❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Today β€” 24 February 2025Main stream

Mike Johnson boxed in by House GOP defectors on "big, beautiful bill"

24 February 2025 at 17:43

The list of no's is growing for House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), and time isn't on his side.

Why it matters: Flipping votes on a budget resolution isn't impossible, but it could force Johnson to delay bringing it to the floor.


  • ⏰ That would further undermine the House's effort to get "one big, beautiful bill" over to the Senate by the end of April.
  • πŸ’₯ Two current public "no" votes, Reps. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) and Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.), say the spending cuts aren't enough.
  • πŸ™‰ At least one other Republican is a private "no" vote, Burchett told reporters Monday evening.

Johnson and his leadership team are projecting public confidence they will be able to pass the resolution Tuesday evening.

  • "There's a couple of folks who just have lingering questions," Johnson told reporters Monday, "but I think all those questions can be answered and we'll be able to move forward."
  • "We'll see," Johnson told reporters when asked if the vote is still on for Tuesday night. "But it'll happen this week."

🚨Johnson says he won't negotiate ahead of a vote, including with moderates who are concerned by Medicaid cuts.

  • "Everybody needs to understand that the resolution is merely the starting point for the process," Johnson said Monday, per Politico.

The big picture: Johnson sided with his most conservative lawmakers in building this budget package. Now they're threatening to leave him hanging.

  • "If the Republican budget passes, the deficit gets worse, not better," Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) posted on X.

Zoom in: Johnson is trying to fuse together 218 votes with the unusual combination of a huge debt limit increase, deep spending cuts and Trump's wish list on tax cuts.

  • Johnson has freaked out his moderates with the depth of the spending cut targets, which will be hard to hit without cuts to Medicaid and nutrition programs.
  • That's for naught if conservatives tank the bill first.

Zoom out: Some senior Republicans remained optimistic that the current framework β€” which will also add up to $4.5 trillion in tax breaks if Congress cuts $2 trillion in spending β€” will eventually find enough votes for passage.

  • "It's going to reduce the debt to GDP ratio," Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) told reporters. "It's important to me and important to our president."
  • "I don't expect it to change," he said. "I feel like we landed at a really good place."
  • "We're going to be fine," Arrington told Axios.

Federal workers sue over Musk's DOGE email soliciting updates

24 February 2025 at 11:22

The federal agency that sent out an email over the weekend asking workers what they accomplished last weekΒ can't fire those workers for not responding, claims an amended lawsuit filed Monday on behalf of federal employees.

Why it matters: It's the latest potential legal stumbling block for DOGE and Elon Musk's slash-and-burn workforce strategy.


Catch up fast: Over the weekend, at President Trump's prodding to be more aggressive, Musk announced that workers would get an email asking what they'd done in the past week. "Failure to respond will be taken as a resignation," he said.

  • The email went out on Saturday to millions of workers β€”Β subject line "What did you do last week"? β€”Β causing confusion and an array of responses inside federal agencies, with many telling employees not to respond.
  • Crucially, the email did not threaten workers with termination.

Where it stands: On Monday afternoon, President Trump appeared to back Musk's threat β€” if employees don't respond to that email, "you're sort of semi-fired or you're fired," he said, answering reporter questions during an event with French President Emanuel Macron.

  • "A lot of people are not answering because they don't even exist."

Reality check: Musk and the White House have provided no evidence to back up that claim.

Zoom in: The Monday lawsuit amends an earlier complaint filed by a coalition of unions, including the AFL-CIO and American Federation of Government Employees.

  • It challenges the legality of mass firings of probationary workers β€”Β those that have been employed in their current roles for only a short time. Tens of thousands of such workers have been terminated, per the suit.
  • Only federal agencies have the ability to hire and fire their workers, the lawsuit says.

The Office of Personnel Management, the federal government's HR office, which sent out the email over the weekend, does not have that authority, the suit alleges.

  • "In creating OPM and delegating duties to its Director, Congress did not authorize OPM or its Director to order the termination of employees at any other federal agency."

The intrigue: Several federal agencies have told their workers not to respond to the email request.

  • If their agency does require a response, workers have until 11:59 pm Monday to do so.
  • After that, it's up to federal agencies to decide next steps, a White House official told Axios Monday afternoon β€”Β before President Trump's "semi-firing" comment.

What to watch: Also on Monday, an independent federal oversight agency said that some of the administration's mass firings of probationary workers were unlawful, per a report in Government Executive.

The bottom line: It's a confusing time to work for the federal government.

Editor's Note: This story has been updated with additional reporting on the firings of probationary workers.

❌
❌