• More than 3,600 older Americans have shared their financial and other regrets with Business Insider.
• Many said they regretted relying on government programs designed to keep them out of poverty.
• This is part of an ongoing series about older Americans' regrets.

America is getting older — and that shift is straining the federal programs meant to keep older people out of poverty.

Since mid-September, more than 3,600 older adults have shared their life regrets with Business Insider through reader surveys and direct emails. Many spoke about their struggles navigating programs like Social Security, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and Medicare. This is part of a series on Americans' retirement regrets.

The overwhelming message was that these programs weren't enough to pay the bills. Retirees said they regretted not realizing this and not saving more to supplement their government checks.

BI followed up with several retirees and asked experts about the programs' performance and improvements they might need. Since most of the retirees rely on programs run by the federal government, the solutions discussed here mainly focus on the public sector. Others may have ideas for private or charitable solutions as well.

To be sure, many American retirees are doing just fine. Baby boomers have benefited from rising home and stock-market values over their lifetimes, and OECD data suggests the US's retirement system is doing well in some areas compared with those of other developed countries. Census data indicates roughly 11% of people 65 and older in the US lived in poverty in 2023, down from about 25% in 1976.

Still, many people are struggling, and the pressures are only likely to grow as the population ages and funding wanes. Some argue that such trends increase the need to preserve or bolster government programs designed to reduce poverty among older adults.

We want to hear from you. Are you an older American with any life regrets you'd be comfortable sharing with a reporter? Please fill out this quick form.

Americans increasingly rely on government checks like Social Security, and the program's funds are diminishing

Pamela Shields, 67, gets $1,470 a month in Social Security payments and an additional $600 from her jobs as a caregiver and a night-shift worker at her local grocery store. She had a long career in customer service and human resources, but she's dealt with unexpected medical expenses and two divorces, and she still provides her children with some financial support.

She said that Social Security wasn't enough to rely solely on and that she feared she wouldn't have enough to retire.

As with all beneficiaries, Shields' Social Security check amount is based on her earnings during her working years. But some major categories of spending — like housing, healthcare, and some utilities — have outpaced inflation in recent decades.

"I really want to be retired and not have to do all this stuff to make a living," Shields said. "But I don't see myself doing that."

Research from the bipartisan public-policy firm Economic Innovation Group suggests that US households like Wood's are increasingly reliant on government assistance like Social Security. EIG found that in 2022, Americans got an average of $11,500 in government payouts, representing 18% of the population's total personal income.

But Social Security may be in trouble, with payouts expected to start shrinking in the mid-2030s. As more baby boomers reach peak retirement age, the strain is expected to grow. Without a solution, they could be the last generation to receive full benefits.

"Social Security has been a very expensive program for a very long time, and it's more expensive particularly as we see upswells in the over-65 share of the population," said Benjamin Glasner, an economist at EIG.

One solution to extend the program's life is to start cutting benefits now. The US Government Accountability Office said in a report this summer that applying an across-the-board cut for all Social Security beneficiaries or cutting some spousal or widower benefits could increase longevity.

Of course, that would put people who are already struggling in an even tighter spot. Ultimately, Glasner said, the US needs more younger workers contributing to the Social Security fund through taxes. He argued that the US should invest more in helping people start and sustain families — the US's fertility rate hit a historic low this year.

"We will not be able to tax or cut our way out of this budgetary mess," he said. He also proposed consolidating various federal benefit programs, including Social Security, to reduce the administrative burden and reduce costs.

Another option is to turn up the nozzle on the program's funding sources: payroll taxes, interest on government securities, and taxes on benefits. Some Democrats, led by Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, have proposed raising payroll taxes on higher earners to help offset the cost of hiking benefits for everyone.

Gopi Shah Goda, the director of the Retirement Security Project at the center-left think tank Brookings Institution, said the US could consider how other countries address retirement programs, including using general tax revenue, like Australia, and focusing expenditures more on lower-income retirees, like Canada.

Because Social Security is among the federal government's biggest expenditures, some legislators are looking for cost-cutting strategies. House Republicans have proposed raising the age at which Americans become eligible for benefits. President-elect Donald Trump has suggested cutting Social Security income taxes for retirees, which could provide immediate relief but further imperil future funding for the program by reducing tax revenue overall.

Andrew Biggs, a senior fellow at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, has proposed capping monthly benefits at $2,050 beginning in 2033, arguing that this amount would keep more older Americans above the poverty line and keep benefits higher for longer than across-the-board cuts would when funding runs dry. This might mean smaller checks for higher earners, but he argued that Social Security is often inefficient for middle- and higher-income Americans because the safety net discourages them from working longer or saving more.

"Because of the taxes charged to fund those benefits, people tend to reduce their labor supply," Biggs said. "If I'm getting an extra $500 per month from Social Security, that's going to reduce the amount I save for retirement."

One way to help workers save more and extend the life of Social Security would be to increase access to employer-match 401(k)s at work. In a December fact sheet, AARP cited an estimate that 56 million Americans — the vast majority of whom earned less than $50,000 — lacked access to retirement savings plans through their employer.

A handful of BI's survey respondents mentioned wishing they had 401(k) matching at work or jobs that provided financial guidance for retirement.

Still, retirees' average Social Security benefits are over 40% higher than they were in the 1970s when accounting for inflation. Participation in — and contributions to — retirement plans has increased since the 1970s. People are also claiming Social Security slightly later in life.

Researchers said that delaying taking Social Security could substantially improve people's retirement security, provided they have other income sources.

Some Medicare and private insurance plans hike premiums on older people or don't cover some needs

Older Americans told BI that medical emergencies, the need for long-term care, or expensive prescriptions eroded their savings. Whether they have private or government insurance, out-of-pocket costs add up. For those on a budget, affording healthcare and other essentials can be challenging, especially if medical conditions keep them from working.

Ronda Nichols, 60, worked as a paralegal, but her career ended when she slipped on ice in 2008. Her emergency savings weren't enough to cover her surgery, which, with aftercare costs, cost well into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Nichols, whose Medicare premium is paid for by Idaho, lives on about $1,100 in disability and $300 from her late husband's pension each month, much of which goes toward prescriptions and over-the-counter pain medications.

"Economically this injury has really impacted me, because every month I think if my Social Security doesn't come I'm screwed," Nichols said.

About 68 million people are enrolled in Medicare, which is divided into traditional Medicare and private insurance overseen by Medicare, such as Medicare Advantage plans.

Dr. Joel Shalowitz, a specialist in geriatric medicine who formerly taught at Northwestern University, said older people could save money on health-insurance premiums if private policies and Medicare Advantage health plans were forbidden from steeply hiking rates for older beneficiaries, as some policies on the Affordable Care Act Marketplace are.

Plus, he said, if all Medicare plans offered health savings accounts, older adults could build emergency funds for medical expenses and out-of-pocket costs.

Goda said many older Americans aren't aware that some Medicare plans don't cover long-term care, hearing aids, or dental care. "It's in a way impossible to know every possible outcome of what ailment you might have and how your health insurance will cover the resulting costs associated with that," Goda said.

She suggested that streamlining access to benefits and subsidizing services for people who need long-term care could improve the system. Goda added that an aging population doesn't always correspond to increased dependency. She argued that the US should invest in health throughout people's lives, citing research that childhood Medicaid eligibility for young people with disabilities was associated with higher employment and lower transfer-program costs decades later.

In a 2023 article, David Henderson, a research fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution, said that if Medicare cuts were to happen, Americans might value turning the program into a per capita benefit where each person receives a set amount to spend as they see fit and particularly sick people get double the allocation.

"Spending $900 billion on 65 million people would give each person $13,800," Henderson wrote. "The vast majority of people would value this $13,800 much more than they would value the amount that Medicare spent on their health care."

An outdated poverty line is preventing some older Americans from getting help

The poverty line, set at $15,060 annually for a single person, has been calculated nearly the same way since the 1960s, when housing was cheaper and groceries were a larger component of household budgets. Many government-assistance programs, like SNAP or Medicaid, base their eligibility criteria on this measure.

Older Americans told BI these programs didn't always provide enough aid to pay their bills. Mary and Steve Dacus, both in their late 60s in Robinson, Illinois, receive $23 in SNAP benefits and $2,140 in Social Security income a month. Mary previously told BI that she and her husband felt food insecure, and she called their limited SNAP allotment "pitiful."

Americans over 65 account for the largest increase in households classified as ALICE: asset-limited, income-constrained, employed. These Americans are still working and make too much to qualify for most government benefits but not enough to cover all their bills. Stephanie Hoopes, the national director of United For ALICE, said that removing complicated paperwork and verification steps could streamline applications for aid programs.

She said that raising the federal poverty threshold and expanding eligibility for government-assistance programs could also help many people access essentials. Of course, any safety-net expansion would have to be paid for by higher taxes or changes in state and federal budgets.

Hoopes added that benefits could be adjusted based on how inflation affects the costs of housing, childcare, food, transportation, healthcare, and technology, adding that this "would allow participants to keep up with the cost of their basic needs."

Still, changing the poverty line would most likely mean that government-assistance programs like SNAP would need more funding to operate, and it would increase the number of Americans considered to be in poverty — a politically unpopular move.

Are you an older American with any life regrets you'd be comfortable sharing with a reporter? Please fill out this quick form.

• Many of the 3,300 older Americans BI heard from recently regret not preparing enough for retirement.
• Financial planners described how younger people could set themselves up now to retire comfortably.
• This is part of an ongoing series about older Americans' retirement regrets.

For many Americans, their golden years can be a time of reflection — and regret.

Since mid-September, more than 3,300 older Americans have shared their retirement regrets with Business Insider through a reader survey or direct emails to reporters. Many said they wished they'd saved more, waited longer to retire, relied less on Social Security, or been more prepared for unexpected financial setbacks, such as a layoff, a medical diagnosis, or a divorce.

"I didn't really think about retirement in concrete terms," one 65-year-old wrote in response to a survey question about how people wished they planned for retirement differently. "I always felt I had time. Now I'm older, wholly unprepared, and without savings or a 401(k)."

We want to hear from you. Are you an older American with any life regrets that you would be comfortable sharing with a reporter? Please fill out this quick form.

BI talked to financial planners, wealth managers, and a personal-finance writer about what younger generations could do to avoid similar financial mistakes. This story is part of an ongoing series.

Start saving and investing as early as possible, even with a small amount of money

The amount of money Americans need to save for retirement can vary based on lifestyle and the local cost of living. In a survey conducted by Northwestern Mutual in January, the average respondent said they thought they'd need about $1.5 million to retire comfortably. Wealth managers and financial planners encourage young people with this goal — or any others — to understand their options, start early, and take advantage of employer-match programs.

Brad Bartick, a wealth planner at Baird, said Americans should begin saving for retirement while they're in college or in their early 20s. "Sobering though it may be," Bartick said, "success may require you to work a second job" or "earn a higher level of training or education."

He suggests people create a "ruthlessly honest budget" so they can identify places to cut spending and ways to pay down high-interest debt or build up an emergency fund. If money is tight, start by putting $25 to $50 per paycheck aside for retirement.

"That may not seem like much, but it is the behavior of saving — the habit, if you will — that is most important later in life," Bartick said. "Additionally, time will reward your having started early."

Bartick suggested that people whose workplaces offer retirement plans contribute at least the maximum dollar amount their employer will match and raise their savings rate as their salary increases.

A fact sheet published by AARP in December cited an estimate based on Census, IRS, and Federal Reserve data that about 56 million Americans in 2022 lacked access to retirement-savings plans at work. The vast majority of those people earned less than $50,000, meaning they may not have much surplus cash to save for retirement.

Judith Ward, thought leadership director and a certified financial planner at T. Rowe Price, said that not every employer clearly communicates which resources it offers, so workers may have to research what's available. She suggests people aim to save 15% of their salary annually.

A 72-year-old who responded to the survey implored people to "always, always, always take advantage of a 401(k) program with your employer and max it out," adding: "My mortgage was too big initially, so I didn't participate in the program for a few years. Big mistake."

Those lacking a retirement-savings plan at work can use individual retirement accounts, which most banks offer. Traditional IRAs offer tax breaks up front. Roth IRAs offer tax-free qualified withdrawals later in life. Bartick said higher earners should consider a Roth 401(k), as they're likely to be in a higher tax bracket later in life and can therefore save more money.

Bartick described investing as "the great equalizer" for young people looking to build a retirement portfolio, adding that most people can open a brokerage account and invest with few barriers. While investing can be lucrative, it involves risk and isn't a surefire way to build wealth.

Rob Williams, a managing director of financial planning at Charles Schwab, said the biggest regret he hears is that people waited too long to invest, missing out on years of compounding interest.

Retirees who didn't save or invest enough often rely on Social Security in their later years. Several older adults told BI they regretted collecting Social Security at 62 instead of 67, when their full retirement benefits would have kicked in.

A 77-year-old survey respondent who wrote that they "took Social Security too early" said they regretted cashing in on their benefit before reaching full retirement age. They added that working a lower-paying teaching job hurt their Social Security income and retirement savings later in life.

Prepare in case of a divorce or a spouse's death

Dozens of survey respondents said they regretted how they handled finances with their spouse. Some said they weren't on the same page about retirement goals, while others said the death of a partner disrupted their carefully laid plans.

Ward suggested married couples consider retirement as a household and analyze finances together, even if spouses keep their accounts separate.

"One of the biggest retirement mistakes I see is when a spouse assumes they share the same retirement vision," Ward said.

Many older adults told BI that a divorce hurt their finances. One 67-year-old survey respondent who got a divorce said they regretted "not having a 401(k) and thinking I would be OK because my husband worked hard all his life."

A study published in the Journal of Gerontology in 2022 found that from 1990 to 2010, the divorce rate for adults 65 and older nearly tripled. A BI analysis of 2023 individual-level Census Bureau data found that divorced retirees had lower average 401(k) balances, less savings, and a lower monthly retirement income than married people.

Elizabeth Ayoola, a personal-finance writer at NerdWallet, said people could protect some of their money and retirement savings with prenuptial agreements. However, prenups typically apply only to money and assets acquired before a couple ties the knot, so they provide less protection if the couple divorces later in life. She said that including major assets or money in a trust could be an effective way to secure wealth in a divorce, and she advised couples to have transparent conversations about finances at all stages of their relationship.

A spouse's death can also have detrimental financial ramifications. Older Americans told BI they struggled to get by without their spouses' paychecks or Social Security income. Others said a lack of a will threw them into a complex legal battle and probate process for their spouses' assets.

Ayoola advised couples to write a will and consider a life-insurance policy.

Build a nest egg to lessen the sting of sudden bills or loss of income

Some older Americans told BI that unexpected expenses or events, like medical diagnoses or layoffs, depleted their retirement savings.

One 78-year-old survey respondent wrote that her husband had heart problems and was recently laid off. She described wanting to reduce their housing costs but being unable to. "We are trapped in a large home living on Social Security and draining savings until it's gone," she wrote.

Dozens of older Americans said a layoff affected their retirement planning. Carly Roszkowski, a vice president of financial-resilience programming at AARP, advised older workers to continue updating their résumés and keep their skills sharp in case they're laid off.

Younger people may want to diversify their skills and prepare to pivot careers. They may also want to build an emergency fund to support themselves or loved ones if they lose their jobs.

"Build relationships with colleagues, mentors, and industry professionals. Networking can open doors to new opportunities and provide valuable support and guidance," Roszkowski said. "Reverse mentorship programs can be effective in organizations to help bridge generational gaps and build understanding and collaboration between different age groups."

Several older Americans said they stopped working or used up much of their savings because of a medical diagnosis. Healthcare researchers advise investing in routine checkups, factoring medical emergencies into nest eggs, and researching government-assistance options.

When a 69-year-old survey respondent and her husband began to struggle with health issues in their 50s and 60s, she said it took a toll on their savings: "Because of our health, I had to cash in my 401(k) for medical expenses at a very early age."

Financial planners told BI that people should analyze the value of their last-resort funding sources, like homes or life-insurance policies, so they know the total of their assets in a costly emergency. Ward said a healthy emergency fund for young people should include enough to cover three to six months' worth of expenses. As people age, they should allocate more: Retirees should have one to two years' worth of income, Ward said.

Sudden healthcare costs can drain emergency funds. Williams advised that people — whether they're young or heading into retirement — research their insurance options so they can reduce out-of-pocket costs.

Doug Ornstein, a director of wealth management at TIAA, argued that people paying high out-of-pocket healthcare costs in retirement "probably would have to live really bare-bones instead of being able to leave their kids some money or be able to do some trips and travel."

Benefits counselors can also help people determine the government aid they qualify for — the money may help them conserve savings and cover bills. The National Council on Aging estimates that up to 9 million older Americans are eligible for government assistance but not enrolled.

Ayoola said that benefits like SNAP or Medicaid could help lower-income people save money over time. "I would tell them to look around for as many government resources as possible to supplement their income," Ayoola said.

Are you an older American with any life regrets that you would be comfortable sharing with a reporter? Please fill out this quick form.