental, physical, and emotional health.
• At her first post-retirement checkup, her doctor noted improvement.

My plan had always been to retire at 65 — grind it out, climb the ladder, and finally enjoy the freedom. But plans change, especially when your body starts flashing warnings you can't ignore.

Last year, at 53, I retired early with my husband — not because we had meticulously planned every detail, but because the cost of staying in the rat race — mentally, physically, and emotionally — had become too high. Work had always been a source of pride, but it was also a source of stress and, at times, serious health consequences.

For more than 30 years, I helped companies ranging from startups to giants such as Shell and Chevron navigate strategic change. I had spent those decades taking on more responsibility than was reasonable, absorbing the pressure, and expecting little in return. Over time, I internalized stress as a normal part of success — until my body forced me to stop.

The corporate fast lane and its toll

The workplace has changed a lot since the '90s and early 2000s, particularly in male-dominated industries like oil and gas. Back then, I was a minority as a woman, and those who made it to the top endured relentless pressure. Some became champions for equality. Others expected fellow women to tough it out, believing suffering was a rite of passage.

Some female leaders respected my work, but others saw it as a threat.

During an orientation at one of my first jobs, I mentioned my experience in speechwriting to a CEO. He asked me to write his sales conference talks, but my female boss told him I wasn't interested and offered to do it herself. I later reached back out to the CEO to clarify, and we ended up partnering for years.

And then there were #MeToo moments I can't believe I tolerated. One boss thought it was appropriate to share his appreciation for Playboy centerfolds during meetings.

The culture shifted over time as companies implemented stronger policies and accountability measures. By the time I reached my final years in corporate life, the culture had improved. But the damage had already been done.

Years of working in high-alert mode left me conditioned to expect the worst, even in safer environments.

The moment my body fought back

Despite disappointments, I kept my foot on the gas. I worked harder than ever, sometimes logging 90-hour weeks, believing that if I just worked smart enough and fast enough, I could outpace the stress.

I was wrong.

One day, I collapsed at work. My blood pressure spiked to 220/180, and I ended up in an ambulance. The EMTs gave me nitroglycerin, but nothing happened. I heard one of them say, "Uh-oh," before telling the driver to move faster.

That should have been my wake-up call. Instead, I doubled down — cycling through medications in a desperate attempt to keep going.

It wasn't sustainable.

A change coach who couldn't change

I had spent my career coaching others to accept change.

The advice I'd given countless others seemed easy when it was someone else's problem. "Do as I say, not as I do," I thought. Yet, as I struggled with burnout and my health deteriorated, I realized I wasn't taking my own lessons to heart. I had built a career around helping people, but I had been afraid to make the same leap myself.

It wasn't until I spoke with a coach — a free consultation, something I almost canceled because I "didn't have time" — that I saw my life from a different perspective.

She asked me one simple question: "When was the last time you did something that scared you?"

The question caught me off guard. I had spent so many years operating in a world of controlled risks, where I calculated every move and mitigated every possible failure. But fear? The kind that comes from stepping into the unknown, from daring to disrupt the status quo? It had been a long time since I'd felt that.

That moment unlocked something in me. I remembered who I was — someone who took chances. I had once thrived on new challenges, stepping into high-stakes projects where failure wasn't an option and leading teams through uncertainty. Yet, I had spent years trapped in a cycle of stress and obligation, mistaking endurance for achievement.

"Sometimes you have to break down to break through," the voice in my head whispered. That was the moment I decided to retire.

Retirement cured me

When I finally stepped away from my career, I didn't fully grasp the toll it had taken on my body. But retirement didn't just heal me — it gave me a new way of living. My husband and I embraced slow travel, trading deadlines and commutes for long walks in new cities, quiet mornings with coffee, and the freedom to explore at our own pace.

It wasn't until my first post-retirement checkup that I saw the difference. My blood pressure had dropped, and my stress markers were lower.

My doctor looked at my stats, then back at me, and said: "Your job was trying to kill you."

Escaping the hustle trap

Retirement didn't just save my health. It felt like finally pulling off the highway, realizing I'd been speeding toward a crash. It rewired my brain. What I had once called "drive" was really just a never-ending sprint toward exhaustion.

While work environments have improved in some ways, the effects of years spent enduring stress don't just disappear overnight. People like me, who became accustomed to overwork and constant pressure, struggle to recognize what a healthy pace actually looks like.

If you feel trapped in a high-stress career, ask yourself: When was the last time you did something that scared you? What are you really working for? At what point will you have enough? How long can your body sustain this stress? And most importantly, what's stopping you from making a change?

I wish I had asked myself these questions sooner. But the good news is that not everyone has to wait until their body forces them to stop.

Do you have a story to share about retirement? Contact the editor at [email protected].

• American Airlines Flight 1006 was seen engulfed in smoke at Denver International Airport.
• The FAA said the plane's engine caught fire after landing and while taxiing to the gate.
• All 172 customers and six crew members were evacuated, the airline said.

An American Airlines plane caught fire at Denver International Airport on Thursday.

The Federal Aviation Administration said in a statement on Thursday night that American Airlines Flight 1006 landed safely in Denver after the crew "reported engine vibrations."

"After landing and while taxiing to the gate an engine caught fire and passengers evacuated the aircraft using the slides," the FAA statement read.

The Boeing 737-800 plane was en route from Colorado Springs Airport to Dallas Fort Worth International Airport.

The airline said in a statement to Business Insider that Flight 1006 "experienced an engine-related issue" after landing and taxiing to the gate.

"The 172 customers and six crew members deplaned and are being relocated to the terminal," the statement said.

A representative for Denver International Airport told local news outlet KDVR that Flight 1006 was emitting "visible smoke."

The airport wrote in an X post on Thursday night that "12 people were transported to local hospitals with minor injuries."

This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates.

• The Trump administration says imposing tariffs on trade partners is a way to shrink the US trade deficit.
• Tesla's CEO Elon Musk has been a key Trump backer, but a trade war would raise costs for its cars.
• In a letter, the company urged the US government to ensure the trade war doesn't "inadvertently harm US companies."

Tesla has warned the Trump administration that it could bear the cost of the president's attempts to impose so-called retaliatory tariffs on US trade partners.

In an unsigned letter uploaded to a regulatory docket on March 11, the automaker said a trade war could increase costs to manufacture its vehicles and lead other countries to slap tariffs on Tesla vehicles made in Austin or electronic equipment it makes in states such as California and Nevada.

"Past US special tariff actions have thus increased costs to Tesla for vehicles manufactured in the United States, and increased costs for those same vehicles when exported from the United States, resulting in less competitive international marketplace for US manufacturers," the company wrote.

Elon Musk, Tesla's CEO, has been named a "special government employee" who has been closely associated with Donald Trump's drive to shrink and automate the federal government. The letter underscores how his political interests and his business interests could diverge.

Tesla's share price has fallen by nearly half since its December peak. Musk said earlier in the week he was having a tough time running his businesses due to his involvement with the White House DOGE office.

"Tesla supports a robust and thorough process to gather information to ensure appropriate actions are taken to address unfair trade practices and which, in the process, do not inadvertently harm US companies," said the letter, which was previously reported by the Financial Times.

The fact that the letter wasn't signed may be unusual, but isn't unprecedented for Tesla, which has previously submitted comments to the IRS without a signature at the bottom. Letters it has submitted to other agencies have included signatures.

Tesla, Musk, and the White House did not respond to Business Insider's request for comment.

The letter was uploaded to a public comment portal for the US Trade Representative on March 11 by an in-house lawyer at Tesla. It is embedded below.

The letter was sent on the same day Trump invited Musk and a lineup of Teslas to the south lawn of the White House for a publicity event. Trump said he'd be buying a Tesla to show his support for Musk and his company after acts of dealership vandalism.

The on-and-off threats of tariffs on Canada and Mexico could deal huge blows to America's largest automakers.

Barclays analysts wrote in a March 5 note that a 25% levy on goods from Canada and Mexico could wipe out profits for Ford, GM, and Stellantis, assuming no price increase or adjustment in production plans.

"If you look at the tariffs, let's be real honest, long term, a 25% tariff across the Mexico and Canadian border would blow a hole in the US industry that we have never seen," Ford CEO Jim Farley said in February.

Tesla also would feel the effects, considering 20-25% of the components for its 2025 model-year vehicles come from Mexico, according to a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration filing.

"There's a lot of uncertainty around tariffs," Tesla's Chief Financial Officer Vaibhav Taneja said in an earnings call on January 29. "Over the years, we've tried to localize our supply chain in every market, but we are still reliant on parts from across the world for all our businesses. Therefore, the imposition of tariffs, which is very likely, and any will have an impact on our business and profitability."

• "Snow White" is the latest classic animated Disney film getting the live-action remake treatment.
• However, it's been mired in controversies since production began.
• Rachel Zegler's casting caused backlash, as have changes to the characters of the seven dwarfs.

After the success of a slew of live-action remakes, a musical retelling of 1937's "Snow White" may have seemed like slam dunk for Disney.

Instead, the $300 million reboot starring Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot has been mired in controversies before even hitting theaters.

Like the original animated classic, "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs," the upcoming film is loosely based on the 19th-century German fairy tale by the Brothers Grimm.

But to update the story for more audiences, a number of key changes have been made, including casting a mixed-ethnicity actor in the lead role, and adjusting the characters of the seven dwarfs.

Channeling her character's grace and kindness, Zegler said in a recent interview that the backlash to the film comes down to the "passion" people hold for the original film.

"What an honor to be a part of something that people feel so passionately about. We're not always going to agree with everyone who surrounds us, and all we can do is our best," she said in an interview in the March issue of Vogue Mexico via Variety.

Ahead of Disney's scaled-back premiere for the contentious new release, here's a breakdown of all the controversies surrounding Disney's "Snow White" live-action remake.

Critics of the new 'Snow White' movie say the live-action remake is too far of a departure from the original

Disney's upcoming live-action remake of "Snow White" attracted controversy as soon as details about the production emerged.

First, some people were left incensed by photos obtained by the Daily Mail that suggested Disney had "gone woke" and replaced the original fairytale's seven dwarfs with a diverse group of people of different genders, ethnicities, and heights.

For what it's worth, the trailer for the film shows that the seven dwarf characters remain true to the original story, and are being played by actors with the help of CGI.

Others questioned Zegler's casting.

Peter Dinklage said Disney should cut the Seven Dwarfs from the new movie

In 2022, "Game of Thrones" actor Peter Dinklage criticized Disney for what he perceived as blatant hypocrisy in its attempts to update the problematic children's fairytale for modern audiences.

Referencing the casting of Zegler in the lead role, Dinklage said on the comedian Marc Maron's "WTF" podcast: "It makes no sense to me, because you're progressive in one way and then you're still making that fucking backward story of seven dwarfs living in a cave."

Following Dinklage's comments, a Disney spokesperson said in a statement to The Hollywood Reporter that the studio was consulting "with members of the dwarfism community" during the pre-production process for the movie.

The statement added that it was "taking a different approach" to the characters of the seven dwarfs as a means to "avoid reinforcing stereotypes from the original animated film."

Rachel Zegler's casting caused controversy

After it was announced that Zegler would be taking on the lead role in the film, some pushed back against her casting, upset that an actor of mixed ethnicity would be stepping into the role of the character who is famously described as having skin "as white as snow."

Appearing on Variety's Actors on Actors series with Andrew Garfield in January 2022, Zegler, who is of Colombian and Polish descent, spoke about the reaction to her casting, and how she hoped to change perceptions of who can or can't play certain roles.

"Never in a million years did I imagine that this would be a possibility for me. You don't normally see Snow Whites that are of Latin descent. Even though Snow White is really a big deal in Spanish-speaking countries," she said. "At the end of the day, I have a job to do that I'm really excited to do. I get to be a Latina princess."

Rachel Zegler caused further controversy with her comments on the original 'Snow White'

Since her casting was announced in June 2021, Zegler has repeatedly stated that she's not a fan of the original 1937 film.

In a late 2022 interview with Entertainment Weekly, the 23-year-old actor said she'd seen the original animated film only once before and didn't enjoy it.

"I was scared of the original version. I think I watched it once and never picked it up again. I'm being so serious," Zegler said.

In a separate red carpet conversation with Variety, Ziegler was asked what she meant when she said she was bringing a modern edge to the character.

"I just mean that it's no longer 1937," Zegler said, adding: "She's not going to be saved by the prince, and she's not going to be dreaming about true love — she's dreaming about becoming the leader she knows she can be and the leader that her late father told her that she could be if she was fearless, fair, brave, and true."

Elsewhere, Zegler described the prince in the original film as a stalker and emphasized that a love story wasn't central to the new film.

"There's a big focus on her love story with a guy who literally stalks her," Zegler told Extra TV. "Weird! Weird! So we didn't do that this time."

"We have a different approach to what I'm sure a lot of people will assume is a love story just because we cast a guy in the movie," she added, before joking that Andrew Burnap, who plays the prince, might be cut from the film altogether.

Stars Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot have differing views on Israel and Palestine

Global politics also has had a part to play in the film's controversy, with the two lead actors expressing conflicting views over the ongoing conflict in Gaza and Israel.

Zegler has been vocal about her support of a free Palestine on social media. Meanwhile, Gadot, who is Israeli and who spent two years serving in the Israel Defense Forces, has been outspoken about her support for the country since the October 7 Hamas attack.

Gadot skipped the European premiere of "Snow White" on March 12 in Spain, which Zegler attended.

Although representatives for Zegler and Gadot did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider, both stars are expected to walk the red carpet at the US premiere on March 15.

• From American whiskey to French Champagne, alcohol has become a factor in Trump's trade war.
• Both beverages could see tariffs in the coming weeks unless the US reaches a deal with the EU.
• Businesses, from wine shops to restaurants, are already reacting to the potential tariffs.

President Donald Trump might not drink, but his trade war is shaking and stirring up the market for some of the most popular boozy beverages globally.

On Wednesday, the European Union responded to US tariffs on aluminum and steel by imposing a 50% duty on various products starting on April 1, including one of the US's most well-known drinks: whiskey.

Just a day later, Trump threatened a 200% tariff on wine and alcohol from EU countries, including iconic French Champagne. It's unclear when or if that levy will take effect, but it's already prompting reactions in the US.

Some wine shops, for instance, are promoting specials for customers who want to stock up on European wine, with one in New York City sending out emails to regular customers offering "tariff buster" deals.

Alexandra Ivanac and her husband Stephen Varela, who run the Italian-Croatian restaurant Villa Berulia in Manhattan, said Trump's threats are "alarming." The restaurant carries about 75 European wines and upcharges alcohol 2.5 to 3 times, higher than many dishes.

"How does an Italian restaurant pivot away from European wine?" Varela said.

It's making them question whether to absorb the costs or pass them on to customers. Ivanac said they may instead look to South America, South Africa, Australia, or New Zealand for wines if the tariffs go into effect, as well as some California wines. Varela also said they may order twice as much wine as normal and stockpile it in their basement.

"Some of these wines are going for, on the higher end, $200 to $300, so how much could we really increase prices?" Varela said, adding some customers are more cautious about spending given economic concerns.

The US accounts for about 31% of EU wine and spirit exports, according to Eurostat, the EU statistics office. The EU, meanwhile, made up about 40% of the export market for US spirits in 2023, according to the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States.

For US winemakers, the latest tariff threat could be an opportunity.

Zach Pelka, cofounder and COO at New York-based Une Femme Wines, said his company developed a supply chain that sits almost entirely within the US after COVID made sourcing abroad more complicated and expensive.

Pelka said he expects more US-based alcohol brands to focus domestically if Trump's 200% tariff takes effect.

If the US's threats come true, Pelka expects that Une Femme will become a more attractive option for restaurants, retailers, hotels, and other customers who want a steady source of wine in the US.

"As of today, I think it becomes the focal point of the pitch" to buyers, he said of the potential tariff.

Tariff talk has already caused consumers in other countries to buy from local suppliers instead of importing from the US. Many Canadians are looking for "Made in Canada" alternatives in light of the levies that the Trump administration has threatened and enacted on that country's goods.

Whether any or all of the taxes materialize remains to be seen. Last week, Trump imposed a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico — only to suspend it shortly afterward for most items until April 2.

Even if the tariffs take effect, drinkers might not see higher prices right away.

Blake Leonard, president of wine at Stew Leonard's Wine & Spirits, which operates several shops in Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York, told BI that some of her suppliers brought months' worth of European wine and even tequila from Mexico into the US to get ahead of potential tariffs.

That early action will help Stew Leonard's keep prices for many beverages stable, at least temporarily. "The last thing we want to do as a family business is raise prices for our customers," Leonard said. About half of all wine that the chain sells comes from European nations — primarily France and Italy, she said.

To say the situation is fluid "would be a massive understatement," said Lawson Whiting, the CEO of Brown-Forman, which makes Jack Daniel's whiskey and counts Europe as a major export market. "It seems like things are changing very, very quickly."

The April 1 effective date for the EU's tariffs on US whiskey leaves time for the US and the EU to resolve their differences, Whiting said at an industry conference on Wednesday, the day the EU announced its latest tariffs.

"That does give me some optimism that both the administration and the other counterparties over the last few weeks have been trying to resolve things," Whiting said.

Have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at [email protected]

• US special operations forces want new drones for cave and tunnel operations.
• Drones could offer communication and situational awareness benefits over military working dogs.
• US special operators are often at the forefront of working with industry on new technologies.

Fighting inside caves and tunnels is a tough and dangerous mission, even for elite special operations forces.

Drones could help solve key problems operators face, such as communication and threat detection issues, while reducing the risk to human warfighters and military working dogs.

SOCOM, on behalf of SOCCENT, which oversees US special operations forces in the Middle East, said in a recent procurement notice first reported by The War Zone that caves present severe logistical problems for operators. The battlespaces are confined spaces characterized by unpredictable terrain and limited visibility. A narrow passageway can instantly become a kill box.

In the Middle East, both state and non-state actors have used networks of caves and tunnels, complicating military operations against them.

"To mitigate these risks and enhance operational effectiveness, we propose the acquisition and deployment of a dedicated UAS solution," SOCOM said in the request, referring to uncrewed aerial system solutions.

Drones come in a range of sizes, from pocket-size Black Hornet drones to quadcopters and octocopters to large, sophisticated combat and reconnaissance drones like the Reaper. Small UAS solutions have proven tremendously valuable in Ukraine, where some have flown into the open hatches of tanks with precision.

SOCOM is seeking a compact first-person-view drone.

The fast, real-time intelligence provided by drones would not only reduce dangers to operators and dogs but also "significantly improve the safety and efficiency of cave clearing operations, ultimately contributing to mission success and force protection," SOCOM said.

Per the procurement notice, a specific but unnamed company has been identified as the only vendor that can provide the desired platform, training, and capabilities for this drone. SOCOM noted that the model has a compact body enabling it "to operate effectively in confined spaces."

Subterranean and underground operations are daunting. Tunnel warfare has been a key focus in counterterrorism and counterinsurgency efforts, and training for fights in these brutal environments has increased in recent years.

While it's unclear which specific drone model Special Operations Command is hoping to acquire for its forces, the notice is indicative of a larger priority to introduce more drones into operations.

At a symposium last month, special operations leadership and defense industry officials spoke candidly about the need to buy and develop more drones and autonomous systems to help their operators address difficult threats.

When it comes to adapting new technology quickly, SOCOM benefits from a comparatively flexible acquisition process, as well as close relationships with industry partners able to help it rapidly iterate and improve new capabilities.

SOCOM needs cheap solutions for future problems, as well as the problems facing operators right now. There are cheap, commercially available systems that could be updated with new software and hardware components depending on threats, countermeasures, and the needs of the operator. There are also specialized solutions that agile outfits can field quickly.

Rising US defense technology company Anduril Industries, for instance, began its work with SOCOM attempting to solve immediate drone and counter-drone problems operators were facing, Anduril Chief Strategy Officer Chris Brose said at the recent symposium.

For its caves and tunnels problem, SOCOM is seeking an already available solution that could make these missions easier and safer by incorporating emerging technology.