Reading view
Tourists Hike for Miles to See View, Can't Believe What They Find at the Top
Kamala Harris' Neighborhood Under Threat as Los Angeles Fire Shifts
Anthony Santander Predicted to Land $110 Million Deal With AL Contender
Slugger Pete Alonso Predicted to Sign $140 Million Deal With NL Contender
Student Loan Debt: Supreme Court to Review Policy that Forgave $17 Billion
Palisades Fire Map Latest: Major Flare-Up Forces New Evacuations
Mark Zuckerberg says AI could soon do the work of Meta's midlevel engineers
- Mark Zuckerberg said Meta will start automating the work of midlevel software engineers this year.
- Meta may eventually outsource all coding on its apps to AI.
- Meta also plans to replace fact-checkers with community notes and reduce DEI initiatives.
This year coding might go from one of the most sought-after skills on the job market to one that can be fully automated.
Mark Zuckerberg said that Meta and some of the biggest companies in the tech industry are already working toward this on an episode of the Joe Rogan Experience on Friday.
"Probably in 2025, we at Meta, as well as the other companies that are basically working on this, are going to have an AI that can effectively be a sort of midlevel engineer that you have at your company that can write code."
It may initially be an expensive endeavor, but Zuckerberg said Meta will reach the point where all of the code in its apps and the AI it generates will also be done by AI. According to a salary tracking site, midlevel software engineers at the company now earn close to mid-six figures in total compensation.
Zuckerberg's interview with Rogan came after a big week of changes for the company.
On Tuesday, Zuckerberg announced that Meta plans to replace third-party fact-checkers with community notes, similar to Elon Musk's X, and bring back more political content. The announcement has elicited alarm from dozens of fact-checking groups, who signed an open letter to Zuckerberg saying the changes would be "a step backward" for the company.
Meta is also planning to roll back several of its DEI initiatives. In a memo sent to staff on Meta's internal communications platform, Workplace, its vice president of human resources, Janelle Gale, wrote, "We will no longer have a team focused on DEI."
Deion Sanders Has 'Strong Interest' in Raiders Head Coach Position: Report
Amy Robach Calls Out David Muir Over 'Clothespin' Controversy: 'It's a Slap in the Face'
Brooke Shields says a doctor once gave her vaginal rejuvenation without her consent: 'I was horrified'
- Brooke Shields said a doctor once gave her a "bonus" vaginal rejuvenation without her consent.
- She wrote about the experience in her new book, "Brooke Shields is Not Allowed to Get Old."
- "This man surgically altered my body without my consent," she wrote.
Brooke Shields has said that a surgeon once performed a vaginal rejuvenation procedure on her without her consent.
In an excerpt published by People from her forthcoming autobiography, "Brooke Shields Is Not Allowed to Get Old," the model and actor said that she elected to undergo a labia reduction surgery eight years after the birth of her youngest daughter.
But she said that following the procedure, the male doctor who had performed the surgery told her he had thrown in a "bonus" rejuvenation, also known as vaginal tightening.
"I was horrified, but also at a loss," Shields wrote. "I didn't want to sue this man β or maybe I did want to, but I didn't feel I could β because I didn't particularly want talk of my lady parts, once again, on the front page of every paper."
Shields, 59, said that it was on the advice of her female gynecologist that she had decided to have the surgery, as she had been experiencing discomfort and pain since high school.
But Shields said that when she woke up from the operation, the surgeon told her that he had gone further: "I was in there for four hours, and you know what I did? I tightened you up a little bit! Gave you a little rejuvenation!"
"He acted as if he'd done me a favor," she wrote. "But I had never asked to be 'tightened' or 'rejuvenated' (translation: given a younger vagina). I felt numb."
"This man surgically altered my body without my consent," she continued. "The sheer gall of it enraged me. The fact that the most intimate parts of my body had been a public focal point for so long ... it was enough already."
Shields has spoken candidly in recent years about her experience of being sexualized and objectified from a young age following her breakout performance playing a child prostitute in the film "Pretty Baby" at age 11. Her 2023 documentary of the same name explored the media's treatment of her throughout her career.
Shields said that while she was outraged by her treatment during the procedure, she "never took action against this doctor" or spoke to him about it, as she questioned herself and wondered "if he was right" that she should feel lucky.
Shields also said that it took her a while to discuss what had happened with her husband, Chris Henchy, adding that "he was nearly as angry as I was."
"Had I been happy with the results of the procedure, I still would have been angry that he did it without my consent. But as it turns out, I wasn't happy with the results, and haven't been since," she went on.
Shields added that while she was "embarrassed" to share her story, she felt it was important to "bring up the uncomfortable but very real issues" if people were to change the way they approach the topic of women's health.
"Shame is no longer an option," she wrote.
YouTuber David Dobrik Looks Totally Different in Before and After Weight Loss Photos
Pro Wrestling Veteran Says WWE Needs to Fire Triple H Over Vince McMahon Connection
Browns Predicted to Make Major Draft Swing by Skipping Quarterback in First Round
Yankees Predicted To Trade $37 Million Pitcher To Mets For Dream Infielder
Surprising NL Contender Listed 'Favorites' To Land $33 Million Phillies Star
Ukraine Captures First North Korean Soldiers Alive
Yankees Could Trade For Top Prospect To Replace $15 Million Gleyber Torres
Tesla's easy money from clean car credits at risk under Trump
Tesla has pocketed $11 billion from the sale of regulatory credits to rival automakers needing help to hit tough emissions targets βΒ easy money that could dry up if President-elect Trump rolls back Biden-era regulations.
Why it matters: Tesla's billionaire CEO, Elon Musk, is spearheading Trump's effort to cut government red tape.
- In this case, reversing Biden's environmental policy would significantly hurt his own company's bottom line.
Follow the money: In the nine months through September 2024, 43% of Tesla's $4.8 billion in net income came from selling regulatory credits to other carmakers.
- Since 2012, 34% of Tesla's total $32 billion in profits have come from such credit sales.
Where it stands: Absent a change in policy, that revenue stream is likely to soar in coming years as legacy carmakers scramble to buy emissions credits from Tesla, which generates such credits with every vehicle it produces.
- But if those credit revenues disappear, Tesla β facing falling vehicle sales β would see its profit margin lag that of GM.
The big picture: Transportation is the leading source of climate-changing carbon emissions. The Environmental Protection Agency under President Biden has enacted ever-stricter limits on tailpipe emissions.
- Starting with the 2023 model year, automakers' fleet-wide emissions must decrease an average of 8% a year through 2026, compared with a typical 2% annual improvement in the past.
- The rules get even more stringent starting with the 2027 model year. From that point on, fleet-wide emissions must fall by about 11% per year through 2032.
Between the lines: While selling hybrid vehicles and more efficient gas cars and trucks certainly helps, lots more EVs are essential to hitting such targets.
- The EPA estimates that compliance would mean 56 percent of new cars sold will be electric by 2032.
The other side: Trump claims Biden's policies are akin to an "EV mandate" and has said he'd relax EPA standards, as he did during his first term.
Friction point: In the meantime, EV sales aren't increasing as fast as expected, which means carmakers face substantial penalties for noncompliance.
- One way to avoid such fines is to purchase tradeable emissions credits from companies that have exceeded the standards by selling lots of electric cars,Β primarily Tesla.
- As long as EPA standards keep rising and EV sales lag, demand for credits will increase, driving up the costs of compliance for most automakers β and fattening Tesla's coffers.
State of play: It's already happening.
- In 2023, the first model year that Biden's higher standards went into effect, Tesla sold $1.8 billion worth of credits, including 34 million federal greenhouse gas credits, to other automakers.
- Through the first nine months of 2024, it's already taken in $2.1 billion in credit revenue, with year-end figures expected Jan. 29.
- Tesla said the 53% increase over the prior nine months was "driven by demand for credits in North America as other automobile manufacturers scale back on their battery electric vehicle plans."
Zoom in: Ford Motor is among the companies trying to scoop up emissions credits to ensure compliance while it reins in its EV plans in favor of more hybrids and plug-in hybrids.
- Ford disclosed in July that it had contracts to purchase about $3.8 billion of regulatory compliance credits for use in North America and Europe for current and future model years, including $100 million it spent during the second quarter of 2024.
- In October, Tesla said it has long-term contracts to sell $4.7 billion of credits, including $683 million in sales expected in the next 12 months.
Of note: Credits are also traded to comply with other state and federal regulations, including California's zero-emission vehicle program.
- In Europe, Tesla could collect more than $1 billion in compensation from Stellantis, Toyota, Ford, Subaru and Mazda, which are pooling emissions with Tesla to avoid big fines, according to UBS analysts.
The intrigue: No company wants to pay a competitor for help complying with the law, but for most automakers, purchasing regulatory credits β just like buying steel or rubber β is now a cost of doing business.
- There is no central marketplace. Instead, credit transactions are handled privately between firms, sometimes under long-term contracts.
How it works: The EPA sets an increasingly-stringent emissions standard, measured in grams of carbon dioxide per mile, for each manufacturer's car and truck fleet.
- The permitted level of emissions is a sales-weighted target based on the average "footprint" (the area between the four tires) of the vehicles each automaker produces. The larger the footprint, the greater the emissions any given vehicle is allowed to produce.
If a carmaker's fleet-wide performance comes in below the EPA limit, they earn credits for that model year. If it is above the limit, they generate a deficit.
- Manufacturers have lots of flexibility to comply, including banking credits from year to year or trading with other companies.
Between the lines: EVs, plug-in hybrids and other alternative-fuel vehicles are incentivized with credit "multipliers," which is why Tesla, a pure EV manufacturer, earns the most credits every year.
- Other EV makers, including Rivian and Lucid, as well as hybrid leaders such as Honda and Toyota, also earn extra credits but nowhere near as many as Tesla.
- The perennial biggest seller of credits is Tesla. The biggest buyer has often been Stellantis, maker of Ram pickups and Jeep SUVs, which is starting to add hybrid and electric powertrains.
The bottom line: Trading emissions credits is big money, and Tesla is the clear winner, as long as Trump doesn't pull the rug out from under his First Buddy.