Stop trying to predict and appraise President Trump's tariffs policies based on economic theories or market realities. Tariffs are pure psychology for the president, fused into his brain like no other topic.

Why it matters: Trump's tariff brain is unpredictable to the outside (and to market analysts) but wholly knowable to those who know how his mind works.

• "There'll be trial and error. There'll be pushing the envelope. There'll be all of that Trumpian stuff," said a top adviser involved in trade discussions.

The big picture: Trump approaches tariffs, the remaking of the U.S. economy and the reshaping of global trade as a continuation of his presidential campaign.

• He ignored experts and assembled a team dedicated to executing his will and shrugging off the consequences of his unpredictability. He's not changing now — rocky rollout and chaotic financial markets be damned.
• "Donald Trump works at his own tempo, and he doesn't change the subject until he's sure he's clubbed people into seeing it as he does," the adviser said.

Between the lines: In Trump's first term, free traders such as then-National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn controlled Trump's impulses to impose tariffs the way he has now. Trump's current NEC chief, Kevin Hassett, is pro-tariff.

• So is the rest of the economic team: Vice President Vance, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, Council of Economic Advisers chair Steven Miran, and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

The intrigue: Trump keeps such a huge team of advisers because he invariably solicits conflicting opinions. He often suffers from analysis paralysis and can be particularly influenced by whomever he talks with last.

• Trump also can be unclear on specifics, resulting in contradictory messages from his advisers, each of whom serves as a TV avatar of his tariff brain. Bessent and Lutnick have been criticized for giving mixed messages.
• "We saw it in business with Trump," one adviser said. "He would have these meetings and everyone would agree, and then we would just pray that when he left the office and got on the elevator that the doorman wouldn't share his opinion, because there would be a 50/50 chance [Trump] would suddenly side with the doorman."
• "There are too many people in his ear," the adviser said. "You didn't see this with other presidents. Nixon didn't act as the maître d' of his own supper club, where every millionaire and billionaire who could get to him at dinner could chime in and affect policy."

On political issues, Trump is often more directionally consistent than his critics give him credit for. He's liable to switch up on policy specifics. But the direction is clear: tariffs. The specifics: wide-ranging.

• "It's about several things," his adviser said. "It's about isolating China. It's about making money for the United States Treasury. It's about settling what Donald Trump is believes is a score where, as he says, stupid people allowed countries to take advantage of us and ripping us off."

The backstory: Trump's tariff-based chip-on-the-shoulder "America First" mindset has been part of his political DNA since his first presidential-style campaign visit to New Hampshire in 1987.

• 'We should have these countries that are ripping us off pay off the $200 billion deficit," he told the Portsmouth Chamber of Commerce then.
• Today, the annual deficit is nearly $2 trillion. And the U.S. trade deficit is just over $1 trillion.
• In 1987, Trump's trade obsession was Japan. Today, it's China.

Animating Trump and his team is the belief, his adviser said, that "in its very most basic form, the patient, which is the United States economy, has been very sick. It's been sick for 40 years, and nobody would say so."

• "It took Trump to come in and say, 'Okay, the patient is really sick. It's going to die. So I'm going to put it on life support, and let's all hope and pray and work together to make sure this life support works.' That's really the way we look at it."

Reality check: Trump's mammoth imposition of tariffs and his on-again-off-again implementation of them has shaken the global financial order, caused consumer sentiment to drop, spread recession fears and damaged Trump's poll numbers.

What they're saying: Many traditional economists (and other critics) think Trump's ideas are crazed, and that his advisers are too scared to say it.

• Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, arguably the most powerful voice in the U.S. economy, warned Wednesday that Trump's tariffs will ignite inflation. That led an angry Trump to suggest he might try to fire Powell, who later said the the removal or demotion of top Fed officials was "not permitted under the law."
• Trump's team is "trying to implement a policy that, frankly, no economist believes in," Justin Wolfers, a University of Michigan economist told MSNBC on Tuesday. He criticized Trump's economic team for not giving "the hard advice that he needs."
• One outside adviser to the White House who called himself a '"plan-truster" said there is a plan and "a method to the madness," but that Trump's "grenades-first approach will also be bumpy."

What's next: During the 90-day pause Trump imposed last week on "reciprocal" tariffs, Greer's team and Bessent are working most prominently on negotiating trade deals with other countries.

• For about an hour Wednesday, Lutnick and Bessent negotiated with Japan's trade minister in the White House's Roosevelt room, a source said.
• China's president, Xi Jinping, isn't yet talking to Trump. Xi is touring other countries to present China as a more reliable and stable partner than the U.S.
• Bloomberg reports China wants Trump to show more "respect" and appoint a point person for negotiations.
• "We're looking at a trade war with China," another Trump adviser said. "It's no time for summer soldiers."

Rome - A second round of U.S.-Iran nuclear talks are underway, this time in Rome, with President Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi leading the delegations.

Why it matters: The talks are taking place with debate still raging within the Trump administration — and between the U.S. and Israel — over whether diplomacy or military strikes are more likely to prevent Tehran from obtaining a bomb.

• For now, Trump is holding back the hawks, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and focusing on getting a deal.
• "I want Iran to be great and prosperous and terrific. But they can't have a nuclear weapon. And if they have a nuclear weapon, you'll all be very unhappy because your life will be in great danger," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Friday.

State of play: While the first round last weekend in Oman was focused on setting the tone and format of the talks, U.S. officials say their goal for the second round is to produce a framework for how the negotiations will proceed.

On the scene: The talks started shortly before noon local time at the residence of the Omani ambassador in Rome's quiet diplomatic quarter.

• Dozens of reporters gathered in the narrow street in front of the Omani diplomatic compound. Araghchi arrived first after a short drive from the Iranian embassy, which is located 300 feet down the street.
• Witkoff's motorcade which arrived 30 minutes later, missed the driveway and had to reverse and circle back in the narrow street.
• Oman's Foreign Minister Badr Al-Busaidi is also attending in the role of chief mediator.

Between the lines: The U.S. had requested the venue shift in part because of the long travel time between Washington and Muscat, but the Iranians wanted Oman — one of the few countries with friendly relations with both sides — to remain as mediator.

• Witkoff traveled to Rome after an undisclosed meeting in Paris on Friday — revealed by Axios — with two senior Israeli officials.
• The officials, strategic affairs minister Ron Dermer and Mossad chief David Barnea, slipped into Paris for the low-profile meeting to try to influence the U.S. position ahead of the talks.

Friction point: U.S. officials said their aim is to get a deal that includes the elimination of Iran's uranium enrichment program, but the Iranians made clear that crosses their red line.

What they're saying: Ali Shamkhani, a senior adviser to Iran's supreme leader, laid down Iran's principles for a nuclear deal Saturday on X.

• He stressed the Iranian negotiators have "full authority" to reach a deal based on "seriousness and balance," but that such a deal must include guarantees the U.S. won't walk away again, as Trump did in 2018.
• Shamkhani added that a deal must include the lifting of sanctions imposed on Iran, and absolutely will not include the full dismantling of Iran's nuclear infrastructure. Netanyahu has urged the U.S. to only accept a deal
• He added that during the talks the U.S. must contain Israel and stop threatening to attack Iran. "Iran has come for a balanced agreement, not surrender," he concluded.

Getting hitched could soon get even more expensive.

Why it matters: Engaged couples are bracing for price hikes on flowers, dresses, cakes, invitations and more because of President Trump's roller-coaster tariffs.

• Some say they've already stocked up on foreign wine, champagne or decor made overseas.

The big picture: America imports many of its wedding staples.

• Nearly all clothes and shoes sold here arrive from other countries.
• So do roughly 80% of flowers, most chocolate and vanilla and a lot of booze.

Between the lines: Tariffs stand to push up the $33,000 cost of an average U.S. wedding, according to The Knot, a planning and registry website.

• Going over budget on the big day has long been common.
• Alcohol ($2,800), floral arrangements ($2,700) and a dress ($2,100) represent some of the steepest expenses.

What we're hearing: "Potential clients are demonstrating an unprecedented level of cost-awareness," Ahna Han, a New York City florist who works with The Knot, tells Axios.

• She's seeing suppliers of tools, materials and vases charging at least 10% more, with prices for imported flowers fluctuating.

As brides and grooms-to-be commiserate on social media, they urge others to rush certain purchases and book vendors early.

• "Get those bridesmaid dresses ordered," one user posted in a Reddit community for wedding planning.
• Higher costs for event rentals like furniture and table settings may be passed onto consumers, too.

Reality check: Hits to the wedding industry could have been harder before Trump paused his sweeping tariffs, except on China.

• A base tax of 10% remains in place across the world.

What they're saying: Bridal companies previously urged Trump to exclude wedding gowns and other formal attire from tariff increases.

• "Without immediate consideration, Americans will lose their businesses and their jobs — and families across this country will lose access to affordable celebrations of life's most treasured milestones," leaders at several wedding companies wrote in a petition.

Florists are digging into the fine print. "We do have clauses in our contract that we can go up to 10% if we have to, but I've never had to implement that," Ohio flower shop owner Jen Linehan told WTOL 11 News.

• Domestic flower growers in states like California and Pennsylvania "simply cannot meet the high demand, especially during peak wedding seasons," Jennifer Bernal, a New York-based event pro who works with The Knot, tells Axios.

What we're watching: Elopements up, guest lists down.

• Some couples may trim their wedding plans or delay the party altogether as many worry about their jobs and finances.

The bottom line: Love is priceless. Everything else will cost you.

A former U.S. attorney under former President Biden is running for mayor of Albuquerque, New Mexico, and seeking to oust a fellow Democrat in a city plagued by rising crime and a troubled police department, Axios has learned.

Why it matters: Alexander Uballez follows former U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland as the second former Biden official running for office in New Mexico, and may show how Democrats will campaign after 2024 losses.

The big picture: Uballez will announce Saturday his run against Mayor Tim Keller and other challengers as incumbent mayors in many cities have recently been ousted over crime, homelessness, and allegations of corruption.

• In November, for example, a bid to recall Oakland Mayor Sheng Thao won by a nearly 2-to-1 ratio, and San Francisco Mayor London Breed lost her reelection to Levi Strauss heir Daniel Lurie.
• Mississippi state Sen. John Horhn crushed Jackson, Mississippi Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba in an April 1 Democratic primary, 48% to 17%. Lumumba was indicted in an alleged bribery scheme and has pleaded not guilty as the pair head to a runoff.

State of play: The 39-year-old Uballez, who grew up in California's Bay Area, was one of the youngest U.S. attorneys under Biden.

• Uballez garnered national attention for sparking an investigation into a decades-old DWI corruption scheme inside Albuquerque police that involved officers taking bribes to miss court and getting DWI suspects off.
• He was among the last of Biden's U.S. attorneys that President Trump forced out in February.

Zoom in: Uballez's entry will likely jolt the race in New Mexico's largest city into a closely watched contest nationally

• The election in November is expected to center on rising crime and a police department hit by the DWI scandal and still under a consent decree stemming from excessive force.

A Keller campaign spokesperson did not immediately respond to Axios.

Zoom out: Preliminary numbers show that homicides in Albuquerque increased by 20% from 2020 to 2024, while the nation's largest cities saw a 16% drop during the same period.

• New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham declared a state of emergency in Albuquerque last week, saying that a significant increase in crime there warranted the help of the New Mexico National Guard.

The intrigue: Uballez is the son of a Chinese immigrant mother and East L.A. Chicano music singer/songwriter Max Uballez.

• The younger Uballez was on an advisory committee of U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland and was one of the most high-profile AAPI Latinos in the Biden administration.
• If elected, he'd become the state's second Asian American/Mexican American mayor of a major city.
• Ken Miyagishima, the former mayor of Las Cruces, New Mexico, and one of the longest-serving Asian American mayors in U.S. history, is expected to join the governor's race next month.

The Trump administration's legal battles continued this week following the president's push to control Harvard University and deport hundreds of thousands of people living in the U.S., including a man mistakenly sent to El Salvador.

Here's our recap of major developments:

Trump targets Harvard

The Trump administration continued its campaign against Harvard University on Wednesday, threatening the university's funding, ability to host international students and its tax-exempt status.

• The Trump administration has already cut some $2.2 billion in Harvard grants and $60 million in contracts after the university on Monday refused to cave in to government demands made in the name of fighting antisemitism.
• Trump wrote on Truth Social, "Harvard is a JOKE, teaches Hate and Stupidity, and should no longer receive Federal Funds."
• Both the national and Harvard chapter of the American Association of University Professors sued the Trump administration last Friday, alleging First Amendment violations.

Appeals court rules for mistakenly deported man

The Trump administration must work to bring home a man deported to a notorious Salvadorian prison due to an "administrative error," a federal appeals court said Thursday.

• The administration resisted an earlier court order requiring it to do so, instead continuing to portray Kilmar Armando Ábrego García as dangerous.

Context: The administration has not walked back its earlier admission that Ábrego García, a Salvadorian national living in Maryland legally, was mistakenly deported.

• Still, it contends without evidence, that he is an "MS-13 gang member " and "not a sympathetic figure."
• When Homeland Security publicized a temporary protective order his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, filed against him in 2021, she defended him, saying Thursday the order "is not a justification" for ICE "abducting him."
• Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D) successfully met with Ábrego García Thursday and said at a press conference the next day he had been moved from the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT) to a detention center in El Salvador's Santa Ana.

Go deeper: Supreme Court "perfectly clear" on returning deported Maryland man: Appeals court

Deportations could land government in contempt

A judge warned Wednesday that "probable cause exists" to hold the government in contempt for deporting people the administration has deemed Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador.

• Defying U.S. District Judge James Boasberg's order, the president invoked an 18th-century wartime authority last month to justify deporting some 250 migrants it accused of being members of the Tren de Aragua gang.
• Boasberg called the move "willful disregard" in a memorandum opinion on Wednesday.
• It's far from the only case that brings Trump administration officials before a judge in what many argue has been a presidency fought in court.

Other court actions involving the Trump administration:

• An appeals court denied the Trump administration's attempt to overturn a court decision to block a ban on transgender troops Friday. Go deeper.
• The Supreme Court will hear arguments next month on Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, the court said Thursday. Go deeper.
• A federal agency referred New York Attorney General Letitia James for criminal prosecution Tuesday, alleging mortgage fraud. Go deeper.
• The Justice Department sued Maine on Wednesday for allowing trans athletes in girls' sports. Go deeper.
• A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from revoking a Biden-era migration program for people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela. Go deeper.

Trump and DOGE push ahead with terminations

• Trump fired two of three board members of the National Credit Union Administration on Wednesday. Go deeper.
• He said Thursday that Fed chair Jerome Powell's "termination cannot come fast enough" after Powell criticized the president's tariffs. Go deeper.
• The Trump administration removed Gary Shapley as acting IRS commissioner, multiple outlets reported Friday. Go deeper.
• Trump is expected to announce Friday his administration is revamping "Schedule F," making it easier to cut federal workers. Go deeper.

Trump prioritizes Social Security rule already law

Trump signed a memorandum on Tuesday to curtail alleged Social Security fraud, despite lacking evidence of widespread impropriety.

• White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the memorandum aims to restrict undocumented immigrants from receiving Social Security retirement benefits, which they are already legally barred from doing, Axios' Jason Lalljee writes.

Trump envoy meets in secret with Israeli officials

Two senior Israeli officials held a secret meeting in Paris on Friday with White House envoy Steve Witkoff to discuss the ongoing U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations, sources told Axios' Barak Ravid.

• The meeting, which included strategic affairs minister Ron Dermer and Mossad chief David Barnea, was kept low profile and took place just before the second round of U.S.-Iran nuclear talks scheduled for Saturday in Rome.

Go deeper: Trump envoy quietly met Israeli officials ahead of Iran nuclear talks

Editor's note: This story has been updated to reflect details of Van Hollen's press conference and the latest news on Trump's attempted ban on transgender troops.

Easter eggflation is striking for the third straight year with prices elevated by the ongoing bird flu outbreak.

Why it matters: The sticker shock is leading some consumers to break traditions, like dyeing eggs, and driving them to swap ingredients in holiday meals.

• 49% of consumers say egg prices are changing how they celebrate the holiday, according to a Ziff Davis shopping seasonal survey of 1,144 consumers.

The big picture: The average wholesale price of a dozen eggs was $3.13 Friday, up 2% from $3.08 on April 11, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data.

• This is down more than $5 a dozen from the Feb. 21 national wholesale average of $8.15.
• Retail prices, which typically trail wholesale, are beginning to drift downward but bigger declines are expected after the holiday.
• The USDA report said demand for shell eggs improved ahead of Easter Sunday but was "driven more by holiday family traditions than price."

Zoom in: Easter is traditionally the second-hottest demand period of the year for eggs, and only trails the busy winter holidays, Brian Moscogiuri, a global trade strategist at Eggs Unlimited, previously told Axios.

• Eggs are a big part of Easter traditions and the Jewish holiday of Passover.
• Agricultural Secretary Brooke Rollins warned on March 11 that the Easter season has "the highest price for eggs" and prices could "inch back up."
• This year major retailers opted out of running their annual holiday egg promotions because supplies only recently recovered, the USDA report said.

Egg hunts switch to alternatives like "potato eggs"

The intrigue: Record-high egg prices in 2023 sprouted the idea of a budget-friendly Easter alternative: painting potatoes instead of eggs.

• Potatoes USA, the national marketing and promotion board representing U.S. growers and importers, has been looking to scramble the holiday traditions and has a has a how-to guide on painting the spuds.
• "Kids of all ages love that potatoes offer an easy, fun, and affordable way to get creative," said Kayla Vogel, a senior global marketing manager at Potatoes USA, noting decorating potatoes for Easter "just made sense.

Zoom out: Potatoes that are decorated with safe-for-consumption materials "can be enjoyed as a delicious treat once the artwork is complete," Potatoes USA said.

More from Axios:

• America's favorite Easter candy: Reese's Peanut Butter Eggs
• A daily weight-loss pill could transform GLP-1 boom
• Michaels expands into party space after Party City's exit

The U.S. will shrink its military footprint in Syria over the coming months, bringing troop levels below 1,000.

Why it matters: President Trump tried to pull all American forces from the war-ravaged country during his first term.

• Along with Turkey, Iran and Russia, the U.S. is one of several foreign powers with a foothold in Syria as the country rebuilds after the fall of dictator Bashar al-Assad.

The latest: Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell announced the reduction Friday afternoon, citing "the significant steps we have made toward degrading ISIS' appeal and operational capability regionally and globally."

Zoom in: Three small operating bases in northeast Syria will be shuttered, the New York Times reported Thursday.

Yes, but: There's significant buildup elsewhere in Central Command, which oversees military operations across the greater Middle East.

• Aircraft carriers Carl Vinson and Harry S. Truman are launching warplanes to combat Houthi rebels in Yemen.
• Patriot air defenses were shifted to the region, away from the Indo-Pacific.
• And B-2 bombers were dispatched to Diego Garcia, an island in the Indian Ocean.

By the numbers: The Pentagon in December disclosed there were roughly 2,000 troops in Syria — far more than the widely known 900.

Go deeper: Trump and Biden on Syria: Maybe not so different

Kilmar Armando Ábrego García, mistakenly deported from the U.S., was moved from CECOT to a detention center in Santa Ana, El Salvador, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said on Friday.

The big picture: Ábrego García said he was traumatized at the Salvadoran megaprison.

• "He said he's sad every day," Van Hollen said at a news conference after returning from El Salvador. Ábrego García's wife, mother and brother were present.

Context: Van Hollen met with Ábrego García on Thursday after the senator spent days working to meet with him.

• The Trump administration has confirmed he was mistakenly deported and has defied a Supreme Court order to facilitate his return to the U.S.

Zoom in: Ábrego García said his prison cell at CECOT had about 25 prisoners, and he was not afraid of them.

• He told Van Hollen he was fearful of prisoners in other cell blocks, who taunted him. Most cells were packed with about 100 people, Ábrego García estimated.

State of play: Van Hollen and Ábrego García met at the senator's hotel. The Salvadoran government initially wanted to hold the meeting with the hotel's pools in the background.

• The pair was surrounded by video cameras during the meeting, Van Hollen said.
• "The government of El Salvador is complicit in that illegal scheme," Van Hollen said.
• Initially, Van Hollen's requests to see or speak to Ábrego García, his constituent, were repeatedly denied.
• He decided to drive to CECOT with a lawyer for Ábrego García's wife and mother, but they were stopped by soldiers who said they had orders not to allow him to go further.

Friction point: "Everybody asks those of us who are Democratic senators whether there's any bottom line where Republican senators will say 'enough is enough' and won't simply continue to be rubber stamps for the Trump administration," Van Hollen said.

• "So far, we haven't hit bottom in this case. We have what I believe is an outright defiance of the Supreme Court."
• White House spokesperson Kush Desai said the administration is "happy to dig that grave" for Democrats pushing for Ábrego García's return.

Zoom out: CECOT has become the symbol of President Trump's immigration crackdown, with several Republican lawmakers and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem touring the prison.

• Trump sent hundreds of Venezuelan migrants there with little or no due process.

The big picture: "This case is not just about one man," Van Hollen said on Friday. "It's about protecting the constitutional rights of everybody who resides in the United States of America."

• He said the Trump administration is eliminating the foundational constitutional premise of due order.

Go deeper: Timeline: The case of a Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador

Editor's note: This story has been updated with more details from the press conference and a White House statement.

Several days before President Trump and members of his administration said publicly that they were prepared to wash their hands of Russia-Ukraine diplomacy, Trump ranted in private about his frustrations that the negotiations were going nowhere.

Why it matters: After promising a deal within 24 hours of taking office, then kicking off weeks of negotiations, Trump said Friday that he was about ready to give up. He hasn't set a deadline or said whether he would take any further action beyond walking away.

• If either side continues to block a deal, "we're just going to say, 'You're foolish, you're fools, you're horrible people,' and we're going to just take a pass," Trump said Friday.

Behind the scenes: Trump made his frustrations clear a few days earlier in an impromptu conversation about the ceasefire push with several of his top advisers, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff.

• That's where Trump raised the idea that if a deal isn't reached soon he could simply move on to other foreign policy issues, a U.S. official briefed on the issue said.

Driving the news: By Friday, Trump's rant had turned into a public policy statement.

• Rubio said Trump had decided "he has dedicated a lot of time and energy to this, and there are a lot of things going on in the world right now that we need to be focused on."
• "We need to figure out ... within a matter of days, whether this is doable in the short term.  If it's not, then I think we're just going to move on," Rubio said.
• Later on Friday Rubio held a phone call with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and reiterated that "if a clear path to peace does not emerge soon, the United States will step back from efforts to broker peace," State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said.

Zoom in: Rubio also shared Trump's frustrations with the French, British, German and Ukrainian officials gathered in Paris for a marathon of meetings on Thursday to discuss the path to peace.

• "Rubio was not specific about what such a step would look like but only stressed that the U.S. wants fast progress," one European diplomat told Axios.
• Two European diplomats confirmed Rubio said Trump was losing his patience and might withdraw from the process if a deal wasn't reached soon.

Between the lines: Three European diplomats felt Rubio's comments were mostly aimed at the Ukrainians.

• A source close to the Ukrainian government also said it seemed Rubio's comments were aimed at pressing Ukraine. The source was also concerned that a Trump withdrawal from the negotiations could lead to suspension of U.S. military aid to Ukraine.
• The European diplomats said Rubio didn't speak about increasing the pressure on Russia during the Paris meetings.
• "The impression was that Rubio and Witkoff are under a lot of pressure from Trump and they are channeling it to the other players," a European diplomat said.

Reality check: Ukraine swiftly agreed to Trump's plans for a 30-day ceasefire, but Russia has slow-walked that proposal and argued they are winning on the battlefield and thus have a number of conditions for any peace agreement.

• As a result, it's unlikely the Kremlin would have particular concerns about Trump giving up on diplomacy.

State of play: The U.S. isn't out of the game yet.

• Rubio and Witkoff also presented a framework for a potential peace deal to end the war during Thursday's meetings in Paris, the State Department said.
• Rubio said he's now awaiting the responses from Kyiv and Moscow.

David Hogg's organization gave $100,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee after angering House Democrats with plans to back primary challengers against their older incumbents, Axios has learned.

Why it matters: The donation addresses one of the central complaints of Hogg's detractors, particularly battleground district Democrats — that his efforts will draw resources away from the fight to retake the House.

• Hogg told the New York Times his group, Leaders We Deserve, will spend $20 million going after older House Democrats in solidly blue districts.
• Rep. Hillary Scholten (D-Mich.) previously told Axios: "I can think of a million better things to do with twenty million dollars right now."

Driving the news: Leaders We Deserve made the donation on Thursday, two days after its primary efforts were first reported, a source familiar with the matter told Axios.

• The gift was first reported by Politico, though Hogg disputed the notion that he is "trying to make nice" with House Democratic leaders.
• "This is not me playing nice. It is demonstrating my commitment to winning back the house and making Hakeem Jeffries the Speaker," the 25-year-old Democratic National Committee vice chair posted on X.

Zoom in: Hogg suggested he will continue to go full bore with his efforts to drive out House Democrats' oldest members.

• "We absolutely cannot wait for people to retire at their own leisure or to let them sit there and do nothing while the country is burning," he said in his social media post.
• Leaders We Deserve did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment on the donation.

Zoom out: The DCCC announced Friday that it raised $36.9 million in the first three months of 2025.

• That figure put them narrowly ahead of the National Republican Congressional Committee, which brought in $36.7 million during the same period.

The Trump administration is expected to announce Friday that it would move forward with mass firings of more federal workers under the auspices of a new rule, previously known as "Schedule F."

Why it matters: The plan will allow Trump to gut civil service protections from a large swath of federal workers, paving the way to replace them with loyalists.

The big picture: Beneath the layer of political appointees every president can nominate, the federal government is staffed by large numbers of civil servants in nonpartisan roles that come with protections that shield them from politically-motivated firings.

• During his first term, President Trump issued an executive order known as "Schedule F," which took aim at these protections.
• Even before Trump officially launched his second presidential run, reports abounded that he planned to resurrect Schedule F during his second term.
• During his campaign, Trump vowed to slash the size of the "deep state" federal government and fire "rogue bureaucrats and career politicians."

What is the new rule?

The new rule, dubbed "Schedule Policy/Career," will reclassify many career civil servants as "at will" employees, making them easier to remove from their posts.

• This new rule will impact workers involved in policymaking, two White House officials familiar with the plan told Axios.

Flashback: Weeks ahead of the 2020 election, Trump issued an executive order known as "Schedule F" that would have reclassified tens of thousands of federal workers whose roles involved policy-making functions.

• That new category made it easier to fire federal employees in civil servant positions and career posts who were considered disloyal to the president.
• Former President Biden rescinded the executive order after he took office.

Reinstating Schedule F

Plans for reinstating Schedule F to fire federal workers have been percolating for months.

• On his first day back in office, the Trump issued an executive order essentially reinstating Schedule F.
• In the order, Trump talked about the need to bring accountability to the federal workforce, arguing it is too difficult to fire underperforming workers with their current job protections.
• The Office of Personnel and Management (OPM) issued a memo in January that set deadlines for agencies to determine which workers might be subject to Schedule F reclassification.

Zoom in: Reinstating Schedule F was also a facet of Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, which Trump's allies touted as the administration's agenda.

Who could be impacted?

As many as 50,000 federal workers — about 2% of the federal workforce — could be affected by Schedule F reclassification.

• Reclassified employees would become at-will employees that are significantly easier to terminate.
• The OPM memo gave agencies until April 20 to submit recommendations for which career positions could be subject to reclassification.

Go deeper: How Trump could weaponize "Schedule F" in 2025

The Trump administration on Friday will announce that it's moving ahead with a new rule, previously known as "Schedule F," that will make it easier to remove federal employees it believes are undercutting President Trump's agenda.

Why it matters: By stripping civil service protections from about 50,000 people — roughly 2% of the federal work force — Trump is continuing his far-reaching effort to trim the federal bureaucracy and make it more answerable to him.

• The Office of Personnel Management's new rule — dubbed "Schedule Policy/Career" — will allow many career civil servants to be classified as "at will" employees, making them easier to remove.
• Trump aides argue they need greater flexibility to fire civil servants who are underperforming, engaging in misconduct or undermining Trump's policy plans.

Zoom in: Such civil servants in nonpartisan roles traditionally have had job protections that shielded them from the political whims of whoever was in the White House.

• But Trump and many of his backers have long believed that a "deep state" of Washington bureaucrats was undercutting his agenda.
• Toward the end of his first term, Trump signed an executive order establishing a Schedule F category for federal employees.
• President Biden rescinded the order after he took office, but after taking office again in January, Trump signed a new executive order reinstating and renaming it.

While he was out of office, Trump and his allies laid the groundwork for a new administration stocked with loyalists. Schedule F was a significant part of that plan

• Many of the Trump allies who pushed for Schedule F now have key roles in the administration, including Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Management of Budget Director Russ Vought.
• "They are making decisions and those decisions should be in line with the president's agenda. Unelected career bureaucrats should be held accountable to the agenda Americans vote for," said a White House official.

Between the lines: The new rule will impact workers involved in policymaking, according to two White House officials familiar with the plan.

• About 50,000 people are likely to be reclassified as "at will" employees, according to an OPM estimate.
• Critics have said that Trump's broadly worded executive order could put far more civil servants in jeopardy of losing their jobs.
• Earlier this month, some federal agencies started making recommendations for which positions should be reclassified under the new rule, according to a White House official.

The big picture: The wave of firings expected to be the fallout from the successor to Schedule F comes as the administration, largely through Elon Musk's DOGE team, continues to make huge cuts in government personnel and funding.

• Critics say those cuts have threatened the functioning of the government, set back government health, education and research efforts, and threatened access to crucial programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

The other side: Trump's plans to implement the rule has drawn aggressive pushback from labor groups.

• The American Federation of Government Employees and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) filed a lawsuit against the administration in February, alleging that it overstepped its authority in reversing Biden's regulation protecting civil servants.
• "Schedule F is a shameless attempt to politicize the federal workforce by replacing thousands of dedicated, qualified civil servants with political cronies," AFSCME President Lee Saunders said then.

Two top Israeli officials had an unannounced meeting in Paris on Friday with White House envoy Steve Witkoff to discuss the U.S.-Iran nuclear talks, three Israeli sources familiar with the meeting tell Axios.

Why it matters: Ron Dermer and David Barnea, Israel's strategic affairs minister and the director of the Mossad intelligence agency, slipped into Paris for the low-profile meeting with Witkoff to try to influence the U.S. position ahead of the second round of talks in Rome on Saturday, the officials said.

• Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is concerned the U.S. will reach a deal with Iran that's similar to the one the Obama administration signed in 2015, and President Trump himself abandoned.
• The Israeli Prime Minister's Office and a spokesperson for Witkoff declined to comment.
• Witkoff was in Paris for meetings on Russia and Ukraine before traveling to Rome for the Iran talks.

Between the lines: During those meetings, Witkoff stressed that the Trump administration's goal on Iran is to resolve the nuclear crisis with through diplomatic means and ensure Iran will no longer enrich uranium.

• Netanyahu and other hawks want a deal to eliminate Iran's nuclear program entirely — or else a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities.
• Trump, who initially set a two-month deadline for the negotiations, said on Thursday that he is in no rush to move forward with a military strike because he believes Iran "wants to talk."

The other side: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, Witkoff's counterpart in the talks, will arrive in Rome on Friday after a visit to Moscow, during which he met with President Vladimir Putin and discussed the negotiations with the U.S.

• Although Russia is not directly involved in the talks, the Iranians are seeking Russian support, including potentially to press their case with Trump. "We hope Russia will play a role in a possible deal," Araghchi said Friday.
• Araghchi added that the U.S. showed seriousness in the first round of talks, but said Iran hears "conflicting messages" from the U.S. in public and in private. "What's said at the negotiating table is what matters," he stressed.
• Araghchi added that a deal can be reached if the U.S. doesn't present "unrealistic demands." One of those demands, Araghchi said, was that Iran completely halt uranium enrichment.

What to watch: The second round of talks on Saturday will be held at the Omani embassy in Rome. They are expected to start around 5am ET and last at least five hours.

• The U.S. wants the second round of talks to end with a framework for the next steps in the negotiations.

Go deeper: Trump team's stark Iran divide

Democratic National Committee vice chair David Hogg's plan to spend $20 million to primary older Democratic incumbents in Congress has sparked intense anger from some lawmakers.

Why it matters: House Democrats told Axios that, while Hogg is not targeting battleground-district members, they believe he will divert attention and resources away from their races and the fight to retake the House.

• "What a disappointment from leadership. I can think of a million better things to do with twenty million dollars right now," swing-district Rep. Hillary Scholten (D-Mich.) told Axios.
• "Fighting Democrats might get likes online, but it's not what restores majorities," she added.
• Another vulnerable House Democrat, speaking on the condition of anonymity to offer candid thoughts about a top party official, called the plan "very counterproductive and counterintuitive" and said "it would sure be nice to have some of that financial support."

State of play: Hogg told the New York Times that his outside group, Leaders We Deserve, will spend $20 million to elect younger primary challengers to older incumbents in safely Democratic districts.

• The 25-year-old gun control activist described a "culture of seniority politics" that has made the Democratic Party less effective.
• He also attempted to front-run some of the criticism he said he expected to face, predicting a "a smear campaign against me" that would aim to "destroy my reputation and try to force me to stop doing this."
• Axios did not receive a response to a request for comment to Leaders We Deserve.

What we're hearing: Democrats' anger boiled over in private this week, with several venting that Hogg is putting his own interests above those of the party.

• "I think this is a mistake," said a second House Democrat who spoke anonymously. "Now, are people pissed? ... I don't know a single person who is happy about it."
• A third told Axios it "seems inappropriate for a DNC vice chair to threaten sitting Dems."
• A fourth said they are "totally dumbfounded" that "instead of focusing on [winning], we're focusing inward in a circular firing squad."

Yes, but: Some lawmakers, particularly progressives, are defending his plan, arguing that the party needs an effective core in order to appeal to voters.

• "He makes some good points. We do have some ranking members who should step aside," said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.),
• McGovern, the ranking member of the House Rules Committee, added that Democrats also "have some long term members who are terrific."
• A fifth House Democrat who spoke anonymously said Democrats "should have the most effective members right now. Competition is not a bad thing," though they argued age shouldn't be the only criteria.

Between the lines: Hogg's efforts touch on a sore spot for congressional Democrats.

• The party engaged in a three-week fight in 2024 over President Biden's candidacy that ended with the then-81-year-old dropping off the ticket.
• Democrats' generational divide poured into the post-election period with the ousters of several of their septuagenarian House committee leaders.
• Now congressional Democrats are bracing for a deluge of primary challenges from younger insurgents who say older and more established incumbents aren't effective foils to President Trump.

Zoom in: Some lawmakers also argued that Hogg's efforts could have a less-than-devastating effect, depending on who he targets.

• "Money matters," said Rep. George Latimer (D-N.Y.), who defeated former Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) in an expensive primary last year.
• But, he added, "A representative who is active locally, knows their people, is accessible and energetic, is far less vulnerable to the 'we need change' argument generated from a source outside that local area."
• Several lawmakers also told Axios that some targeted incumbents are expected to retire anyway: "That's gonna happen naturally," said one.

What to watch: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), in keeping with his longstanding policy, is standing behind his incumbents.

• "Leader Jeffries will continue to strongly support all of his colleagues in the House Democratic Caucus, while working to flip the majority by defeating Republican incumbents in Congress," said spokesperson Justin Chermol.

The Trump administration's informal end-of-April deadline for Russia to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine is drawing near without any commitments from the Kremlin.

Why it matters: U.S.-Russia talks have shown little clear progress and President Trump's promise of a swift peace deal appears nowhere near fruition. Still, he insisted Thursday that a ceasefire was getting closer and that he'd be "hearing from Russia this week."

Driving the news: Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Friday that Trump was prepared to abandon peace talks altogether within a "matter of days."

• "We're not going to continue to fly all over the world and do meeting after meeting after meeting if no progress is being made," Rubio said.
• He did not blame either side or say whether the U.S. would impose any costs before walking away.
• In response, the Kremlin argued that progress had already been made but said no further contacts with the U.S. were planned for this week.

Behind the scenes: White House envoy Steve Witkoff met Russian President Vladimir Putin for more than four hours last Friday in St. Petersburg.

• Witkoff said he emerged with a clearer idea of Putin's demands for a peace settlement.
• But he didn't get Putin's approval for a 30-day ceasefire plan Trump has been pushing for six weeks as a first step toward longer-term peace, and which Ukraine has signed off on.

State of play: Rubio spoke on Thursday with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov and stressed Russia needs to commit to the U.S. ceasefire framework.

• U.S. officials have described the end of April as an informal deadline, after which Russia could face fresh sanctions.
• But while Putin launched the war and is the biggest barrier to a ceasefire, Trump continues to put much of the blame on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
• "You don't start a war with someone 20 times your size and then hope people give you some missiles," Trump said of Zelensky earlier this week.

Split screen: Rubio, Witkoff and Trump's Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg held a marathon of meetings in Paris on Thursday with French President Emanuel Macron and senior officials from Ukraine, Germany and the U.K.

• "It was the first peace negotiation meeting on Ukraine that brings all together Europeans, Americans, and Ukrainians around the table," a French official said.
• The French official said the discussions focused on plans for a comprehensive ceasefire, including on the front line, and also on the parameters for a deal that could end the war.
• "The participants expressed support to President Trump's objective to put a swift end to the war and agreed on the need of a ceasefire as quickly as possible," the official said.

The other side: When Rubio called Lavrov after the meeting, the Russian foreign minister said Moscow was ready to work with the U.S. "with the aim of reliably eliminating the root causes of the Ukrainian crisis," according to Moscow's readout.

• The statement didn't mention a ceasefire.

The big picture: Another round of talks between U.S., European and Ukrainian officials is expected to take place next week in London.

• A European official said these talks represent a positive shift in the way the U.S. has been willing to discuss the Ukraine-Russia issue with its European allies.
• A European official said the talks represent a positive shift in the Trump administration's dealings with its European allies over Ukraine, and that the gathering in Paris was the first substantive discussion of the issue between the sides.

What to watch: While the ceasefire efforts are still stuck, Trump said the U.S. and Ukraine will sign a long-awaited minerals deal next Thursday.

This story was updated with Rubio's comments and the Kremlin response.

In his first 100 days, President Trump has declared more national emergencies — more creatively and more aggressively — than any president in modern American history.

Why it matters: Powers originally crafted to give the president flexibility in rare moments of crisis now form the backbone of Trump's agenda, enabling him to steamroll Congress and govern by unilateral decree through his first three months in office.

• So far, Trump has invoked national emergencies to impose the largest tariffs in a century, accelerate energy and mineral production, and militarize federal lands at the southern border.
• Paired with his assault on the judiciary, legal scholars fear Trump is exploiting loosely written statutes to try to upend the constitutional balance of power.

How it works: The president can declare a national emergency at any time, for almost any reason, without needing to prove a specific threat or get approval from Congress.

• The National Emergencies Act of 1976, which unlocks more than 120 special statutory powers, originally included a "legislative veto" that gave Congress the ability to terminate an emergency with a simple majority vote.
• But in 1983, the Supreme Court ruled that legislative vetoes are unconstitutional — effectively stripping Congress of its original check, and making it far harder to rein in a president's emergency declarations.

The big picture: Since then, presidents have largely relied on "norms" and "self-restraint" to avoid abusing emergency powers for non-crises, says Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Brennan Center's Liberty and National Security Program.

• That precedent was broken in 2019, Goitein argues, when Trump declared a national emergency in order to bypass Congress and access billions of dollars in funding for a border wall.
• President Biden stretched his authority as well, drawing criticism in 2022 for citing the COVID-19 national emergency to unilaterally forgive student loan debt.
• But Trump's second-term actions have plunged the U.S. firmly into uncharted territory — redrawing the limits of executive power in real time, and fueling fears of a permanent emergency state.

Zoom in: Trump's justification for his tariffs cites the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which can be invoked only if the U.S. faces an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to its national security, foreign policy, or economy.

• According to the White House, America's decades-old trading relationships — including with tiny countries and uninhabited islands — qualify as such threats.
• As a result, a 1977 law originally designed to target hostile foreign powers — and never before used to impose tariffs — is now being deployed to rewrite the global economic order.

What they're saying: "Troubling times call for serious responses. The previous administration left President Trump a nation in decline — financially vulnerable, with unsecured borders and dangerously unfair trade deals. The President is leveraging every tool the Constitution provides to Make America Great Again," White House spokesman Harrison Fields said in a statement.

Between the lines: Trump's affinity for extraordinary powers extends beyond just the National Emergencies Act.

• He has invoked the wartime Alien Enemies Act of 1798, for example, to deport Venezuelan migrants who his administration claims are participating in an "invasion" of the United States.
• The ACLU recently raised alarms over Trump's flirtation with the Insurrection Act of 1807, which would allow him to deploy National Guard troops on domestic soil without state consent.
• "You would hope to see authorities like these used sparingly and reluctantly, as the last resort in an actual crisis situation, because they are a real departure from the constitutional norm," Goitein told Axios.

The bottom line: Trump campaigned on "saving America" — framing his return to power as an urgent, existential mission. Now that he's back in Washington, the sirens never stop.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said Thursday he'll sue the Trump administration over the reported DOGE-driven dismantling of the AmeriCorps service program.

The big picture: This is Newsom's second lawsuit announcement against the administration this week after saying Wednesday that he'd sue over President Trump's sweeping global tariffs.

Driving the news: AmeriCorps placed most of its federal staff on paid administrative leave Wednesday, per America's Service Commissions (ASC), a nonprofit representing state service commissions, and multiple news reports.

• The agency's National Civilian Community Corps, which oversees volunteerism and service work, told volunteers Tuesday they'd leave the program early "due to programmatic circumstances beyond your control," per AP, which cited an email it obtained.
• The Golden State "will both challenge the illegal action in court and accelerate recruitment for the California Service Corps program — already the largest service corps in the nation, surpassing the size of the Peace Corps," per a statement from the state governor's office.
• The statement noted that "AmeriCorps members were on the ground, distributing supplies and supporting families" during the climate change- related wildfires that devastated much of Los Angeles earlier this year.

By the numbers: Some 2,200 18- to 26-year-olds serve for 10-11 months on projects with FEMA, nonprofits, the U.S. Forest Service or community groups, per the agency's site.

What they're saying: "We've gone from the New Deal, the New Frontier, and the Great Society to a federal government that gives the middle finger to volunteers serving their fellow Americans," Newsom said in a statement Thursday. "We will sue to stop this."

• Newsom's chief service officer Josh Fryday said in a statement the actions of DOGE, which the world's richest person Elon Musk is the face of, "aren't about making government work better — it's about making communities weaker."

The other side: "A White House official said the Trump administration questioned using taxpayer money for the program," per AP.

• Representatives for the White House and AmeriCorps did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment in the evening.

Go deeper: AmeriCorps pledges aid to tribal-led climate solutions

Virginia's bare-breasted state flag, and a lesson about the Commonwealth of Virginia, has been banned for some students in a Texas school district.

The big picture: Lamar CISD, a school district around 30 minutes from Houston, last fall removed a section about Virginia from its online learning platform used by 3rd-5th graders, Texas Freedom to Read Project co-director Anne Russey tells Axios.

• The reason: The bare breast on Virginia's flag, a picture of which was included in the lesson, violated the district's recently adopted ban on any "visual depictions or illustrations of frontal nudity" in elementary school library material.
• That's according to what the Lamar district confirmed to Russey in a Freedom of Information Act request.

The district did not respond to Axios' request for more information.

Zoom out: The Texas district, like some in Virginia, uses the educational website PebbleGo Next as one of its online learning platforms for elementary-age students, per the district's website.

• PebbleGo's lesson about Virginia does, in fact, include an image of the state's flag, as well as a picture of the state seal, which also shows the breast.
• The lesson notes that the state's seal and flag depict the Roman goddess Virtus standing over a "defeated tyrant," along with the state's motto, "Sic semper tyrannis."
• That motto, the lesson tells students, means "Thus Always to Tyrants."

Google wants employees to focus on their work and not fret about the company's loss of "parts of" its online advertising monopoly case, it said in a memo to employees Thursday.

Why it matters: The court's ruling, which Google said it would appeal, could fundamentally reshape the giant's advertising business, depending on the remedies, or penalties, the judge determines.

• Advertising represents the vast majority of Google's revenue. It fuels the company's ability to invest in new technologies, like AI and cloud servers.

Zoom in: In a note to staff, Google VP of regulatory affairs Lee-Anne Mulholland said it's important for employees to"continue to focus on our users and customers by building amazing products that help people around the world."

• Google, she noted, plans to appeal the ruling, arguing it "incorrectly suggests a company like ours has a legal obligation to do business with competitors."
• "This is contrary to past Supreme Court decisions," she asserted.

Between the lines: Mulholland also sought to clarify the outcome of the case by noting that the court delivered a mixed ruling.

• "It rejected key parts of the DOJ's case," she said. "The court found our advertiser tools don't harm competition and our acquisitions of DoubleClick and AdMeld were not anticompetitive. But it agreed with the DOJ's claims about one of our publisher tools. In other words, we won half, lost the other half."

Go deeper: Here's the full text of Google's memo:

Today, a U.S. district court issued a mixed decision in our advertising technology case with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). We asked Lee-Anne Mulholland, VP of Regulatory Affairs, for her thoughts.

Give us an overview of the court's decision today. The court delivered a mixed ruling in the DOJ's lawsuit focused on some of our ad tech. It rejected key parts of the DOJ's case: The court found our advertiser tools don't harm competition and our acquisitions of DoubleClick and AdMeld were not anticompetitive. But it agreed with the DOJ's claims about one of our publisher tools. In other words, we won half, lost the other half.

For those unfamiliar, what's the focus of this case? This case is focused on the tools we provide to advertisers and publishers for third-party display advertising on the web. While these tools are valuable for those customers, they represent a narrow part of our advertising business — separate from Search and YouTube ads. Specifically, it looked at whether some of our advertising technology — tools that connect advertisers (like retailers) and ad sellers (typically website owners) — violated antitrust law; as well as whether our acquisitions in this space were anticompetitive.

What are the next steps? On this case, there is a ways to go; this is definitely not the final word. We will next go to trial to decide the remedies in this case, and then we will appeal the decision. We believe we're strongly positioned to appeal based on established Supreme Court precedent, the facts of our case, and the findings of the court today:

• The ruling doesn't align with how the Supreme Court has previously viewed multi-sided markets like ours, which involve advertisers, publishers, platforms, and users.
• The ruling incorrectly suggests a company like ours has a legal obligation to do business with competitors. This is contrary to past Supreme Court decisions.
• The court recognized that our advertising tools operate in a competitive market, alongside major players in social media and beyond.
• The ruling found that our acquisitions in this space (DoubleClick and Admeld) did not harm competition.
• Publishers have tons of options and they choose Google because our tools are simple, affordable, and effective.

Is there anything else you want Googlers to know? There's been a lot of interest by regulators in our ad tech products around the world for many, many years so this scrutiny isn't new! We've long invested in ad tech because it goes back to our mission of making information universally accessible and useful. Ad tech helps online publishers, content creators, and bloggers make money—which in turn keeps the internet free and open to use for all of us.

We're deeply committed to providing solutions to a wide array of publishers and advertisers in a highly competitive sector. The Regulatory Affairs team will keep working to challenge this case through the appeals process. It's important for Googlers to continue to focus on our users and customers by building amazing products that help people around the world.

Former top Pentagon spokesperson John Ullyot "was asked to resign," a Defense Department official said in an emailed statement on Thursday evening.

Why it matters: Despite this announcement, Ullyot maintains he offered his resignation, telling Axios late Thursday that "DoD officials who hide behind anonymous statements clearly resent that they did not have the access or relationship to Secretary [Pete] Hegseth that I enjoyed under President Trump's leadership."

• He added in his emailed statement: "Their sour-grapes anonymous spin is as inaccurate as it is laughable." Representatives for the Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment in the evening on Ullyot's statement.
• Ullyot's resignation comes during a staffing overhaul at the Pentagon that saw three politically appointed senior aides to Hegseth placed on administrative leave amidst an investigation into Defense Department leaks.

The big picture: Politico first reported on Wednesday that Ullyot would leave the Pentagon on Friday and AP first reported on Thursday's announcement and the former Pentagon press secretary's denial that he was asked to resign.

• Ullyot oversaw responses to outrage at the Defense Department's removal — and subsequent restoration — of webpages related to baseball and civil rights legend Jackie Robinson and the Navajo Code Talkers as part of a Trump administration crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).
• The Marine veteran also held senior roles in the first Trump administration and served in a top communications role during the president's 2016 campaign.

Read former top Pentagon spokesperson John Ullyot's resignation letter that he shared with AP, via DocumentCloud:

Editor's note: This article has been updated with comment from former Pentagon press secretary John Ullyot and further context.