• I met a blind date at the Atlanta airport, and we flew to Alaska together.
• Though we didn't end up having a romantic connect, we spent a week together with our friends.
• It was an amazing time, and I'm glad I was brave enough to say yes.

I never thought a blind date would include flying thousands of miles with someone to see if we were compatible, but when mutual friends set me up, I couldn't resist. My date was in the Air Force and on his way home to Alaska for a two-week leave.

We decided to spend his first week off together. It would be a crash-and-burn scenario or a story to tell my grandkids one day. Whatever the result, I was all in.

We met at the airport and flew to Alaska together

Our first meeting was in the airport moments before an eight-hour flight from Atlanta to Anchorage. It wasn't my ideal way to start the date, especially since we'd spoken on the phone exactly once before, but it turned out better than I expected. He was thoughtful and made things less awkward. We made small talk for the first couple hours of the flight but mutually decided not to overdo the conversation.

The mutual friends who'd set us up greeted us in Anchorage. My date had known them most of his life, and I'd met them a year before on a work trip when they'd plotted this set-up, thinking the two of us might hit it off. Connecting with them helped ease any lingering awkwardness and settled my nerves.

We didn't have a romantic connection, but we still had an amazing time

Our friends planned an incredible week for us, and our first real date was at his favorite restaurant after we arrived. We quickly figured out neither of us felt a romantic connection but enjoyed hanging out together. Thankfully, our friends pivoted, and we ended up doing everything as a group for the rest of the week, taking the pressure off both of us and still allowing us to enjoy the week they had planned.

We visited an old mining community and picked wild raspberries on the side of the road. Traffic stopped on our way to Portage, but instead of worrying about what we'd miss, we played cards while waiting for the roads to reopen. It was a joy to discover glaciers work as well as trees for hammock-hanging. Soaking up the sun felt incredible after white water rafting down a freezing cold river to this Georgia girl.

Capping off our trip, I climbed Bear Mountain and nearly kept up with the Airman and my native Alaskan Friends. I only had to stop and take pictures every few feet to catch my breath. Thankfully, they pretended not to notice. The midnight sunset view from the top was worth every minute of the struggle. I've never felt so accomplished, especially as we raced down the mountain to beat complete darkness.

While our days were jammed with the best Alaskan adventures, when the sun finally set, our nights were filled with endless rounds of Settlers of Catan. Those cozy nights around a fire fueled my love for games and experiences, even if it didn't ultimately bring me the love of my life (or much sleep!).

Even though I never saw or talked to my date again after that trip, it was still one of the best vacations of my life. I learned you should always take a chance when you have an opportunity in front of you. You never know what the end result will be until you try — you could meet the love of your life or just go on the best vacation ever. I'm thankful for my friends, who took a shot at setting us up, and for the courage to live in a moment of spontaneous possibility.

As for all the landmarks I missed last time, I plan to return in March. Who knows what will happen this time?

• YouTube and Threads have taken down pro-Luigi Mangione posts they've said violate their policies.
• YouTube told Business Insider it forbids videos that glorify the murder of the UnitedHealthcare CEO.
• The different moderation approaches among platforms are leaving some users confused.

Diana "Ladidai" Umana, a content creator based in New York, has been closely following the news of Luigi Mangione — posting her thoughts on various social media accounts.

Umana's posts are pro-Luigi (and some have unorthodox angles, like saying he wasn't the shooter, which authorities have charged him with). But she was surprised when her entire YouTube account was permanently removed for what YouTube told her were "severe or repeated violations" of its rules.

YouTube's content moderation policies forbid "content praising or justifying violent acts carried out by violent extremist, criminal, or terrorist organizations."

"This means we remove content that glorifies or promotes the suspect in the murder of [UnitedHealthcare CEO] Brian Thompson, as well as content that trivializes his death," Jack Malon, a spokesperson for YouTube, told Business Insider. "This enforcement began in the immediate aftermath of the incident, as part of our standard practice to address content related to violent tragedies."

Other social platforms have also taken down content related to Mangione.

Several subreddits devoted to him have been banned — like r/luigimangione2 — although there are still other active subreddits about him. Reddit didn't respond to a request for comment on its moderation policies about the topic.

TikTok also has a policy against "promoting (including any praise, celebration, or sharing of manifestos) or providing material support" to violent extremists or individuals who cause serial or mass violence. People have complained that TikTok has removed comments saying "Free Luigi" and some videos about Mangione.

On Meta's Threads, people have said some of their posts about Mangione — like a post about his astrological sign or a video montage of him set to an Olivia Rodgigo song — were removed.

Meta has similar guidance, banning the "glorification" of dangerous organizations and individuals, which it defines as "legitimizing or defending the violent or hateful acts of a designated entity by claiming that those acts have a moral, political, logical or other justification that makes them acceptable or reasonable."

However, Meta recently updated what it calls its dangerous organizations and individuals policy to allow for "more social and political discourse in certain instances including — peace agreements, elections, human rights related issues, news reporting and academic, neutral and condemning discussion — and to ensure users are not unduly penalized for sharing it."

A spokesperson for Meta pointed to this policy but declined to comment further.

Pro-Lugi posts can be difficult to moderate

You might imagine how, when it comes to posts discussing Luigi Mangione, there are some gray areas between what's considered praise vs. discussion of social issues.

That's where the deluge of pro-Luigi posts from American users on social platforms gets a little weird.

Mangione's popularity among some people online is complicated, and I won't try to untangle it here (read this or this for some smart analysis). But you've probably already observed some of this online: There are a lot of people posting about Mangione and running afoul of content guidelines that they'd never usually run up against — rules designed for posts praising ISIS or Mexican drug cartels, for instance.

The result is some confusion and frustration among users.

Content moderation is an art, not a science, and there's a spectrum of differences between a statement like "Luigi was justified" and a meme about his looks or an ironic fan cam edit video.

Mangione has been charged with first-degree murder "in furtherance of terrorism," which may clarify things for platforms about whether to consider him as a single accused murderer or an alleged terrorist when it comes to content policy.

For now, it seems that a lot of social media users are surprised or confused by what is or isn't allowed when talking about Mangione on social media.

• It's becoming more common for people to choose to be child-free.
• Seven people shared why they don't want to be parents.
• Some never desired kids, while others felt that bringing a child into this world would be unfair.

For a long time, it was a societal expectation that people would grow up, get married, and have 2.5 kids.

However, that's changing.

From concerns about overpopulation and the environment to a simple desire to remain independent, more and more people just don't want children.

Business Insider spoke to seven people about why they're not interested in being parents, and their answers ranged from practical concerns about parenthood to just never feeling the desire to have kids.

Itzett Romero

Age: 37

Job: Digital marketer and content creator

When she knew she didn't want to have kids: Romero told BI she knew from a young age, as she spent much of her adolescence helping to care for her younger siblings.

Why she doesn't want them: Romero is the oldest of three children, and because of the large age gap with her siblings, she did a lot of childcare growing up. She understood the sacrifices people make when they have children, and it wasn't something she wanted for herself.

"I grew up very much understanding not just the Disney version or what the media portrays as having kids, but the more realistic version of having kids," she said.

She also thinks the American government and society don't do enough to support parents, particularly mothers.

"Women are very much taking on the burden of motherhood, as well as everything else, by themselves," she said. "I personally don't think that's fair."

"There's also something to be said about the fact that motherhood is just not for everybody," she added. "I have so much ambition. There are so many things I want to do."

How people have responded to her choice: "I have been lucky that I have surrounded myself with friends and family who have always respected my decision," she said.

Romero said she sometimes gets pushback from people she isn't close to but looks inward for acceptance instead of outward.

"I have stopped trying to get validation from people who don't understand my decision-making," she added.

What she's most excited about for her future: "As a content creator, I'm very passionate about human rights and collective liberation," Romero told BI.

"I'm excited to have the time, and the space, and the purpose to be able to do these things," she said. "I am a child of immigrant parents, and I'm looking forward to being a voice for that experience."

Anaïs Chantal

Age: 26

Job: Project manager, personal assistant, and bookkeeper in the music industry

When she knew she didn't want to have kids: In 2020, Chantal became friends with a woman who wouldn't have kids.

"I had in my head that I was going to grow up, get married, and have three children," she said. "When she said that, it was like, 'Oh, you can choose to do that. That's an option.'"

"I really started to self-reflect on why I wanted children," she said. "Did I actually want kids, or was I just conditioned to want children?"

Why she doesn't want them: Chantal said her mental health is one of the biggest reasons she wants to remain child-free. She told BI she is a victim of sexual assault and thinks giving birth, breastfeeding, and raising a child could be triggering for her.

"I don't normally tell people this, but there might be somebody out there that has this conflict, and I want people to know that they're not alone," she added. "My mental health is really important, and I don't want to put myself through that. And I also don't want to put my child through that because kids can pick up on things."

Chantal also said that she just doesn't think kids are something she needs to feel fulfilled and joyful.

"I have friends with kids, and they're the sweetest little things, but I really value my peace and being able to come home to peace and quiet," she said.

How people have responded to her choice: "My parents, of course, were initially sad," Chantal said. "But when I sat them down and told them my reasons, they were like, 'You know, it sounds like you really thought this through.'"

She also said she surrounded herself with people who don't want children, both in person and online, which gave her a sense of community.

Chantal had her fallopian tubes removed at 24 once she decided to remain child-free. Her insurance covered the procedure, and she said she felt relieved when it was done.

"I can remember getting wheeled out and waking up and seeing my partner with the biggest smile on my face," she said. "I was so, so happy."

What she's most excited about for her future: Chantal plans to move to New York with her partner next year. Eventually, they hope to settle in a more remote desert area with their dog.

"I just want to see the world, and I'm excited for my freedom," she said. "It does feel like the possibilities are endless for me."

Israa Nasir

Age: 37

Job: A therapist and the author of "Toxic Productivity"

When she knew she didn't want to have kids: "The feeling of wanting to have kids just never came," Nasir told BI.

She said her friends often imagined themselves as moms during imaginative play when they were children, but she pretended to be an explorer or adventurer.

"Even when I hit high school, I never really imagined a future where I was having a kid, but at that time, I didn't know that there was a thing of not having kids because everybody around me had children," she said.

"As I grew older, I started realizing this is a thing," she added. "There are some people who don't have children."

Eventually, Nasir realized she had fallen into that group.

Why she doesn't want them: "I'm very happy around kids," Nasir said. "I think they're very interesting. You can learn a lot from them."

However, Nasir told BI she's "not interested in parenting."

"It doesn't fit the lifestyle I've built for myself over the last 15 years," she said. "I would have to shift a lot to accommodate a child."

"I'm a therapist, and I know how important it is to have parents who are present, connected, and engaged," Nasir continued. "I think that my role in the world is different."

"Everybody has a role that they take on in this world, and when people have kids, a lot of their life, especially for the first five years, starts revolving around their children," Nasir said, adding that she's "not able to do that."

How people have responded to her choice: Nasir said she and her husband were on the same page about not having kids but her choice has been more surprising for other family members.

"I'm South Asian. This is a very big part of our culture, so I definitely got a lot of disappointment and anger from my mom," she said, adding that her mom still has not accepted her decision.

She also thinks her dad is sad about not being a grandpa, and some of her friends have expressed that she and her husband would have been great parents.

"I make a lot of space for other people's grief on this because they lose something when I make a decision," Nasir said. "It doesn't mean that I'm not entitled to it, and it does not mean that I have to feel guilty about it."

What she's most excited about for her future: "I am excited about building something that I can leave behind for others that makes their life a little better," she said. "One person can't change the whole world, but I want to add an impact."

"On a personal level, I'm really excited about being able to have experiences with my partner and have adventures and have a really big life on my terms," she added.

TJ Turner

Age: 38

Job: Engineer at a power company

When he knew he didn't want to have kids: Turner reflected on how kids could fit into his life after his father died in 2024. His dad was part of two unplanned pregnancies, including his conception.

"Not to insult myself, but I realized I didn't want to make that same mistake," he said. "That's kind of when I decided this isn't for me."

Turner decided to get a vasectomy when he was 28.

Why he doesn't want them: "I just didn't think that I would be good parent material," Turner told BI.

He said the financial and physical toll of parenting, like a lack of sleep, didn't appeal to him. He also didn't think he could take care of his mental health and be the kind of parent he wanted.

"In this day and age, it's so hard to focus on yourself that I don't know how people can not only focus on their own mental health but also focus on the health of their children on top of working full-time," he said.

How people have responded to his choice: Turner was already married when he decided to get a vasectomy, and he said his wife was supportive of his choice. His mom also supported him, though she was "sad initially" that she wouldn't have grandchildren.

"I tried to explain to her, like, 'Look, it's not because I think you raised me poorly or I had a bad childhood. It's honestly more because I know I will never be as good of parents as you were,'" Turner said.

"I think she understood that, and I think she respects that," he said.

What he's most excited about for his future: Turner told BI he's glad his future is flexible thanks to the independence. He can foster his love of motorcycling or go on a date with his wife without worrying about childcare.

"I can pay for my own retirement, own houses, and just live comfortably," he said.

Kathryn Hoffman

Age: 33

Job: Marketing professional

When she knew she didn't want to have kids: Hofman said she always knew, on some level, children weren't part of her life plan. In fact, her late grandfather knew she didn't want children before she did.

"I was not the serial dater," she said. "I didn't typically bring folks around, so everyone assumed it was pretty serious when I brought my husband home. Somebody asked something about children, and my grandfather just chimed in and was like, 'She doesn't want kids.'"

"And I was like, 'You know what? I don't,'" she said.

Why she doesn't want them: "I have a lot of ambitions," she said. "I'm not saying a mom can't accomplish a lot of things, but I really value my ability to assign success to myself and not assign success to what I've done for other people in my adult life."

"I think there are many, many things that I would have to prioritize differently if I were to be a mom," Hofman added.

How people have responded to her choice: "One of the things that people tell me often in response to the statement that I don't want children is, 'Oh, but you would be so good at it,'" Hofman said.

"The idea that I would be exceptionally good at it is one of the deterrents," she told BI. "I know myself well enough to know that if I were to become a mother, I would put all of my effort and energy into that child versus myself."

"Whether that's selfish or not, I'm sort of indifferent to that," she said. "I value my relationships as they are, my relationship with my husband and my relationship with myself."

What she's most excited about for her future: Hofman is an aspiring author, so she's looking forward to starting the querying process in 2025.

She also hopes to learn more and travel with her husband. They plan to head to New Zealand together and Disney World with her niece and nephews.

"That was one of the very few things I felt like I might miss out on not becoming a mom is that first time taking kids to Disney, so I'm borrowing my niece and nephews, and we're going to go do that with them," she said.

"There's just a lot of opportunity and things that come with the freedom of not owing your life and raising somebody else. You can raise yourself and go from there," Hofman said.

Whitney S.

Age: 38

Job: Nursing home staffer

When she knew she didn't want to have kids: When she was 17, Whitney watched a video of a woman giving birth in a college-level health class. The reality of giving birth shocked her — and made her sure she didn't want to go through the experience herself.

"I didn't tell anyone because you can't say that when you're 17," she told BI. "Nobody will believe you."

"But no matter what phase in life, no matter how old I was, I said, 'A kid is not going to fit in this,'" Whitney added.

Why she doesn't want them: "With the way things have been going and the way things will be, I don't see a reason to bring a child into this world," she said, pointing to the climate crisis as one of her concerns. "I don't feel like it's safe enough."

Whitney also said she doesn't want to take on the physical and mental risks of pregnancy and motherhood. She thinks many people take the responsibility of becoming parents too lightly.

"I know people who really want kids, and they're preparing for that financially and mentally," she said. "But I know too many people who have not … and the kids always suffer."

How people have responded to her choice: Whitney said she is estranged from some of her family members, who are disappointed she isn't having children, even though there are other kids in her family. She also said her decision impacted her dating life.

"For seven years, I was single," Whitney told BI. "That's a large reason I was single for so long."

Whitney has a boyfriend now, and she said she told him early in their relationship that she didn't want to have children.

What she's most excited about for her future: Whitney has fostered a community with other child-free people on social media and said she's eager to keep growing it and connecting with like-minded people.

"I get a lot of enjoyment out of it despite all the negativity," she said. "I told myself there's gotta be at least one person that can relate to what I'm saying."

Jessica Hawk

Age: 55

Job: Retired high-school teacher and content creator

When she knew she didn't want to have kids: Hawk said she never felt the urge to be a mother, even as a child.

Watching her friends become parents made it clear to Hawk that having kids wasn't for her.

"I had so many goals and aspirations for myself," Hawk said. "I knew from my friends who started having kids in their 20s just how much time, effort, and energy, mentally and physically, kids took."

"When I saw real-life examples of exhaustion, I definitely knew it was not the path for me," she added.

Why she doesn't want them: "When you decide to become a parent, you have to be ready for every possible scenario that could come up," Hawk said. "That includes having a child who might have special needs and will need care for the rest of his or her life."

"You have the possibility of the marriage not lasting," she added. "What would it be like to be a single mother?"

"When you think of all the variables that can come up with having children, it was more reasons for me to say I'm not ready to accept any of those variables," Hawk said.

How people have responded to her choice: Hawk didn't have pressure from her family to have children, which made her decision easier.

"I come from a long line of child-free women on both sides of my family," she added. "I always had real-life examples of child-free people thriving in my life."

Still, when she married her ex-husband — who also didn't want children — Hawk said people asked them within hours of the moment they said "I do" when kids were coming.

"At the beginning of the reception, I said, 'Oh, you know, we don't want to have children,' and the pushback I got: 'Oh, you'll change your mind.' 'You're too young.' 'You just got married.'"

"I'm like, 'Can I eat my cake?'" Hawk said.

What she's most excited about for her future: "I am at a point in my life now where I put myself in a really good financial situation," she said. "I live in my own large apartment and have peace and quiet. I travel extensively with my boyfriend and friends. I have such freedom to live my life in a way that is not a grind."

"I just feel completely unfettered and to the point where I can really just have fun, and I think not everybody has that opportunity," she added. "I'm going to take it to the fullest extent I can."

• The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a charitable organization with a $75.2-billion endowment.
• The nonprofit was created by Microsoft founder Bill Gates and his now ex-wife, Melinda French Gates.
• The foundation supports causes related to global health issues, poverty, and inequity.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a nonprofit charitable organization founded by Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and his then-wife, Melinda French Gates. The foundation has donated tens of billions of dollars to issues like global health, gender equality, water sanitation programs, nutrition education and support, and more.

The Gates Foundation, which is a 501(c)(3) organization, partners with groups that can do impactful work on specific issues in specific areas — medical researchers studying mosquito-borne illness in Tanzania, for example — and helps ensure there is proper funding for the work.

The Gates Foundation is one of the largest such organizations, second only to Denmark's medical research-focused Novo Nordisk Foundation. Its size and scope noted, there is still much people wonder about the BMGF, so let's take a closer look at who it supports, who runs it, and just how much money we're talking about here.

The history, ownership, and wealth of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was formed in 2000 as an offshoot of the William H. Gates Foundation, which the Microsoft founder created six years earlier. Bill Gates stepped down as Microsoft CEO in 2008 to devote more of his time to the foundation.

Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates divorced in August of 2021, and she resigned from her position as co-chair and trustee of the foundation in the spring of 2024. However, despite the couple's divorce, the Gates Foundation is still very active and is even growing the scope of its operations and its endowment. The foundation has about 2,000 employees, and has offices all over the world, including several in Africa, Europe, and Asia.

The former power couple aren't actually the owners of the organization. The Gates Foundation is owned by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Trust.

The Gates Foundation is best known for funding efforts to eradicate diseases like polio and malaria worldwide and addressing global poverty and malnutrition. It works closely with global health organizations like the World Health Organization and UNICEF. The foundation has backed efforts like developing and delivering vaccines to poverty-stricken countries, supporting agriculture and reducing food insecurity in developing nations, and committed more than $2 billion to fight the COVID-19 pandemic.

However, the foundation has also received criticism from global health and development experts, who have accused the organization of lacking transparency and accountability. Despite being a private, unelected entity, the foundation has had major effects and implications on public policy around the world, and its critics say it makes decisions based on the whims of its billionaire trustees rather than voters.

For instance, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into agricultural development in Africa over the years via a "green revolution" emphasizing technological innovations in farming. Instead, multiple organizations have called the efforts a failure and urged the foundation to instead listen to the needs of African farmers.

Bill and Melinda Gates have also acknowledged shortcomings in the foundation's strategies. For instance, despite spending billions on improving the US education system, with the goal of boosting high school graduation rates, the couple acknowledged that the foundation's efforts to improve American public schools were "still falling short" and said the foundation hadn't accomplished as much as they would like.

How much money does the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have?

The foundation is well-endowed, largely thanks to donations directly from the Gates themselves and billionaire Warren Buffett. BMGF has also made some excellent investments over the years.

According to its website, the foundation has an endowment of $75.2 billion. Bill and Melinda Gates have given $59.5 billion to the foundation since its inception, and Buffet has given $39.3 billion since 2006.

The foundation has billions of dollars of Microsoft stock, which is little surprise given that the software company is the provenance of Bill Gates' wealth. Bill Gates' net worth fluctuates with the stock market, but it is well over $100 billion — and that's after subtracting the $76 billion Melinda Gates gained when the couple separated.

Notably, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation does not give money to individuals, its website states, nor does it donate to "projects addressing health problems in developed countries," "political campaigns and legislative lobbying efforts," "building or capital campaigns," or "projects that exclusively serve religious purposes."

• Founding partner Alex Witt shared three venture capital predictions for the next decade.
• Witt says that managers who've launched less than three funds will get more attention.
• He also says that five key technologies and the African market will see more investments.

Since venture capital funds plummeted from 2021 to 2023, VCs are looking for ways to stop the pain and regain a sense of control over their future. Still, many VCs predict the industry will significantly decline in 2025 due to high interest rates.

Alex Witt, general partner at Verda Ventures and cofounder of the payment platform SWFT Blockchain agrees with recent predictions. Based on his 14 years of experience in finance and technology, Witt also gave Business Insider three more core predictions for the VC industry's next decade.

He believes technological opportunity combined with changing demographics will shape the VC experience over the next 10 years, creating more investment space for emerging managers, five key technologies, and Africa.

1. Emerging managers will drive the highest returns in the next decade

As limited partners recognize that successful Fund 1s don't necessarily translate into successful Fund 2s or 3s, the VC landscape will see a greater focus on new managers who've launched less than three funds.

"Emerging managers have been traditionally underfunded despite their success," Witt explained.

For context, Witt explained that larger funds have a track record of underperforming: only 17% of funds larger than $750 million return over 2.5 times of capital. Yet smaller funds have been proven to consistently outperform.

"Funds under $249 million are disproportionately represented in the top decile and quartile of performers," he said. Witt explained that targeting smaller, high-performing funds will be critical for future success.

2. VCs have an unprecedented chance to back five transformative technologies

According to Witt, we're entering a new "industrial renaissance" fueled by breakthroughs in five key technologies he believes have massive VC potential.

• Generative AI: Witt predicts that key players in this arena will be companies with unique datasets, such as Google with YouTube data and xAI with X and Tesla data. Generative AI will even affect the finance and pharmaceutical industries.

  "Some impacts of generative AI to watch for include drug discovery with even faster trials and finance with real-time, data-driven trading.

• Robotics: Witt pointed to innovations like generative AI-driven physical AI — for example, Nvidia — and referenced Tesla. "Market leader Tesla is positioned to dominate this area with its 'robots on wheels' approach to manufacturing."
• Autonomous electric vehicles: Witt said Chinese carmaker BYD stands out as a global leader in data access and scalable manufacturing. "In terms of cost impact, more than 70% of Uber ride costs are labor-related, and autonomous transport will significantly reduce expenses," he said.
• Blockchain: Accessibility is an area to watch in blockchain. Witt said blockchain enables low-cost, borderless transactions, and more markets are using it. "For example, MiniPay, the #1 app in Kenya, surpassed Facebook and Instagram in downloads."
• Biotech: As an emerging technology, Witt explained that gene-based therapies offer precision treatments for inherited or environmental genetic abnormalities. "As examples, Moderna's mRNA success foreshadows the broader potential of CRISPR and similar technologies," he said.

"This era is reminiscent of the early 20th century's transformative, broad-based innovations like electricity and the internal combustion engine," Witt said. For VCs, Witt believes the coming decade marks a rare chance to back category-defining companies in emerging industries — but he emphasized that success won't come easy.

"VCs will face the challenge of identifying category-defining winners," Witt said. "As history shows, industries tend to consolidate around one or two dominant players, with only a small fraction of companies emerging as leaders — think Amazon and Google among the dot-com era's 500 IPOs."

3. Africa and the Global South will lead in VC-backed innovation

Beyond technology, Witt stressed that demographics are a critical and often overlooked factor shaping VC trends. He projects that population dynamics will increasingly determine the locations where innovation thrives.

"Demographics are destiny," Witt said.

He predicts that VCs will increasingly allocate capital to the Global South, particularly Africa, due to its "explosive" consumer and market growth potential.

"This shift will redefine traditional portfolio strategies, emphasizing demographic-driven investments," Witt said.

As support for his prediction, Witt noted that Africa leads global population growth, and that all of the top 20 fastest-growing populations are in the Global South.

He added that countries with aging populations and declining birth rates, such as Korea, with a fertility rate of 0.68, face a shrinking workforce and reduced appetite for risk and technological adoption.

In contrast, he believes that regions like Africa, with a fertility rate of 4.18, offer a young, growing population and expanding market potential.

"This is why some VCs are betting on the Global South as the next frontier for innovation and growth," Witt concluded. "Large populations equal large markets, and big markets mean that one or two successful companies can offset eight or nine failures, which is critical for VC success."

If you're a VC who would like to share your thoughts on the industry, please email Manseen Logan at [email protected].

• The personal trainer Ben Carpenter said it's a mistake to rely on willpower to make healthy changes stick.
• For lasting fat loss, Carpenter advises making habits that can be kept long-term.
• Work with, not against, your existing preferences, he said.

If you want to lose weight successfully — and for good — it helps to make it as easy as possible.

By making healthy habits effortless, you won't have to rely on willpower and are more likely to stick to them, Ben Carpenter, a personal trainer and fat loss coach, told Business Insider.

Carpenter's new book, "Fat Loss Habits," is designed to help people set themselves up for sustainable fat loss.

"When it comes to weight loss, a lot of people view obesity traditionally as a lack of willpower," Carpenter said.

But willpower is a finite resource, and at some point, it will run out, he said.

By choosing a form of exercise you enjoy, rather than what's optimal, you're more likely to develop a habit that becomes so ingrained in your routine that you don't have to think about it.

"Over time it becomes second nature," Carpenter said.

Think long-term

Changing your mindset about fat loss could be the key to getting off the yo-yo diet cycle.

Carpenter said that instead of asking yourself how you can lose as much weight as possible as quickly as possible, ask what you could still be doing in a year's time.

"What could you be doing so well a year from now that next January you aren't asking yourself again, 'What diet should I go on?' I think that's a fundamental mindset shift that would help most people," Carpenter said.

People go on and off restrictive diets like they're switching lights on and off, Carpenter said: "If someone can adopt health-promoting behaviors that they can adhere to for long periods of time, arguably the need for dieting diminishes."

For your weight loss to be long-term, you need to think about long-term habits, Carpenter said: "Most people are trying to achieve long-term goals, but they're doing it via short-term behaviors."

Dietitians have previously told BI that diets promising rapid, drastic weight loss are unsustainable and best avoided.

Keep a food diary for a couple days

Carpenter recommends people self-audit before trying to lose weight.

This could be as simple as keeping a food diary for a couple of days to help you identify tweaks. For example, swapping cream in your coffee for milk.

"I prefer to ask people what they're doing at the moment, their own preferences, and then try and find things that take as little effort and cause as little pain as possible," Carpenter said.

He added: "If you can get better results doing 99% of everything you are already doing, it takes a lot less effort and willpower than someone going, 'Here is your new diet plan, good luck.'"

Overhauling your diet can seem doable at the start but motivation often dwindles.

"From a motivation perspective, it could be really exciting to make substantial changes to your eating and watch the scale drop quickly. It might even motivate you to keep going," registered dietitian Alix Turoff previously told BI. "But when your plan is very rigid, this motivation typically lasts only a few weeks before you're burnt out and wanting to quit."

• Justin Baldoni sued The New York Times over its coverage of Blake Lively's harassment complaints against him.
• The suit is a strong PR defense that shows he's serious about protecting his reputation, a PR expert said.
• Industry pros told BI both stars' personal and professional lives will likely be damaged as the battle continues.

Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni's reputations are likely to face even more damage as their legal battle intensifies, crisis PR and legal experts say.

Baldoni, the director and star of the romantic drama "It Ends with Us," sued The New York Times on Tuesday for libel, false light invasion of privacy, promissory fraud, and breach of implied-in-fact contract over its December 2024 story about his costar Lively's accusations that he sexually harassed her and damaged her reputation in the press.

Baldoni's 87-page lawsuit rebuts Lively's claims in detail, offering a different perspective on the Times' bombshell story. It also accuses Lively of attempting to salvage her public image at Baldoni's expense and engaging in a "hostile takeover" of the production of "It Ends With Us."

The Times told BI in a statement that their story was "meticulously and responsibly reported."

Baldoni's team's decision to sue a newspaper for hundreds of millions of dollars isn't just a legal tactic. It's a major PR statement, too.

"To know that the Baldoni team is so strongly standing in their truth shows that there's a lot more to the story than what initially came out in that Lively complaint," Mike Fahey, the founder and CEO of the PR agency Fahey Communications, told Business Insider.

Baldoni's suit does not name Lively, but her attorneys told BI in a statement that the filing doesn't change anything about the initial claims made in her complaint, and they look forward to addressing Baldoni's claims in court.

Whether the case goes to trial or settles out of court, Fahey said the story is far from over. "It's an onion, and there are a lot of layers to peel back," he said.

Erik Bernstein, the president of Bernstein Crisis Management, agreed. He cautioned that it might get ugly: "I think we're going to see two people's personal and professional lives dragged through the mud."

The text messages included in Baldoni's lawsuit cast Lively's claims in a different light

The timing of Baldoni's lawsuit against the Times, which was filed 10 days after Lively filed her initial complaint against him, was a strategic move to strike back quickly before public interest waned, Fahey said.

"The shelf life on a story like this is very short," Fahey said.

Evan Nierman, the CEO of PR firm Red Banyan, added that the tone of Baldoni's lawsuit suggests that the actor-director is "concerned that The New York Times piece could define him for years to come."

"He is taking a very aggressive stance to defend his reputation and prevent a negative perception of him from hardening into the public consciousness," he added.

Part of that stance included providing additional context on text messages in Lively's complaint to make the case that the Times' reporting leaned on "'cherry-picked' and altered communications stripped of necessary context and deliberately spliced to mislead."

The PR and legal experts who spoke to BI said that, if real and undoctored, the text message screenshots included in Baldoni's lawsuit strengthen his case and make for a strong defense.

"I thought it was a necessary move to show the full context of the text messages and the full context of some of the events that Blake Lively is alleging to paint a different type of picture, a different type of narrative," said Camron Dowlatshahi, a partner at MSD Lawyers, a Los Angeles law firm that specializes in entertainment and employment law.

"This is a full-on legal battle, but this is more of a public relations battle at this point," he added. "And so Baldoni had to come forward and do something."

Baldoni's lengthy lawsuit addresses various points made in Lively's initial complaint. With pages and pages of details to pore through, the general public may no longer know what to believe. Nierman said that's likely also by design.

"I think that's probably part of their strategy, is to muddy the waters," Nierman said. "And part of the way that you do that is by launching a full frontal assault on the outlet that broke the story and has so far framed the narrative."

Nierman added that Baldoni and his team probably hope that undermining the Times' credibility will "cast doubt into people's minds that Baldoni is this negative actor that the story portrayed."

Baldoni's lawyer, Bryan Freedman, doubled down on his team's intention to unveil more messages between Lively and Baldoni during a Friday interview on NBC's "Today" show.

"We plan to release every single text message between the two of them," Freedman said. "There is nothing that in any way is a concern about this entire situation from our perspective, and we want the truth to be out there."

Bernstein said that Baldoni and his team likely view this lawsuit "as a must-win."

"He has to be thinking that he needs to win, or he'll be seen as untouchable by Hollywood in our, let's say, post-Weinstein era," he said.

Experts say Baldoni seeking $250 million in damages from the Times is a deliberate move to fuel headlines

Baldoni's suit is lengthy and asks for a hefty $250 million in damages. The experts who spoke to BI said that's another PR strategy that will draw more attention to Baldoni's narrative.

"Big numbers get printed, right? Your story is a lot more interesting if it's $250 million than if it's $20,000," Bernstein said.

"The exorbitant number is meant to drive headlines, not to result in collection,'" Nierman added. "It is a PR play to get attention and to ensure that his side of the story does get reported. So I actually think it's a very savvy move to attach such an astronomical figure to it."

Dowlatshahi, the lawyer, said that it's not typical for an amount in damages to be listed in the lawsuit, though he said that this situation is anything but typical.

"This is a high-profile celebrity battle, and so I think that amount was needed to be a show of force."

The PR battle will continue in public, and neither star will emerge unscathed

The same day Baldoni filed his lawsuit against the Times, Lively formally filed a lawsuit against Baldoni, his production company Wayfarer, and his PR team in New York federal court.

The lawsuit, obtained by BI, stems from the complaint Lively previously filed with the California Civil Rights Department. It accuses Baldoni and his PR team of engaging in a campaign to retaliate against Lively for speaking out about Baldoni's alleged sexual misconduct on the set of "It Ends With Us."

It's unclear how long it will take for this to play out — it could be months or even years if it goes to a jury trial — but the experts BI spoke with agreed that this is just the beginning of a long and messy road ahead.

And the hits will keep coming: Though Lively was not named in Baldoni's suit against the Times, Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman told NBC's "Today" show that they "absolutely" plan to sue Lively, too.

Though both stars' reputations have already been damaged, they'll likely worsen as the case unfolds publicly.

"There's going to be some skeletons in the closet coming out," Bernstein said. "It's just going to be a long dragged-out thing where there's maybe no real winner."

• China's new Type 055 cruiser is its most modern and powerful surface combatant.
• The ship China labels as a destroyer is so large it compares more to US cruisers.
• China is building these ships fast while the US sunsets most of its aging cruisers.

China's navy has a menacing new addition to its naval fleet: the Type 055 class guided missile destroyer.

The destroyer is the most modern and potent surface combatant in China's navy, officially known as the People's Liberation Army Navy. Designed for multiple missions and fitted with a massive arsenal and advanced electronics, it is an apex predator in the PLAN's growing fleet meant to protect China's carriers from harm.

The class is so daunting and capable that the US Department of Defense classifies it as a cruiser. Many observers compare it to the US Navy's own cruisers, which have performed a similar role.

"Depending on your criteria, the Type 055 is the best or second-best surface combatant in the world," Chris Carlson, a retired US Navy captain and naval analyst told Business Insider.

And while the US Navy seeks to divest from its aging cruiser fleet, China is expanding its fleet at a breakneck pace.

Type 055 'Renhai'

China's desire for a massive surface combatant dates back to the 1960s. China initiated an "055" program in the mid-1970s, then canceled it in 1983 due to weaknesses in its industrial base and technological know-how.

Three decades later, however, China's booming economy enabled its shipbuilding industry to become the largest in the world. It emphasized modernizing the navy and building or acquiring fleet oilers, nuclear submarines, guided missile warships, aircraft carriers, and more.

The keel of the first Type 055, Nanchang, was laid in December 2014, just three months before the keel of China's first domestically built carrier, Shandong, was laid.

When Nanchang was commissioned in 2020, it made the class a force to be reckoned with. Measuring 590 feet long and displacing 12,000-13,000 tons, it is the largest class of surface combatant China has ever built.

Each Type 055, which NATO classifies as the Renhai-class, is fitted with 112 vertical launch system (VLS) cells, which launch missiles. Sixty-four cells are positioned forward of the bridge in an 8x8 configuration and 48 are located aft in a 6x8 configuration. These VLS cells have both cold and hot launch capability, enabling them to field a more diverse missile arsenal; in a cold launch, a missile is ejected from the cell via pressurized gas before its engine fires.

That arsenal includes YJ-18 anti-ship cruise missiles, CJ-10 land-attack cruise missiles, and HHQ-9 surface-to-air missiles (SAMs), which have ranges of around 335 miles, 497 miles, and 124 miles, respectively. The class may also be able to carry Yu-8 anti-submarine missiles.

In 2022, China tested a cold launch of a YJ-21 hypersonic missile from a Type 055's VLS cells. The missile reportedly has an approximate range of 932 miles, a cruising speed of Mach 6, and a terminal speed of Mach 10, which makes it challenging to intercept.

The Type 055 also features a single box launcher with 25 HHQ-10 short-range SAMs, four Type 726 defensive launchers capable of launching chaff, flares, and decoys, 2 triple-tubed torpedo launchers with Yu-7 torpedoes, a single 11-barelled H/PJ-11 Close-in weapon system (CIWS), and a H/PJ-38 130 mm naval gun.

At the stern, a helicopter deck and hangar can house two helicopters capable of tracking submarines and helping with logistics.

The Type 055 is also brimming with modern radars, sensors, and other electronics. This includes four Type 346B Dragon Eye S-band active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars mounted on the superstructure and four X-band radars housed in an integrated mast, making it the first Chinese warship with dual-band planar radar arrays. Its hull-mounted sonar can be enhanced by towed active array sonars.

With its arsenal and sensor/electronic suite, the Type 055 can take on an anti-ship, anti-submarine, anti-air, or land-attack role, making it the best candidate for a carrier escort. It's also capable of operating as a command flagship for any PLAN surface action group without a carrier.

The US Department of Defense has speculated that China wants to incorporate ballistic missile defense (BMD) systems on the Type 055, which could enable it to serve in a BMD/anti-satellite role similar to Japan's BMD destroyers.

Eight Type 055s are in service. At least three more are reportedly in varying stages of construction. China may build as many as 16 Type 055s in total.

Despite its young age, the class has already gained a reputation as one of the best surface combatants in the world.

"I'd say the Type 055 is the most capable in anti-surface warfare, but not as capable in the air defense and BMD role as a US [Arleigh] Burke DDG," Carlson, the retired US Navy captain, said. He said the Type 055's strike and ASW capabilities are about the same as its American counterpart.

Ticonderoga-class

The size, armament, and mission of the Type 055 are often compared to the US Navy's Ticonderoga-class cruiser. Measuring 567 feet long, displacing around 10,000 tons, and first entering service in 1983, the ships of the class are considerably older and smaller than the Type 055s.

But the Ticonderogas are no less potent and have a larger missile arsenal, with two sets of 61 Mk 41 VLS cells able to carry 122 missiles and two quad-tubed Mk-141 launchers at the stern.

Two Mark 45 5-inch guns are present at the stem and stern, as well as two Phalanx CIWS' and two triple-tubed Mark 32 torpedo tubes capable of firing Mk 46 or Mk 50 torpedoes. A helicopter hangar capable of housing two MH-60R Seahawk helicopters provides additional ASW capability.

The exact makeup of each Ticonderoga's missile arsenal is dependent on its mission, as it is capable of carrying a host of different missiles. These include Tomahawk cruise missiles for ground targets, Harpoon anti-ship missiles for hostile ships, and RUM-139 VL-ASROC anti-submarine missiles for enemy subs.

The missiles have ranges of up to 1,500 miles, 149 miles, and 10 miles respectively.

The Ticonderoga's main role, however, is air defense. It can carry a wide range of anti-air missiles, including Evolved Sea Sparrow SAMs, and all active variants of the Standard Missile family; the SM-2 Blocks III, IIIA, IIIB, and IV; the SM-3, and the SM-6.

Those missiles, which can intercept targets ranging from 35 miles to over 200, enable the Ticonderoga to provide an effective air defense umbrella against low- and high-altitude threats, including helicopters, drones, jets, and missiles.

In 2008, an SM-3 fired from the cruiser USS Lake Erie destroyed a defunct satellite at an altitude of some 150 miles, demonstrating its ability to perform anti-satellite missions.

Another defining asset of the Ticonderogas is the AN/SPY-1 passive phased array radar — a vital component of the AEGIS Combat System, an advanced and integrated naval defense system that combines command, detecting, tracking, and weapons control for comprehensive management of air, surface, and submarine threats, and which the Ticonderogas were the first ships to employ.

Twenty-seven Ticonderoga-class cruisers were built between 1980 and 1994, but only nine are in active service today.

Cruiser gap?

The importance of the Ticonderoga and the Type 055 to their respective fleets is hard to overstate. Their displacement, arsenal size, and ability to perform multiple missions and operate as flagships puts them at the top of the list of most important surface combatants — second, perhaps, only to the carriers.

In an acknowledgment of their capability, the US Department of Defense officially designates the Type 055 as a cruiser, despite China's own designation of destroyer, which is likely a PR move intended to make the PLAN seem less aggressive. (Destroyers typically have smaller displacements and arsenals than cruisers and play a less prominent role in the fleet.)

Consequently, their deployments are carefully monitored, with their standalone voyages seen as intentional shows of strength.

Type 055s have sailed in the waters off Alaska in 2021, 2022, and 2024, including as part of joint Chinese-Russian patrols. Recently, a Type 055 visited the island nation of Vanuatu, signaling to some that China was trying to increase its presence in the South Pacific.

The Ticonderogas have also been on the move. In 2022, the cruiser USS Port Royal sailed through the Taiwan Strait in a sign to China. More recently, in June, USS Normandy participated in a show of strength off Norway, and in September, USS Bunker Hill took part in a massive five-nation drill in the South China Sea.

Though both navies currently have nine cruisers in active service, this will not be the case for long. While China has only just entered the cruiser game, the US Navy has been seeking to decommission its cruisers for years.

The Navy argues that the cruisers have approached, passed, or will soon pass their expected service lives and that the cost of keeping the ships up and running is draining the service of funds and shipyard space.

In 2021, for instance, USS Vella Gulf lasted just one week into a deployment before leaks in a fuel tank required it to return to port. More mechanical problems were soon uncovered, and the ship spent two months undergoing repairs before it could rejoin its carrier strike group.

Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro has even testified to Congress that some of the ships were unsafe. A modernization effort for seven cruisers, meanwhile, went as much as 200% over budget and fell years behind schedule.

The Navy wants to divest from ships it says it doesn't need and invest in new vessels that it argues can adequately fill in for the role of the Ticonderogas in the 21st century, like the new Flight III variant of the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers.

But Congress has so far rejected the Navy's plans to retire all of its remaining cruisers due to fears that they play too important a role in countering China, whose increasing might could be a means to try to seize the island of Taiwan by force.

Four Ticonderogas — Vicksburg, Cowpens, Leyte Gulf, and Antietam — were decommissioned in the last year. On November 4, Del Toro announced that the Navy would operate three cruisers planned to be decommissioned in 2026 into 2029, effectively extending their service lives. The rest are planned to be decommissioned before then.

China, meanwhile, will continue building Type 055s at rates virtually unthinkable to US shipyards.

Benjamin Brimelow is a freelance journalist covering international military and defense issues. He holds a master's degree in Global Affairs with a concentration in international security from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. His work has appeared in Business Insider and the Modern War Institute at West Point.

• Elon Musk is funding a new private preschool in Texas called Ad Astra.
• It's set to open its doors this year for children aged three to nine.
• The school is focused on STEM-based learning and has long-term goals to expand into a university.

Elon Musk is expanding his reach as he launches his newest venture: early childhood education.

Located in Bastrop, Texas, Ad Astra is a private preschool that is accepting applications for children aged three to nine. The school's website said that Ad Astra will subsidize tuition for its opening year, after which costs will be set in line with local private schools.

"Ad Astra's approach to education is centered around hands-on, project-based learning, where children are encouraged to explore, experiment, and discover solutions to real-world problems," the website said, adding that its curriculum will be centered on integrating STEM subjects into the classrooms.

A notice from the Texas Health and Human Services Department said the preschool obtained its initial permit on November 14, officially allowing the school to open in 2025. Per the permit, the preschool can admit up to 21 students in its first year of operation. The school's application materials first obtained by Bloomberg said that the school's long-term goal is expanding into a university focused on STEM learning.

While Musk's name does not appear in any of the school's application materials to the state, his foundation donated $100 million to get the preschool up and running, according to tax filings.

As the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and the owner of the social media website Twitter turned X, Musk is not primarily known for his influence on education. However, this isn't his first investment into the field — in 2014, Musk opened a school also named Ad Astra that he created for his kids and the kids of his SpaceX employees, which stopped its in-person operations after Musk's kids graduated.

It's not uncommon for billionaires to donate to schools and universities. Ad Astra's opening, however, comes at a time when President-elect Donald Trump is taking office for his second term. Musk is a close ally of Trump, tasked with leading a new cost-cutting commission called the Department of Government Efficiency. Amid calls to eliminate the Education Department and give states more control over classrooms, Musk could play a key role in shaping education policy by offering advice to Trump and lawmakers. DOGE does not have the power to make any changes on its own.

"I do think we need significant reform in education," Musk said during a Trump campaign event in October.

"The Department of Education seems to regard as its primary duty foisting propaganda on our children as opposed to getting them a good education. It's insane," Musk said. "The priority should be to teach kids skills that they will find useful later in life and leave any sort of social propaganda out of the classroom."

Ad Astra and Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Business Insider.

New priorities for education

Ad Astra's website said it is not a Montessori school, but it operates like one, focusing on child-centered education and individualized lessons. The application form to the school also encourages parental involvement, saying that Ad Astra wants "parents and guardians to be actively involved and share their gifts with the community."

The school's website does not directly reference politics, but Musk, Trump, and other Republican lawmakers' past comments indicate how the GOP would like to shape education under Trump's administration. When Trump announced former wrestling executive Linda McMahon as his education secretary, he wrote in a statement that she would "fight tirelessly to expand 'Choice' to every State in America, and empower parents to make the best Education decisions for their families."

Reducing the federal Education Department's influence over education has long been a priority for Republican lawmakers. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed into law a series of bills aimed at increasing parents' involvement in classroom curricula and ending "woke" lessons in classrooms.

Trump and Musk's DOGE partner Vivek Ramaswamy have also proposed shutting down the Education Department altogether. Ramaswamy recently blamed the department for kids' poor reading literacy scores.

The emphasis on STEM education at Ad Astra reflects Musk's priorities for hands-on learning that would equip children with the skills he has said they'll need to enter the workforce. McMahon has previously expressed support for workforce education programs, suggesting a focus on teaching kids practical skills could be a priority over the next four years.

Are you a parent interested in enrolling your child at Ad Astra? What priorities do you have for education in the US? Share your thoughts with this reporter at [email protected].