President Trump fired Joint Chiefs of Staff chair Gen. Charles "CQ" Brown, Jr. and other top military leaders on Friday.
The big picture: The terminations, also reaching Adm. Lisa Franchetti and Vice Chief of Staff Gen. James Slife, come amid the Trump administration's mass firings and pushback against diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.
Brown is the first Black chief of staff of the Air Force and the second Black general to serve as chairman, following Colin Powell.
Franchetti is the first woman to serve as the highest-ranking officer of the U.S. Navy.
Brown, Franchetti and Slife were all nominated to their roles by former President Biden.
Catch up quick: Trump has claimed the military's leadership is too heavily focused on diversity issues, and he signed an executive order on January 27 directing the Department of Defense to ax DEI programs.
Zoom in: Trump didn't say why the military leaders were being fired but thanked Brown for more than 40 years of service to the United States, calling him "a fine gentleman and an outstanding leader" in a Truth Social post.
Trump went on to nominate Air Force Lt. Gen. Dan "Razin" Caine for Joint Chief of Staffs chair, claiming he "was passed over for promotion" by Biden.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Franchetti and Slife's terminations by saying he was seeking nominations for their positions in a statement Friday.
"Under President Trump," he said, "we are putting in place new leadership that will focus our military on its core mission of deterring, fighting and winning wars."
Editor's note: This story has been updated with additional terminations.
If you have travel plans for May or beyond, check your ID to see if it meets federal requirements.
Why it matters: Starting May 7, a Real ID compliant license or identification card — or another acceptable document — is needed to board a commercial aircraft in the U.S.
The guidelines also apply when visiting military bases and secure federal buildings like courthouses.
What is a Real ID?
The big picture: A Real ID is a state-issued driver's license or identification card that meets federal security standards.
Compliant IDs are typically marked with a star in the upper right corner, though the specific design may vary by state.
When is the Real ID deadline?
Threat level: May 7is the enforcement deadline for Real ID after years of delays.
The Department of Homeland Security estimates that 61.2% of Real IDs, relative to all driver's license and identification in circulation, will be Real ID-compliant by May 7, according to a final rule published in January.
Real ID Act of 2005
Flashback: Congress passed the Real ID Act in 2005 after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, seeking to beef up security surrounding IDs used at airports.
The law was scheduled to be enforced in 2008 but has been delayed many times.
All states were compliant for issuing Real IDs in 2020 but many states were in compliance earlier.
You travel on a plane in the U.S. (and don't have a valid passport or other acceptable ID),
Visit a military base or a secure federal building like a courthouse or
Enter nuclear power plants.
Zoom out: You don't need a Real ID to drive, vote or open a bank account.
TSA does not require children under 18 to provide identification when traveling within the count
How to get a Real ID, DMV appointments
How it works: Go to your state's driver's licensing agency website to find out exactly what documentation is required to obtain a Real ID.
In some states, you can order a Real ID and others you'll need to make an appointment with the local Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).
Between the lines: Federal and state officials are urging people to upgrade their IDs now so they're prepared for the upcoming deadline.
Last-minute surges in demand for Real IDs are expected ahead of the deadline.
Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias said Thursday that state facilities are seeing "unprecedented" traffic for Real ID appointments, NBC Chicago reports.
Real ID requirements
State of play: DHS says at a minimum you must provide documentation that shows your full legal name, date of birth, Social Security number, two proofs of address of principal address and lawful status, DHS says.
Find your states' requirements and how to get a Real ID on this DHS page.
What we're watching: The Transportation Security Association says there are other forms of acceptable identification to show at the airport checkpoint in order to travel.
Enhanced Driver's Licenses (EDL) issued by Washington, Michigan, Minnesota, New York and Vermont are also considered acceptable alternatives.
U.S. passport or passport card and DHS trusted traveler cards (Global Entry, NEXUS, SENTRI, FAST)
Permanent resident card
Find the TSA's full list of acceptable identification here.
Will the Real ID deadline be extended again?
The latest: Another extension isn't expected but TSA published a final rule in January that provides a "framework for federal agency phased enforcement" of Real ID requirements starting May 7.
TSA has not made a final decision on an exact phased approach, an agency spokesperson told Axios.
What happens if you don't have a Real ID after May 7
What's next: "Travelers who fly after May 7, 2025 and still do not possess a REAL ID are strongly encouraged to use their U.S. passport or other acceptable form of ID when flying domestically," the TSA spokesperson told Axios.
"TSA also recommends that these passengers arrive a little earlier than normal to allow time for the identity verification process."
Long lines and airport delays are expected.
"TSA recommends individuals without acceptable identification arrive at least three hours in advance of their flight time," the government agency said.
Driving the news: Filed by Lambda Legal, the lawsuit alleges Trump's actions "pose an existential threat to transgender people and the organizations that ... provide them with life-saving services."
The plaintiffs, which include San Francisco AIDS Foundation (SFAF), GLBT Historical Society and San Francisco Community Health Center, are asking the district court to declare the orders unconstitutional and block their implementation.
The lawsuit also accuses the Trump administration of expressing "a disparaging, demeaning, idiosyncratic, and unscientific viewpoint about transgender people and gender identity."
That exponentially increases harm against trans people — who are already four times more likely to be victims of violent crime — and other marginalized populations, plaintiffs argue.
What they're saying: "These executive orders attempt to erase an entire community and enshrines blatant discrimination as national policy" while threatening to withdraw funds from organizations "simply because they acknowledge the reality of the people they serve," Lambda Legal's Jose Abrigo, the lead lawyer in the case, said in a press call Friday.
"Moreover, if these executive orders stand, they set a dangerous precedent where the government can dictate what private organizations, researchers and service providers can say and do, even when it contradicts established medical, legal and historical fact."
Zoom in: The legal challenge comes after federal agencies sent notices terminating federal funding to organizations that serve trans people and other underserved communities, according to Lambda Legal.
"We will not sit by and let this happen without a fight," SF Community Health Center CEO Lance Toma said in the press call.
Between the lines: Both SF Community Health Center and SFAF receive millions of federal dollars annually to provide its services. That includes free HIV testing and prevention work, mpox interventions, culturally competent care and programs that address disparities in health outcomes.
Taking away that funding would force them to reduce services and turn away clients, the lawsuit argues. SFAF alone serves roughly 27,000 clients per year.
The GLBT Historical Society, whose founding members included trans people, has similarly relied on federal funding to preserve materials related to LGBTQ+ communities for nearly 20 years.
Trump's orders would force potential cuts to staff and operations, leading to a loss of access to priceless archives that reflect "accurate representations of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people throughout time," the lawsuit alleges.
Other nonprofits involved in the lawsuit include Prisma Community Care in Arizona, the NYC LGBT Community Center, Bradbury-Sullivan Community Center in Pennsylvania, Baltimore Safe Haven and FORGE in Wisconsin.
The other side: Trump has said his executive orders are an effort to defend women from "gender ideology extremism" and restore "biological truth."
On the campaign trail last year, he frequently lambasted what he called "transgender craziness" and falsely claimed that gender-affirming operations are being conducted in schools without parents' knowledge.
The White House did not immediately return our request for comment.
While DOGE has begun facing a measure of GOP backlash, some Republicans are privately brushing off a spate of raucous protests and town halls in their districts targeting President Trump's government efficiency efforts.
Why it matters: The muted reaction signals at least some willingness, even by electorally vulnerable Republicans, to continue marching into this firestorm on behalf of the president to whom they've tethered their fates.
Democrats, however, see echoes of their triumphant 2018 election cycle and are eager to press their advantage.
"House Republicans have galvanized voters across the country to come out in protest against their Medicaid cuts, veteran layoffs, and defunding of health care for 9/11 first responders," said CJ Warnke, a spokesperson for Democrats' House Majority PAC.
Driving the news: Angry constituents flocked to House Republicans' town hall events and district offices this week to protest DOGE's efforts to slash spending and lay off huge chunks of the federal workforce.
What we're hearing: One swing-district House Republican, speaking on the condition of anonymity to share candid thoughts, told Axios they have "zero concerns" about a protest they're expecting outside their office.
"It's 2017 all over. They've hated Trump since 2016. Same folks largely," the lawmaker said, although they added, "Most hate [Elon] Musk based on the calls."
"That's all manufactured bulls**t for likes and clickbait," said another House Republican, who asked for anonymity to speak candidly about the upswell in protests.
Reality check: 2017 preceded a GOP wipeout in the 2018 midterm elections. Democrats took control of the House for the first time in nearly a decade by riding a wave of anti-Trump sentiment.
Strategists on both sides expect any wave on either side to be far smaller next year, but Democrats are bullish they can at least retake the House by harnessing anger toward the administration.
"House Republicans can run from town halls and protests, but they can't hide from their own constituents — and it will cost them in 2026," said Warnke.
Between the lines: The liberal groups who have bombarded Democratic lawmakers into demonstrating more active resistance to the administration are not shying away from their role in organizing these confrontations.
MoveOn said in a press release: "MoveOn members and allies will show up at congressional-led town halls and congressional offices across the country, targeting House Republicans whose votes will be crucial in opposing Trump and Musk's harmful policies."
The Working Families Party and Indivisible similarly lauded the protests, with Indivisible framing them as part of their "Week of Action."
Friday marks the 60th anniversary of the assassination of Malcolm X (also known as el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz) following a brief but lasting career as a civil rights advocate and Black nationalist.
Through the lens: Here are some images of Malcolm X's evolution from a life of crime, to a prominent leader in the Nation of Islam, to an international traveler investigating racism against Asians, to a cultural icon.
Malcolm X, then Malcolm Little, at age 18, at the time of an arrest for larceny, police photograph front and profile in Boston. Photo: Bettmann Archive/Getty Images
Malcolm X supports some of his followers at the courthouse in Queens, New York, during a police brutality case. Photo: Lloyd Yearwood/Three Lions/Getty Images
Malcolm X talking to Nigerian students and African Americans in Harlem, New York, circa 1960-1965. Photo: Lloyd Yearwood/Three Lions/Getty Images
Malcolm X at an outdoor rally, likely in New York City. Photo: Bob Parent/Hulton Archive/Getty Images
Muhammad Ali with Malcolm X at 125th St. and Seventh Ave. in New York City. Photo: John Peodincuk/NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images
An audience listens to Malcolm X during a press conference at the National Memorial African Book Store in New York City on March 12, 1964, as he urges America's 22 million Black Americans to learn how to use shotguns and rifles to fight racism and violence. Photo: Bettmann Archive/Getty Images
Dr. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X after a press conference at the U.S. Capitol about the Senate debate on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Washington, D.C., on March 26, 1964. Photo: Universal History Archive/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Malcolm X at a press conference at New York's JFK airport upon returning from Africa. Betty Shabazz and four daughters are in the rear. Photo: Robert Parent/Getty Images
Malcolm X visiting the English town of Smethwick during a visit to the Midlands following a high-profile racist election in February 1965. He was investigating racism against Caribbeans and Asians in England. Photo: Staff/Mirrorpix/Mirrorpix via Getty Images
Furniture damaged by a firebomb lies outside of the home of Malcolm X in Elmhurst, New York, Feb. 15, 1965. Photo: Bettmann Archive/Getty Images
New York police officers remove the body of Malcolm X from the Audubon Ballroom in Harlem after his fatal shooting just before a speech on Feb. 21, 1965. Photo: Bettmann Archive/Getty Images
A sheik administers blessing at the coffin of Malcolm X during funeral services at Faith Temple in New York on Feb. 27, 1965. Photo: Bettmann Archive/Getty Images
Young Lords Party member Juan Gonzalez, future columnist for the New York Daily News, sits under a poster of Malcolm X on June 7, 1969. Photo: Bev Grant /Getty Images
Filmmaker Spike Lee wears some of his clothing line, including a baseball shirt with the 40 Acres and Mule logo of his film company, and a T-shirt and baseball cap with the Malcolm X logos on May 1, 1992. Photo: John van Hasselt/Sygma via Getty Images
French far-right leader Jordan Bardella canceled planned remarks at CPAC Friday, after ex-Trump adviser Steve Bannon made a "gesture referring to Nazi ideology," according to a statement to French news agency Agence France-Presse.
Why it matters: Bardella's change of plans is the strongest rebuke yet of Bannon, who, during his remarks at the annual conservative conference made a gesture that appeared to mimic a Hitlergruß, or Nazi salute.
"This is a lie … It's a wave … I acknowledged a crowd after the best speech @ CPAC," Bannon told Axios.
Bannon added that he sees Bardella as "gutless ... not tough enough to be a leader of France — he's a spokesmodel."
A CPAC representative did not respond to a request for comment Friday.
Driving the news: "At this forum, (Thursday), while I was not present in the room, one of the speakers allowed himself, out of provocation, a gesture referring to Nazi ideology," Bardella said in a statement to AFP.
"As a result, I have taken the immediate decision to cancel my speech scheduled for this afternoon at the event."
The big picture: TheBannon incident comes about a month after Trump-ally Elon Musk also made a hand gesture that drew comparisons to a Nazi salute.
Despite blowback, Musk dismissed the criticisms, writing on X: "Frankly, they need better dirty tricks. The 'everyone is Hitler' attack is sooo tired."
President Trump hasn't implemented most of the tariffs he's announced, but the uncertainty over when — or even if — he'll do so is already hurting the auto industry.
Why it matters: It's a tumultuous time for automakers, which are already grappling with regulatory uncertainties and worries about consumer acceptance of electric vehicles.
At the very moment they need to be placing huge, multibillion-dollar bets on the future, they're instead caught in a "will he or won't he" limbo over Trump's tariffs.
As they await more clarity, they're pausing or delaying huge investment decisions, increasing the risk they'll fall behind faster-moving Chinese rivals.
The big picture: The auto industry, more than any other, is caught in the crosshairs of Trump's burgeoning trade war.
Prolonged tariffs on trade with Canada and Mexico, plus additional levies on steel and aluminum imports, would deliver a multibillion-dollar hit to U.S. automakers, according to credit analysts at S&P Global Ratings.
There's also an invisible cost: the risk of delayed development of future vehicle programs, "particularly in light of evolving emission and fuel economy regulations," the analysts wrote.
What they're saying: General Motors CFO Paul Jacobson said this week at a Barclays conference that if U.S. tariffs became permanent, the automaker would have to consider moving plants. But for now, it's holding off on such decisions until the macroeconomic picture is clearer.
"Those are questions that just don't have an answer today, because (what) I can tell you is, as much as the market is pricing in a big impact of tariffs and lost profitability, we think about a world where on top of that, we're spending billions of dollars in capital. So we can't be whipsawing the business back and forth," Jacobson said.
Between the lines: Ford is delaying the launch of its next-generation F-150 pickup from 2027 until mid-2028, Crain's Detroit Business, an affiliate of Automotive News, scooped this week.
Ford declined to comment on "speculation" about future products, but delaying a makeover of the F-150, its biggest money-maker, would be extraordinary.
Ford has been tearing up its product plans, adding more hybrids and extended-range electric vehicles to its pipeline, while axing plans for a much-anticipated three-row electric SUV and delaying the launch of its next generation electric F-150 Lightning truck.
A "skunkworks" team in California is developing more affordable EVs from the ground up, starting with a midsize electric pickup in 2027.
Reality check: Multiple factors are at play in Ford's product pivot, but CEO Jim Farley's frustration about recent policy swings — on top of everything else — boiled over last week at a Wolfe Research conference when he said Trump's tariffs threaten to "blow a hole" in the auto industry.
"So far what we're seeing is a lot of costs and a lot of chaos."
Zoom in: As Erin Keating, an executive analyst at Cox Automotive, notes: "The delays and uncertainty are doing no one any favors, and there is little automakers can do in the near term, as changing sourcing and/or production sites is not an easy task and costly as well."
What to watch: The daily chaos from Washington seems to be negatively impacting consumer sentiment, per Cox Automotive's chief economist Jonathan Smoke.
With tariffs likely to push up car prices, and lower auto loan rates looking less likely, he expects shoppers to buy sooner rather than later.
Disclosure: Cox Automotive and Axios are both owned by Cox Enterprises.
2025 is on pace for fewer fatal aviation accidents compared to the last several years, despite the I'll-just-drive vibes lately.
Why it matters: It may seem like the planes are falling out of the sky over the past few weeks, but the data paints a different picture.
By the numbers: There have been 13 fatal U.S. aviation accidents so far in 2025, per NTSB data.
There were 31 such accidents in January and February 2024, 28 during those months in 2023, 33 in 2022, and 39 in 2021.
How it works: That includes all U.S. civil aviation, from single-engine private planes to commercial airliners — the latter of which have far more pristine safety records.
It also includes Alaska, where often treacherous conditions can make flying more dangerous compared to the Lower 48.
Caveat: This is a measurement of overall accidents, not the number of fatalities.
So January's tragic midair collision near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, which killed 67 people, only counts once.
Still, that was an aberrant event — the country's first major fatal commercial air disaster in about 16 years, a remarkable stretch of safe flying.
Between the lines: There's palpable unease in some aviation circles about President Trump and Elon Musk's still-vague plans to "upgrade" air traffic control.
That the Trump administration recently fired hundreds of FAA technicians and other staffers has only amplified those concerns.
Yes, but: There's no clear link between Trump's recent moves and the latest high-profile aviation incidents.
The bottom line: It's perfectly reasonable to be concerned about aviation safety right now, given all the headlines. But frequency illusion is a heck of a thing, and as Superman said: Statistically speaking, flying is still the safest way to travel.
U.S. and Ukrainian officials negotiated all night into Friday morning in an attempt to conclude a minerals deal and halt the deterioration in relations, a U.S. official and a source with direct knowledge of the issue tell Axios.
Why it matters: The disagreement over minerals helped spark a wider crisis in relations this week. Now Trump administration officials and some in the Ukrainian government are pressing President Volodymyr Zelensky to make a deal.
The U.S. official and the source familiar said the decision is now up to Zelensky, and both expressed concern that the U.S.-Ukraine crisis will deepen if he rejects the offer.
The U.S. official called it a "make or break scenario for the Ukrainians."
The latest: "President Zelensky is going to sign that deal and you will see it in the very short term," White House national security adviser Mike Waltz said on Friday at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).
Breaking it down: The rare earth minerals in question could be worth trillions of dollars in total.
Zelensky rejected an initial U.S. offer presented by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent which would have given the U.S. 50% of all revenues from the mining project, infuriating Trump.
Zelensky had concerns about some provisions of the deal and the fact that it offered no security guarantees for Ukraine. The U.S. side came back with an "improved" offer earlier this week, and has now made additional modifications.
The exact terms of the current U.S. offer are not clear.
The latest: U.S. envoy Keith Kellogg is still in Kyiv meeting with Zelensky's aides.
The Trump administration sent to Ukraine the latest version of the mineral agreement on Thursday night, the U.S. official who is involved in the negotiations and a source with direct knowledge told Axios.
The U.S. official said the modified version of the agreement is aimed at "fixing the situation" between the U.S. and Ukraine.
The official said a U.S. cabinet secretary — who is not Bessent — was empowered by Trump to make the new offer. The official declined to say which cabinet secretary.
The latest: Kellogg wrote on X on Friday morning that he had a "long and intense day with the senior leadership of Ukraine" including "extensive and positive discussions" with Zelensky.
The U.S. envoy referred to Zelensky as "the embattled and courageous leader of a nation at war" — a strikingly different characterization than Trump, who called Zelensky an unpopular "dictator."
Editor's note: This story has been updated with Waltz's comment on Friday.
Why it matters: Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has barreled forward with his backup plan as Speaker Johnson (R-La.) scrambles on his mega-package that would also make good on President Trump's tax promises.
The measure passed 52-48 after Democrats raised dozens of unsuccessful amendments, including one on IVF.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) was the only Republican to vote against the budget resolution.
Between the lines After 25 rounds of voting on amendments, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Republicans "were forced to go on record and defend their plans to cut taxes for Donald Trump's billionaire friends."
"What happened tonight was only the beginning," Schumer added. "This debate is gonna go on for weeks, and maybe months. Democrats will be ready to come back and do this over and over again."
Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) voted with Democrats on failed amendments blocking Medicaid cuts.
Zoom in: Theresolution provides $150 billion in additional defense spending and $175 billion for border. It also changes energy policy.
The package will be offset by spending cuts and increased energy revenue.
What to watch: Getting both chambers to agree to a budget resolution is just the first step in the reconciliation process, which allows the Senate to get around the 60-vote filibuster for budget-related measures.
The House and Senate have yet to agree on the first step.
Once they do, they will also have to reach agreement on all the particulars — the funding, spending cuts and policies.
The big picture: House and Senate leadership have been divided over how best to go about passing Trump's biggest legislative priorities through budget reconciliation.
Speaker Johnson insists the best chance of getting major wins through his razor-thin majority is if everything is in one package.
Senate Republicans want to move faster on border and defense spending and give more time for negotiating a host of complicated and contentious tax issues in a second bill.
Trump sided with Johnson this week, preferring "one, big beautiful bill." Still, Vice President Vance gave the Senate the green light to move forward with their own plan as backup.
The other side: Democrats tried to turn the budget "vote-a-rama" into a referendum against Trump's first month in office.
Democrats mainly focused their amendments on cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and Trump's federal funding freeze.
While none of their amendments passed, it gave Democrats an opportunity to get Republicans — especially moderates facing reelection next year — on the record about supporting Trump's agenda.
"In 2026, these amendments are going to play a valuable role," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told Axios in an interview earlier this week.
Top Democrats eyeing runs for the White House in 2028 are divided on how to confront Donald Trump and his mandate: Fight, or moderate.
Why it matters: Since the election, Democrats are facing an identity crisis: They no longer have a clear one.
After Trump's surprise victory in 2016, many Democrats moved left and united under a "resistance" banner.
This time, there's no consensus on strategy — and prominent Democrats already are taking different paths.
Driving the news: Potential 2028 contenders such as Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Colorado Gov. Jared Polis have been foremost in touting their bipartisan bonafides, positioning themselves as pragmatic, center-left leaders.
Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Govs. Gavin Newsom of California and JB Pritzker of Illinois have opted for a more aggressive approach — regularly picking fights with the new administration and proposing progressive legislation.
Zoom in: In recent weeks, Whitmer has touted that she sent National Guard troops to the border to combat illegal immigration, and said she's open to some new tariffs to protect industry.
She also declined to join a multistate federal lawsuit challenging Trump's push to ban birthright citizenship, even though Michigan's Democratic attorney general is involved in the suit.
In a much-touted "Road Ahead" speech at the Detroit Auto Show in January, Whitmer said that "in the Whitmer house, compromise was a good thing … "I won't go looking for fights … but I won't back down from them, either."
Whitmer has proposed a new payroll tax cut for Michiganders and split from some Democrats who've proposed electric vehicle mandates.
"We don't care what you drive— ICE [internal combustion engines], hybrid, or EV — we just care that it's made right here in Michigan, by Michigan workers," she said.
In his State of the State address, Colorado's Polis said he hopes Congress can give a pathway to citizenship for some groups of undocumented immigrants.
But Polis also said he hopes Trump and Congress "work together quickly to secure the border, stop human trafficking and stop the illegal flow of guns and drugs ... We welcome more federal help to detain and deport dangerous criminals."
Polis also backed Trump's nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to be Health and Human Services secretary.
Whitmer and Polis have criticized Trump on issues such as how he's approached tariffs — but they're not reflexively against everything he does.
The other side: Democrats such as Newsom, Pritzker and Murphy have argued that Democrats need to keep up the fight against Trump to protect people from his policies.
In his State of the State speech Wednesday, Pritzker argued the current moment has disturbing parallels to the rise of Adolf Hitler in Germany. He criticized those Democrats who think Trump will make an exception for those who don't speak up.
"The seed that grew into a dictatorship in Europe a lifetime ago didn't arrive overnight," he said. "It started with everyday Germans mad about inflation and looking for someone to blame."
"We don't have kings in America — and I don't intend to bend the knee to one. I am not speaking up in service to my ambitions, but in deference to my obligations."
The day after Trump won the 2024 election, Newsom called for a special legislative session in California to raise money to prepare to challenge Trump in the courts.
Newsom added in a signing statement that said, "None of the funding in this bill is intended to be used for immigration-related legal services for noncitizens convicted of serious or violent felonies."
Zoom out: Other possible 2028 contenders have taken more of a wait-and-see approach — picking a few fights without mounting an all-out resistance.
This group includes Govs. Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania, Wes Moore of Maryland and Andy Beshear of Kentucky.
Shapiro and Beshear have joined lawsuits against the Trump administration, but also have said they're looking to find places of common ground.
Moore has been critical of Trump's attempt to slash broad parts of the federal government, but he also told CNN recently: "I'm not the leader of the resistance. I'm the governor of Maryland."
Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky angered Donald Trump so much during the peace talks with Russia that Trump was on the verge of withdrawing American military support from Ukraine, three U.S. officials familiar with the discussions tell Axios.
Why it matters: The conflict between Trump and Zelensky escalated into a war of words between the two that scared European allies who are worried about emboldening Russian dictator Vladimir Putin and rewarding his brutal expansionism.
"President Trump is obviously very frustrated right now with President Zelensky," National Security Advisor Mike Waltz said Thursday at the White House press briefing.
The big picture: Trump and Zelensky have had an awkward relationship ever since Trump was impeached in 2019 for trying to leverage U.S. military aid to the war-torn country in return for Zelensky having Joe Biden's son investigated over his sinecure with a Ukrainian gas company.
Today, Trump is finding it more difficult than expected to make good on his pledge to quickly implement a deal to end the Russia-Ukraine war.
Zoom in: Six administration officials tell Axios that during the past nine days there were five incidents that angered Trump, Vice President Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Waltz. Taken together, one administration official said, Zelensky "showed how not to do the 'Art of the Deal' " when it came to courting Trump's support:
Feb. 12: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent met Zelensky in Kyiv to offer a proposal that would give U.S. access to Ukrainian mineral rights in return for de facto U.S. protection. Trump later told reporters Zelensky was "rude" and delayed his meeting with Bessent because he slept in.
Feb. 14: At the Munich Security Conference, Vance and Rubio met Zelensky to get his approval for the mineral rights deal. But, the officials said, Zelensky surprised the Americans by saying he didn't have the authority to unilaterally approve it without parliament.
Feb. 15: Zelensky publicly rejected the offer at the conference. White House sources noted that his remarks to reporters — that the deal was "not in the interests of a sovereign Ukraine" — were markedly different from more positive-sounding comments he'd made on X the day before.
Feb. 18: As Rubio, Waltz and presidential envoy Steve Witkoff sat down with Russian negotiators in Saudi Arabia to talk peace, Zelensky criticized the meeting for occurring without Ukraine at the table. An angry Trump then lashed out at Zelensky at a Mar-a-Lago press conference, falsely suggesting Zelensky had started the war with Russia and had an approval rating of only 4%.
Feb. 19: Zelensky fired back, saying the U.S. president "lives in a disinformation space." Trump then ratcheted up the pressure by posting on Truth Social that Zelensky, a former actor, was a "modestly successful comedian" who has become a "dictator without elections." Trump has refused to criticize Putin as a dictator.
What they're saying: Vance told the conservative media outlet The National Pulse on Wednesday that Zelensky should've aired his complaints "in a private discussion with American diplomats … he's attacking the only reason [Ukraine] exists, publicly, right now. And it's disgraceful. And it's not something that is going to move the president of the United States. In fact, it's going to have the opposite effect."
Three administration sources say Vance's comment about Trump's state of mind was a not-so-veiled threat to walk away from Ukraine.
In the White House's view, Zelensky grew too accustomed to former President Biden's open-ended support for Ukraine's war effort, the full-throated backing of NATO countries and the positive press that went with it. So he overstepped.
"Zelensky is an actor who committed a common mistake of theater kids: He started to think he's the character he plays on TV," a White House official involved in the talks said. "Yes, he has been brave and stood up to Russia. But he would be six feet under if it wasn't for the millions we spent, and he needs to exit stage right with all the drama."
"We created a monster with Zelensky," another official involved in the negotiations said. "And these Trump-deranged Europeans who won't send troops are giving him terrible advice."
"In the course of a week, Zelensky rebuffed President Trump's treasury secretary, his secretary of state and his vice president, all before moving on to personally insulting President Trump in the press," another administration official said.
"What did Zelensky think was going to happen?"
What's next: Despite the mistrust and anger, Trump's team has continued negotiating with Zelensky and a new mineral-rights deal that would be part of a peace agreement is in the offing.
Reality check: The deal Trump appears to be negotiating could be highly controversial. Based on their public and private statements, Trump's team is expected to pressure Zelensky into giving up Crimea (which Putin seized in 2014) portions of eastern Ukraine and the Azov Coast (occupied in Russia's 2022 invasion).
The U.S. insistence on claiming a share of Ukraine's mineral rights has been compared to a "mafia shakedown" by liberal critics, who point out that the country would lose land and mineral rights and get little in return.
"It's a sh*t sandwich," a Trump administration official acknowledged.
"But Ukraine is going to have to eat it because [Trump] has made clear this is no longer our problem."
For Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), the overnight session on Thursday is about proving Democrats have a path — and the guts — to get out of the political wilderness.
Why it matters: Schumer sees the budget "vote-a-rama" as his shot to convince voters that President Trump's GOP serves billionaires, not the working-class people who make up the new MAGA coalition. Axios scooped Schumer's thinking earlier this week.
Democrats are expected to offer about 40 amendments as part of the debate over the Senate GOP's $300 billion budget reconciliation package.
The amendments — which aren't expected to pass — are designed to pin Republicans between what's good for their reelections and what could infuriate Trump.
🔑 Schumer's two key targets are Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who each face reelection in 2026.
As Schumer told Axios this week: "In 2026, these amendments are going to play a valuable role."
🎉 Zoom in: The festivities won't end until each side votes the other to exhaustion.
Amendments are unlimited and the median age of senators is 65, per Pew Research Center.
Among the potential amendments: Sens. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.) plan to put GOP senators on the record on Trump's IVF promises, as Axios scooped tonight.
The bottom line: For Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), the evening is much more straightforward.
Endure the vote-a-rama and pass the resolution.
Plant the Senate's flag as Trump's most viable path to quickly fund his mass deportations and border security.
Take back the upper hand from Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who has a daunting path next week to get his one big bill through the House.
Canada beat Team USA 3-2 in an overtime 4 Nations Face-Off Championship Game thriller in Boston on Thursday night, which saw political tensions spill into the arena.
The big picture: Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took a swipe at President Trump's call for Canada's annexation as the 51st U.S. state moments after the win, saying on X: "You can't take our country — and you can't take our game."
Trump said on Truth Social earlier Thursday he was calling Team USA "to spur them on towards victory tonight against Canada, which with FAR LOWER TAXES AND MUCH STRONGER SECURITY, will someday, maybe soon, become our cherished, and very important, Fifty First State."
Zoom in: Ahead of the game, U.S. hockey fans booed Canada's national anthem — after Canadian fans booed a rendition of the "Star-Spangled Banner" before Team USA's winning game in Montreal last week.
And singer Chantal Kreviazuk confirmed to CBC News she changed the lyrics to "O Canada" on Thursday from "True patriot love, in all of us command" to "that only us command" in response to Trump's annexation calls.
In photos: Highlights from politically charged U.S.-Canada hockey final
Brad Marchand, #63 of Team Canada, and Connor Hellebuyck, #37 of Team USA, collide during overtime in the Feb. 20 game. Photo: Maddie Meyer/Getty Images
Brady Tkachuk, #7 of Team USA, checks Devon Toews, #5 of Team Canada, during the third period in the NHL clash on Feb. 20. Photo: Bruce Bennett/Getty Images
Brady Tkachuk, #7 of Team USA, and Devon Toews, #5 of Team Canada, vie for position in front of the Canada net during the third period of the 4 Nations Face-Off Championship on Feb. 20. Photo: Chase Agnello-Dean/4NFO/World Cup of Hockey via Getty Images
Brock Faber, #14 of Team USA, pushes down on Sidney Crosby, #87 of Team Canada, at the end boards during the second period of the face-off on Feb. 20. Photo: Ben Jackson/4NFO/World Cup of Hockey via Getty Images
Jack Hughes, #86 of Team USA, and Connor McDavid, #97 of Team Canada, collide during the second period of the game on Feb. 20. Photo: Maddie Meyer/Getty Images
Sam Bennett, #9 of Team Canada, scores a goal against Connor Hellebuyck, #37 of Team USA, during the second period of their Feb. 20 game. Photo: Maddie Meyer/Getty Images
Chris Kreider, #20 of Team USA, argues with Cale Makar, #8 of Team Canada, during the first period in the NHL 4 Nations Face-Off on Feb. 20. Photo: Maddie Meyer/Getty Images
Brady Tkachuk, #7 of Team USA, celebrates after scoring a goal against Jordan Binnington, #50 of Team Canada, during the first period of the Feb. 20 game. Photo: Bruce Bennett/Getty Images
Cale Makar, #8 of Team Canada, gets between Brock Nelson, #29 of Team USA, and the puck during the first period of the sides' clash on Feb. 20. Photo: Chase Agnello-Dean/4NFO/World Cup of Hockey via Getty Images
Matt Boldy, #12 of Team USA, and Thomas Harley, #48 of Team Canada, collide during the first period in the NHL 4 Nations Face-Off Championship Game on Feb. 20. Photo: Bruce Bennett/Getty Images
A general view of the atmosphere during the Canadian national anthem prior to the Feb. 20 face-off. Officials asked fans to "respect the national anthem and the players that represent each country," but some Team USA fans still booed. Photo: Bruce Bennett/Getty Images
Editor's note: This article and the headline have been updated to reflect Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's comment and further context has been added.
The Trump administration has "not complied" fully with a court order pausing a freeze on foreign aid, a federal judge in D.C. ruled Thursday evening.
The big picture: U.S. District Court Judge Amir Ali decided not to hold the State Department and Office of Management and Budget in contempt, but said to the extent they "have continued the blanket suspension, they are ordered to immediately cease it."
Driving the news: The Trump administration said it had complied with the order Ali issued last week that it temporarily reinstate foreign aid funding, as two nonprofits challenge in a lawsuit the axing of the assistance via USAID and the State Department.
"By enjoining Defendants and their agents from implementing any directives to undertake such blanket suspension, the Court was not inviting Defendants to continue the suspension while they reviewed contracts and legal authorities to come up with a new, post-hoc rationalization for the en masse suspension," Ali wrote.
The judge found the Trump administration had continued a funding freeze "pending review of agreements," something the temporary restraining order "enjoined pending the parties' requested briefing schedule and the Court's prompt resolution of whether to issue a preliminary injunction."
However, the judge said "contempt is not warranted on the current record and given Defendants' explicit recognition that 'prompt compliance with the order' is required."
Context: The groups that filed the motion for civil contempt, the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition (AVAC) and Journalism Development Network, Inc. (JDN), cited a Trump administration status report that they said showed it had not restarted any funding or allowed the resumption of work despite the court order.
They brought the lawsuit after President Trump on Jan. 20 signed an executive order pausing U.S. foreign aid amid a wider, DOGE-led cost-cutting overhaul of the federal workforce and agencies.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio later issued waivers for "life-saving humanitarian assistance programs." Rubio also ordered a stop on most foreign assistance funded via the State Department and USAID.
The nonprofits say the Trump administration's actions are illegal and "harming global health and security."
Trump said in his order the "foreign aid industry and bureaucracy are not aligned with American interests and in many cases antithetical to American values."
A note on the database on the Department of Justice's website says Trump revoked an executive order signed by then-President Biden and the database will be decommissioned.
The big picture: The move by Trump fulfills a campaign promise to reserve police reforms that came out of the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests following the murder of George Floyd.
Trump reserved Biden's order creating the database, even though he had proposed it himself.
It ends one of the defining moments of the Black Lives Matter demonstrations as many of the police reforms died amid infighting, political stalemate and a rising conservative backlash.
Context: Biden'sExecutive Order (EO) 14074 established a national database of police misconduct and required all federal law enforcement agencies to participate and use the database to screen personnel.
It banned the use of chokeholds and carotid restraints "unless deadly force is authorized" and restricted the use of no-knock entries.
It ensured "timely and thorough investigations and consistent discipline."
It also mandated body-worn camera policies and the expedited public release of footage in cases of serious bodily injury or deaths in custody for all federal agencies.
And: It restricted the transfer or federal purchases of military equipment "that belongs on a battlefield, not on our streets."
It also tracked data on use-of-force incidents.
By the numbers: The national database encompassed nearly 150,000 federal officers and agents, from the FBI and IRS down to the Railroad Retirement Board, per the Post.
All 90 executive branch agencies with law enforcement officers had provided thousands ofdisciplinary records dating to 2017, a report issued by the Justice Department in December said.
Axios CEO Jim VandeHei wrote this column for Finish Line, our evening newsletter:
We're flooded with reader feedback on covering politics in this wild era. It ranges from calling me a "Beta Soy Boy" who should have been aborted to a soulless suck-up, wittingly enabling tyranny.
I can confidently say: The truth sits in between!
Why it matters: Here's the shocker: Most people, even caustic critics, ask thoughtful questions about why and how we do what we do in terms of our coverage. This Finish Line is my stab at demystifying it a bit.
Our North Star: Readers first.
Those were the first two words of our Axios Manifesto nearly eight years ago, and they've shaped every tough decision ever since. It's a great gut check: What helps our readers get smarter, faster on the most consequential topics?
This star led us to break with most traditional media companies on three important points:
No editorial page, ever. Opinion pieces drive a lot of traffic — and therefore a lot of ad revenue and subscribers — for our competitors. But we felt it was confusing for readers to have to differentiate between an opinion piece and a serious news piece emanating from the same institution. So we have no opinion section.
No popping off on social media. We ask anybody who works for Axios, whether they're on the editorial side or any other part of the business, not to express their political leanings in public settings, including social media. We felt this was one small step to persuade the persuadables that we're trying to get to the closest approximation of the truth without putting our thumbs on the scale. We're imperfect but quite good on this score.
Smart BREVITY. We ask every reporter to fully buy into both the "Smart" and "Brevity" parts of our journalism. This is designed to be respectful of your time and intelligence. It's a big differentiator from more traditional media companies. We put every new writer and editor through a Smart Brevity Boot Camp to get this right.
This new environment is different in two substantial ways:
1. Fragmentation. We've written extensively about how all of us are breaking off into different information ecosystems based on age, interests, politics and jobs. This means Axios needs to deepen its relationship with our core readers AND look for new ways to engage open-minded readers elsewhere.
One example: Posting our stories aggressively on X. Elon Musk and I had a spirited exchange about the value of traditional reporting. (I inalterably support it. He's inalterably skeptical of traditional media.) But Axios wants our content where smart, curious readers congregate — and X is inarguably the top platform for tens of millions of them.
2. War on media. Truth is, President Trump consumes and talks to legacy media more than any president we can think of. Trump will do more press avails in a month than President Biden did in a year. Axios' Zachary Basu traveled with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on last week's Europe swing.
But Trump and his allies are suing media companies over coverage, freezing out AP from covering him inside the Oval Office or Air Force One, and suspending subscriptions to many publications. So it gets tense.
We signed a letterprotesting Trump's decision to bar AP reporters from the Oval Office and Air Force One, after the newswire's style guidelines stuck with calling it the Gulf of Mexico rather than Trump's renamed Gulf of America. We simply think neither party should bully a free media over its words or stories. We also believe it's unwise and dangerous not to confidently allow seasoned reporters access. Both parties should invite serious scrutiny: It makes your ideas, and the country, stronger.
But in general, Axios will speak for Axios. We aren't legacy media — in fact, we bolted legacy media to start new companies for a new era. We cherish our relationship with you, the reader, and will be transparent with you on controversial topics. It's in our DNA.
Some of you were pissed that we broke with AP on the actual Gulf debate. Our style is "Gulf of America (renamed by the U.S. from Gulf of Mexico)." Critics saw this as caving into the White House. But to us, it was easy to simply follow the North Star of being reader-first. If you go to Google Maps, Apple Maps or government websites, that body of water is called Gulf of America. So we just give the exact state of play without putting on the jersey of one side or the other.
What to expect from Axios: We'll cover every topic — from Trump to AI — clinically and unemotionally, like a doctor. We simply want to give you the facts and insights to make better decisions and live better lives.
Our ask: Don't assume every story we write or decision we make is because we're morons or corrupt or MAGA lovers or liberal lovers. Just ask. We try to respond to every email. If you hit our publisher, Nick Johnston ([email protected]) about any of our policies, I guarantee you a timely response.
Keep the feedback coming:[email protected]. But go light on the Soy Boy crap.
The Trump administration is rolling back protections for Haitian migrants in the U.S., allowing hundreds of thousands of people to be targeted for deportations this summer, the Department of Homeland said Thursday.
The big picture: The move is a part of President Trump's vow to crack down on illegal immigration, and comes after he amplified baseless claims about the Haitian American community on the campaign trail.
Trump said at the time that he'd end Temporary Protect Status (TPS) designations for Haitians as he and his surrogates spread false information about Haitian immigrants in Ohio.
Driving the news: Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem vacated a decision Thursday from the Biden administration to extend Haitians TPS by 18 months.
Former Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas had extended TPS for Haitians until February 2026 before Trump took office.
Noem's move ends TPS eligibility for an estimated 520,000 Haitians as of Aug. 3, 2025, unless extended.
Zoom in: TPS shields immigrants who entered the U.S. without authorization or overstayed visas.
In addition to being safe from deportation, TPS recipients qualify for work permits and can also pursue asylum while they have TPS.
Only people from certain countries qualify for the program.
What they're saying: A DHS spokesperson said in a statement that President Biden and Mayorkas "attempted to tie the hands of the Trump administration by extending Haiti's Temporary Protected Status by 18 months—far longer than justified or necessary."
The spokesperson added: "President Trump and Secretary Noem are returning TPS to its original status: temporary."
Flashback: Trump attempted to end TPS designations for several countries during his first term.
However, a federal judge's injunction stopped the change as a court battle played out. A three-judge appeals court panel sided with Trump, but the decision was appealed again, so TPS remained in place. Biden later reversed Trump's decision.
A civil rights attorney is asking the Trump administration to declassify the FBI and CIA files linked to Malcolm X on the 60th anniversary of his assassination.
Why it matters: The plea comes on the heels of President Trump ordering the declassifying of FBI files connected to the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Zoom in: Civil rights and personal injury attorney Ben Crump is scheduled Friday to make a public demand for the files of Malcolm X, later known as el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz, at the New York City site where he was assassinated.
Crump, who has represented several Black families of victims of high-profile police shootings, will be accompanied by Malcolm X's family.
Representatives for the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment in the evening.
Context: Malcolm X was assassinated at age 39 on February 21, 1965 while speaking at the then-Audubon Ballroom.
He was shot 21 times by a group of men in front of his wife and daughters.
Scholars and civil rights advocates have long said the men later charged with killing Malcolm Xwere wrongly convicted.
Some have alleged police and federal agents played a role in his death.
The intrigue: In early 2021, the family of Malcolm X released a letter reportedly written by a now-deceased police officer alleging that the New York Police Department and FBI were behind the assassination of the Black Civil Rights Movement leader.
Between the lines: Scholars believe the files could give clues to tensions between Malcolm X and his former group, the Nation of Islam, after a public breakup.
Some scholars and historians believe the Nation of Islam and/or the FBI may have been behind the assassination.
They also believe that the CIA followed Malcolm X as he took international trips to the Holy City of Mecca and London, U.K.
Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan said in a 2000 "60 Minutes" interview that he regrets his writings may have led others to murder Malcolm X. Farrakhan has denied ordering the assassination but in 1994 admitted to having "helped create the atmosphere" that led to it.
Zoom out: The CIA and FBI put Malcolm X under surveillance after witnessing him drawing large crowds where he spoke of Black nationalism and urged Black Americans to defend themselves against violence.
FBI leader J. Edgar Hoover and others in the U.S. government sought to prevent the rise of what they feared would be a Black "messiah" who could unify African Americans.
Yes, but: King's family is concerned that Trump's order to release records about his assassination could revive the FBI's attempts to discredit him — efforts that sought to exploit his indiscretions with women and undermine his legacy, sources close to his relatives told Axios.
The family requested a sneak preview of the records before their release. Trump declined, a White House official said, but not out of animus toward the family.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said Thursday that she will propose constitutional reforms to crack down on foreigners involved in gun smuggling in the country.
Why it matters: The move came after the U.S. State Department formally announced it has designated eight drug cartels — including six in Mexico — as global terrorist organizations that pose a threat to national security.
The designations prompted worries in Mexico about the U.S. military crossing the border to target the cartels, AP reported.
Trump allies prior to his inauguration reportedly discussed a "soft invasion" of Mexico to target cartels with cross-border special forces operations or drone strikes.
Driving the news: Sheinbaum said at a press conference Thursday that the proposed reforms would shore up Mexico's sovereignty by ensuring foreign agents can't operate in Mexico without the permission and collaboration of the Mexican government, per AP.
The reforms would also include calling for the highest penalties to be applied to foreigners who are found guilty of smuggling and distributing guns.
Zoom out: The U.S. is a major conduit for the flow of weapons into Mexico each year, helping fuel gun violence in the country.
Earlier this month, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) introduced legislation aimed at curbing the supply of guns from the U.S. to Mexico.
Roughly 200,000 to 500,000 American-made guns are trafficked into Mexico each year, primarily from sources like unlicensed gun dealers and straw purchasers, they said.
Reality check: Updating the country's constitution is just a first step in a long road towards prosecuting offenders of gun smuggling.
The Mexican justice system has a large case backlog that can lead to delays in prosecutions. Statistics show that only about 40% of incarcerated people in Mexico have actually been convicted of a crime.
