• Microsoft's chief product officer of experiences and devices says people should keep learning to code.
• Computer science isn't dead, Aparna Chennapragada said on a recent podcast, and the role of the engineer will endure.
• For project managers, she said that editing and "taste-making" will be more important than ever.

Microsoft CPO Aparna Chennapragada doesn't buy the idea that coding is on its way out.

"I have one other additional bonus thing, which is a lot of folks think about, 'Oh, don't bother studying computer science or the coding is dead,' and I just fundamentally disagree," Chennapragada, the tech giant's chief product officer of experiences and devices, said on Lenny's Podcast.

"If anything, I think we've always had higher and higher layers of abstraction in programming," she added.

Despite fears that AI could ultimately render software engineers irrelevant — or at least materially cut down on job openings in the field — Chennapragada believes that AI only adds a further layer of abstraction in the existing process of programming.

"We don't program in assembly anymore," she said. "Most of us don't even program in C, and then you're kind of higher and higher layers of abstraction. So to me, they will be ways that you will tell the computer what to do, right? It'll just be at a much higher level of abstraction, which is great. It democratizes."

Chennapragada said it's possible that, in the future, we'll think of software engineers more as software operators, but the role itself is unlikely to disappear.

"There'll be an order of magnitude more software operators," she said. "Instead of 'Cs,' maybe we'll have 'SOs,' but that doesn't mean you don't understand computer science and it's a way of thinking and it's a mental model. So I strongly disagree with the whole, 'Coding is dead.'"

As for the fate of project managers, who are subject, like many other middle managers, to big tech's "great flattening," Chennapragada expects them to endure, albeit with modified responsibilities. Taste, she said, will be more important than ever.

"In some sense, if you look at it, there's going to be a supply of ideas, a massive increase in supply of ideas in prototypes, which is great," Chennapragada said. "It raises the floor, but it raises the ceiling as well. In some sense, how do you break out in these times that you have to make sure that this is something that rises above the noise?"

Chennapragada did not respond to a request for comment by Business Insider prior to publication.

AI makes it easier than ever to actualize an idea, she said, which means that sifting through the glut of ideas will be especially important — so project managers will need to further develop what Chennapragada calls "the taste-making and the editing" instincts.

"In a world where the supply of ideas, supply of prototypes becomes even more like an order of magnitude higher, you'd have to think about, 'What is the editing function here?'" she said.

Because it's so much easier to just get started, Chennapragada says she's observed less of an instinct to automatically turn to a project manager for approval. Though final approval will become more important than ever, she believes PMs have to earn the right to judge.

"There's an interesting side effect I am observing in startups that I'm advising, companies, and even within the companies, that there used to be more gatekeeping, I would say, in terms of like — 'Oh, we should ask the product leader what they think,'" Chennapragada said. "And again, there is a role for that editing function, but you have to earn it now."

• The word "tariff" might be about to get scarcer in the retail world, a consumer researcher told BI.
• Walmart drew President Trump's ire after saying the company would hike prices due to tariffs.
• Neutral wordings like "sourcing costs" or "supply chain expenses" may become more common, the researcher said.

The "T-word" may soon go the way of DEI and ESG.

In the months since President Donald Trump began rolling out his shifting tariff policies, companies have been grappling with how to communicate the impact the policy will have on prices. But consumers may be hearing about that less.

Instead, phrases like "sourcing costs," "supply chain expenses" or "import costs" — accompanied with a detailed explanation of measures the company took to mitigate any price increase — will become code for "tariff" in earnings calls and other business meetings, said Denise Dahlhoff, director of marketing and communications research at The Conference Board, which advises companies on economic trends.

"As a business today, you have to think of it as a multi-stakeholder world," Dahlhoff told Business Insider. "There are your customers, your employees, your investors, the government, the president, the media, and your supplier community."

The tariffs are part of Trump's economic agenda to bring back offshored American manufacturing and incentivize companies to make goods domestically by making imports more costly.

Businesses large and small have said they see disclosing tariff costs as a means to retain consumer trust, but major companies that have been explicit about tariff costs or have been suspected of such plans are facing increasing political pressure, often from the president himself.

Walmart announced during an earnings call on May 15 that they would need to raise prices due to Trump's tariffs. In a post on Truth Social on May 17, Trump criticized Walmart for "blaming" his policies and demanded that the retailer "eat the tariffs," adding that he will "be watching" for price hikes.

Walmart did not immediately respond to a request for comments, but a spokesperson previous told BI that the company has always worked to keep prices "as low as possible."

This also wouldn't be the first time Trump took tariff price hikes personally. When it was reported that Amazon was considering displaying how much tariffs are contributing to the price of individual products, the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, called the idea a "hostile and political act." Amazon quickly denied ever planning to display tariff costs.

"Saying 'tariff' could be interpreted as a political statement because this country is politically very divided, so it is a very complex environment, and you want to avoid terms that might divide people or might not be universally liked," Dahlhoff said.

Retailers may avoid the issue altogether, and instead leave the consumers to do the math, Michael Baker, a senior analyst at D.A. Davidson, previously told BI.

"Retailers will have learned they need to be very careful — and it's very tricky — on how they articulate that so as to not wind up on a Truth Social post," Baker said. "That does add a layer of complication."

Dahlhoff said company leaders these days should also avoid words like DEI and ESG, which promote equity and environmentalism, but have become very politically charged after Trump threatened to cut federal funding from institutions that engage in these practices. Some businesses like Target have publicly rolled back DEI measures after Trump's inauguration, and promptly faced public boycott. The company changed the name of its DEI strategy to "Belonging at the Bullseye."

"If it was a tight rope businesses were walking before, now it's a thin string," Dahlhoff said.

Peter Cohan, an associate professor of management at Babson College and a venture capitalist, previously told BI that tariff awareness is extremely heightened among consumers, so they have a good understanding of the cause of price hikes at this point, regardless of what businesses call it.

"I do not think it's smart to cave," said Cohan of giving in to the President's demands. "If there isn't pushback, then it's appeasement, and companies changing their policies based on getting an angry call from the President will lose their ability to effectively manage their business."

Have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at [email protected] or Signal at katherineli.21 or WhatsApp at 510-365-6496. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here's our guide to sharing information securely.

• I bought a Lafufu, a cheap, counterfeit, somewhat creepy version of the viral Labubu toy.
• People around the world are shelling out money to buy Lafufus — it's becoming a retail phenomenon.
• Lafufu lovers told BI they love the toys for how ugly they are, not in spite of it.

As soon as I ripped open the packaging of my brand-new Lafufu, I giggled.

It was my fault. Instead of buying an authentic Labubu from Chinese toymaker Pop Mart, I caved and bought a Lafufu. The sad, budget fuzzy doll stands in for the real deal — a toy that has taken the world by storm and made millions for its Chinese owner.

The term Lafufu is an affectionate nickname for these counterfeit Labubus and is often used in videos on social media platforms like TikTok.

The most obvious knockoff sign was my Lafufu's lopsided face, which made its creepy smile look extremely unsettling. The next thing I spotted was its missing hands, but upon closer inspection, I saw they had been attached backward.

I compared it to my coworker's real Labubu and noticed that the devil really is in the details. The paint job on the legit Labubu was cleaner. My Lafufu, meanwhile, felt flimsier, and its white fur was coarser. The Lafufu's limbs weren't completely mobile — its feet could not be rotated 360 degrees.

And most unfortunately, my poor Lafufu also appeared to have a receding hairline, while the real Labubu had an ample crown of fur on its head.

I snagged the Lafufu toy for 9.77 Singapore dollars, or about $7.50, on local e-commerce platform Shopee. The real toy of this size from Pop Mart costs SG$24.90.

On Shopee, dozens of listings offer various Lafufus, with prices as low as SG$0.60.

Purchasing it was a two-minute affair, a far cry from waiting in line for hours outside a Pop Mart outlet ahead of product drops. In the UK, Pop Mart has temporarily paused physical sales of the toy because queues were getting out of hand.

Labubu and The Monsters toy line was a lucrative product category for Pop Mart in 2024, with sales totaling 3.04 billion yuan, or about $426 million. Pop Mart's stock is up more than 530% in the last year.

While some people may buy Lafufus as a Labubu replacement, others are going out of their way to secure the fake version.

Joey Khong, a trends manager at London-based market research agency Mintel, said, "Like most fakes, Lafufus reflect a combination of systemic market inequalities and genuine human motivations: the desire to belong, to experience joy, and to participate in the cultural moment."

Juda Kanaprach, the cofounder of Singapore-based market research firm Milieu Insight, told me Lafufu is having its "own little cultural moment."

"Whether it's about humor, aesthetics, or just jumping on a trend, everyone's coming at it from a different angle," Kanaprach said. "And that, to me, makes this whole thing more than just a 'fake toy' moment."

Representatives for Pop Mart did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

A cheaper, funnier alternative to Labubu

Lafufu buyers told me they love the fakes because of how ugly they are, not in spite of it.

Miabella Rivera, a college freshman from San Diego, said she got a Lafufu for $12 because the real ones were "impossible to get."

"My Lafufu came without eyes, so I had to superglue them on, but it still turned out really cute," Rivera said.

Renn Lazzerin, who works at an elementary school in Los Angeles as a behavior analyst, has two Lafufus. The first was an unintentional buy — she was scammed by an online seller claiming the doll was authentic.

But soon after, she bought a second Lafufu knowingly, because of how ugly it was.

"The eyes pop out, it has blush blindness, and the teeth are misprinted," Lazzerin said.

"The fake Labubu offers a different serotonin rush than getting an original. It's like, how ugly can it get?" she added.

Khong, the trends manager, said fakes can often look more eccentric or intriguing than real Labubus.

"While anyone with enough money can buy a 'real Labubu' straight from the store, a rare, well-made fake with a unique outfit or expression might require more taste, effort, or insider knowledge to source," he said.

Austin D'Souza, the managing director of Ozzie Collectables, an Australian collectibles store, said Labubus are made with high-quality materials.

"Authentic Labubus are crafted with care and creativity, and counterfeit versions can detract from the unique experience that collectors seek," he said.

"The packaging of genuine products typically features high-quality printing and branding, whereas counterfeit packaging may appear less polished or have inconsistencies," D'Souza added.

Buying a Lafufu has convinced some people to pick up real Labubus

Despite being obvious fakes, Lafufus may be driving up demand for authentic Labubus.

"Even though they're fake, they keep the brand in people's minds. Everyone's sharing them online, making fun of them, and talking about them, which keeps the attention and interest around the real Labubu going," said Kanaprach, from Milieu Insight.

"Buying a fake Labubu was not good enough for me, so I punched the real one to make me feel better about owning just one," said Kimberly Hernandez, a special education assistant from Los Angeles.

The popularity of counterfeits comes with risks

Kanaprach said Pop Mart needs to stay ahead of the game because too many fakes could flood the market. At some point, well-made fakes may become indistinguishable from the real deal.

"Labubu just needs to keep things special, always come up with new designs, keep it limited, and remind people why the original is still worth it," she said.

Khong said a larger problem for brands like Pop Mart is keeping their core fans engaged and satisfied "while riding the volatility of popularity or trend cycles."

While I see the allure of a Labubu — despite never having purchased one myself — I think I'm satisfied with my SG$9.77 Lafufu.

After a few days of staring at its lopsided grin, its deformities have even become endearing.

• Johan Helberg was asleep at home when a 440-foot-long cargo ship crashed into his backyard.
• The NCL Salten was transporting goods to the Norwegian town of Orkanger when it ran aground.
• The ship's owner said it had run aground twice in 2023 and 2024.

A 440-foot-long cargo ship ran aground beside a house in Byneset, Norway, on Thursday morning, local time.

"If the ship had hit the rocky cliff right next to it, it would have lifted up and hit the house hard. It wasn't many meters off," Johan Helberg, the owner of the house, told local newspaper Nidaros.

Helberg said he was asleep when the ship ran aground and did not know what happened until his neighbor alerted him.

"I thought, who in the world rings the doorbell at 5:45 in the morning? I looked out the window, and he said: 'Haven't you seen the ship?'" Helberg told The New York Times in an interview published Thursday.

There were 16 men aboard the NCL Salten, Helberg said in his interview with the Times. The boat was captained by a Norwegian, and its crew comprises Russians and Ukrainians, Helberg said.

Helberg told the Times that his neighbor, Jostein Jørgensen, was "in shock all day" after seeing the ship plow into their backyard.

Jørgensen told the local media outlet TV 2 that he heard the ship at around 5 a.m. local time.

"When I looked out the window, I saw a boat moving at full speed towards shore," Jørgensen said, adding that he expected the ship to turn course initially.

But the ship only stopped moving when it was about "six to eight meters" from Helberg's house wall, Jørgensen told TV 2.

The NCL Salten was transporting goods to Orkanger, a town in Trondheim, Norway, when the crash occurred, per TV 2's report. The ship is owned by Baltnautic, a Lithuanian shipping company.

Baltnautic CEO Bente Hetland told the Times that "nobody was injured in the grounding." She added that the company does not know "what caused the incident and are awaiting the conclusion of the ongoing investigation."

Hetland told TV 2 that the NCL Salten had run aground twice before, both times in Norway. The ship ran aground in Hadsel in 2023 and in Ålesund in 2024.

Baltnautic did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

The Norwegian Coastal Administration said on Thursday that no injuries or oil spills had been reported. It added that Baltnautic and the salvaging company it hired could not "pull the ship off the ground at high tide" with a tugboat on Thursday evening.

"Geotechnical investigations will be carried out, and the shipping company's salvage company is awaiting the results of these to determine whether special considerations need to be taken when the ship is to be pulled off. We expect the investigations to take some time," the statement continued.

• Tom Cruise does his own stunts, and it's remarkable what he's been able to pull off.
• Hanging from the side of a plane, skydiving, climbing the world's tallest building — he's done it all.
• He also jumped off the roof of the Stade de France to mark the end of the 2024 Paris Olympics.

Tom Cruise has been one of the biggest names in Hollywood since the 1980s, and as his star power grew, so did his ambitions. 

He started to do a lot of his own stunts when appearing in action blockbusters like "Top Gun," "Mission: Impossible," and "Minority Report." Now, stunts have become Cruise's calling card.

His ambitiousness also bled into real life at the 2024 Paris Olympics' closing ceremony when he jumped off the roof of the Stade de France.

Now, the actor has added another stunning aerial sequence to his list of feats, in his latest movie: "Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning."

Here are the best stunts of Cruise's career, ranked.

12. For the cargo-plane crash in "The Mummy," Cruise did the stunt inside a NASA plane that trains astronauts for zero gravity.

In 2017's "The Mummy," Cruise finds himself stuck in a cargo plane as it crashes. To pull off a scene like this, actors would typically film it in a controlled setting like a sound stage surrounded by a green screen.

Not Cruise, though.

The star shot the scene in a plane that NASA uses to train astronauts.

The scene was filmed in the plane which had to go up to 25,000 feet to get the look that Cruise was in zero gravity. The plane then did a free fall for 22 seconds.

Cruise did the flight four times to pull off the scene.

11. Cruise flew a helicopter in "Mission: Impossible — Fallout."

For the thrilling helicopter-chase scene in the finale of "Fallout," Cruise spent 16 hours a day training to get to the required 2,000 hours to fly a helicopter on his own.

But Cruise didn't just fly the helicopter. He also pulled off a 360-degree corkscrew dive in it, which would challenge even the most veteran pilot.

10. Cruise is really in an F/A-18 jet for the flight scenes in "Top Gun" Maverick" and had to deal with the G-forces.

When you see Cruise and the cast looking like they are battling G-forces in the jets, complete with distorted faces, it's because they really were.

Cruise and the cast went through training so their dogfight scenes could look as realistic as possible — which meant sitting in the F/A-18 jets as they were spun around and took dramatic dives.

9. Cruise jumped off the Stade de France during the closing ceremony of the 2024 Paris Olympics.

The 2024 Paris Olympics closing ceremony went big on the Americana to mark Los Angeles hosting the 2028 games, with Cruise pulling off a stunt straight out of a Hollywood blockbuster.

He jumped off the roof of the Stade de France and descended into France's national stadium in front of thousands in a stunt that blurred the lines between himself and the daring characters he's known for playing. 

When Cruise got to the stage, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Olympian gymnast Simone Biles gave him the Olympic flag. After it was attached to a motorbike, the actor drove out of the stadium to start the flag's journey to America. He was later shown jumping out of a plane and turning the Hollywood sign into the Olympic rings. 

They're not the most extreme stunts of Cruise's career, but perfectly captures his showmanship.

8. Cruise climbed a 2,000-foot cliff in "Mission: Impossible 2."

In the opening scene of 2000's "M: I 2," Cruise is seen climbing a cliff. And yes, that's really him.

Cruise scaled the cliff in Utah with nothing but a safety rope. He also did a 15-foot jump from one cliff to another.

7. Cruise held his breath for six minutes for an underwater stunt in "Mission: Impossible — Rogue Nation."

In one scene, Cruise's Ethan Hunt has to dive into an underwater safe to retrieve the computer chip that will lead him closer to the villain.

Along with having to hold his breath the whole time, he must keep away from a large crane that's circling around the safe.

For the scene, Cruise first jumped off a 120-foot ledge. Then, in a 20-foot deep-water tank, Cruise held his breath for six minutes.

6. Cruise broke his ankle jumping between buildings while making "Mission: Impossible — Fallout."

Tom Cruise loves to run in his movies; it's become his trademark. But his ability to continue running came into question after a stunt went wrong on the set of "Fallout."

While jumping from one building to another, Cruise hit the wall of the building the wrong way and broke his ankle.

The accident halted production for months and doctors told Cruise his running days might be over. But, six weeks later, Cruise was back on set doing sprints.

5. Cruise climbed the tallest building in the world for "Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol."

The Burj Khalifa in Dubai is the tallest building in the world, and Cruise climbed it.

For "Ghost Protocol," the actor's climb got him up to 1,700 feet in the air.

He also fell four stories down by rappelling on the surface of the building.

4. Cruise did 500 skydives and over 13,000 motocross jumps for the thrilling motorcycle stunt in "Mission: Impossible — Dead Reckoning Part 1."

For the latest "M:I" movie, Cruise once again pushed himself.

And one stunt in particular is definitely up there as one of his craziest ideas yet: driving a motorcycle off a cliff.

The star did 500 skydives and over 13,000 motocross jumps to prepare for the stunt. And that wasn't just so Cruise had the skill and comfort to pull off the stunt; the training also made it possible for director Christopher McQuarrie and his crew to map out camera angles to capture it. 

The stunt was then done on the first day of principal photography.

"We know either we will continue with the film or we're not. Let's know day one!" Cruise told "Entertainment Tonight" on why it was done on the first day.

Cruise ended up doing the stunt six times on the day of shooting.

 

3. Cruise hung on the side of a plane as it took off for "Mission: Impossible — Rogue Nation."

Cruise clung to the side of a massive Airbus A400M plane as it took off and went up to 1,000 feet dealing with speeds of 100 knots.

To protect the actor, he was secured with a wire attached to the plane. He also had special contacts on to protect his eyes from debris.

Cruise did this stunt eight times.

2. Cruise navigated between two flying planes in "Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning."

In the climax of "The Final Reckoning," Hunt holds on to a biplane during takeoff, before eventually punching its pilot, throwing him out of the vehicle, and climbing into another plane being flown by the villain, Gabriel (Esai Morales).

The ambitious nature of the scene is what we've come to expect from Cruise, but seeing him cling on for dear life above the valleys of South Africa is nothing short of astounding.

Yes, he was strapped to the two different vehicles during multiple takes to achieve the sequence, but watching it unfold on the big screen is still breathtaking.

1. Cruise did 106 skydives with a broken ankle to pull off the HALO jump in "Mission: Impossible — Fallout."

While Cruise was healing the broken ankle he sustained earlier in the "Fallout" production, he went and pulled off the most amazing stunt he's done in his career so far.

In the movie, Cruise's character and CIA tagalong August Walker (Henry Cavill) decide to do a HALO jump — a high-altitude, low-open skydive, in which you open your parachute at a low altitude after free-falling for a period of time — out of a giant C-17 plane to get into Paris undetected.

Cruise did this for real by executing the jump 106 times over two weeks, many of them done during golden hour, a very brief period of perfect lighting that occurs just before sunset.

• UBS is using AI to create avatar videos from analysts' notes.
• 36 analysts covering a range of sectors are taking part in the Swiss bank's initiative.
• UBS told Business Insider that clients have been seeking more video options.

Banks are using AI to save their analysts' time while giving clients what they want.

Bank of America uses "Banker Assist" to aggregate information to offer insights unique to each client, while Goldman Sachs has a "GS AI Assistant" that functions as an in-house ChatGPT for staff.

Swiss bank UBS has gone further, using AI to generate avatars of analysts that explain their research to clients, and it's planning to do this more.

The Swiss bank started using AI avatars of some analysts in January. About 36 UBS analysts, or 5% of its total, have volunteered to take part. They cover sectors including technology, consumer goods, and energy.

UBS's use of AI avatars was first reported by The Financial Times.

Using OpenAI and Synthesia tools, a script is generated in a matter of seconds that is then edited by staff.

Scott Solomon, head of global research technology at UBS, told Business Insider that his team started creating videos of analysts a decade ago, but capacity restrictions meant they were capped at about 1,000 annually.

Analysts were writing an average of two notes a week but would only go to the video studio once a quarter, he said.

The new tools are "enabling somebody to use a capability in video that they weren't really able to use before," he said.

It also gives clients another way to digest information and meet their rising demand for video, Solomon said.

He compared an avatar to other parts of an analyst's toolkit. "When an analyst joins UBS, we give them Excel, we give them our authoring platform, we give them a CRM [customer relationship management] tool so they can talk to clients. I want them to have an avatar," he said.

Solomon said the next step would be integrating the technology so that a video can eventually be created when an analyst publishes a note — without the need for editing.

He said he hoped this would become possible by the end of the year.

Even if the process was fully automated, UBS said analysts will still assess a video based on their notes before it is sent to clients.

Solomon said that ideally, the avatars would eventually become part of the onboarding process, so that whenever a note is published, there's a video too.

The next step would be integrating this capability directly into the authoring platform.

"We have the script generator, we have the ability to send the script to generate the avatar, and then we obviously have the ability to deliver the avatar to clients," Solomon said.

"We want to string all that together so that as they're writing the note, they can get the video with it as well. Our goal is absolutely not to do 50,000 videos a year, but clearly there's an opportunity to do more videos than we are today."

• Systems engineer Michael Floyd worked at Lockheed Martin for four years.
• Floyd was the breadwinner for his family, but chose to become a stay-at-home dad.
• He and his wife budgeted for the transition and even built a chicken coop to counter egg prices.

This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Michael Floyd, a 36-year-old stay-at-home dad from Ithaca, New York. It's been edited for length and clarity.

When my wife was pregnant with our child, I was the main breadwinner for our family. We were deciding between two options: putting our daughter in childcare or me becoming a stay-at-home dad.

My wife's plan has always been to become a full-time professor at a top university, so we knew she wouldn't be staying home with our daughter. On the other hand, I was working as a systems engineer for Lockheed Martin, with a six-figure salary.

I took three months of parental leave, and after that, my decision was clear. I left my six-figure engineering job to care for our child while my wife focused on her career. Here's how we decided and budgeted for the change.

New York state childcare would've cost us $30,000 a year

While I was at Lockheed Martin, my wife was working a postdoctoral position at Cornell University. We were also making additional income from our Airbnb rental and two full-time rental properties.

We did calculations, and in our city in New York state, childcare would cost about $30,000 annually.

But I didn't officially decide to be a stay-at-home dad until I spent time caring for my daughter during my parental leave. I noticed just how much attention she needs. I don't trust that even the best childcare worker could attend to my daughter to the degree that I would want.

Plus, until my daughter is of the age where she can raise her voice and let me know something's wrong, it's really hard for me to allow a stranger to watch her. I'm sure 99% of workers are amazing, but I don't want to take a chance on the 1%.

I enjoyed my job, but I left to take care of our daughter full time

I found my job to be fun because it felt like solving Sudoku puzzles all day, but it required me to sit at my desk for 10-hour shifts.

Since I hurt my back during my 6-year service in the military, long periods of sitting or standing make it flare up. After four years doing my job, the last two of which were remote, I felt isolated, so I knew I had made the right decision to leave.

I don't have any plans to return to work at the moment, but it's not off the table for the future.

Since I was the main breadwinner, we had to budget for me to stay home

We canceled our housekeeper and our CrossFit memberships. We also switched from Verizon to T-Mobile, which saves us over $100 each month, and removed one of our three vehicles from our insurance.

I've cut down on our grocery bill by adjusting my diet to rely on more plant-based sources of protein like lentils rather than expensive meats. We also switched to cloth diapers, which we estimate will save us up to $2,000 by the time she's potty-trained.

I even built a chicken coop in response to egg price inflation. I converted the old shed in our backyard into a chicken coop. We currently have five chickens, but our coop can hold up to 20, and we spend $60 on chicken feed monthly.

Being a stay-at-home parent is demanding, but worth it

The biggest challenge of being a stay-at-home dad has been how emotional my daughter's crying rants can be. You'd think that you could just put her in a crib and leave and let her cry it out, but you can't.

It's constant work, but that doesn't affect me much. What affects me is that when she's crying, there's not always something I can do. It's an emotionally difficult experience. Sometimes, it'll be 6 p.m. and she's tired of me and the bottle, and she just wants to be comforted by her mother. In those moments, she's completely inconsolable.

But the best part about being a stay-at-home parent is seeing all of her firsts. When she started smiling after one month, it made everything worth it. There's a lifetime of firsts coming, and I can't wait to see all of them.

If you left a high-paying job to be a stay-at-home parent and would like to share your story, please email the editor, Manseen Logan, at [email protected].

• Coworker.ai nabbed $13 million in VC funding from Triatomic Capital, Abstract Ventures, and Eniac.
• Founded by former Uber managers, the startup builds a general-purpose AI teammate for the workplace.
• Business Insider got an exclusive look at the pitch deck Coworker used to raise its seed round.

Your newest work colleague might not be joining you at the water cooler or at the team's next happy hour: AI agents are infiltrating the workplace, and one startup building those — aptly named Coworker — just cleared a big funding round to put "AI teammates" to work.

Jeff Huber, managing director at Triatomic Capital, led Coworker's $13 million seed funding round, which was announced on Tuesday. Ramtin Naimi of Abstract Ventures, Mallun Yen of Operator Collective, Tim Young of Eniac Ventures, and Clark Golestani, Ken Hausman, and Jack Greenfield of K2 Access Fund also participated in the raise.

Based in San Francisco, Coworker bills itself as a general-purpose AI teammate that can research, plan, and execute high-level work just like an experienced colleague can. The startup said its technology, which about 25 companies have been beta testing since late 2024, has been used across engineering, product management, sales marketing, and operations functions.

For example, a Coworker can act as an engineering teammate to write code, create and review pull requests, and automate release notes, keeping human developers focused on shipping new features. It can also act as a sales teammate, analyzing sales calls and generating proposals and follow-up emails.

Coworker uses its own products at work, which gives the startup a leg up in shipping new features and developing the technology, said CEO and cofounder Alex Calder. For example, Coworker's agents do work like drafting product requirement documents based on customer feedback, creating tickets, writing code, and turning that code into sales talking points, he said.

"In the last six months, we've seen our internal team going from 'AI is good at giving me information' to 'AI is good at using that information to do work for me'," Calder told Business Insider. "That's only possible when you give AI really rich context on your company, your goals, and how you do work."

Calder and his cofounder, Coworker chief product officer Bradford Church, are former Uber managers who led the transportation company's shared rides team.

AI agents are generating strong interest from VCs, and there's high demand, especially for agents that take over rote workplace tasks and free up human employees to focus on more creative and high-impact work. In May, ThriveAI, which builds AI agents that act as junior software engineers, announced a $1.2 million pre-seed round, and AI coding agent startup StackAI announced it landed $16 million.

Another general-purpose AI workplace agent, Artisan, announced in April it raised $25 million.

Calder acknowledged that the AI agent market is getting crowded. When it came to getting VCs excited, focusing on customers helped Coworker close the round, he said.

"There are so many jaw-dropping AI demos these days that VCs are totally desensitized to them," he said. "What they really care about is how customers are actually using the product and whether it can solve real problems at scale. I think what worked in our favor is that we were able to show the real impact Coworker is having inside large companies during our fundraise."

Coworker previously raised $3.5 million in pre-seed funding from Soma Capital, Focal VC, Mischief, and Karman Ventures.

Check out the 14-slide presentation Coworker used to raise $13 million in seed funding.

• Google announced 100 updates at I/O, aiming to dominate the AI landscape.
• Google's AI model Gemini will integrate into Chrome, challenging OpenAI's ChatGPT.
• Google's strategy shows ambition but risks a lack of focus amid competition from OpenAI.

Google made literally 100 announcements at I/O this week, a clear sign that the tech giant intends to dominate every aspect of AI, from its overhaul of Search to its latest AI models and wearables tech.

The event was packed and, at times, felt electrifying. Google showed impressive stats about how its AI has taken off. It had plenty of far-out goals, too, like building a universal AI assistant and extended reality glasses that give directions in real time.

I/O also showcased Google's vulnerabilities. Some releases clearly overlapped, while arch-rival OpenAI upstaged Google on Wednesday with a big announcement of its own.

With the conference now over, here are six main takeaways.

Google wants a 'total overhaul' of Search

The biggest change touted at I/O was AI Mode — what CEO Sundar Pichai called a "total overhaul" of Google's most iconic feature. In AI Mode, users will have a far more conversational Search experience, asking Google questions directly about what they're looking for.

That's a marked change from the traditional experience of going through a long list of links to find the right answer, which feels more clunky than ever in an age of AI chatbots.

At the same time, AI features like these could cannibalize Google Search and threaten the tech giant's main cash cow, Google Ads. Google risks not figuring out how to heavily monetize these AI tools. That being said, it's already testing ads in AI Mode.

Gemini everywhere

Google's AI model family, Gemini, took center stage at I/O. Google announced that it will integrate Gemini into Chrome, allowing users to chat with its latest AI models while they browse. (The feature rolls out to subscribers this summer.) It's a shot across the bow to OpenAI's ChatGPT, which already has a popular Chrome extension.

I/O also announced an array of updates to its Gemini app, which recently passed 400 million monthly active users — an impressive figure, though still behind ChatGPT. With an update called Personal Context, Gemini app users can get tailored responses based on personal data from Google services, like asking its AI to find a long-lost email.

It's all part of a long-term plan to build a universal AI assistant: what Google calls Project Astra. While it's still unfinished, that plan feels more fleshed out now than when Business Insider tested Astra a year ago.

Soaring AI traction

New AI features are undeniably cool, though Google's AI traction garnered some of the biggest reactions at Pichai's keynote speech on Tuesday.

Onstage, Pichai boasted that the number of tokens generated by Google across all its platforms a month had exploded 50 times to over 480 trillion since last year.

The crowd gasped—it was a big moment. Last year's I/O felt like a giant teaser for coming AI features, with plenty of promise but little to show for it. This year felt different.

Sergey Brin goes founder mode

There was no greater manifestation of Google tripling down on AI than cofounder Sergey Brin crashing a fireside chat with DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis. That was after Brin wandered around a pavilion trying on a pair of Google's XR glasses.

At the chat, Brin said he goes into the office "pretty much every day now" to work on AI. He also said that retired computer scientists should get back to work to take advantage of the current environment.

Brin has been back at Google since 2023 as the search giant races against AI rivals, and it's obvious he's in "founder mode" — something quite rare at a mature company.

Google's smart glasses are here — sort of

Google let BI briefly try on its prototype Android XR glasses, which have Gemini's AI features and allow users to ask questions. While the tech shows promise, it's still early days. Google staffers asked the throngs of I/O attendees lining up for demos not to ask about price, availability, or battery life.

"We just don't know!" they said.

The prototype glasses feel impressively lightweight — almost too much so, to the point that they felt like they might fall off our faces. The display sits only on the right lens and is practically invisible unless viewed at just the right angle under the right light. It's full-color, but it's small and subtle enough that you might miss the display entirely.

We weren't allowed to view Google Maps or Photos in the glasses like Google showed off in its keynote. Instead, we put on the glasses and walked around a room filled with artwork on the walls and travel catalogs on a table that we could ask Gemini questions about.

While Gemini correctly identified the artwork, it couldn't answer a basic travel query when we looked at the travel catalogs: "What is the cheapest flight to New York next month?" And because the display is only on one side, focusing on it made us feel a bit cross-eyed.

The version we saw isn't the final design. It's missing the coming Warby Parker and Gentle Monster flair, though we did see glimmers of something promising here.

Throwing everything against the wall may or may not work

Google's announcements are undeniably impressive, though some of them felt repetitive. It's hard to understand the difference between Search Live and Gemini Live, for example. Both of them involve chatting with your phone about what it sees through its camera.

Google's strategy of launching literally 100 different things at once could work for the company. It could also signal a lack of focus.

BI was at an I/O panel when the news broke that OpenAI was buying former Apple design chief Jony Ive's hardware startup. Seeing OpenAI upstage Google like that felt a little ominous.

The Google panel BI attended was quite dry and technical, with terms like AI-powered "tool calling" mentioned several times. The contrast with OpenAI's buzzy announcement couldn't be clearer. We even saw several attendees check their phones when the news came out.

Google does have massive advantages in scale and distribution, thanks to Android and Chrome.

Still, it's possible that in the long term, something like an AI-native device that ditches Google's ecosystem altogether eventually takes over.

Investors got a taste of that risk last month, when the stock of Google's parent company, Alphabet, briefly tanked after Apple senior vice president Eddy Cue said search volume was shrinking due to AI.