House Democrats from across the party's ideological spectrum — united in their fury at Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) — are engaged in a campaign to get Senate Democrats to defy their leader.

Why it matters: House lawmakers feel that there is a glimmer of hope, however faint, that they can actually persuade their Senate counterparts to reject a Republican-led government spending bill.

• "There is a massive effort going on with people reaching out to their senators ... still happening this morning," one House Democrat told Axios on Friday.
• "We just need to pick off four or five" senators, the lawmaker said.

What we're hearing: House Democrats are circulating a draft letter to Schumer, a copy of which was obtained by Axios, voicing "strong opposition" to passing the spending measure.

• "The American people sent Democrats to Congress to fight against Republican chaos," they wrote.
• "Instead of capitulating to their obstruction, we must fight ... we urge you to reject the partisan continuing resolution."
• The letter has been signed by more than 50 House Democrats, one lawmaker told Axios. It was first reported by the Washington Post.

State of play: Schumer sent House Democrats into fits of rage on Thursday by announcing that he would vote to allow Senate Republicans to pass their stopgap government spending bill.

• Democrats have pushed for language in the bill to stop DOGE from cutting congressionally approved spending, but Schumer argued that Democrats would ultimately lose a shutdown fight.
• The announcement came after all House Democrats except Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) voted against the bill, which passed the chamber virtually along party lines Tuesday. Now they feel they walked the plank for nothing.
• President Trump on Friday praised Schumer's "courage" in backing the bill.

The intrigue: It's not just the left pressuring Schumer. "A lot of it is being led by [former Progressive Caucus chair Pramila] Jayapal and AOC, but there are frontliners too trying to whip," one House Democrat told Axios.

• The draft letter is being led by Rep. Derek Tran (D-Calif.), who represents one of the most competitive districts in the country, according to multiple House Democrats and aides familiar with the matter.
• A centrist House Democrat who represents a battleground district stressed to Axios that "this is NOT an ideological battle. I've never seen our caucus more united around an issue."

What they're saying: Centrist Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), asked by Axios about Schumer's decision to support the stopgap bill, quipped, "Amy Schumer was great in that movie 'Trainwreck.'"

• Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.) said in a statement that Senate Democrats are "making a strategic calculation that we as a party might live to regret."
• "The CR represents the best (and possibly only) leverage that we as Democrats will have to halt or impede Donald Trump's systematic decimation of the social safety net—particularly Medicaid," he added.

Yes, but: There isn't total unanimity. Some House Democrats, for instance, conceded that senators are in a tougher spot given that the upper chamber's 60-vote filibuster threshold gives them a unique ability to actually force a government shutdown.

• Others feel the letter may be a strategic misstep.
• "I don't think it's the right approach," one House Democrat told Axios of the letter. "Senators don't like being whipped by House members publicly like that."

The bottom line: "The anger from yesterday has not subsided at all," a House Democrat told Axios, adding that members feel "let down."

• "At the end of the day, because this is the only opportunity where we matter, we needed to get more from it, and we got nothing," the lawmaker said.
• The Democrat noted that swing-district House lawmakers already see themselves getting roasted by Republicans for opposing a bill that could now pass anyway: "The NRCC ads are already happening."

Editor's note: This story has been updated with additional reporting.

Consumers are becoming sharply more pessimistic about the economic outlook, according to a preliminary reading of the University of Michigan's sentiment survey for March.

Why it matters: The mix of new tariffs, federal cutbacks, erratic policy, and a slumping stock market is dampening American's optimism, which risks generating self-fulfilling economic weakness in the event consumers act on their newfound sense of worry.

• Lower sentiment was strikingly broad-based, seen "across all groups by age, education, income, wealth, political affiliations, and geographic regions," survey director Joanne Hsu said in an announcement.

By the numbers: Overall consumer sentiment fell 11% in the month to 57.9, the third straight month of decline. That level is the lowest since the fall of 2022. when Biden-era inflation was still running high.

• The decline was sharpest among Democrats, whose expectations declined 24%, but sentiment among Republicans fell 10% as well.
• Inflation expectations also surged, with survey respondents now expecting inflation over the next year of 4.9%, up from 4.3% a month ago

Of note: Long-term inflation expectations also surged, to 3.9% in March from 3.5% in February. That will be particularly worrying to Federal Reserve officials, who may be reluctant to respond to any weakening in the economy due to fears that inflation expectations are coming unmooored.

• That was the largest one-month rise in long-term inflation expectations since 1993.

What they're saying: "While current economic conditions were little changed, expectations for the future deteriorated across multiple facets of the economy," Hsu wrote, "including personal finances, labor markets, inflation, business conditions, and stock markets.

• "Many consumers cited the high level of uncertainty around policy and other economic factors; frequent gyrations in economic policies make it very difficult for consumers to plan for the future, regardless of one's policy preferences," she aded.

Yes, but: The preliminary reading of the Michigan survey, released mid-month, is based on a relatively small sample of around 420 households.

• The final March number, based on about 800 survey respondents, is to be released March 28.

President Trump plans to invoke a centuries-old wartime authority to accelerate mass deportations of undocumented immigrants with little to no due process.

Why it matters: Trump floated invoking the law on the campaign trail. Its potential use comes as some of his administration members have become frustrated with the slower than expected pace of deportations.

• Trump could invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 as soon as Friday.
• Since the act is not part of immigration law, it would allow the government to detain and deport people without court hearings or asylum interviews.
• Its most infamous use came during World War II, when it was used help justify Japanese internment.
• Reality check: The U.S. is not currently at war with any country.

The big picture: Despite promising to carry out the "largest deportation program" in U.S. history, the pace of arrests of undocumented immigrants under Trump has appeared to lag behind President Biden's.

• The Trump administration has faced lack of funding and infrastructure hurdles, and even looked to hold detainees in Guantanamo Bay — a plan that has faced legal challenges.
• If Trump were to invoke the Alien Enemies Act during peacetime it would be a "staggering abuse," sure to wind up in court, per the Brennan Center for Justice.

Zoom in: The president has suggested the law it could be used to target immigrants with alleged ties to criminal gangs.

• Less than 1% of immigrants deported last fiscal year were kicked out of the U.S. for crimes other than immigration violations, Axios' Russell Contreras has reported.

What is the Alien Enemies Act of 1798?

The Alien Enemies Act allows the government to detain and remove immigrants when there is "a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government."

• It could also apply in cases when a foreign government has "perpetrated, attempted, or threatened" an invasion or "predatory incursion" of the U.S.
• While the law can't be used to detain U.S. citizens, the U.S.-citizen children of immigrants could be affected.
• Trump border czar Tom Homan, when asked how deportations could be carried out without separating families, said in October that families would be deported together.

When has the Alien Enemies Act been used?

Only three times since its inception, during the War of 1812, World War I and World War II.

• In these instances, the act has been "wielded against immigrants who have done nothing wrong, have evinced no signs of disloyalty, and are lawfully present in the United States," according to the Brennan Center for Justice.
• During both World Wars, Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Harry Truman used it to justify the "detentions, expulsions, and restrictions targeting German, Austro-Hungarian, Japanese, and Italian immigrants based solely on their ancestry," per the center.

How has Trump laid the groundwork for its use?

Trump on his first day in office issued an executive order instructing his administration members to prepare for the act's potential invocation.

• While the Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, the president has the authority to respond to sudden attacks, like predatory incursions or invasions, per the Brennan Center for Justice.
• Trump has already begun making the case that such an incursion or invasion is already underway.
• His administration has declared some Latin American cartels to be terrorist organizations, and Trump has baselessly suggested that one of them — Tren de Aragua — has already taken over a Denver suburb.
• Many Republicans have also echoed Trump's language referring to illegal immigration as an "invasion."

Go deeper: Trump plans to use 1798 law in mass deportations

President Trump said on Friday he "strongly requested" that Russian President Vladimir Putin "spare the lives" of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers, whom he claimed were "surrounded" in the Kursk region in Russia.

Why it matters: Ukraine launched a risky cross-border incursion into Kursk last August and occupied a significant swath of Russian territory, but Russia has been making rapid gains in recent weeks and putting those forces under severe pressure. Trump claimed the troops now faced a potential "massacre."

Driving the news: Putin raised the fate of the Ukrainian forces in Kursk as a key issue to be resolved before he would consider Trump's proposal for a 30-day ceasefire.

• In a Thursday press conference, Putin asked: "Should we release them after they committed serious crimes against civilians?" Russia has previously said soldiers captured in Kursk would be considered terrorists.
• Gen. Oleksandr Syrskyi, commander-in-chief of Ukraine's armed forces, acknowledged the "difficult situation" on Tuesday but said Ukrainian forces were not surrounded and were moving to "more favorable" defensive positions. He said Ukraine would fight on in Kursk "as long as reasonable and necessary."
• Ukraine has not yet said whether it supports Trump's call for its troops to be given safe passage out of Kursk.

State of play: Trump made the comments on Truth Social a day after his envoy Steve Witkoff met Putin for discussions Trump called "very good and productive."

• The meeting lasted several hours and Witkoff didn't depart Moscow until 2am local time.
• The Kremlin said Putin gave Witkoff a message for Trump, and that a phone call between the leaders could take place in the coming days.
• Before the meeting, though, Putin downplayed Trump's proposal for an unconditional surrender, making clear that with his forces on the march in Kursk and in southeastern Ukraine, several demands would have to be met before he would order them to stand down.

What they're saying: "We had very good and productive discussions with President Vladimir Putin of Russia yesterday, and there is a very good chance that this horrible, bloody war can finally come to an end," Trump wrote on Friday morning about Witkoff's meeting.

• Trump added: "BUT, AT THIS VERY MOMENT, THOUSANDS OF UKRAINIAN TROOPS ARE COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY THE RUSSIAN MILITARY, AND IN A VERY BAD AND VULNERABLE POSITION."
• "I have strongly requested to President Putin that their lives be spared. This would be a horrible massacre, one not seen since World War II. God bless them all!!!"

Gold hit a new all-time high Friday, breaking $3,000 for the first time ever, as investors search for tariff safe-havens.

Why it matters: There's a psychological value to important assets breaking through big, round numbers — but it's also further evidence of the market's nerves and uncertainty about global trade.

By the numbers: The new gold all-time high came Friday morning, crossing $3,000 just after 4 a.m. ET.

• The yellow metal is up about 10% since President Trump won the election last November, outperforming most other asset classes.

Zoom out: In difficult times, investors search for "safe" assets that are likely to retain more of their value, regardless of geopolitical disruptions.

• So much gold was brought into the U.S. earlier this year, in a bid to front-run tariffs, that it skewed the trade deficit and messed up key calculations of economic growth.

The intrigue: The new record for gold comes just a few hours after the biggest U.S. stocks entered correction territory, 10% off their all-time highs set less than a month ago.

• "A key factor behind the recent market selloff is the uncertainty surrounding trade tariffs and their economic implications," LPL Financial chief technical strategist Adam Turnquist wrote in a market commentary earlier this week.
• "The lack of clarity regarding tariff policies has made it difficult for markets to stage a meaningful recovery, as investors hesitate to make significant moves without a clearer outlook."

A powerful storm system is set to bring multiple rounds of dangerous severe thunderstorms, with numerous strong tornadoes possible, from the Midwest to the Southeast beginning Friday.

Threat level: A total of about 100 million people live in areas under threat from straight-line wind damage, hail and tornadoes through the weekend.

• The greatest threat for storms on Friday centers on the Midwest, where a squall line containing straight-line winds and embedded tornadoes is forecast to congeal later in the day and sweep across parts of Missouri east to Indiana.
• A large area of strong winds will occur even outside of severe storms, raising the likelihood of widespread power outages.
• Cities under a "moderate risk" of severe thunderstorms on Friday, which is a Level 4 of 5 on the Storm Prediction Center's threat scale, include Memphis, St. Louis, Des Moines and Springfield, Ill.

"Today may end up as one of the more prolific severe weather outbreaks in recent memory" in the region, the NWS forecast office in St. Louis stated in a forecast discussion Friday.

• The greater threat for powerful tornadoes will occur on Saturday, when an especially volatile setup takes shape across the Southeast.

Zoom in: The SPC is using strong language to describe the tornado threat in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama in particular on Saturday.

• "Numerous significant tornadoes, and some long-track tornadoes are expected on Saturday afternoon and evening, centered on eastern Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama," forecasters wrote Friday morning.
• The tornado threat will continue into the overnight hours on Saturday into early Sunday.
• Overnight tornadoes are particularly deadly because people have a harder time receiving warnings and getting to shelter, particularly in states with high proportions of mobile homes.

Cities in the moderate risk zone Saturday include New Orleans and Baton Rouge, La. as well as Birmingham, Montgomery and Mobile, Ala.

• Alabama Governor Kay Ivey (R) issued a state of emergency for the entire state going into effect beginning at 2 pm on Friday in advance of the severe weather.
• "The state of Alabama is at risk for potentially dangerous, severe weather throughout this weekend, so it is critical that everyone stays very aware of their local forecasts," Ivey said.

Context: Climate change is altering the environment in which severe thunderstorms and tornadoes form. Studies show that while some ingredients, such as humidity and atmospheric instability, are likely to increase with a warming climate, others may do the opposite.

• Climate change is anticipated to decrease the amount of wind shear available to severe thunderstorms, which could deprive them of a key ingredient for tornado formation.

Yes, but: When the right mix of ingredients are present, climate change may lead to larger severe weather outbreaks, albeit fewer in number overall per year.

The intrigue: The Southeast has been particularly hard-hit by tornado outbreaks in recent years beginning during March.

• Some researchers have noted a shift of so-called "Tornado Alley" to the southeast and earlier in the year, away from some of the Plains states and Midwest, over time.
• However, tornado alley itself has long been considered somewhat of a misnomer in the meteorology community, with multiple areas favored for tornado outbreaks. Tornadoes can and have occurred in any state.

Between the lines: This severe weather outbreak will test NOAA's ability to handle a large-scale, potentially deadly weather event in the wake of laying off about 800 meteorologists and other staff in late February.

• These layoffs reduced staffing at some local weather forecast offices to threadbare levels, causing some to reduce their services.
• Some meteorologists are also having to put in more frequent overtime shifts.
• Recent court rulings may bring at least some of those fired federal workers back on the job at least temporarily.

Further staff reductions of about 1,000 NOAA workers are planned, though it is not clear if those would focus on the NWS or NOAA's other missions.

The bottom line: This severe weather outbreak could be a high-end event, resulting in multiple powerful, long-lasting tornadoes, particularly in the Southeast on Saturday.

Go deeper:

Scoop: NOAA monthly media calls on climate change suspended

NOAA cuts could ground some Hurricane Hunter flights

2nd judge orders agencies to reinstate thousands of fired federal workers

Hamas said on Friday it agreed to release Israeli-American hostage Edan Alexander, 21, and return the bodies of four other American-Israeli hostages.

Why it matters: Hamas' statement didn't make clear what the group demands in return for releasing the five remaining American hostages.

• Hamas would likely demand Israel release Palestinian prisoners and extend the Gaza ceasefire.
• Israeli negotiators will leave Doha on Friday and return to Israel after five days of talks that didn't lead to a breakthrough, an Israeli official said.

What they are saying: Hamas said in its statement that it met on Thursday with the Qatari and Egyptian mediators and received a proposal for extending the Gaza ceasefire.

• "We handled this proposal with responsibility and a positive approach and responded on Friday. We are ready to start negotiations on the second phase of the Gaza ceasefire deal and we call for pressing Israel to implement its commitments," Hamas said.

State of play: Hamas' statement suggests it has agreed to a proposal given to it by Trump's hostage envoy Adam Boehler last week during the direct talks between the U.S. and the group in Doha.

• The proposal focused on releasing the remaining American hostages as an opening move for a broader deal on releasing all other hostages and reaching a long-term truce that would effectively end the war in Gaza. Israel didn't agree to this proposal.
• On Wednesday, White House Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff gave Hamas a new proposal that focused on releasing five living hostages and returning the bodies of nine dead hostages in exchange for extending the ceasefire until after Ramadan and Passover, which end on April 20. Israel accepted this proposal.

The other side: The Israeli Prime Minister's Office called Hamas' statement "manipulation and psychological warfare."

• "While Israel has accepted the Witkoff proposal, Hamas stands by its refusal and has not budged a millimeter," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said.
• Netanyahu will convene a ministerial team on Saturday night to discuss the hostages situation, receive a detailed report from the Israeli negotiating team, and decide on next steps, the prime minister's office said.

Between the lines: An Israeli official claimed in a briefing with reporters that Hamas' "alleged offer" to release American hostages was intended to sabotage the negotiations.

• "Hamas has not changed its position one bit, despite the efforts of the Trump administration and the Qatari and Egyptian mediators, and despite Israel's willingness to be flexible," the Israeli official said.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates

Third Way, the well-connected center-left Democratic think tank, today will launch an 18-month Signal Project, including polling, to identify Trump administration actions "that are most relevant to key voters and how best to frame those issues."

• Why it matters: Anything "that seems performative will be tuned out or backfire," Third Way says. "It is a painful irony that while our very democracy is at stake, a focus on 'democracy' (and the trashing of democratic norms) simply won't save it."

In unveiling the project, Third Way says: "Shuttering USAID, using government power to attack political opponents, firing indiscriminately, degrading the civil service, releasing J6ers, or blaming Ukraine for the Russian invasion all are a combination of unwise, unethical, illegal, or unconstitutional. But none resonate much with key voters."

• So as an opening frame, the project will focus on "Risking Americans' Safety and Security."

Between the lines: Matt Bennett, a Third Way co-founder, told Axios that there's "real concern among Democrats that the Trump/Musk attacks were coming so fast and so arbitrarily that the opposition was having trouble with a coherent response.

• "The things we believe to be important — like foreign aid, or Trump actions that violate the law — don't always line up with voters' concerns," Bennett added. "We can fight back effectively ... but only if we are creating a singular narrative that is simple, memorable, and resonant. If we do that, Trump's allies will feel the heat."

🐘 The other side: Tony Fabrizio and Chris LaCivita, who run Trump's outside political operation, told us in response to the Third Way plan that "no matter the approach, Americans know that for the last four years their safety — economically and physically — has been put in jeopardy."

• "One glaring flaw in their strategy: What happens when President Trump's policies work and deliver the change voters voted for? Once again, the Democrats — much like the Harris campaign — will be left having no position or a positive agenda for America."

Read the Third Way plan.

Hackers already have the AI tools needed to create the adaptable, destructive malware that security experts fear. But as long as their basic tactics — phishing, scams and ransomware — continue to work, they have little reason to use them.

Why it matters: Adversaries can flip that switch anytime, and companies need to prepare now.

Driving the news: The looming threat of autonomous cyberattacks was a top talking point at the inaugural HumanX conference in Las Vegas this week.

• "You know that phrase, 'Keep your powder dry'? That's what attackers are doing right now," James White, chief technology officer at AI security startup CalypsoAI, told Axios, implying that bad actors are ready for battle.

The big picture: Cyber leaders have long feared generative AI would enable autonomous cyberattacks, making current security tools ineffective.

• These attacks could involve AI agents carrying out hackers' bidding or malware that adapts in real time as it spreads.

Between the lines: A few years into the generative AI revolution, experts are split on how imminent these threats are.

• Some say we're less than two years away from seeing agentic malware in nation-state cyber warfare.
• Others argue hackers have little incentive to change tactics as they continue to profit from simple scams, phishing and ransomware.

Threat level: Even though AI-powered malware has yet to flood the zone, companies can't rest easy.

• "The rate of acceleration is insane," Evan Reiser, CEO of email security company Abnormal Security, told Axios. "You don't have to be a total science fiction nerd, like me, to imagine where this can go in one year, two years."
• AI will speed up attacks, leaving defenders with little time to react.
• Meanwhile, most organizations are still behind on basic security measures, Reiser said, noting that the typical company is focused on setting up two-factor authentication. Abnormal Security works with about 20% of the Fortune 500.

Reality check: Startups selling AI security tools have an interest in hyping potential threats.

• Mandiant says it has yet to respond to an attack involving truly autonomous AI or adaptable malware.
• "I'm actually not worried about any of that right now," Charles Carmakal, CTO at Mandiant, told Axios.
• Mandiant has mostly seen adversaries using AI for basic tasks like crafting phishing emails or researching targets.

The intrigue: Companies hiring cybersecurity vendors are beginning to understand that the best way to fight AI attacks is with AI security tools, said Itai Tevet, CEO of Intezer, a startup that offers an autonomous security operation center.

• "It's dramatically different between 2023 and today," Tevet told Axios. "In the past, we needed to evangelize on why technology can do the same job. Today, all CISOs are getting asked by their board, 'How do you leverage AI?'"

Zoom in: AI agents can also help threat intelligence teams review the pile of notifications they receive about new vulnerabilities, phishing emails and other malicious activity, Steve Schmidt, chief security officer at Amazon, said in a fireside chat with Axios.

• Amazon currently doesn't let agents make decisions or act on their own, but they can review the threat intelligence coming in to determine what needs to be prioritized.
• "We've ended up significantly improving the lives of the security engineers, making them more efficient at what they have to do," Schmidt said.

Most Michigan swing voters in our latest Engagious/Sago focus groups said that although they voted for President Trump in November, they have objections, frustrations and fears about his behavior since he returned to power.

Driving the news: Ten of 13 participants from this battleground, auto-industry state bordering Canada said what they're seeing isn't what they thought they were voting for — and they're worried Trump's approach may hurt their pocketbooks.

• "Erratic," "frightening," "disruptive" and "dictator" were among the words they used to describe their concerns.

Zoom in: A focus group is not a statistically significant sample like a poll, but the voters' reactions suggest that Trump risks overplaying his mandate to reshape government, trade and international alliances.

• The online panels, conducted Tuesday night, were made up of Michigan voters who backed former President Biden in 2020 but switched to Trump last November. Eight were self-described independents, four were Republicans and one was a Democrat.

The big picture: The voters' responses stand in stark contrast to last month's focus group with Arizona swing voters, all of whom said they approve of Trump's earliest actions.

• The Michigan voters felt differently after more exposure to Elon Musk, DOGE, large-scale federal worker firings, tariffs and no relief on prices.
• Trump entered his second term with a higher approval rating than he had during his first term, but polls indicate his honeymoon has begun to fade as Americans' concerns over the economy rise.

What they're saying: "I don't feel like he was this aggressive last time because I don't think anyone would've voted for him if they expected to see what we're seeing now," said Shannon B., 27, of Livonia, Mich.

• Sheryl M., 44, of Chesterfield, said of Trump: "He's so erratic, and it's getting to the point where I'm almost scared to watch the news. I mean, it's a little bit frightening 'cause each day is something new, so you get a little anxious."
• "I mean, Canada? When have we ever had issues with Canada?" asked Phil L., 45, of Dearborn Heights. "We barely have a border. You can go in and out of the country and a lot of places, a lot of states. I think we're just barking up the wrong tree with this."

Another voter, Therese L., 55, of Commerce Township, bristled at the viral image of a crowned Trump, the president's "long live the king" comment and Trump saying, "He who saves his country doesn't violate any law. "

• "He is acting like a dictator," she said.

One participant who does home remodeling, worried about tariffs raising the price of wood and causing clients to drop their remodeling plans.

• Another voter, who owns a health and weight loss business, said most of her clients are in the auto industry — if they're hit it could devastate her. One said she works in the auto industry and just got furloughed because "we are not building any cars right now."

Michael L., 43, of Commerce Township, said Trump "campaigned on lowering prices and making things more affordable for working-class people. He's moving in the opposite direction." He conceded that Trump had previewed tariffs during the campaign, but said "we didn't necessarily think it would be this much, this fast."

• "I was voting for him based off of the economy the first time around and I'm seeing a significant decline," said Samantha S., 31, of Birmingham.
• "I was expecting him to do things to better our country and I'm not seeing that," said Katelyn D., 26, of Woodhaven.

Several of the voters said they want Congress to push back.

• Malea H., 34, of Clinton Township, said she fears "that this will eventually turn into a dictatorship... if the people that we elected to be his checks and balances don't check and balance him, then what are they there for?"

They disagreed with Trump freezing out Associated Press journalists from coverage in the Oval Office and Air Force One because the independent news organization hasn't gone along with his insistence that the Gulf of Mexico should be called the Gulf of America.

• "It's just so childlike," said Shannon B.

On the other hand: Only one of the 10 Trump voters-turned-critics said they'd choose Kamala Harris for president if they could do it over.

• "Trump, we've gone through four years with him before — and it's just kind of just grin and bear it for another four," said Malea H., 34, of Clinton Township.
• "Just because these swing voters discovered they don't like the taste of wheatgrass juice, it doesn't mean they long to swallow castor oil," said Rich Thau, president of Engagious, who moderated the focus groups.
• The three voters who did approve of Trump's earliest actions say that while they may not agree with him on everything, on balance they at least feel he is getting things done.
• "He said that he would get busy as soon as he got in office, and I feel like he has," said Kara B., 39, of DeWitt.

Go deeper: Trump's economic shock therapy

The agency charged with carrying out President Trump's mass deportation promises has warned Congress it is short a whopping $2 billion for this fiscal year, Axios has learned.

Why it matters: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) repeatedly has faced significant budget shortfalls in recent years. Trump's immigration plans — which include deporting "millions" of unauthorized immigrants — would rack up costs even more.

• Congress would send ICE an extra $500 million in the stop-gap spending bill that passed the House and is being debated in the Senate.
• But that wouldn't come close to covering the nearly $2 billion the agency told Congress it needs just to keep up the work it's doing through the end of September, two sources familiar with the communications told Axios.
• Add to that the expense of fully implementing Trump's plans —which will include hiring hundreds of people, more than doubling ICE detention space to 100,000 beds and adding many more planes for deportation flights.

Zoom in: Not all of that is addressed in the bill now before Congress, which means the additional money ICE says it needs is unlikely to land anytime soon.

• The Department of Homeland Security may have to pull money from its other agencies — such as FEMA or the Coast Guard — and direct it to ICE.
• A report from the Government Accountability Office on budgets from 2014 to 2023 found that ICE regularly overspent and had to grab funds from other agencies within DHS to cover its costs.

What they're saying: The spending plan now before Congress is "not going to be sufficient to be able to cover the entire need for what they're covering" at ICE, said Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.).

• "Just the bed space alone becomes very significant. And to just be able to detain people for a couple of days while they're processing, and then to be able to move out flights ... is exceptionally expensive."
• "What we've been told is there would be a shortfall, a significant one, by the end of the year," said Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.).
• After Congress approves a temporary spending plan, Britt said, lawmakers will have to "make those adjustments moving forward in FY26 so we can continue the good work being done."

The big picture: Trump's executive orders and directives for ICE to ramp up arrests have contributed to significantly lowering the numbers of migrants crossing the southern border — and led to some high-profile criminal arrests for the administration to tout.

• Trump has leaned on the military to help DHS with some immigration enforcement, tapped the federal Bureau of Prisons and local governments to help detain more migrants, and is now looking to get help from the State Department.
• For weeks, Trump border czar Tom Homan has been telling reporters that immigration agencies would need more funds.
• The White House and DHS did not responded to requests for comment.

The intrigue: Congress is planning to provide tens of billions of more dollars for immigration efforts as part of a sweeping budget reconciliation package. Reconciliation allows the Senate to bypass the 60-vote filibuster.

• But that will take time, especially as lawmakers haggle over significant tax policy changes that also would be included in the bill.
• "While ICE backfills are well-intentioned and desperately needed, the clock is ticking on the [budget] reconciliation front. Every delay lets Biden's chaos fester," said RJ Hauman, founder of National Immigration Center for Enforcement, an organization that advocates for lowering immigration levels.
• "Whenever [ICE is] coming up against a period of budget negotiations, they tend to do this thing where they overspend so that they can justify an ever ballooning budget," said Setareh Ghandehari, advocacy director at Detention Watch Network, which opposes immigrant detention.

Deprived of all levers of federal power, and with their party's popularity at rock bottom, some Democrats are taking a polarizing new tack: Engaging with the enemy.

Why it matters: Backlash against cultural elitism — and a reluctance to take risks — fueled the party's loss in 2024. Ambitious Democrats are reckoning with the need to reach beyond their base as they try to claw out of the wilderness.

Driving the news: None have been as daring as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has rankled the Democratic base by hosting a trio of hardline MAGA voices for the first three episodes of his new podcast.

• Other party favorites are itching to take the fight to Republicans on their home turf, sensing opportunity as President Trump's honeymoon fades and DOGE cuts grow more unpopular.
• Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former VP nominee Tim Walz are touring red districts, filling a vacuum where some Republicans have refused to hold town halls.

The intrigue: Far from staging combative debates, Newsom — who's widely expected to run for president in 2028 — struck a conciliatory tone and sought middle ground in his debut podcast episodes.

• In a discussion with MAGA activist Charlie Kirk, Newsom broke with his party on trans athletes and owned up to "the dumbest bonehead move of my life" — dining maskless indoors at a French restaurant during COVID.
• With conservative radio host Michael Savage, Newsom slammed California's slow vote-counting process, complimented Tucker Carlson and called for protecting Ronald Reagan's legacy.
• With former Trump strategist Steve Bannon, Newsom was cordial and polite while giving Bannon ample time to promote his economic populist views — and his false claims that Trump won the 2020 election.

Between the lines: Other prominent liberals have ventured into the belly of the beast with a different mindset — engage in fierce but respectful debate with the goal of publicly exposing MAGA's flaws.

• A YouTube debate series by Jubilee Media — featuring titles such as "20 Trump Supporters Take on 1 Progressive" — routinely produces viral fireworks.
• Clips from this week's performance by left-wing commentator Sam Seder racked up tens of millions of views — hard currency in the war for online attention that's dominated by MAGA influencers.
• Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, another likely 2028 candidate, also has appeared on Jubilee's "Surrounded" series, as have several liberal streamers.

The big picture: Most Democrats have kept conservative media at arm's length, shunning the biggest MAGA platforms and personalities to avoid "normalizing" fringe rhetoric such as election denialism.

• Former President Biden never appeared on Fox News while in office, and the Democratic Party rejected the network as a primary debate host in 2020.
• "I think Democrats are afraid to talk to Trump voters," Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), whose victory was one of the party's few bright spots in 2024, told the New York Times.
• "I think Democrats are afraid to talk to people that are going to criticize them."

What to watch: With little to lose and a lot of ground to make up, that's beginning to change — for podcasters and politicians alike.

• Pod Save America's Jon Lovett welcomed Bill Maher, who challenged the left's prevailing support for transgender rights and gender-affirming care. His colleague Tommy Vietor went on Fox News with Jesse Watters.
• Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), a Fox News regular along with Buttigieg, has joined Truth Social, appeared on "The Joe Rogan Experience" and criticized the Democratic "Resistance" against Trump.

The bottom line: The right has built some of the country's most potent megaphones. Now Democrats are using them to try to climb their way out of a deep political hole.

House Democrats erupted into apoplexy Thursday night after Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said he would support Republicans' stopgap government funding measure.

Why it matters: House Democrats feel like they "walked the plank," in the words of one member. They voted almost unanimously against the measure, only to watch Senate Democrats seemingly give it the green light.

• "Complete meltdown. Complete and utter meltdown on all text chains," said the member, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to offer sensitive details of members' internal conversations.
• A senior House Democrat said "people are furious" and that some rank-and-file members have floated the idea of angrily marching onto the Senate floor in protest.
• Others are talking openly about supporting primary challenges to senators who vote for the GOP spending bill.

Driving the news: Schumer said in a floor speech Thursday that while the GOP measure is "very bad," the possibility of a government shutdown "has consequences for America that are much, much worse."

• "A shutdown would give Donald Trump the keys to the city, the state and the country," Schumer said.
• The comments likely clear a path for at least eight Senate Democrats to vote for the bill — enough for Republicans to overcome the upper chamber's 60-vote filibuster threshold.

Zoom in: All but one House Democrat voted against the bill earlier this week, in large part because it lacks language to keep the Trump administration from cutting congressionally approved spending.

• "There were many battleground Dems in the House ... that were uncomfortable, semi-uncomfortable, with the vote," said one House Democrat. "The Senate left the House at the altar."
• House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), in remarks to his House colleagues at their annual retreat Thursday, lauded them for standing up to President Trump by voting against the bill, according to multiple sources.
• When he praised House Democrats' votes, he received a standing ovation. When he mentioned Senate Democrats, members booed.

What we're hearing: House Democrats' text chains lit up Thursday night with expressions of blinding anger, according to numerous lawmakers who described the conversations on the condition of anonymity.

• "People are PISSED," one House Democrat told Axios in a text message.
• Several members — including moderates — have begun voicing support for a primary challenge to Schumer, floating Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) as possible candidates, three House Democrats said.
• One lawmaker even vowed at the House Democratic retreat to "write a check tonight" supporting Ocasio-Cortez, said the senior House Democrat.
• Another Democrat told Axios the ideation has gone a step further: "There is definitely a primary recruitment effort happening right now ... not just Schumer, but for everyone who votes no."

What they're saying: Plenty of members have also gone public with their dismay at their Senate colleagues.

• "I know I speak for so many in our caucus when I say Schumer is misreading this moment. The Senate Dems must show strength and grit by voting no," said Rep. Becca Balint (D-Vt.).
• Said Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.): "I don't know where Schumer is coming from. ... It doesn't look good for the leader."

What to watch: Members have spent the day frantically texting and calling their home-state senators, hoping to persuade enough of them to vote against the bill to block it. That outreach has continued late into Thursday night.

• Said one member: "Folks are still working the phones tonight with their senators. We have not given up."
• Some House members, in turn, have gotten an earful from constituents. "I have also never had so many people from home personally texting me—ANGRY," said another House Democrat.
• "I don't think they knew who Chuck Schumer was before today," the lawmaker said. "But they know now and they hate him."

Editor's note: This article has been updated with comment from a senior House Democrat.

Lawyers for Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia graduate and legal resident from Syria, are asking a federal judge to order U.S. immigration authorities to immediately release him and find his detention in violation of the First Amendment.

The big picture: Court documents filed late Thursday show that Khalil's lawyers intend to aggressively challenge the Trump administration's use of a rarely used law that gives the secretary of state the authority to revoke visas from foreigners deemed to be a threat.

Zoom in: Khalil's expanding legal team, which now includes the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), is asking U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman to set aside the determination by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio that resulted in Khalil's arrest.

• Lawyers want Furman to declare efforts to target noncitizens "advocating for Palestinian rights" unlawful — something President Trump hinted could be more common soon.

Catch up quick: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested Khalil on Saturday after he returned from dinner with his wife.

• The Department of Homeland Security has been investigating him and gathered evidence that he was actively supporting Hamas, but not materially supporting the terror group, a White House official said.
• Rubio was presented with evidence from the DHS review and determined that Khalil acted against U.S. foreign policy positions, the official said.

Context: U.S. law allows the secretary of state to deport a green card holder if that person is deemed to have "potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States" — but it's been rarely used outside of the Cold War or serious crimes, experts told Axios.

• Rubio posted on X last week that the U.S. has "zero tolerance for foreign visitors who support terrorists."
• He added that "violators of U.S. law — including international students — face visa denial or revocation, and deportation."

Reality check: Khalil, a legal resident with a green card, has not been charged or accused of any crimes.

Zoom out: That case has drawn international attention and generated protests nationwide.

• Nearly 100 people were arrested after protesters gathered at Trump Tower in Manhattan Thursday to demand the release of Khalil.

What they're saying: "This is a clear attempt by President Trump to make an example out of Mr. Khalil and silence dissent across the country," Brett Max Kaufman, senior staff attorney with ACLU's Center for Democracy, said in a statement.

• "No matter what your views are on Israel and Palestine, we should all be terrified of a government incarcerating its residents for their political opinions."
• "With today's filing, we are making it crystal clear that no president can arrest, detain, or deport anyone for disagreeing with the government," said Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, another group that joined the legal team.

For the record: Furman on Wednesday halted ICE from deporting Khalil, who is in a detention facility in Louisiana.

• Representatives for the White House, State Department and ICE did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment in the evening.

What we're watching: Lawyers for the Trump administration are expected to submit their response to Khalil's attorneys on Friday.

• They are likely to invoke the broad authority the secretary of state has to deem foreigners a threat to the nation's foreign policy.
• The legal challenge to Khalil might ultimately come down to the Supreme Court, which would decide how far the secretary of state can determine whether a permanent resident can be removed for speech.

The rare Blood Moon total lunar eclipse started lighting up the sky late Thursday with a bright full Moon.

Why it matters: It's the only lunar eclipse visible from the U.S. this year and the first total lunar eclipse since November 2022.

• Photos captured around the world late Thursday show a bright and illuminating Moon.

What time is the Blood Moon?

The Moon appears red or orange during the lunar eclipse because "any sunlight that's not blocked by our planet is filtered through a thick slice of Earth's atmosphere," NASA said.

• "It's as if all the world's sunrises and sunsets are projected onto the Moon," NASA said.

What we're watching: The Moon will appear coppery red during the lunar eclipse's totality phase for a little less than an hour, according to NASA's timeline.

• This phase begins at 2:26am EDT Friday, 11:26pm PDT and 6:26 UTC.
• Totality ends at 3:31am EDT, which is 12:31am PDT and 7:31 UTC.

Full Moon to appear full through Saturday

March's full Moon, also known as the "Worm Moon," is officially full at 2:55am EDT Friday, NASA said.

• It will appear full for about three days — from Wednesday evening into Saturday morning.

More from Axios:

• Government suspends free COVID test distribution program
• Trump claims credit for falling egg prices but no relief for shoppers yet
• Why food prices are still high, five years after COVID

Editor's note: This story will be updated with additional photos.

The Trump administration must reinstate thousands of fired probationary federal workers, a judge said in a temporary restraining order on Thursday.

Why it matters: In the second such order to reinstate fired workers on Thursday, U.S. District Judge James Bredar ruled that the lawsuit brought by state attorneys general against 18 agencies was likely to succeed in showing the mass firings "were unlawful."

Driving the news: In the latest case, the Obama-appointed judge said in his order in Maryland the agencies gave "no advance notice" for the mass layoffs.

• "It claims it wasn't required to because, it says, it dismissed each one of these thousands of probationary employees for 'performance' or other individualized reasons," Bredar wrote.
• "On the record before the Court, this isn't true. There were no individualized assessments of employees. They were all just fired. Collectively," he added.

The big picture: The lawsuit was filed against agencies including the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, Transportation, Treasury and Veterans Affairs, along with their secretaries.

• A federal judge in California earlier on Thursday ordered six government agencies to offer fired probationary federal workers their jobs back.
• Representatives for the Trump administration did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment in the evening.

Set an alarm and reminders to look at the sky for the rare chance to see a Blood Moon total lunar eclipse late Thursday night and early Friday morning.

The big picture: It's the only lunar eclipse visible from the U.S. this year and the first total lunar eclipse since November 2022.

• All of the phases of the eclipse are expected to last around six hours.
• North America and South America are expected to get the best views of the eclipse, but it will be visible across the Western Hemisphere.

Total lunar eclipse and Blood Moon

A lunar eclipse occurs when the Sun, Earth and Moon align so the moon passes into Earth's shadow, according to NASA.

• Total lunar eclipses occur when the Moon passes into the dark shadow of the Earth.

Lunar eclipses are sometimes called "Blood Moons" because the Moon will turn a reddish and copper hue, NASA said.

What time does the lunar eclipse start tonight?

When to watch: The hours for when the lunar eclipse will be visible vary by time zone.

• The initial phase of the eclipse, called the penumbral eclipse, begins at 11:57pm EDT and 8:57pm PDT Thursday, NASA said in its timeline.
• The partial eclipse begins at 1:09am EDT Friday, which is 10:09pm PDT Thursday, and as the Moon moves into the umbra "it looks like a bite is being taken out of the lunar disk."
• Totality begins at 2:26am EDT Friday or 11:26pm PDT Thursday. In totality, the Moon is "tinted a coppery red."

What time does the total lunar eclipse end?

Totality ends at 3:31am EDT/12:31am PDT.

• The partial eclipse ends when the Moon has set in 4:47am EDT or 1:47am PDT.
• The penumbral eclipse ends when the Moon has set in 6am EDT or 3am PDT.

How to see the total lunar eclipse live

What we're watching: Unlike a solar eclipse, anyone with a view of the Moon during a lunar eclipse will be able to see it as it occurs, NASA said. Special equipment isn't needed to observe a lunar eclipse.

• "Binoculars or a telescope will enhance the view," NASA said, noting a "dark environment away from bright lights makes for the best viewing conditions."
• Timeanddate.com will have a live stream of the lunar eclipse starting at 1am EDT Friday.

March full Moon is the "Worm Moon"

The Moon, known as the "Worm Moon," will be full early Friday morning at 2:55am EDT, NASA said.

• It will appear full for about three days — from Wednesday evening into Saturday morning.
• NASA said the Maine Farmers' Almanac began publishing Native American names for full moons in the 1930s and called the March full Moon the Crow, Crust, Sap, Sugar or Worm Moon.

Why the Moon appears red during total lunar eclipse

How it works: The Moon appears red or orange because "any sunlight that's not blocked by our planet is filtered through a thick slice of Earth's atmosphere," NASA said.

• "It's as if all the world's sunrises and sunsets are projected onto the Moon," NASA said.

Solar eclipse 2025

What's next: Get your solar eclipse glasses ready as the first solar eclipse of 2025 will be on March 29 and is a partial eclipse.

• It will be visible from North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, the Atlantic Ocean and the Arctic Ocean, NASA says.
• There is also a Sept. 21 partial eclipse that NASA said will be visible from Australia, Antarctica, the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean.

Next lunar eclipse

Zoom out: The March total lunar eclipse is the last one that will be visible in the United States this year.

• There will be a total lunar eclipse on Sept. 7 that will be visible from Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia.
• A March 3, 2026, total eclipse will be visible from the Americas, Asia, Australia and the Pacific Islands, NASA said.

More from Axios:

• In photos: Blood Moon total lunar eclipse lights up sky
• Trump claims credit for falling egg prices but no relief for shoppers yet
• Government suspends free COVID test distribution program
• Why food prices are still high, five years after COVID

President Trump opened the door Thursday for Senate Republicans to find cost savings in Medicaid as they hunt for ways to pay for his border, defense and tax priorities, Axios has learned.

Why it matters: Trump has been emphatic that Medicaid benefits won't be "touched," but he endorsed looking for "waste, fraud and abuse" and even imposing new work requirements.

• On Thursday, Trump and some top White House officials met with Republican senators on the Finance Committee, which includes Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and GOP Whip John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).

Zoom in: Trump indicated to senators he is open to cutting "waste, fraud and abuse" from any mandatory spending — including Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security, multiple senators in the meeting told Axios.

• Social Security can't be dealt with in reconciliation.
• Trump expressed openness to work requirements for Medicaid and discussing ways to reduce the rate of growth of some health care programs which could be counted as potentially hundreds of billions of dollars in savings.
• He was also clear he wants Congress to deal with raising the debt ceiling in the reconciliation package and supports making his 2017 tax cuts permanent by using a "current policy" maneuver to make the cost $0.

"It became clear that [Trump] wanted to be bold," one senator told Axios, requesting anonymity to speak candidly.

What they're saying: "The President wants to make sure that we do eliminate waste, fraud, abuse, and, you know, there are a number of scams going on right now with Medicaid," Barrasso told Axios.

• "There is money laundering being done with regard to Medicaid, and the American taxpayers shouldn't have to pay for that," Barrasso said.

What to watch: The group also discussed an idea of codifying DOGE cuts with a big rescission package, which could be passed with a simple majority in the Senate — rather than needing Democrats to break the filibuster.

• Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) pitched Elon Musk on the idea last week.

Zoom out: Hill leaders are still working to get on the same page to get moving on their biggest legislative priority of the year.

Johns Hopkins University said Thursday it's axing more than 2,200 jobs in the U.S. and overseas due to the Trump administration ending over $800 million in USAID funding.

The big picture: The Baltimore-based university appears to be among the hardest-hit research institutions affected by the Trump administration's cuts across the federal government.

• Johns Hopkins said the cuts have forced it to "wind down critical work" in Baltimore and internationally.
• Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced this week the Trump administration was canceling 83% of USAID programs.

Driving the news: "We can confirm that the elimination of foreign aid funding has led to the loss of 1,975 positions in 44 countries internationally and 247 in the United States in the affected programs," the university said in an emailed statement Thursday evening.

• "An additional 29 international and 78 domestic employees will be furloughed with a reduced schedule."
• The university said it's proud of the work at places impacted by the cuts.
• Cuts affected Jhpiego, a recognized expert in maternal health; the Bloomberg School of Public Health, the oldest and largest such school in the U.S.; and the School of Medicine.
• It works "to care for mothers and infants, fight disease, provide clean drinking water, and advance countless other critical, life-saving efforts around the world," the university added in the statement.

What's next: U.S. based workers are being given at least 60 days of advance notice before the reductions or furloughs take effect, per Johns Hopkins.

• The university said it is providing "support with additional benefits, assistance, and resources to help employees navigate this transition and explore new opportunities."
• "For international employees, we will be complying with local employment laws."

A federal judge on Thursday ordered six government agencies to offer fired probationary federal workers their jobs back.

Why it matters: At least 30,000 probationary workers have been fired in DOGE's sweeping remaking of the government. A few federal agencies have called their people back, but most are still not working.

Zoom out: The order is effective immediately, ruled Judge William Alsup, a Clinton appointee who presides in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

• Alsup said the Office of Personnel Management's order and the firing process was basically a "sham," noting that some probationary workers had been told that they were fired based on their performance.
• "It is sad, a sad day," said Alsup. "Our government would fire some good employee, and say it was based on performance. When they know good and well, that's a lie."

Zoom in: The agencies ordered to re-hire workers include the Department of Agriculture, Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of the Interior, Department of Treasury, and Veterans Affairs.

• Notably the Treasury Department includes the IRS. The tax agency has been hit hard by job cuts in recent weeks.

The big picture: The order comes just as agencies are set to undertake even more firings, or "reduction in force" in federal jargon.

• These reduction memos from each agency are due Thursday and are expected to detail as many as 250,000 job cuts.
• Alsup's decision comes on top of a ruling last week from the Merit Systems Protections Board, a federal agency that reviews worker complaints, ordering the reinstatement of 6,000 workers at the USDA.

Where it stands: In his ruling, Alsup made clear that it is within an agency's right to conduct a reduction in force, as long as it complies with the law.

• "This case is really an attempt to do a reduction in force, but to force it through the OPM," Alsup said.

OPM argued that it did not order these firings — but the judge read from agency letters that made clear that the firings had been ordered by OPM.

• He also pointed to the firing of an employee of the U.S. Forest Service, who had just months earlier received a positive performance review but was told in her termination letter that she was being fired due to poor performance.
• The firing process, he said, "was a sham in order to try to avoid statutory requirements."

What they're saying: The White House "will immediately fight back against this absurd and unconstitutional order," press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement Thursday.

• "A single judge is attempting to unconstitutionally seize the power of hiring and firing from the Executive Branch," she said. "If a federal district court judge would like executive powers, they can try and run for President themselves. "

Catch up quick: The lawsuit was filed by unions representing federal workers, as well as several advocacy groups, including the Coalition to Protect American's National Parks.

• The plaintiffs argued that the Office of Personnel Management didn't have that authority to order these firings, and in an initial ruling last month Alsup agreed.

Earlier this week, lawyers for the White House retracted testimony from the acting chair of the Office of Personnel Management, Charles Ezell, rather than comply with Alsup's request that he testify or be deposed.

• Alsup was not pleased about that — nor with the government's attempt to use press releases to argue that the firings were something agencies did on their own.
• "I want you to know that I've been practicing or serving in this court for over 50 years, and I know how that we get at the truth," Alsup said. "And you're not helping me get at the truth. You're giving me press releases. Sham documents."

Of note: As the hearing came to a close, Alsup apologized for getting worked up.

• "I want to make it clear that I don't think counsel for the government has done anything dishonorable. I've given him a hard time," he said. "He's doing the best he can with the case he's got. Thank you for your service in the Justice Department."

Editor's Note: This story has been updated to remove an erroneously attributed statement.