A top advisor to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was escorted out of the Pentagon on Tuesday and placed on administrative leave, according to a Defense Department official.
Reuters first reported Caldwell had been placed on leave for an "unauthorized disclosure" of information amid an investigation into Pentagon leaks. An official confirmed to Fox News Digital that Reuters' reporting is accurate but declined to comment on an ongoing investigation.
Caldwell, who formerly worked at restraint-minded think tank Defense Priorities and Concerned Veterans for America, a group formerly led by Hegseth. A foreign policy realist, he has argued that the U.S. should dramatically reduce its footprint in Europe and pull out forces in Iraq and Syria.
Last month the Defense Department announced a probe into "recent unauthorized disclosures of national security information" and said it planned to use polygraphs to determine the source of leaks.
"The use of polygraphs in the execution of this investigation will be in accordance with applicable law and policy," DOD Chief of Staff Joe Kasper wrote in a memo. "This investigation will commence immediately and culminate in a report to the Secretary of Defense."
He wrote that "information identifying a party responsible for an unauthorized disclosure" would be referred for criminal prosecution."
Caldwell did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
Former New York Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo was denied nearly $3 million in publicly matched campaign funds by New York City's campaign finance regulators on Tuesday.
The denial of $2.5 million in publicly matched campaign funds followed a frantic email the Cuomo campaign sent out Friday, calling on those who had donated to his campaign to fill out a form to ensure all requirements for the public money were necessarily met. But that effort failed.
Public confirmation of the denial was made in a Tuesday press release from the New York City Campaign Finance Board (NYCCFB), which indicated that at least 20% of Cuomo's required disclosures contained documentation errors for contributions. The press release also said that the Cuomo campaign failed to meet its required two-part threshold of total contributions, which must be at least 1,000 different individuals, and contributors, which must amount to at least $250,000, needed to obtain the publicly matched funds.
"Our campaign officially announced on March 1, and within 13 days, proudly raised an unprecedented $1.5 million, including $330,000 in matchable funds, from more than 2,800 donors. This surpassed the campaign finance board's threshold for qualifying for matching funds by the filing deadline of March 13. Since the last filing deadline on March 13, the campaign has amassed an additional $1 million, totaling over $2.5 million raised from over 4,100 individuals," Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said in a statement.
"Last Friday, the campaign was informed by the campaign finance board that, due to a technical software error, contributions collected on one of our vendor platforms, NGP, were missing one of the fields required by the Campaign Finance Board, and so while we met the thresholds necessary to receive matching funds, the campaign had to remedy this technical matter."
Azzopardi noted that the "technical software error" had been remedied and the adequate documentation was provided to the city's campaign finance board. However, the campaign won't be able to receive matching funds until the next payment period beginning May 12.
Nearly every other top mayoral candidate received payouts Tuesday, according to Politico. However, incumbent Mayor Eric Adams found himself denied $4.5 million in matching funds over the same reasons Cuomo did, in addition to other bookkeeping and compliance mistakes.
Polling from Siena College found Cuomo as the front-runner among Democrats, but Adams was not included in the survey results as he will be running for reelection as an Independent.
Adams was facing a federal corruption investigation until the Trump administration stepped in and got the case dismissed. As a result of the investigation, one of the NYCCFB's members, Richard Davis, has recused himself from voting on any matters related to Adams after writing an editorial earlier this year in which he slammed President Donald Trump's Justice Department for intervening in the Adams case, referring to the move as "ludicrous."
The Democrat-controlled city council of New York City is suing Mayor Eric Adams for cooperating with the Trump administration by allowing ICE to conduct immigration investigations at Rikers Island Prison.
The city council is asking the court to declare an executive order by the mayor’s office allowing ICE into Rikers Island "illegal, null, and void."
The lawsuit was filed in the Supreme Court of New York on Tuesday. In the suit, the city council accuses Adams of engaging in an illegal "quid pro quo" with the Trump administration by allowing ICE into the city prison in exchange for having the federal corruption charges against him dropped.
The suit claims that Adams, who is running for re-election as an independent, prioritized his own political goals over the city’s "prized sanctuary laws," calling the executive order "the poisoned fruit of Mayor Adams’s deal with the Trump Administration."
"Today, in New York City, a corrupt bargain is taking place in plain view: New York City Mayor Eric Adams … is using his official powers to pay off the Trump Administration for dropping criminal charges against him," the suit claims. "The ‘purchase price’- which was agreed to in advance and is now being proffered - is the safety and wellbeing of immigrant communities and all New Yorkers whose rights are protected by our City's prized sanctuary laws."
At issue in the suit is an executive order signed by New York City First Deputy Mayor Randy Mastro last week that allows federal immigration authorities to operate an office on Rikers Island to help carry out criminal investigations into drug trafficking, organized violence and migrant gang activity plaguing the city.
The order states that the safety of New Yorkers has been jeopardized by violent transnational gangs like MS-13 and Tren de Aragua – gangs designated as foreign terrorist organizations by the Trump administration – and there is a critical need for federal law enforcement to share "real-time" intelligence with the city’s corrections department and police.
The order allows federal law enforcement agencies to share intelligence with the corrections department and NYPD about criminal gang activity among individuals both inside and outside of custody.
It does not give ICE permission to carry out civil immigration enforcement and arrest people simply for being undocumented.
The order was issued the week after federal charges against Adams were dismissed. He had been accused of using his position as mayor to receive luxury travel and illegal campaign contributions from Turkish foreign nationals. Adams insisted the case was politically motivated and was pursued in retaliation for his criticism of President Joe Biden's immigration policies.
New York City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, a Democrat who is running to unseat Adams, claimed in a Tuesday statement that the order allowing ICE to conduct immigration investigations on criminals at Rikers Island is "a naked attempt by Eric Adams to fulfill his end of the bargain for special treatment he received from the Trump administration."
She said the city council’s lawsuit is an attempt to "protect the rights and safety of all New Yorkers against attacks by the Trump administration—because the city’s mayor won’t stop placing his own personal interests ahead of the people of our city."
Kayla Mamelak, a spokesperson for Adams, responded to the lawsuit by calling it "baseless" and "contrary to the public interest."
"The City Council appears to be spreading misinformation," Mamelak told Fox News Digital. "So let’s be clear: To maintain the trust of the nearly 8.5 million New Yorkers our administration serves and protects every day — and to ensure there was never even the appearance of any conflict — Mayor Adams delegated all powers, responsibilities, and decision-making related to any action authorizing federal officials to investigate crimes at Rikers Island to First Deputy Mayor Randy Mastro."
The spokesperson said that Mastro "conducted a thorough and independent assessment — which included multiple visits to Rikers Island, conversations with federal law enforcement and our own Department of Correction officers, and more — and he independently concluded that a federal presence at Rikers to conduct federal criminal investigations is in New York City’s best interest and protects public safety, particularly in our ongoing efforts to target violent transnational gangs now present in our city, including those designated as terrorist organizations."
"Executive Order 50 is expressly authorized by New York City’s local laws — the very laws enacted by the City Council," said Mamelak. "While we will review the lawsuit, this one seems baseless and contrary to the public interest in protecting New Yorkers from violent criminals. We remain committed to our administration’s efforts to reduce crime and keep New Yorkers safe — we hope the City Council will join us in doing so."
Fox News Digital’s Michael Dorgan contributed to this report.
The White House accused congressional Democrats of prioritizing "illegal immigrant gang members" rather than their own constituents.
"It's mind-boggling the priorities of the modern-day Democrat party," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Tuesday.
"I think it's atrocious that you have Democrats in Congress on Capitol Hill who swear an oath to protect their constituents and to serve them in Washington, D.C., spending more time defending illegal immigrant gang members than their own constituents and law-abiding American citizens," Leavitt said.
The comments come as Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., floated possibly traveling to El Salvador to check on a Maryland resident the Trump administration's Justice Department admitted it deported to El Salvador in an "administrative error," should the resident not return to the U.S. by "midweek."
Both Trump administration officials and El Salvador President Nayib Bukele agreed Monday at the White House that they didn't have the authority to return Maryland resident Abrego Garcia, who the Trump administration claims has ties to the MS-13 gang.
Additionally, the Supreme Court upheld Thursday a lower court's order that "requires the government to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador."
While Attorney General Pam Bondi told reporters Monday that El Salvador would call the final shots on whether it would return the Maryland resident, Bukele said it was "preposterous" for El Salvador to do so.
"How can I smuggle a terrorist into the U.S.? I don't have the power to return him to the United States," Bukele said at the White House Monday.
Meanwhile, Van Hollen announced Monday that if Garcia did not return to the U.S. by "midweek," he personally would travel to El Salvador to check up on Garcia’s well-being and release.
"Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia never should have been abducted and illegally deported, and the courts have made clear: the Administration must bring him home, now," Van Hollen said in a Monday statement. "However, since the Trump Administration appears to be ignoring these court mandates, we need to take additional action."
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., told rally attendees not to let Republicans "trick" them into thinking they "can be separated" by race or into stoking "deep divisions along race, identity and culture," despite President Donald Trump's recent efforts to rid identity politics from public and private spaces.
The progressive "Squad" lawmaker's comments came at a "Fighting Oligarchy" rally Monday night in Idaho alongside Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. It was the pair's latest stop in a tour of appearances across the country.
"The only chance they have to get away with such an unpopular and hurtful agenda is to stoke deep divisions along race, identity and culture to keep us fighting and distracted. It's not going to work anymore," AOC told rally goers. "Don't let them trick us into thinking we are enemies. Don't let them trick us into being weak and being into thinking we can be separated into rural and urban, black and white and Latino."
The rally with AOC and Sanders was largely centered around criticizing "billionaire" oligarchs like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg and President Donald Trump, who, as president, has been leading an anti-DEI push that is aimed at ridding identity politics from public and private spaces.
In fact, per political analyst and regular MSNBC contributor Eddie Glaude, identity politics was "at the heart" of former Vice President Kamala Harris' election loss to Trump.
"The only thing that was woke or representational about [Kamala Harris'] campaign was her, her body, the fact that she was a woman of color. So I think that the concern, the so-called backlash, to tending to the diversity of the nation actually proves the point," Glaude said in an interview with NPR shortly after Republican's November election victories.
Meanwhile, since being inaugurated, Trump has implemented executive actions explicitly targeting "identity politics."
"Prior to harmful changes introduced by the Obama and Biden administrations, the United States military offered equality of opportunity to every American capable of and interested in serving their country. Yet these two administrations exploited the military in favor of identity politics—harming our national defense, undermining the non-political nature of our military, and eroding morale and recruitment," Trump wrote in one of his first Executive Orders after being sworn in. "Due to this ‘woke’ assault, the Services together logged their lowest recruiting records since 1940 with a 41,000-troop shortfall in 2023."
Trump has also taken steps to rid DEI from universities, the federal government and even the private sector.
According to Trump, it was Democrat President Joe Biden who implemented "illegal and immoral discrimination programs," which often tied individual success to immutable factors like race, sex and ethnicity.
"President Trump is restoring fairness and accountability in federal hiring, and terminating DEI across the federal government," reads a March fact sheet from the White House.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Indiana filed a suit against the Trump administration on Tuesday, claiming that the lawful status of seven international students in Indiana were reportedly terminated without explanation.
The suit claims that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not offer the students any opportunity to challenge the decisions and therefore violated due process rights. The suit names DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and Todd Lyons, acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
The Trump administration has targeted hundreds of international students in recent weeks for their engagement in anti-Israel protests, which the administration argued was support for U.S.-designated terrorist organization Hamas. The administration has also revoked visas for international students over past infractions such as traffic violations.
"There is no rhyme or reason for DHS’s action," ACLU of Indiana Legal Director Ken Falk said. "To terminate an international student’s status, the U.S. government must adhere to regulatory standards and provide basic due process, which it has failed to do."
Plaintiffs claimed international students are allowed to continue their studies and maintain their legal residency status even after their visas get revoked.
The lawsuit asked the U.S. District Court to allow the seven international students to continue their studies by reinstating their status. A temporary restraining order has also been requested to provide immediate protection to the students, according to the ACLU of Indiana.
Among the students named in the lawsuit, six are Chinese citizens attending Purdue University or Indiana University Indianapolis. Another student is a Nigerian citizen attending the University of Notre Dame. Two of the seven students named were expected to graduate next month.
"The impact on these students’ lives is profound, and now they live in fear of being deported at any moment," Falk continued. "We're calling on the court to take immediate steps to stop these unlawful actions."
Fox News Digital reached out to the DHS for comment, but they did not immediately respond.
The lawsuit is one of the increasing number of complaints the White House is facing over student visa revocation.
Numerous international students whose visas were terminated without explanation recently also filed another suit against the Trump administration over an alleged violation of due process.
Trump administration officials have defended the revocation of student visas, claiming that the government reserves the right to cancel them.
"There is no right to a student visa," Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters on March 28. "We can cancel a student visa under the law just the same way that we can deny a student visa under the law. And we will do so in cases we find appropriate,"
FIRST ON FOX: The GOP lawmaker leading a collective response to more than 100 judges and attorneys who demanded condemnation of Trump allies said Tuesday she and her delegation won't be "pushed around" amid ongoing attacks on left-wing judges.
Wyoming’s congressional delegation responded to dozens of Cowboy State jurists, including a former governor who issued an open condemnation of lawmakers’ failure to defend judges under fire from conservatives over sweeping nationwide injunctions hindering President Donald Trump’s foreign policy and homeland security actions.
The response, led by Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., rejected the basis on which the jurists were calling for the state’s Republicans to vociferously intervene in support of what the White House describes as rogue judges, citing the Founding Fathers’ words.
"In Federalist [Paper] 78… Alexander Hamilton wrote that "the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous" and that judges "have neither force nor will," the letter states.
"In recent years, we have become increasingly concerned with how our country has strayed from this Hamiltonian aspiration. We have seen judges across the political spectrum assume both "force" and "will" — Many Americans are worried judges are misusing their independence by imposing policy preferences on our country — all with no accountability."
They also noted Georgetown Law professor Brad Snyder "said it best" – "The Court does not have the last word on the Constitution."
In comments to Fox News Digital, Lummis said Americans elected Trump and did not select "liberal judges."
"I represent the people of Wyoming, and they have made it clear that they support President Trump’s agenda and want a government where their elected representatives make the laws," she said.
"Our delegation stands with President Trump and won’t be pushed around by far-left judicial activists who wish to further divide our country."
The jurists objecting to the Republicans’ silence cited calls to reject disinformation after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot and similarly recounted critiques from administration allies of judges, like James Boasberg, who have issued nationwide injunctions blocking Trump’s homeland security measures.
In a missive entitled "The Rule of Law Matters," they cited more virulent critiques of such judges, as well as a conservative op-ed decrying that "if impeachment is the remedy for every adverse judicial ruling, we wouldn’t have a judiciary left."
"These attacks are part of a growing effort to discredit, not just judges, but seemingly the American Rule of Law as we know it," the original letter states. It was signed by about 100 jurists, including former Wyoming Democratic Gov. Michael Sullivan, former President Bill Clinton’s Irish ambassador.
"Recent executive orders targeting prominent national law firms disfavored by the administration with severe retribution… has, as night follows day, resulted in yet more incendiary social media postings attacking the judiciary and openly encouraging the executive branch to disobey court orders."
In their response to the scores of jurists, Lummis, Sen. John Barrasso and Rep. Harriet Hageman condemned the fact the direct letter had also been distributed to the media and that the lawmakers would have collectively appreciated direct discussion.
"We are disappointed you failed to express your concerns with us directly before rushing to publish your letter," they wrote.
"A robust discussion about addressing the challenges and concerns facing our nation would be more beneficial than attempting to score political points through the press."
The complainants wrote that while there is populist sentiment for "radical change," the "growing reckless disdain for the independence and security of our judiciary must be resisted by anyone sworn to uphold our Constitution.
"That includes us, and it certainly includes you."
The lawmakers stood firm, however, on the idea that they are acting responsibly and within their legislative role.
They cited their co-sponsorship of a bill that would ban most nationwide injunctions effecting change "across the ideological spectrum," and not just those against Trump’s actions.
Legislation highlighted by the lawmakers cited both conservative and liberal Supreme Court justices issuing criticisms of such nationwide injunctions.
"The Supreme Court has consistently noted that political questions should be kept at arm’s length by the judiciary," they wrote, as a Senate Judiciary Committee statement on the Judicial Relief Clarification Act quoted reservations from both Justices Clarence Thomas and Elena Kagan.
Other jurists have, however, echoed Trump's criticisms, including George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, who told Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle" that judges must remember they've been "appointed, not anointed."
Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez faced blowback from conservatives on social media this week after they accused her of putting on a fake accent at a rally.
The progressive New York congresswoman held a rally in Nampa, Idaho, with Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who caucuses with Democrats, on Monday where she reportedly drew over 12,000 people and caught the attention of conservatives with one particular clip where she was accused of deliberately changing her tone of voice.
"Oh look, AOC is doing the interchangeable accents to fit the demographic she's in front of," conservative influencer account Gunther Eagleman wrote on X. "Did she take notes from Kamala?"
"Kamala Harris just introduced yet another new accent," conservative influencer Benny Johnson posted on X. "Sike, this is AOC. Seems to be using Kamala’s playbook. I guess she didn’t pay attention during the 2024 election."
"AOC is pretending to have some sort of strange accent," Townhall.com posted on X. "This is exactly what Kamala Harris did on the campaign trail. Why do they do this?"
"WATCH: AOC debuts new accent ahead of reported Presidential run," Breaking 911 posted on X. "It’s worse than Kamala’s or Hillary."
Fox News Digital reached out to AOC’s office for comment.
The comparisons to Harris originate from the presidential campaign trail last year when Harris was often criticized for using different accents while speaking to different crowds.
Ocasio-Cortez has been touring the country with Sanders as part of a "Fighting Oligarchy" campaign criticizing Tesla CEO Elon Musk and the Trump administration overall.
"Your presence here today is making Donald Trump and Elon Musk very nervous," the 83-year-old Sanders said to loud cheers at a rally in Los Angeles, adding about 36,000 attended the event.
The pair have also held rallies in Las Vegas; Tempe and Tuscon, Arizona; and Denver and Greeley, Colorado, and they have several upcoming rallies scheduled.
Fox News Digital's Brie Stimson contributed to this report
EXCLUSIVE: Although the REAL ID deadline has been pushed numerous times, the Department of Homeland Security says stopping illegal immigration is a major reason why it’s holding firm to the current May 7 deadline.
In a memo exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital, the department said part of the reason REAL ID will be enforced is to prevent those in the country illegally from flying – unless they are looking to self-deport on an international flight.
"Under Biden, illegal aliens used non-compliant IDs from sanctuary cities to board flights, but REAL ID’s higher security standards make it nearly impossible to forge legitimate documents, ensuring only verified travelers can fly," the memo states.
"This closes the gaping vulnerabilities Biden’s policies created, preventing criminals and potential terrorists from exploiting our aviation system, as seen during 9/11 when fraudulent IDs enabled attacks," the memo continues.
The agency emphasized that the measure prevents people in the country illegally from traveling within the U.S.
"DHS and TSA are clear, the only place an illegal alien should be flying is home. Under Secretary Kristi Noem’s leadership, illegal aliens will be barred from domestic flights, with one exception: illegal aliens self-deporting on international flights will be allowed to board without a REAL ID, encouraging their exit from the U.S.," it states.
DHS said that during the Biden administration, 1.4 million "inadmissible aliens" were allowed into the country because of programs like CBP One and the Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans parole program, and over half a million flew into American airports as of August 2024, according to the memo.
The department said 320,000 illegal immigrants were permitted to fly into 43 airports before flying to other parts of the country as a direct result of CBP One in 2023.
DHS cited Fox News Digital’s reporting from 2022 where the Transportation Security Administration under Biden and former Homeland Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas allowed civil arrest warrants to be used as acceptable identification.
"For non-citizens and non-U.S. nationals who do not otherwise have acceptable forms of ID for presentation at security checkpoints, TSA may also accept certain DHS-issued forms, including ICE Form I-200 (Warrant for Arrest of an Alien)," a TSA spokesperson told Fox News at the time.
Americans looking to fly domestically and enter some federal buildings will need a form of identification, and a passport can be used as an alternative.
The REAL ID Act was signed into law by former President George W. Bush in 2005.
"These IDs keep our country safe because they help prevent fraud and they enhance security," Noem said in a recent video. "Please do your part to protect our country, go today, and don’t delay."
The memo from DHS comes as sweeping changes have occurred under the Trump administration on immigration policies, including scrapping the CBP One app and replacing it with the CBP Home app meant for self-deportations.
Meanwhile, federal immigration authorities have cracked down on alleged criminals who are in the country illegally, including sending many to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, which has led to numerous ongoing legal battles.
Some have opposed the enforcement of REAL ID, which many people have gotten over the years if their license has a star or flag on it, for example.
"As long as the pilot’s door is locked and no one has weapons, why do you care that someone who flies has government permission?" Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., tweeted on Monday. "Real ID provides no benefit, yet presents a serious risk to freedom. If a person can’t be trusted to fly without weapons, why are they roaming free?"
A new White House memo highlighting the top 10 Supreme Court rulings federal agencies must follow has legal experts optimistic about reining in the administrative state, while some litigators remain skeptical the directive will be enforced.
"Any administration that really cares about making sure that they were following the law should be reviewing regulations," Carrie Severino, president of Judicial Crisis Network, told Fox News Digital. "We want a government that isn't just taking every bit of power that it can get away with, but one that wants to make sure the constitutional limits are guarded as well, which is why this memorandum is refreshing and novel in a good way."
The administration issued a memorandum on April 9 requiring agencies to rescind regulations not in line with 10 recent Supreme Court opinions on proper administrative agency functions.
The memo, titled, "President Donald J. Trump Directs Repeal of Regulations That Are Unlawful Under 10 Recent Supreme Court Decisions," says it is in line with a February executive order seeking to rein in the administrative state.
The memo lists various Supreme Court cases aligned with Trump's deregulatory agenda as well as the administration's efforts to get rid of DEI initiatives. Among the cases listed are Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, West Virginia vs. EPA, and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Both Loper Bright and West Virginia notably narrowed executive agencies' authority in issuing rules and regulations affecting the American public. Likewise, Students for Fair Admissions rejected the use of affirmative action in university admissions.
"The President is right: agencies must repeal regulations that the Supreme Court has deemed unlawful. The President continues to deliver on his promises to roll back regulations and government overreach crippling American enterprise," White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers told Fox News Digital in a statement.
Several of the cases listed are not retroactive, meaning regulations issued prior to these decisions being handed down will not be disturbed as a result of the opinions. However, experts say agencies can re-evaluate previous rules and regulations under the new standards imposed by the Supreme Court opinions.
"I think that that is good fodder, a good basis for a lot of agencies to go back and look, ‘Where have we created massive regulatory compliance burdens and structures that massively impact the economy or society on the basis of a very thin thread and where can we undo it?'" Daniel Huff, senior legal fellow at the American Path Initiative, told Fox News Digital. "And we can point to these elephants in mouse holes and when it's reviewed in the future, they will say ‘Yes, that is a good rationale’ and it will be upheld."
Kara Rollins is a lawyer for the New Civil Liberties Alliance, the nonprofit organization that argued Relentless Inc. v. Dept. of Commerce in front of the high court – Loper’s companion case that sought to scale back the reach of the administrative state. Rollins told Fox News Digital the "retrospective look" these agencies will take toward previous regulations is not "misplaced."
However, Rollins raised concerns about the administration's enforcement of the directive, noting that several related cases were already underway before the Supreme Court issued its rulings.
"What happens to these cases that are currently active where DOJ or the agency is just taking the wrong position?" Rollins said. "Who's looking at that? Who's clearing out those cases and saying, in light of this memorandum, we've looked at our litigation position and we can no longer sustain it? And that's the real sort of open question, particularly for litigators right now."
Rollins said that, as a litigator, her concern is agencies have yet to change positions when it comes to these Supreme Court opinions: "That sort of signals that there is a problem between what the president is saying he wants to have happen and what's being effectuated on the ground."
In the memo, Trump directs agencies to employ the Administrative Procedure Act’s "good cause" exception "where appropriate," which allows agencies to do away with the usual notice-and-comment rulemaking process in the interest of the public. The usual process requires time for public input on the proposed rule.
Huff said there is "less of a need" to impose the regular notice-and-comment rulemaking process given that agencies will likely be reviewing previous rules rather than passing new ones.
"They're not adding new burdens. This isn't new to people," Huff said. "People already sort of know what's there and it was there before. And we're just turning back the clock. We're putting it back to the way it was. We're restoring the original status quo."
Severino said there could be litigation over the use of the exception despite the fact that the language is "very broad."
"But I do think there are strong arguments for it because the laws must keep with the constitutional limits on government, and, of course, be in the public interest."
Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, who last week referred to President Donald Trump as a "mofo" — an abbreviated form of the profanity ‘motherf---er’ — has continued leveling colorful attacks against him.
In a Monday night post on X she used words including "buffoon" and "orange."
"Y’all can keep wasting time on conspiracy theories aka lies about me OR start paying attention to things that actually impact your life like this," she wrote when sharing a video in which wealthy investor Ray Dalio said he is concerned about the possibility of "something worse than a recession … "
"PS Still Single, Childless, no granny drama, no new mysterious wealth (like those that may have engaged in INSIDER TRADING as Trump manipulated the market & produced more wealth for his rich friends), no random mansions, no shady donations (like Elon’s purchase of the Oval Office)," Crockett continued.
"Unfortunately for MAGA… their buffoon of a leader is every ethical & criminal stereotype that they attribute to me, but the only one that fits the bill isn’t black, but instead orange," she declared. "Thank me later for trying to educate you as your leader wants you left in the dark."
Fox News Digital reached out to Crockett's office on Tuesday but did not receive a comment by the time of publication.
The White House replied to a comment request on Tuesday by sending a previously reported statement from spokesperson Harrison Fields.
"Crockett and her followers in the Democratic Party are simply all hammer and no nail. When she's leading the Democrats in ‘oversight,’ that's when you know the party is in shambles. Her constituents should DOGE her in the next election."
Crockett said on MSNBC last week that "the fact that no one is questioning" Trump's "mental acuity or fitness to serve is beyond wild to me."
Contrary to the congresswoman's comments, a memo from the physician to the president states that "President Trump exhibits excellent cognitive and physical health and is fully fit to execute the duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State."
However, the insults have been flying in both directions, with Trump blasting Crockett as well.
Trump called Crockett a "very low-IQ person and a lowlife" during an interview with radio host Vince Coglianese last month.
"She can't speak. She can't get the words out of her mouth," he said of Crockett, noting that he "can't see her going very far in politics."
During remarks at a National Republican Congressional Committee event last week, the president said that if Crockett is the Democrats' "new star" the party is in "serious trouble."
President Donald Trump weighed in on an already contentious Senate primary race in the most populous red state in the nation, saying he will make an endorsement decision "at the right time."
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced his candidacy for the U.S. Senate while speaking on Fox News last week. Paxton, a conservative firebrand and outspoken supporter of Trump, is seeking to replace incumbent Sen. John Cornyn, an influential member of the GOP who previously served as the Party’s Senate whip and has held the seat since 2002.
With both Paxton and Cornyn being considered leading members of the Republican Party, the race promises to be particularly messy.
Paxton has accused the current senator of being a lukewarm supporter of Trump’s agenda, saying, "It's time that we have another great senator that will actually stand up and fight for Republican values, fight for the values of the people of Texas and also support Donald Trump in the areas that he's focused on in a very significant way."
For his part, Cornyn has dismissed the attorney general as a "fraud" motivated by "vanity and personal ambition."
Trump told reporters that both GOP senatorial candidates in Texas are "friends of mine" and "good men," but he stopped short of issuing an endorsement of one over the other, at least for now.
"Well, they're both friends of mine," said Trump. "They're both good men, and I don't know. We don't, we don't know who else is running, but these two, you know, Ken and John, they're both friends of mine, so I'll make a determination at the right time."
Since announcing his candidacy, Paxton has already garnered endorsements from Reps. Troy Nehls, R-Texas, and Lance Gooden, R-Texas, as well as around 250 state legislators and business leaders across the state, according to a spokesperson.
Those endorsing Paxton are emphasizing his pledge to double down on his conservative agenda and "take a sledgehammer to the D.C. establishment."
One of Paxton’s supporters, conservative Texas Rep. Tony Tinderholt, called him "the most conservative attorney general in the nation," saying he "will be a fantastic upgrade over John Cornyn."
Gooden, whose district is just east of Dallas, said he was endorsing Paxton because "it's time for change in Texas," adding that "Texans deserve a conservative champion who has a record of taking on the establishment, fighting to secure our border, and advancing the Trump agenda."
Meanwhile, Cornyn, who has been in the Senate for nearly 23 years, has the support of some of the Republican Party’s top leaders, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, Sen. Tim Scott, R-South Carolina, as well as the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
Since Trump returned to the White House three months ago, Cornyn has been supportive of the president's Cabinet nominees and agenda.
Cornyn has emphasized previous corruption and bribery charges against Paxton, which in 2023 led to the attorney general being impeached by the Texas House of Representatives. Paxton was later acquitted of all charges by the Texas Senate.
Paxton was indicted on securities fraud charges soon after taking office in 2015 and also came under investigation by the FBI over bribery and corruption allegations from former top staffers. The charges in the long-running federal corruption probe were dropped during the final weeks of the Biden administration.
A spokesperson for Cornyn’s campaign asserted that Trump would be wise to endorse the senator, emphasizing his experience helping to lead the GOP.
"During his first term, John Cornyn voted with President Trump more than 95% of current Senators, securing the votes for his biggest accomplishments as his Whip," the representative told Fox News Digital.
"Democrats are trying to destroy President Trump," the representative went on. "And he and Texas need a battle-tested conservative who knows how to protect his agenda in the Senate and won't be outsmarted by [Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer."
Paxton, however, posits that Cornyn’s enthusiasm for Trump is all an act.
"We're all glad John Cornyn suddenly found religion and is embracing President Trump's policies now that he's facing a primary challenge," Paxton told Fox News Digital. "But if he's re-elected, he'll immediately go back to being the same old John who said President Trump's 'time has passed him by' and fought to stop the President's America First agenda."
"I was grateful to join my friend Troy Nehls as one of two elected officials at President Trump's 2024 announcement and have always been proud to stand with him," he said. "I will continue to support the President and work with him to secure our border, defend the integrity of our elections, and protect our 2nd Amendment—unlike John Cornyn who has tried to undermine President Trump every step of the way."
"I'm incredibly grateful to have the support of over 250 conservative leaders from across our great state," Paxton went on. "While John Cornyn is relying on the Washington establishment to save him, I'm proud that my campaign is powered by the grassroots and the people of Texas."
As Cornyn and Paxton vie for the GOP nomination, former Democratic Rep. Colin Allred, who launched a surprisingly competitive but ultimately unsuccessful challenge against Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, in 2024, is weighing another run in 2026.
Fox News Digital's Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y. on Tuesday said that the Supreme Court should consider holding the Trump administration in contempt over its deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, an El Salvadorian illegal migrant and former Maryland resident.
The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a lower court's decision to facilitate the return of Abrego Garcia from an El Salvador prison where federal officials sent hundreds of suspected criminals and gang members last month.
"The Supreme Court has made clear that Mr. Abrego Garcia should not have been deported," Jeffries said at a Tuesday press conference on Democrats' upcoming "Save Social Security Day of Action" to oppose what he claims will be cuts to social security.
"In fact, the Trump administration has acknowledged that fact and so they need to comply with the Supreme Court's directive or the Supreme Court needs to enforce its order aggressively, which should include contempt."
The Supreme Court acknowledges that Abrego Garcia was subject to a 2019 withholding order forbidding his removal to El Salvador, and that the removal to El Salvador was "therefore illegal." The Court stressed that the government must facilitate his release from custody in El Salvador and treat his case as if he were never deported.
One immigration judge in 2019 found that Garcia had not sufficiently refuted evidence of MS-13 affiliation and was thus removable to anywhere other than El Salvador because of a threat from a rival gang, this is called a withholding order.
The Trump administration has faced criticism from Democrats, left-wing media and human rights advocates for sending Abrego Garcia back to his home country. Trump officials initially acknowledged his removal was due to an "administrative error."
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller on Monday said that two courts found Abrego Garcia to be an MS-13 gang member, and he was deported after Trump declared the violent gang a terrorist organization.
Miller said that when Trump declared MS-13 a terrorist organization, Abrego Garcia was no longer eligible for any form of immigration relief in the United States.
Miller said that Abrego Garcia had an outstanding deportation order, meaning he wasn’t even allowed to be present in the U.S. and had to be removed because of the foreign terrorist designation.
Abrego Garcia is married to a U.S. citizen, and they are raising three children.
Jeffries, meanwhile, added that he was supporting the efforts of Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., who is trying to meet with El Salvadorian President Nayib Bukele while he is here in the country. Van Hollen is trying to get Abrego Garcia sent back to the U.S.
Bukele met with Trump at the White House on Monday for a bilateral summit focused largely on immigration.
"I support the efforts and leadership of Senator Chris Van Hollen," Jeffries said. "The president should accept that meeting request and have a real discussion as to when Mr. Abrego Garcia is going to be returned to his family in the United States of America."
Van Hollen said he also wants to see the Trump administration held in contempt.
"It's absolutely unjust and illegal to have this Marylander detained one more day in a notorious prison in El Salvador," Van Hollen said, per WBAL-TV.
"I saw that the families, the lawyers, have asked that the administration lawyers be held in contempt, and I think that's an absolutely appropriate move to take right now. They're absolutely snubbing their nose at the courts right now, including the Supreme Court."
Fox News’ Kerri Urbahn contributed to this report.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. called on the head of President Donald Trump's Social Security Administration to resign on Tuesday.
Schumer declared a "Social Security Day of Action" during a press conference in New York on Tuesday, accusing Trump, Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) of cutting Americans' social security. Schumer called on acting SSA Administrator Leland Dudek to resign.
"Dudek is bad medicine for our seniors," Schumer said from the podium.
"Donald Trump and Elon Musk have a hatchet man in Leland Dudek, an acting Commissioner with an emphasis on the 'acting,' because his real role is to dismantle the very office he is supposed to lead, make better, and protect," he continued. "We have seen his audition and his work on the stage, and it is clear: Dudek is incapable of doing this job in the way it needs to be done. He won't protect seniors. He will hurt them. Leland Dudek should resign."
"Republicans are trying to kill Social Security from the inside – it is a cut by another name – and we won’t let that happen," Schumer said in another statement.
The press conference comes after Schumer feuded with Musk on social media. The Tesla founder reacted to Schumer's criticism of DOGE by suggesting the lawmaker was "getting a piece of the action with the government fraud."
"Another Elon lie. He wants you to think anyone who dares to stand up to him is committing fraud, meanwhile he’s taking tens of billions from the government," Schumer declared in a post last week.
Musk also fired off a response to a post in which Schumer suggested that Musk is slashing Social Security benefits.
"Make no mistake: What Elon Musk is doing at Social Security is cutting benefits," Schumer said.
"The intern running Schumer’s social media account is lying," Musk shot back.
During a Senate speech, Schumer claimed that "Elon Musk is cutting Social Security benefits."
"When offices close down, when websites crash, when phone lines shut off, that's no different than cutting benefits," Schumer said.
