❌

Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

Eldest daughters tend to be their parents' favorite kids. Here's why it isn't always a good thing.

Two parents sitting with their teenage daughter
A new study found that both mothers and fathers tend to favor daughters and their oldest kids.

Oliver Rossi/Getty Images

  • A new study explored how birth order, gender, and personality traits influence parental favoritism.
  • It found that parents tend to prefer their oldest kids and also daughters.
  • Parents may show preferential treatment toward eldest daughters, who they see as more responsible.

It's a fact of life that parents play favorites, but which children are favored more β€” and why β€” is an ongoing topic of research.

A recent study, published in the journal Psychological Bulletin in January, has shed some light on the matter, in hopes of pointing out how favoritism doesn't end well for anyone involved.

Which child parents are more likely to favor

The Brigham Young University researchers analyzed data from over 19,000 participants in 30 studies and 14 databases across North America and Western Europe.

They examined how birth order, gender, temperament, and personality played a role in favoritism and found that parents primarily tend to favor elder children, agreeable children, and daughters.

The data couldn't explain why this is the case, but the researchers have their theories.

Why parents favor eldest daughters

For example, daughters might be favored over sons because they're easier to parent and have more effortful control β€” the ability to sit still and ignore distractions.

Parents might also grant more autonomy, a measure of favoritism in the study, to older siblings because they are more "developmentally capable" than younger siblings.

Moreover, because eldest daughters may naturally take on more responsibilities and ease household burdens, "parents may naturally invest more in them," Annie Wright, a therapist practicing in California, told Business Insider.

She added that many cultures socialize girls to be "more emotionally expressive, empathetic, and communicative β€” traits that may make them more likable and easier for parents to bond with."

At the same time, the golden child can also wear a heavy crown.

The consequences of being the favorite

Wright is the eldest of six and identifies with eldest-daughter syndrome.

She told BI that there's a "shadow side" to being the favorite, such as people-pleasing and feeling relentless pressure to perform. Over time, it can lead to resentment and tension between siblings, Wright said.

Moreover, eldest daughters like Wright β€” who was given more chores growing up β€” can feel overly responsible for others. This mentality can eventually put them in a position as the caretakers in their families, a role that some lament because they feel like it holds them back.

Despite the societal messaging that women should make their own decisions, "there's still pressure for girls to care for the emotional needs of people in their immediate surroundings," Dr. Michelle Janning, a professor of sociology at Whitman College, told BI.

She added that these two expectations β€” to be great caretakers and to reach their ambitions β€” aren't mutually exclusive. "They are both in existence, but what's not happening maybe is how to manage both of them," she said.

In practice, it can lead to burnout and workaholism. Wright, for example, said she used to work 80-hour weeks while missing time spent with her daughter.

Wright added that eldest daughters, as a result, can also struggle with self-expression and independence later in life.

That said, life isn't too rosy for the less-favored kids, either.

Parents can make small adjustments

The study's authors believe that less-favored kids, like more defiant younger sons, are "at greater risk for maladaptive outcomes" because they receive less support from their parents.

In general, playing favorites isn't good for anyone involved and "negative outcomes happen for all siblings in the family," said Dr. Alexander C. Jensen, an associate professor at BYU and the study's lead researcher,

Parents can do small things to improve the dynamic, Wright said. They can ask themselves if they impose similar rules on their kids or if they provide more emotional attention to one child. And if they sense disparities, it's time to "level things out."

Read the original article on Business Insider

Universities feel ripple effects of DOGE cuts to health

As the battle over Elon Musk's DOGE-directed cuts to federal medical research continues, institutions already are freezing hiring, cutting back on the number of Ph.D. students they'll accept and making other contingencies.

Why it matters: Capping how much the National Institutes of Health covers the schools' overhead costs could lead to billions of dollars in cuts to scientific research funding and widespread economic fallout.


Driving the news: An economic analysis by software company Implan on Tuesday estimates proposed cuts could lead to a loss of $6.1 billion in the nation's gross domestic product, a $4.6 billion reduction in labor income and result in the loss of more than 46,000 jobs nationwide.

  • This includes the direct effects of the research itself, with 17,000 expected job cuts, but also indirect effects through a slowing of business-to-business spending in the R&D supply chain that could support 14,000 more jobs.

What they're saying: "It's not just researchers that are affected. It's not just universities that are affected," said Bjorn Markeson, academic divisional director and economist at Implan.

  • "There's going to be impacts on real estate ... there's going to be impacts on legal services. There's going to be impacts on services to buildings, office, administration."

Between the lines: While federal courts have temporarily frozen plans to slash the rate NIH pays for "indirect costs" and the administration's temporary "pause" on federally funded grants and loans, universities are already feeling real pain.

  • Institutions have also been reporting delays of NIH grant reviews, in what some legal scholars call a "backdoor" approach to freezing funding, Nature reported.

NIH cuts are most immediately hitting graduate education programs.

  • The University of Pennsylvania said it would reduce graduate admissions, pointing in part to the NIH cuts, reported The Daily Pennsylvanian.
  • The University of Pittsburgh, Vanderbilt University and University of Southern California are among institutions that temporarily paused Ph.D. program admissions but have since resumed the process, per Inside Higher Ed.
  • Meanwhile, Columbia's medical school and MIT, among others, have frozen hiring.

Zoom in: Maryland is among the states that could be hit hardest, with potential annual losses exceeding $2 billion due to Johns Hopkins University and its robust research corridor, Terry Clower, director of the Center for Regional Analysis at George Mason University, told Axios.

  • By his calculations, there could be 2,000 to 3,000 jobs eliminated in the state as the result of the new NIH policy on administrative and overhead costs.
  • "Losing 3,000 jobs across the state would not devastate the economy, but it's an add-on effect to everything else that's going on now," Clower said.
  • "Taking into account job losses elsewhere in the federal government ... it's a hard hit to the local economy," he said, noting the Maryland suburbs of D.C. have not seen job growth rebound to their pre-pandemic levels.

The cuts can have outsized impacts within states that receive much less, pointed out officials at Dartmouth College.

  • Dartmouth has about 1,300 employees funded in part by its roughly $97 million in federal NIH grants. Dartmouth Health has another 400 employees whose jobs are funded at least in part by its $18 million in NIH grants.
  • "In New Hampshire, that's a lot of people," said Steven Bernstein, chief research officer of Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center.
  • Officials said they are not discussing layoffs or other changes. But "medium term and longer term, if the research portfolio shrinks, those job opportunities are going to decline," said Dean Madden, vice provost for research at Dartmouth College.

What we're watching: U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley is still considering whether the cut to the funding of indirect costs is unlawful.

The bottom line: The future of research talent and scientific advancements could be at stake with these looming cuts.

  • "It will impact our ability to to train the next generation of scientists, because there will be less funding available to help support students while they're in their studies," Clower said. "There will be knock-on effects in the economy in future years."
  • "What we can't measure is what those losses would mean to discovery of new medications, new drugs, new medical procedures," he said.

Gozem nets $30M to expand vehicle financing, digital banking in Francophone Africa

Since its launch in 2018 as a ride-hailing service in Togo, Gozem has steadily expanded across French-speaking West Africa, integrating a wide range of services as it sought to become a super-app. The company now offers ride-hailing, commerce, vehicle financing, and digital banking across Togo, Benin, Gabon, and Cameroon. Now, in a bid to scale […]

Β© 2024 TechCrunch. All rights reserved. For personal use only.

❌