❌

Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

Apple hit with $1.2B lawsuit after killing controversial CSAM-detecting tool

Thousands of victims have sued Apple over its alleged failure to detect and report illegal child pornography, also known as child sex abuse materials (CSAM).

The proposed class action comes after Apple scrapped a controversial CSAM-scanning tool last fall that was supposed to significantly reduce CSAM spreading in its products. Apple defended its decision to kill the tool after dozens of digital rights groups raised concerns that the government could seek to use the functionality to illegally surveil Apple users for other reasons. Apple also was concerned that bad actors could use the functionality to exploit its users and sought to protect innocent users from false content flags.

Child sex abuse survivors suing have accused Apple of using the cybersecurity defense to ignore the tech giant's mandatory CSAM reporting duties. If they win over a jury, Apple could face more than $1.2 billion in penalties. And perhaps most notably for privacy advocates, Apple could also be forced to "identify, remove, and report CSAM on iCloud and implement policies, practices, and procedures to prevent continued dissemination of CSAM or child sex trafficking on Apple devices and services." That could mean a court order to implement the controversial tool or an alternative that meets industry standards for mass-detecting CSAM.

Read full article

Comments

Β© NurPhoto / Contributor | NurPhoto

Apple sued over abandoning CSAM detection for iCloud

Apple is being sued over its decision not to implement a system that would have scanned iCloud photos for child sexual abuse material (CSAM). The lawsuit argues that by not doing more to prevent the spread of this material, it’s forcing victims to relive their trauma, according to The New York Times. The suit describes […]

Β© 2024 TechCrunch. All rights reserved. For personal use only.

An Apple employee is suing, saying the company monitors personal devices and stops staff from talking about pay

People inside an Apple store.
The lawsuit was filed by Amar Bhakta, an Apple employee, who claims the firm unlawfully restrains freedom of speech.

Andrew Harnik via Getty Images

  • A lawsuit says Apple invades the privacy of employees by monitoring personal devices.
  • The lawsuit also claims Apple's policies suppress employee rights and whistleblowing.
  • The suit was filed by an Apple worker who says it barred him from publicly discussing his work.

A lawsuit says Apple illegally limits the freedom of employees by monitoring personal devices andΒ iCloud accountsΒ and prohibiting them from talking about their pay and working conditions.

The complaint was filed on Monday in the California Superior Court in Santa Clara County by Amar Bhakta. The suit says Bhakta has worked for Apple in digital advertising tech and operations since 2020.

"Apple's surveillance policies and practices chill, and thus also unlawfully restrain, employee whistleblowing, competition, freedom of employee movement in the job market, and freedom of speech," the suit says.

It also claims the smartphone maker "actively discourages" using iCloud accounts only for work.

"If you use your personal account on an Apple-managed or Apple-owned iPhone, iPad or computer, any data stored on the device (including emails, photos, video, notes and more), are subject to search by Apple," the lawsuit quotes Apple company policy as saying.

The lawsuit says that Bhakta was barred from discussing his work in podcasts and was asked to delete information about his working conditions from his LinkedIn profile.

Bhakta filed the suit under the Private Attorneys General Act, which authorizes workers to sue on behalf of the State of California for labor violations.

He is being represented by Outten & Golden and Baker, Dolinko & Schwartz.

Outten & Golden is also representing two women suing Apple in a suit saying the company paid more than 12,000 female workers in California less than male colleagues with similar roles.

"All California employees have the right to speak about their wages and working conditions," Jahan Sagafi, a partner at Outten & Golden, said in a press release about Bhakta's case.

"Apple's broad speech suppression policies create a danger of discrimination going unchallenged far too long, which harms all Apple employees and Californians in general," he added.

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

In a statement to Reuters, Apple said the suit's claims lacked merit, adding: "At Apple, we're focused on creating the best products and services in the world and we work to protect the inventions our teams create for customers."

Read the original article on Business Insider
❌