❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayMain stream

Not a single original film broke the box office top 15 in 2024

3 January 2025 at 05:51
Hugh Jackman and Ryan Reynolds.
Deadpool & Wolverine was the second highest-grossing film in 2024.

Taylor Hill/WireImage

  • Franchises and sequels dominated the 2024 box office, including "Inside Out 2" and "Deadpool & Wolverine."
  • The only movie in the top 15 not based on an existing film was "Wicked," which was based on a Broadway musical.
  • Sequels and franchises continue to be lucrative for studios.

Franchises, sequels, and adapted stories dominated the box office in 2024. Not a single original story cracked the top 15.

The highest-grossing films worldwide, according to numbers compiled by Box Office Mojo, included sequels like "Inside Out 2," "Dune: Part Two," and "Gladiator II," and franchise titles like "Deadpool & Wolverine," "Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire," and "Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes."

"Wicked," based on a popular Broadway play, was the only film in the top 15 not based on an existing movie. "It Ends With Us," based on a popular book, came in at number 16, while "The Wild Robot," based on a kids' book, came in at number 18.

The top-grossing film not based on an existing movie, play, book, or comic was John Krasinski's "IF," which earned over $190 million globally and came in at number 24.

Films based on existing intellectual property have generally dominated the box office in recent years, though not always quite as much as in 2024.

In 2023, the top three highest-grossing films were "Barbie," "The Super Mario Bros. Movie," and "Oppenheimer." While those were based on a toy, a video game, and a book, none were sequels or part of an existing film franchise, unlike the top three in 2024. Two movies in the top 15 in 2023 β€” the Chinese film "No More Bets" and Pixar's "Elemental" β€” were original stories.

A survey commissioned by the streamer Tubi found that 74% of millennial and Gen Z respondents preferred originals to remakes. The survey, conducted by The Harris Poll in late 2023 and early 2024, included over 2,500 adults who streamed at least one hour of video a week.

The box office numbers, however, show that sequels and franchises tend to pay off for studios. That was true for Pixar in 2024. And despite indications of superhero fatigue, the success of "Deadpool & Wolverine" showed moviegoers aren't yet finished with the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Michael O'Leary, the chief executive of the National Association of Theater Owners, told The New York Times about 76% of Americans aged 12 to 74 saw a movie in a theater in 2024.

"We feel very good, which is not something many of us would have said last year at this time," he said.

Plenty more sequels and franchise flicks are set to come out in 2025, from "Mission: Impossible β€” The Final Reckoning" to a live-action "Lilo & Stitch" remake.

Read the original article on Business Insider

The best, worst, and most unnecessary prequels in movie history

24 December 2024 at 06:22
Young Taka (voiced by Theo Somolu) and Mufasa (Braelyn Rankins) in Disney's "Mufasa: The Lion King."
"Mufasa: The Lion King."

Disney

  • With a prequel, Hollywood can get as much out of intellectual property as possible.
  • Prequels can also be a good way to illuminate something new about a story or character.
  • Here are some of the best, worst, and plain unnecessary sequels in movie history.

When the news dropped back in 2020 that Disney was producing a prequel to "The Lion King" about the adventures of young Mufasa and Scar, people were skeptical.

Of course, this movie might have something to do with the fact that the live-action remake of "The Lion King" earned $1.6 billion at the box office and the original 1994 film made $978 million.

"Mufasa: The Lion King" was released on December 20 to somewhat middling reviews.

This isn't the first time Hollywood has released a prequel that may or may not be totally necessary. We've compiled a list of the 22 best, worst, or confusing prequels of all time β€” keep reading to see which films made the cut.

In contrast to "The Hunt for Gollum," we were excited about "Furiosa," the prequel to "Mad Max: Fury Road."
Anya Taylor-Joy putting grease on her forehead
Anya Taylor-Joy in "Furiosa."

Warner Bros.

There have been four movies set in the world of "Mad Max," a postapocalyptic future where the entire planet looks like a desert and society has almost completely broken down β€” and we can't get enough.

The 2015 installment, "Mad Max: Fury Road," introduced audiences to Imperator Furiosa (played by Charlize Theron), a general who fights against the tyrannical Immortan Joe (played by Hugh Keays-Byrne) to free his enslaved wives.

As "Fury Road" is technically a "Mad Max" movie, we spend more time with Max (played by Tom Hardy in "Fury Road" and originally played by Mel Gibson in the first three), but everyone left the theater wanting more Furiosa.

While "Furiosa" may not have been a hit at the box office, it was still so great to be back in the world created by director George Miller. Anya Taylor-Joy did a solid job as Furiosa, but it was Chris Hemsworth's performance as Dementus that we couldn't stop thinking about.

Another amazing prequel? "The Godfather Part II."
robert de niro godfather
Robert De Niro in "The Godfather Part II."

Paramount

"The Godfather Part II," released in 1974, is both a sequel and a prequel to 1972's "The Godfather." The film simultaneously follows Al Pacino's Michael Corleone as he assumes the role of don in the Corleone crime family after the death of his father Vito, and tells viewers the origin story of a young Vito (played by Robert De Niro) as he immigrates to New York City from Italy.

Comparing and contrasting Vito and Michael at similar ages is a fascinating look into each of their personalities, and the film keeps viewers equally invested in both as they rise to power.

The less we say about "The Godfather Part III," the better.

"Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again" follows a similar format, and it's also a total banger.
mamma mia 2
Jessica Keenan Wynn, Lily James, and Alexa Davies in "Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again."

Universal Pictures

In our opinion, "Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again," released in 2018, is far superior to the 2008 original film. Why? Because it somehow follows "The Godfather Part II's" playbook and is both a sequel and a prequel.

While we watch a grown-up Sophie (Amanda Seyfried) struggle to finally open her mother Donna's hotel in the present, weΒ alsoΒ get to look back at how a young Donna (played by the effervescent Lily James) met the threeΒ veryΒ handsome men, any one of whom could be Sophie's father.

It shouldn't work, but it does. All we know is that β€” even if it doesn't make sense β€” we need both James and Meryl Streep back for the rumored third film.

"The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" is a perfectly entertaining film, whether you've seen the other two films in the trilogy or not.
the good, the bad, and the ugly movie clint eastwood
Clint Eastwood in "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly."

"The Good, the Bad and The Ugly"/Produzioni Europee Associati

"The Good, the Bad and the Ugly," released in 1966, was the third and final film of director Sergio Leone's "Dollars Trilogy," which began with 1964's "A Fistful of Dollars."

But "The Good..." is actually a prequel, as it depicts Clint Eastwood's character (known simply as The Man with No Name) gaining the iconic items of clothing he wears in the other two films, and it explicitly takes place during the Civil War, while the others seem a bit more modern.

However, you don't need to see "Fistful" or its 1965 sequel to understand why "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" rules. It's a staple of the spaghetti Western genre, Eastwood is as good as he's ever been, and the film's theme is still iconic almost 60 years later.

"Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom" is a controversial film, but there are still things to enjoy about it.
Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom harrison ford
Harrison Ford in "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom."

β€˜Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom’/LucasFilm

Yes, "Temple of Doom," released in 1984, takes place before 1981's "Raiders of the Lost Ark," even though characters from "Temple of Doom" (e.g. Ke Huy Quan's Short Round or Kate Capshaw's Willie Scott) are not mentioned in "Raiders" or "Last Crusade."

Instead, "Temple of Doom" is a rip-roaring adventure following archaeologist/treasure hunter Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) as he goes up against a religious sect that uses enslaved children and rips out human hearts while trying to save a rural village that's been cursed.

"Temple of Doom" hasΒ notΒ aged well in all aspects (its depiction of Indian food and culture is abysmal), and it doesn't really provide any context about Indy's early life β€” you'd have to watch the prologue of "Last Crusade" to see River Phoenix playing a younger version of the character β€” it's still worth the watch for the mine car chase, Ford's delivery of "We are going to die," and the ludicrous plane-crash scene.Β 

"Rogue One" is the best "Star Wars" prequel β€” bar none.
rogue one
Felicity Jones in "Rogue One."

Lucasfilm

"Rogue One" is a prequel that explains exactlyΒ oneΒ plot point from the first "Star Wars" movie, originally released in 1977. Almost 40 years later, in 2016, fans finally got the answer to this question: How did the Rebels get access to the schematics of the Death Star?

Now we know: The daughter of an Empire engineer, Jyn Erso (Felicity Jones), teamed up with a ragtag crew comprised of a spy named Cassian Andor (Diego Luna), a reprogrammed Imperial droid named K-2SO (Alan Tudyk), a blind believer in the Force and his best friend (Donnie Yen and Jiang Wen), and a former Imperial pilot who turned good (Riz Ahmed), to steal the plans from an Imperial base on a suicide mission.

"Rogue One" is such an effective prequel because it almost immediately gets you invested in these characters, and you already know the stakes because of the original trilogy β€” the fate of the galaxy is at stake.

If that wasn't enough prequel action for you, don't fret. The Disney+ series "Andor" is itself a prequel to "Rogue One."

"Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith" is also a solid prequel.
Revenge of the Sith
Hayden Christensen in "Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith."

Lucasfilm

It all led to this: "Revenge of the Sith," released in 2005, finally showed "Star Wars" fans how exactly Jedi prodigy Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen) turned into one of the most terrifying villains of all time, Darth Vader.

The final confrontation between Anakin and his erstwhile mentor, Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor), has basically become a meme at this point, but when you rewatch the movie, it still hits. These two actors are both operating at the top of their game, and you really feel the heartbreak coming from both of them.

This film almost makes the mediocre first two films in the prequel trilogy (more on them later) worth it.

"Bumblebee" gave audiences the chance to learn more about everyone's favorite yellow Transformer.
bumblebee movie
Hailee Steinfeld in "Bumblebee."

Paramount Pictures

After the truly mind-boggling events of 2017's "Transformers: The Last Knight," which introduced the Knights of the Round Table and Merlin to the mythology, it was time to take the franchise back to basics.

And one year later, they did by releasing "Bumblebee," which takes the story back to 1987 and focuses on 18-year-old Charlie (Hailee Steinfeld). Charlie, who has just lost her father, finds Bumblebee in a scrapyard and begins to bond with him.

The stakes are a little lower, the lore is aΒ lotΒ more digestible, and Steinfeld is easily the best protagonist the franchise has ever seen.

"Transformers: Rise of the Beasts" is pretty good too β€” "Transformers" might be the only franchise that's truly benefited from prequels.
Transformers: Rise of the Beasts
"Transformers: Rise of the Beasts."

Paramount Pictures

In 2023, "Rise of the Beasts" was released. It's a bigger story than "Bumblebee" but not as incoherent as "Last Knight" or "Dark Side of the Moon." It also has a way more compelling cast of characters, led by Anthony Ramos as Noah Diaz, Dominique Fishback as Elena Wallace, and Pete Davidson as Mirage.

Again, this movie is a prequel to the original films, taking place mainly in 1994 and largely ignoring the events of both "Bumblebee" and the later films.

It's a fun time at the movies for anyone who simply likes to turn off their brain and watch giant robots beat each other up.

Because, against all odds, "Transformers One" makes this list too.
An animated still of Megatron and Optimus Prime facing each other.
"Transformers One."

Paramount Pictures

In 2024, audiences were treated to yet another movie focusing on the Transformers; this time it was an animated prequel about the origins of Optimus Prime, voiced by Chris Hemsworth, his best-friend-turned-archnemesis Megatron, voiced by Brian Tyree Henry, and Bumblebee, voiced by Keegan-Michael Key.

To put it plainly: This movie rocks. The voice casting is impeccable, the animation is beautiful, and the story is genuinely compelling.

"X-Men: Days of Future Past" was a fun way to see younger versions of our favorite characters while keeping around some of the original X-Men.
x men days of future past
Patrick Stewart, Fan Bingbing, Ian McKellan, and Hugh Jackman in "X-Men: Days of Future Past."

20th Century Fox

The "X-Men" franchise has one of the most complicated chronologies in movie history β€” and much of that is made even more confusing with the events of 2014's "Days of Future Past," which sees characters from the original "X-Men" film go back in time to link up with the characters introduced in 2011's "X-Men: First Class" to change the future and hopefully save all of mutant-kind.

But even with that complicated setup, this movie is a lot of fun.

Seeing Hugh Jackman's Wolverine interact with the younger version of his mentor Professor X (played by James McAvoy) and his arch-enemy Magneto (Michael Fassbender) is entertaining, and the happy ending they manage to pull off for almost everyone feels earned.

The only prequel Pixar has ever produced is "Monsters University," which doesn't match the highs of "Monsters, Inc.," but is still a prequel worth watching.
monsters university
"Monsters University."

Disney/Pixar

"Monsters University" was released in 2013, 12 years after we last saw Sulley and Mike, our resident scarers (and later comedians).

The ending of "Monsters, Inc." should never be touched β€” it's perfect β€” so when it was announced that another film in this universe was coming, fans were a bit nervous. But the filmmakers managed to avoid ruining the end of "Monsters, Inc." by instead showing us how best friends Mike (Billy Crystal) and Sulley (John Goodman) met while they were attending Monsters University.

Fans get some genuine insight into how this world works, how Mike and Sulley were able to bond even though they're total opposites, and even how their beef with Randall (Steve Buscemi) started.

And before you ask: No, "Lightyear" isn't a prequel.

"Alien: Covenant" is more connected to the original "Alien" films than its predecessor, "Prometheus."
alien covenant Fox final
Katherine Waterston in "Alien: Covenant."

Fox

The world of "Alien" is a big one β€” that's why there have been seven movies, with a TV show on the way next year.

While 2012's "Prometheus" takes place in the same universe as "Alien," its 2017 sequel "Alien: Covenant" directly ties into the events of the earlier films by essentially retelling the events of 1979's "Alien." But this time, it explains how the horrifying xenomorphs were actually created by the evil Weyland-Yutani Corporation and how learning to control these creatures has always been their plan.

Also, we have to shout out Michael Fassbender, whose dual performance as Walter and David is the highlight of this movie. Creepy androids are an important part of the "Alien" franchise, and he knocked it out of the park.

But not all prequels are great β€” some are completely unnecessary, like "Oz the Great and Powerful," an origin story for the Wizard from "The Wizard of Oz."
oz the great and powerful
James Franco in "Oz the Great and Powerful."

Sony Pictures Imageworks/YouTube

"The Wizard of Oz" remains one of the greatest films of all time, even though it was released 85 years ago. That's probably enough of a reason to leave this story alone, but instead, there have been many attempts to create a worthy sequel of the film β€” none of them have lived up to the original.

Sadly, neither does 2013's prequel "Oz the Great and Powerful," starring James Franco as the titular Oz. Part of the fun of "The Wizard of Oz" is that you don'tΒ reallyΒ know how the Wizard got to Oz, and that mystery adds to the fantastical vibes of the land of Oz.

But if you watch "Oz," you'll learn all about Oscar's career as a scam artist, how he manipulated everyone around him, and how he inadvertently created the Wicked Witch of the East.

It's not a horrible movie, but it kind of diminishes the magic of the original film, and for that, it's unnecessary.

We can't knock Emma Stone's performance in "Cruella," but did we really need an origin story for the Dalmatian-hating Cruella de Vil?
cruella emma stone hq 1
Emma Stone in "Cruella."

Laurie Sparham/Disney

We know that anti-heroes are all the rage, but did Disney really expect us to start siding with a woman who wanted to skin 101 Dalmatian puppies for a coat? This 2021 film gives Cruella de Vil, the villain of the 1961 animated film, a convoluted back story in which she clashes with a legendary fashion designer known only as the Baroness (Emma Thompson).

It is fun to watch Stone and Thompson face off, the fashion is to die for, and it's overall a solid movie ... but there's no reason for it to exist. We didn't need to know any more about Cruella β€” and we definitely don't need a sequel.

Many people loathe the "Hobbit" trilogy β€” "Lord of the Rings" fans were content with the original three films.
the hobbit
Martin Freeman in "The Hobbit."

Warner Bros.

Simply put: "The Hobbit" films (2012's "An Unexpected Journey," 2013's "The Desolation of Smaug," and 2014's "The Battle of the Five Armies") are slow. While the first three "Lord of the Rings" movies are based on a 1,200-page tome, "The Hobbit" films are based on a 300-page novel (that's downright cute in comparison).

Maybe "The Hobbit," which starred Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins, would've worked as a single film, but there was no reason for the story to be stretched out across three films β€” especially when we know exactly how it ends thanks to Bilbo's appearances in "Fellowship of the Ring" and "The Return of the King," as played by Ian Holm.

We'll see if "The Hunt for Gollum" is a more worthy prequel β€” the jury's still out on "The War of the Rohirrim."

"300: Rise of an Empire" took everything that was not great about "300" and doubled down.
300 rise of an empire
Lena Headey and Sullivan Stapleton in "300: Rise of an Empire."

Warner Bros.

"300," the 2006 historical epic, isn't exactly a work of cinematic art, but it is entertaining, and spawned many a meme and much interest in ancient Sparta.

However, "Rise of an Empire," released in 2014, is both a prequel and a sequel and also takes place during the events of "300." You could argue it bites off more than it can chew. Plus, in our opinion, Sullivan Stapleton does not hold the screen the same way Gerard Butler does.

As The New York Times' Nicolas Rapold put it, "Rise of an Empire" "[lacks] the momentum and bombastic je ne sais quoi of '300.'"

"The Thing" didn't live up to the '80s original.
the thing 2011
Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje and Joel Edgerton in "The Thing."

Universal Pictures

The 1982 John Carpenter classic "The Thing" was negatively reviewed upon its release, but it has since been reappraised as one of the best sci-fi/horror films of all time. The special effects alone remain horrifying 42 years later.

The 2011 prequel, also called "The Thing," leads viewers right up to the first moments of the 1982 film, which completely removes the stakes β€” you know that everyone in the film is toast.

As many critics noted, the 2011 version also didn't really deviate from the source material. NME's Owen Nicholls wrote, "The real mess lies in the fact that from Plot Point One until Act III we're treading over all-too-familiar snow prints."

Just watch the original.

"Star Wars: Episode I β€” The Phantom Menace" and "Star Wars: Episode II β€” Attack of the Clones" are just boring.
Phantom Menace
Liam Neeson, Jake Lloyd, and Ewan McGregor in "Star Wars: Episode I β€” The Phantom Menace."

Lucasfilm

Think back to 1999 β€” the first "Star Wars" movie in 16 years is about to be released. You can't wait to see how director George Lucas is going to show fans how the Jedi chosen one, Anakin Skywalker, became the space fascist known as Darth Vader.

You sit down with popcorn to view "The Phantom Menace" ... and you watch a movie that's about track blockades, contains a scientific explanation for the Force, and portrays the future Darth Vader as a whiny kid.

Three years later, in 2002, you sit down once again to see "Attack of the Clones." Maybe they've course-corrected β€” but no. Now you have a whiny teenage Anakin Skywalker, the Jedi acting even more incompetently than they did in "Phantom Menace," and a movie that's just as boring. There's not a Han Solo-level character to be found.

Skipping to "Revenge of the Sith" is the best way to view "Star Wars," trust us.

"The Scorpion King's" only redeeming quality is that it started Dwayne Johnson on his path to movie stardom.
The Scorpion King the scorpion king
Dwayne Johnson in "The Scorpion King."

Universal Pictures/"The Scorpion King"

"The Scorpion King" is just a bad movie. The CGI is bad, the Rock hasn't mastered his on-screen persona yet (read: he does not have a personality in this movie), and there's really no reason we needed to see the Scorpion King's origin story: There's a scene dedicated to his origin story in "The Mummy Returns," and that tells us everything we need to know.

It's a testament to Johnson's charisma because if this had been anyone else's first leading role, their career would've been over.

"Mufasa: The Lion King" does not justify its existence.
Young Taka (voiced by Theo Somolu) and Mufasa (Braelyn Rankins) in Disney's "Mufasa: The Lion King."
"Mufasa: The Lion King."

Disney

Prequels like this are tricky to pull off β€” weΒ knowΒ that Taka will turn into the villainous Scar, who will one day push his brother off a cliff to his death, an act that traumatized so many '90s and 2000s kids. So, it's hard to get invested in him as a cute cub when we know what his future holds.

Similarly, it's hard to get invested in the action when we know that basically every character on screen will be fine. There are so many scenes where Mufasa almost falls off a cliff, which is supposed to be foreshadowing but also has no dramatic tension since we know he will be OK (for now).

The animation is better than in 2019's "Lion King" remake. However, it's still somewhat in the uncanny valley zone, and it's always going to be easier animating a cartoon lion to have expressions than a photorealistic one. If you're really in need of a "Lion King" sequel, check out "The Lion King II: Simba's Pride."

Read the original article on Business Insider

The 10 best and 10 worst sequels of 2024, according to critics

1 December 2024 at 06:27
Lady Gaga has Harley Quinn in "Joker: Folie Γ  Deux."
Lady Gaga starred as Harley Quinn in "Joker: Folie Γ  Deux."

Warner Brothers Pictures

  • Sequels were a popular choice for movie studios this year.
  • "Inside Out 2" is the highest-grossing film of 2024, with $1.7 billion in worldwide ticket sales.
  • But not all sequels hit the bar set by their predecessors.

Hollywood seems to have taken a strong liking to the lesson, "If it's not broken, don't fix it."

After decades spent collecting dust in old DVD and VHS collections, previously loved classics like "Beetlejuice," "Gladiator," and "Twister" were revived by studios with sequels fit for both their original audiences and a new generation of moviegoers.

But while these movies earned mid-tier ranking from critics (they all scored around 75% on Rotten Tomatoes), others like "Dune: Part Two" shone brightly β€” Hoai-Tran Bui wrote for Inverse that it was "in contention for the pantheon of greatest sequels ever."

However, there were some disappointments, too. (Hello, "Joker: Folie Γ  Deux.")

While the internet can debate the value in reviving storylines with sequels, prequels, reboots, etc., Business Insider's Palmer Haasch reported that "familiar IP is comforting to viewers β€” and risk-averse executives."

In fact, all 10 of the highest-grossing films of the year are sequels, ranging from $397 million to nearly $1.7 billion in worldwide ticket sales, according to Box Office Mojo.

As the year comes to a close, here's a look at the 10 best and 10 worst sequels of the year so far, according to critics on Rotten Tomatoes.

All Rotten Tomatoes ratings were accurate as of November 26.

Let's start with the worst sequels of the year. 10. "Bad Boys: Ride or Die"
Martin Lawrence and Will Smith as Detective Marcus Burnett and Detective Mike Lowrey in "Bad Boys: Ride or Die."
Martin Lawrence and Will Smith star as Detective Marcus Burnett and Detective Mike Lowrey in "Bad Boys: Ride or Die."

Sony Pictures Entertainment

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 65%

Will Smith and Martin Lawrence reprise their roles as Detective Mike Lowrey and Detective Marcus Burnett, who are on a mission to clear the name of their late police captain Conrad Howard.

Matt Goldberg wrote for The Wrap, "The 'Bad Boys' series has never been about tight plotting or ingenious twists. It's about throwing Lowrey and Burnett into chaotic situations and forcing them to wisecrack and shoot their way out. That's it. Those are the movies. They're a bizarre blend of soap opera, broad comedy, and bombastic action, and they should not work, but they do."

9. "Force of Nature: The Dry 2"
Eric Bana as Detective Aaron Falk in "Force of Nature: The Dry 2."
Eric Bana reprised his role as Detective Aaron Falk in "Force of Nature: The Dry 2."

IFC Films

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 64%

The second film in "The Dry" series focuses on the disappearance of a woman, Alice Russell (Anna Torv), during a hiking retreat with four fellow employees. When they return without her, Detective Aaron Falk (Eric Bana) must figure out the truth of what happened to her.

We Live Entertainment's Aaron Neuwirth gave the film a 6/10 rating, writing the story "ends up feeling too convoluted for its own good, with a less engaging structure and more like a push towards some inevitable moments that ultimately take away from the film's urgency."

However, he added that it's still "decadent enough" to watch, and that he doesn't mind seeing another iteration of this story in a few years.

8. "Descendants: The Rise of Red"
Rita Ora as the Queen of Hearts in "Descendants: Rise of Red."
Rita Ora starred as the Queen of Hearts in "Descendants: Rise of Red."

Disney+

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 57%

The "Descendants" series continued with its fifth iteration in July, as Ursula's daughter Uma (China Anne McClain) β€” now in charge of Auradon Prep β€” invites the Queen of Hearts (Rita Ora) and her teenage daughter Red (Kylie Cantrall) to the school. But when the Queen of Hearts launches a coup against her high-school nemesis Cinderella (Brandy), each of their daughters, Chloe (Malia Baker) and Red, must team up to go back in time and stop the event that turned the Queen evil.

While the score only draws from seven critics' reviews, Decider's John Serba wrote that fans of the series will be used to its over-the-topness, "which exists very much within the Disney Channel formula of heavily processed visuals and forced pep," and is "surely just good enough for all interested and engaged parties."

7. "Despicable Me 4"
A still of "Despicable Me 4" characters Gru, Lucy, and Gru Jr.
"Despicable Me 4" grossed more than $968 million at the worldwide box office.

Illumination

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 56%

In the latest "Despicable Me" film, Gru (Steve Carell) must face his high-school rival, villain Maxime Le Mal (Will Ferrell) and his girlfriend, Valentina (SofΓ­a Vergara). But to keep the family safe β€” complete with their newest addition, Gru Jr. β€” everyone must relocate to a safe house.

Zaki Hasan, of the San Francisco Chronicle's Datebook, wrote, "At this point, the 'Despicable Me' series ('Minions' too) is mostly about keeping the content flowing so Universal can continue selling backpacks and plush toys, so don't be shocked if your child asks to return to theaters again in a few years. Talk about despicable."

6. "Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire"
A still from "Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire," with Godzilla roaring.
"Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire" was released in March.

Warner Brothers Pictures

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 54%

The Monsterverse franchise continues with "Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire," to see the iconic monsters team up against an even bigger threat to the world.

"This movie's a mess," wrote The Film Frenzy's Matt Brunson.

"It's noisy, punishing, soulless (it calculatingly kills off more civilians than even 'Man of Steel'), needlessly convoluted, populated by nitwits and dullards, and choked with increasingly impersonal CGI," he added.

5. "Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire"
Paul Rudd, Finn Wolfhard, Mckenna Grace, and Carrie Coon in a still from "Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire."
Paul Rudd, Finn Wolfhard, Mckenna Grace, and Carrie Coon starred in "Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire."

Sony Pictures Entertainment

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 42%

In the follow-up to the "Ghostbusters" revival, "Ghostbusters: Afterlife," descendants of the late Egon Spengler team up with members of the original Ghostbusting crew β€” including Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, and Annie Potts β€” to save the world from a second Ice Age.

"Ultimately, there's nothing in 'Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire' that will win you over β€” no great action sequences, no laugh-out-loud jokes, and certainly nothing as inspired as 'Ghostbusters II's' perfect metaphor of a malevolent ooze fed by the negative energy of New York City seeping into the sewers. The jokes are witless, the emotions artless, and the film joyless," wrote Vulture's Bilge Ebiri.

3 (tie). "Venom: The Last Dance"
Tom Hardy as Eddie Brock and Venom in "Venom: The Last Dance."
Tom Hardy reprised his roles as Eddie Brock and Venom in "Venom: The Last Dance."

Sony Pictures Entertainment

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 40%

Sure, Sony doesn't have a perfect track record with superhero movies (see: "Morbius" and "Madame Web"), but the "Venom" series has been a surprise hit … until now. In the final film of the trilogy, Tom Hardy returns as Eddie Brock and Venom as the pair goes on the run from forces from both their worlds.

While The Hollywood Reporter's Gayle Sequeira wrote that what works in this installments' favor is "its incredibly earnest exploration of the characters' personal stakes," Observer's Dylan Roth had a harsher take, writing, "True to form for this trilogy β€” which supposedly concludes here β€” the brainless and disjointed 'Last Dance' skates by on star Tom Hardy's charm and a few good gags."

"It's a relentless marathon of mediocrity," Roth added.

3 (tie). "Horizon: An American Saga β€” Chapter 2"
Kevin Costner as Hayes Ellison in "Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 1."
Kevin Costner directed, wrote, produced, and starred in "Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 1" and "Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 2."

Warner Brothers Pictures

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 40%

After the lackluster reception of "Horizon: An American Saga β€” Chapter 1," Kevin Costner debuted the second chapter of his Western passion project during the Venice International Film Festival in September. Though the sequel was pulled from theaters ahead of its planned August debut, it's already garnered enough reviews from critics to earn a 40% on Rotten Tomatoes.

Variety's Jessica Kiang wrote that it "is an exercise in contradictions: incident-packed yet oddly sedate; replete with characters new and returning, yet largely lacking in compelling characterization; and, running to over three hours, simply too long a film to be so jarringly abrupt."

2. "Joker: Folie Γ  Deux"
Lady Gaga has Harley Quinn in "Joker: Folie Γ  Deux."
Lady Gaga starred as Harley Quinn in "Joker: Folie Γ  Deux."

Warner Brothers Pictures

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 32%

The musical follow-up to 2019's critically acclaimed "Joker," did not live up to expectations despite the introduction of Lady Gaga's Lee Quinzel, aka Harley Quinn.

"By any reasonable measure this is a terrible movie, too long and too self-serious and way too dramatically inert, a regrettable waste of its lead actors' boundless commitment to even their most thinly written roles," Dana Stevens wrote for Slate.

1. "Rebel Moon β€” Part Two: The Scargiver"
Djimon Hounsou as General Titus in "Rebel Moon β€” Part Two: The Scargiver."
"Rebel Moon β€” Part Two: The Scargiver" was released on Netflix in April.

Netflix

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 16%

"Rebel Moon β€” Part Two: The Scargiver" was released in April, offering a quick follow-up for audiences who'd seen "Rebel Moon: Part One β€” A Child of Fire" in December 2023. The sequel picks back up with Kora (Sofia Boutella) and her group of ally warriors returning to the planet Veldt; there, they must train and defend its people from an impending attack while Kora comes to terms with her past.

David Fear wrote for Rolling Stone that "life is painfully short," and advised readers to "turn away from your screens. Go for a walk. Start your own wheat-threshing collective. Anything but suffer through this."

Now, the best sequels of the year: 9 (tie). "Alien: Romulus"
Cailee Spaeny as Rain Carradine in "Alien: Romulus."
"Alien: Romulus" was released in August.

20th Century Studios

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 80%

The seventh installment in the "Alien" series follows indentured space colony worker Rain Carradine (Cailee Spaeny) and a group of other young workers as they attempt to escape to another colony.

Jordan Hoffman wrote for Entertainment Weekly that the film "doesn't try to reinvent anything and instead focuses on refining what works. It's got the thrills, it's got the creepy-crawlies, and it's got just enough plot to make you care about the characters."

9 (tie). "Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes"
A closeup still of Proximus Caesar in "Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes."
"Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes" was released in May.

20th Century Studios

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 80%

"Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes" returns to Earth decades after Caesar's reign to reveal that apes are now the dominant species, not humans. But as Caesar's legacy is distorted by a new ruler, Proximus Caesar, who's attacked and enslaved other clans in the pursuit of human technology, a young chimpanzee, Noa, and a woman must work together.

Ty Burr wrote for The Washington Post, "'Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes' is a sturdy new entry in the revived Planet of the Apes franchise, itself one of the more successful second go-rounds, commercially and artistically, of Hollywood's modern corporate era."

8. "The First Omen"
Nell Tiger Free as Margaret in "The First Omen."
"The First Omen" was released in April.

20th Century Studios

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 83%

As the prequel to 1976's "The Omen," "The First Omen" centers on a young American nun, Margaret, who uncovers a conspiracy to birth the Antichrist while serving at a Catholic orphanage in Rome.

Alison Foreman wrote for IndieWire that the film "ticks all the boxes of a justified IP revisitation that arguably should get more chapters [because] it improves what came before it."

Foreman added, "It's also the rare prequel (sequel, requel, what have you) that fits seamlessly inside the existing franchise and makes tracks toward a chilling new future. In short, it births something new and genuinely scary. Remember when that wasn't so rare?"

7. "Smile 2"
Naomi Scott as Skye Riley in "Smile 2."
Naomi Scott starred as pop star Skye Riley in "Smile 2."

Paramount Pictures

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 86%

Beginning six days after the end of "Smile," "Smile 2" focuses on pop star Skye Riley's (Naomi Scott) battle with the Smile entity.

Though the AP's Mark Kennedy concedes that director and screenwriter Parker Finn's script "sometimes lags as he searches for an ending," Finn found "a great satirical target, given life to a third film easily and showcased another rising star to watch. That's a reason to, well, smile about."

6. "A Quiet Place: Day One"
A closeup still of Lupita Nyong'o as Samira in "A Quiet Place: Day One."
Lupita Nyong'o starred as Samira in "A Quiet Place: Day One."

Paramount Pictures

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 87%

"A Quiet Place: Day One" serves as a prequel to the first two installments in John Krasinski's "A Quiet Place" series by highlighting the first day of the alien invasion in New York City through the journeys of Samira "Sam" (Lupita Nyong'o) and Eric (Joseph Quinn).

"The third chapter of 'A Quiet Place' shows that this smart, reliably frightening series, which began with a modestly budgeted feature that performed way beyond expectations, is by no means tapped out," David Rooney wrote for The Hollywood Reporter.

5. "Transformers One"
An animated still of Megatron and Optimus Prime facing each other.
"Transformers One" was released in September.

Paramount Pictures

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 89%

"Transformers" might be one of the most heavily mined IPs in Hollywood, but Paramount's "Transformers One" manages to do something unique by telling the origin story of Orion Pax (Optimus Prime) and D-16's (Megatron) friendship and inevitable hatred.

Carlos Aguilar of the LA Times wrote that writers Andrew Barrer, Gabriel Ferrari, and Eric Pearson created "a consistently humorous script brimming with witty banter and quips that mostly land."

"Yet what grounds the story amid the pileup of sci-fi terms and lore is the convincingly intense bond that these male protagonists have nurtured," Aguilar added. "There's a gravitas to their relationship that makes the heartbreak of their eventual separation feel earned."

3 (tie). "Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga"
A still of Anya Taylor-Joy as a young Imperator Furiosa in "Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga."
Anya Taylor-Joy starred as a young Imperator Furiosa in "Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga."

Warner Brothers Pictures

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 90%

Another origin story that was well-received this year was "Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga." The prequel follows the story of Furiosa, portrayed by Anya Taylor-Joy, from her kidnapping from the Green Place to her life as a skilled mechanic, driver, and warrior ready to take on her enemies.

Though NPR's Justin Chang thought something in Furiosa's "arc feels a bit too psychologically tidy to grip or disturb you in the way it's supposed to," the movie's post-apocalyptic world is the true star.

"Even in the moments when the CGI looks a little obvious, the mayhem is staged and shot with the kind of blissful coherence that you rarely see in a Hollywood blockbuster anymore," Chang said.

3 (tie). "Inside Out 2"
A still of Joy, Anger, Sadness, Disgust, and Fear being afraid of the new emotion, Anxiety, in "Inside Out 2."
"Inside Out 2" was released in June and is the highest-grossing film of the year.

Pixar

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 90%

Audiences are thrust back into the mind of "Inside Out" protagonist Riley Andersen, who's now 13, as her lovable cast of emotions, led by Amy Poehler's Joy, deal with the introduction of new characters Anxiety, Envy, Ennui, and Embarrassment.

"What I loved most about 'Inside Out 2,' a movie that's warmhearted and entertaining if not quite up to the revelatory standards of its predecessor, is its portrayal of Anxiety as not a villain but a character who believes herself to be a protector," Dan Kois wrote for Slate.

2. "Dune: Part Two"
A closeup still of TimothΓ©e Chalamet as Paul Atreides in "Dune: Part Two."
TimothΓ©e Chalamet returned as Paul Atreides in "Dune: Part Two."

Warner Brothers Pictures

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 92%

In the highly anticipated follow-up to 2021's "Dune," TimothΓ©e Chalamet returns as Paul Atreides as he lives and trains amongst the Fremen of Arrakis and decides whether to embrace his position as the Lisan al Gaib, or messiah.

"It's a towering feat of sci-fi cinema that will put 'Dune: Part Two' in contention for the pantheon of greatest sequels ever," Hoai-Tran Bui wrote for Inverse.

1. "Paddington in Peru"
A still of Paddington Bear in "Paddington in Peru."
"Paddington in Peru" was released to UK audiences in November.

Sony Pictures Entertainment

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 94%

Though "Paddington in Peru," the third on-screen adventure for Paddington Bear, doesn't premiere in US theaters until January 17, it's already received positive reviews from those in the UK, where it was released on November 8.

The film follows Paddington and the Brown family as they go on an adventure through the jungles of Peru to search for his missing Aunt Lucy.

"This is confectionary cinemaβ€”sweet, light, and wanting little more than to make its audience smile," Ross McIndoe wrote for Slant.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Writer Richard Curtis on why Julia Roberts rejected a 'Notting Hill' sequel: 'A very poor idea'

30 November 2024 at 01:58
Notting Hill
Julia Roberts in the classic romantic comedy.

Universal Pictures

  • Richard Curtis's idea for a second "Notting Hill" film was apparently shelved because of Julia Roberts.
  • Roberts is said to have disliked his idea for a follow-up film with a divorce plot.
  • "Julia thought that was a very poor idea," the "Love Actually" director told IndieWire.

The screenwriter behind the rom-com "Notting Hill" has opened up on why the classic movie has never got a sequel.

In an interview with IndieWire, Richard Curtis said that Julia Roberts was not a fan of his idea for a follow-up in which Roberts' and costar Hugh Grant's characters split up.

Asked if he would like to do any follow-ups to his past films, he said: "I tried doing one with 'Notting Hill' where they were going to get divorced, and Julia thought that was a very poor idea."

"I actually did four Red Nose Days and Comic Relief. We did those mini sequels to 'Love Actually,' and those satisfied me," he added.

A representative for Roberts did not respond to a request for comment sent by Business Insider.

In the 1999 film, Roberts plays a famous movie actor named Anna Scott.

Scott falls in love with William Thacker (played by Grant), the owner of a bookstore in the picturesque area of London from which the film takes its name.

notting hill
Julia Roberts and Hugh Grant in "Notting Hill."

Universal Pictures

While the paparazzi's fascination with Anna initially complicates their relationship, the film ends with the pair happily together and expecting a child.

When it was released in theaters over Memorial Day weekend in 1999, "Notting Hill" grossed around $21.8 million over three days, and $27.7 million over the long weekend, making it the biggest opening for a romantic comedy film at the time.

The movie, directed by the late Roger Michell, was nominated for best film in the comedy or musical genre at the Golden Globes, with Grant and Roberts also receiving individual nominations.

Curtis, whose new animated film "That Christmas" premieres on Netflix on December 4, suggested that even if Roberts was on board with a "Notting Hill" sequel, his focus was currently on branching out into new kinds of projects.

"I think oddly enough I'm keen at this stage in my career of doing new things as much as I can," he told IndieWire. "That's why it was great doing an animated film. I've made, I think, 17 films. It's quite hard for the 18th to be as different as this one is."

Read the original article on Business Insider
❌
❌