โŒ

Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

Private equity buys into NFL's Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins

The Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins each have agreed to sell minority ownership stakes to private equity, the first such deals in National Football League history.

Why it matters: The NFL had been the last major U.S. sports league to allow institutional investors to hold stakes in teams, approving new rules back in August.


Zoom in: Ares Management led the Miami deal, while Arctos Partners led the Buffalo deal.

  • Each transaction is for a 10% stake, which is the maximum amount allowed under the NFL's new policy.
  • The Miami Dolphins are majority-owned by real estate developer Stephen Ross, and the Ares investment also includes stakes in Hard Rock Stadium and the Formula 1 Crypto.com Miami Grand Prix. Joining Ares are Brooklyn Nets owner Joe Tsai and investor Oliver Weisberg.
  • The Bills are majority-owned by billionaire businessman Terry Pegula, and Arctos is being joined by a group of individuals that includes former pro athletes Vince Carter, Tracy McGrady and Jozy Altidore.

Catch up quick: Arctos and Ares are two of four private equity groups that were approved to buy ownership stakes.

  • The other two: Sixth Street and a consortium made up of Blackstone, Carlyle, CVC Capital Partners, Dynasty Equity and Ludis, a platform founded by former NFL star Curtis Martin.
  • Other funds will be approved in the coming months, although there is no set timeline.

Elsewhere: The NFL also approved the sale of a minority stake in the Philadelphia Eagles at an $8.3 billion valuation, although private equity would not be involved in that deal, according to CNBC.

DirecTV-Dish deal falls apart

DirecTV terminated its planned acquisition of rival Dish Network on Thursday night following bondholders' rejection of a debt swap that the deal depended upon.

Why it matters: A merger between the two struggling satellite TV providers was seen as essential to the survival of both.


Zoom in: DirecTV informed Dish on Thursday night that it was terminating the deal, an individual familiar with the situation told Axios.

What they're saying: "While we believed a combination of DIRECTV and DISH would have benefitted all stakeholders, we have terminated the transaction because the proposed Exchange Terms were necessary to protect DIRECTV's balance sheet and our operational flexibility," said Bill Morrow, CEO of DIRECTV.

  • "DIRECTV will advance our mission to aggregate, curate, and distribute content tailored to customers' interests by pursuing innovative products and providing customers with additional choice, flexibility, and control. We are well positioned for the future with a strong balance sheet and support from our long-term partner TPG."

Catch up quick: A deal between the longtime satellite TV rivals, which would have seen DirecTV acquire Dish from Echostar, was first announced in September.

  • The deal called for DirecTV to pay a nominal $1 for equity and required Dish's bondholders to swap $9.75 billion of existing debt into roughly $8 billion of new bonds, essentially asking them to take a 20% haircut.
  • An improved offer, which lowered the minimum loss on those bonds by around $70 million, was rejected earlier this week by a group of bondholders, Bloomberg reported earlier this month.
  • DirecTV then informed Dish that the deal would be terminated on Nov. 22 if the two sides weren't able to resolve their impasse.

The big picture: A Dish-DirecTV combination would have formed the country's largest pay-TV company.

  • The combined entity, which also would have included Dish's Sling TV streaming cable bundle, would have had an estimated 20 million subscribers.
  • Both have lost nearly half of their subscriber base since 2013, which is considered the high point of the pay-TV era.

Flashback: This is the second time a DirecTV-Dish merger failed to come to fruition.

  • The two tried to combine in 2002 in a $26 billion deal, but was blocked by regulators in the George W. Bush administration over concerns it would reduce competition.
  • Those same competition concerns likely would not have been a factor this time, given the decline in the satellite TV business.

โŒ