Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg fired back at President Donald Trump on Thursday after the commander in chief blasted the Democrat during a press briefing about the deadly midair collision between a military helicopter and a passenger airplane that occurred on Wednesday night.
Trump sarcastically called Buttigieg "a real winner."
"He's a disaster. He was a disaster as a mayor. He ran his city into the ground. And he's a disaster now. He's just got a good line of bulls---," the president said.
Buttigieg, the former South Bend, Indiana Mayor who served as secretary of the Transportation Department under former President Joe Biden, sounded off in a post on social media.
"Despicable. As families grieve, Trump should be leading, not lying. We put safety first, drove down close calls, grew Air Traffic Control, and had zero commercial airline crash fatalities out of millions of flights on our watch," Buttigieg declared in a post on X.
"President Trump now oversees the military and the FAA. One of his first acts was to fire and suspend some of the key personnel who helped keep our skies safe. Time for the President to show actual leadership and explain what he will do to prevent this from happening again," he added.
Buttigieg mounted a presidential bid in 2019, but dropped out the next year and endorsed Biden.
Buttigieg is reportedly "taking a serious look" at the possibility of running for U.S. Senate in in Michigan.
"Pete is exploring all of his options on how he can be helpful and continue to serve," a source familiar with Buttigieg's thinking told Fox News Digital. "He's honored to be mentioned for this, and he's taking a serious look."
Fox News Digital's Julia Johnson contributed to this report
A top government accountability group will send a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the U.S. Selective Service System (SSS) for data on illegal immigrants who did not register for the draft and therefore committed a felony.
Oversight Project executive director Mike Howell – whose group is filing the action – underlined the move is not an illustration of any support for illegal immigrants serving in the military.
By law, all U.S. males aged 18-26 must register with the SSS under penalty of felony conviction and $250,000 fine under the Military Selective Service Act of 1917, Howell’s group noted in their filing.
Additionally, the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 makes failure to register with the SSS a deportable offense, and the SSS website clearly states undocumented aliens are required to sign up for the draft, Howell noted.
However, the Oversight Project’s filing also cites a passage on the SSS website saying the agency does not share or collect information on a man’s immigration status and has "no authority to collect such information, has no use for it, and it is irrelevant to the registration requirement."
Given that discrepancy, the letter goes on to cite a 2023 SSS report to Congress cataloging 23,249 registrations from USCIS – the federal agency responsible for overseeing legal immigration – but no data from ICE, the Office of Refugee Resettlement or other agencies engaged in handling illegal immigration and asylees.
In a Thursday interview, Howell and attorney Kyle Brosnan said SSS registration has been flat during the Biden administration as far as it relates to the obvious uptick in "military-aged males" crossing the border and being "caught-and-released" by federal immigration authorities.
"The absence of such a surge indicates that there is widespread criminal non-compliance by such aliens," they wrote in their FOIA request.
"There should be a large increase in [SSS registration] with 10 million illegals that have come over the border in the last four years," Brosnan said.
"Former Secretary Mayorkas went on the Hill and talked about how good [Biden’s DHS] was at processing people – well, how didn’t that processing lead to an increase in registrations for Selective Service?"
"What we are really looking at now is whether the Selective Service under the Biden administration took this into account and they purposely avoided this issue for political reasons."
"If you look at their website… they go out of their way to assure illegal aliens like we're not going to share information with ICE... So I want, you know, whether those people have any culpability for failing to register the biggest population surge of military age males in U.S. history when their job is to register military."
Howell said the FOIA request’s results could go beyond the scope of just determining whether undocumented residents of the U.S. may have attempted to avoid the draft – but also potentially offer an additional avenue for Border Czar Thomas Homan’s mass deportation plans.
With failure to register with SSS being a felony and a deportable offense, Howell said that if the threads are pulled further on this situation, it could provide simplified legal grounds for the mass deportation plans of the Trump administration.
"Now that this little quirk has been figured out, how can ICE and other entities in the federal government use this new authority to drastically scale-up immigration enforcement?"
"You can turn a class of individuals into potential criminals overnight. What it also means is you don't need ICE necessarily to do it. [Alleged SSS violators] would be prosecuted by DOJ. That means they're in other beds that aren't ICE beds. So you're looking at all of them being in federal prison potentially, as opposed to taking up space in ICE custody," Howell said.
"All of these things open up the aperture for immigration enforcement in a huge way."
The Oversight Project went on to formally request at least a dozen data points from SSS in hopes of ascertaining how many asylum seekers and illegal immigrants are violating the law twofold with their avoidance of the draft.
Copies of the letter will also be sent to Homan, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.
President Donald Trump's pick for director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, faced an hourslong hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, fielding a bevy of questions related to her qualifications and previous remarks related to national security.
Gabbard appeared before the intelligence committee on Thursday morning where she worked to rally support from lawmakers ahead of Senate committee and floor votes.
Fox News Digital reported ahead of the hearing that Gabbard did not have a majority of its committee members' votes, which are necessary to move to the full Senate, according to a senior Intel Committee aide. Gabbard likely will need every Republican vote to move past the committee, assuming Democrats vote against her.
A spokesperson for Gabbard brushed off concerns that Gabbard would not have enough committee votes in a statement to Fox News Digital ahead of the hearing.
"Anonymous sources are going to continue to lie and smear to try and take down the President’s nominees and subvert the will of the American people and the media is playing a role in publishing these lies," the spokesperson said. "That doesn’t change the fact that Lt. Col. Gabbard is immensely qualified for this role and we look forward to her hearing."
Fox News Digital compiled the top five moments, exchanges and highlights from the hearing, which ended ahead of 1 p.m. on Thursday before it moved to a closed session later in the afternoon.
Gabbard kicked off her Thursday hearing by preemptively combating "lies and smears" she anticipated to hear from some Senate lawmakers, including that she simultaneously operates as a "puppet" for Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin and others.
"Before I close, I want to warn the American people who are watching at home: You may hear lies and smears in this hearing that will challenge my loyalty to and my love for our country," Gabbard said.
"Those who oppose my nomination imply that I am loyal to something or someone other than God, my own conscience and the Constitution of the United States," she continued. "Accusing me of being Trump's puppet, Putin's puppet, Assad's puppet, a guru's puppet, Modi's puppet, not recognizing the absurdity of simultaneously being the puppet of five different puppet masters."
"The same tactic was used against President Trump and failed," she said of the accusations against her.
Gabbard's critics have slammed her since Trump's election win and her nomination, including claiming she lacks the qualifications for the role, questioning her judgment over her 2017 meeting with then-Syrian dictator Bashar Assad and labeling her a "likely a Russian asset," as Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz claimed in November 2024.
"The American people elected President Trump with a decisive victory and mandate for change," Gabbard said. "The fact is, what truly unsettles my political opponents is I refuse to be their puppet. I have no love for Assad or Gadhafi or any dictator. I just hate al-Qaeda. I hate that we have leaders who cozy up to Islamist extremists, minimizing them to so-called rebels."
Gabbard was questioned on her views of National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden repeatedly throughout the hearing, including by ranking member Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., as well as Sens. Angus King, I-Maine, Michael Bennet, D-Colo., Susan Collins, R-Maine, James Lankford, R-Okla., and others.
"Was Edward Snowden a traitor to the United States of America?" Bennet asked Gabbard.
"He broke the law," Gabbard responded.
"Was Edward Snowden a traitor?" Lankford also asked.
"Senator, my heart is with my commitment to our Constitution and our nation's security," she responded. "I have shown throughout my almost 22 years of service in the military, as well as my time in Congress, how seriously I take the privilege of having access to classified information and our nation's secrets. And that's why I'm committed, if confirmed as director of national intelligence, to join you in making sure that there is no future Snowden-type leak."
Gabbard previously has made favorable remarks related to Snowden across the years, including in 2019 on Joe Rogan's podcast, and calling on Trump in 2020 to pardon "brave whistleblowers exposing lies and illegal actions in our government," such as Snowden.
"If it wasn’t for Snowden, the American people would never have learned the NSA was collecting phone records and spying on Americans," she said on "The Joe Rogan Experience" podcast in 2019.
Snowden was working as an information technology contractor for the National Security Agency in 2013 when he traveled to Hong Kong to meet with three journalists and transferred thousands of pages of classified documents about the U.S. government’s surveillance of its citizens to them. He soon traveled to Russia and planned to head to Ecuador, but federal authorities canceled his passport and indicted him for espionage.
Snowden ultimately remained in Russia and became a naturalized citizen in 2022.
"Until you are nominated by the president to be the DNI, you consistently praised the actions of Edward Snowden, someone, I believe, jeopardized the security of our nation and then, to flaunt that, fled to Russia," Warner said to Gabbard on Thursday morning.
"You even called Edward Snowden, and I quote here, ‘a brave whistleblower,’" he said. "Every member of this committee supports the rights of legal whistleblowers. But Edward Snowden isn't a whistleblower, and in this case, I'm a lot closer to the chairman's words where he said Snowden is, quote, 'an egotistical serial liar and traitor' who, quote, 'deserves to rot in jail for the rest of his life.' Ms. Gabbard, a simple yes or no question: Do you still think Edward Snowden is brave?"
Gabbard pushed back that Snowden "broke the law" and does not agree with his leak of intelligence.
"Mr. Vice Chairman, Edward Snowden broke the law," she said. "I do not agree with or support with all of the information and intelligence that he released nor the way in which he did it. There would have been opportunities for him to come to you on this committee or seek out the IG to release that information. The fact is, he also, even as he broke the law, released information that exposed egregious, illegal and unconstitutional programs that are happening within our government."
Gabbard argued that the attack on 9/11 likely could have been prevented if government "stovepiping" had not suppressed intelligence communications from reaching other officials.
Stovepiping is understood as information being delivered through an isolated channel of communication to government higher-ups without broadening the distribution of the information.
"There's a general consensus that there was a massive intelligence failure," Republican Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., said during Gabbard's hearing regarding 9/11. "This caught us all by surprise, even though the World Trade Center had been attacked earlier. Do you think stovepipeing was a problem in our intelligence failure?"
"There's no question about it, senator," Gabbard said before Wicker asked her to elaborate.
"Senator, when we looked back at the post-9/11 reporting and the post-assessments that were made, it was very clear that there was stovepiping of information and intelligence that occurred at many levels, at the highest but also at the lowest levels," she said.
"Information that was collected by the FBI, information that was collected by the CIA was not being shared," she said. "It was almost ships passing in the night, where if there was an integration of those intelligence elements and information being shared, it is highly likely that that horrific attack could have been prevented."
Wicker pressed if the intelligence community could face another "stovepipe" issue in the future if plans to trim the director of national intelligence office of redundant jobs and increase efficiency, as Gabbard has said she will do, is put into effect.
"The problem that we had in 2001, senator, remains at the forefront of my mind," she responded. "And as you said, this is exactly why the ODNI was created. Given my limited vantage point not being in this seat, I am concerned that there are still problems with stovepiping that need to be addressed. And in some cases, my concern would be that unnecessary bureaucratic layers may be contributing to that problem."
Critics and Democrat lawmakers have slammed Gabbard for a 2017 meeting with then-Syrian dictator Bashar Assad, claiming it is evidence she would be a "danger to the American people" if confirmed.
Gabbard met with Assad in 2017, years before his government was overthrown in 2024, and publicly revealed the meeting after she returned from Syria. Gabbard was a member of the U.S. House representing Hawaii at the time of the meeting.
"There is not a great deal in the public record about what you and Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad discussed for so long in January of 2017," Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., said to Gabbard on Thursday. "And I think there's a great deal of interest from the American people about what was discussed in that meeting. So what did you talk about? And did you press Assad on things like his use of chemical weapons, systematic torture and the killing of so many Syrians?"
"Yes, Senator. I, upon returning from this trip, I met with people like then-Leader Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer, talked to them and answered their questions about the trip," Gabbard responded.
Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi had met with Assad in 2007, despite then-President George W. Bush's criticism of the visit.
Gabbard remarked that she was surprised by the lack of interest at the time from the intelligence community regarding her own meeting.
"I was surprised that there was no one from the intelligence community or the State Department who reached out or showed any interest whatsoever in my takeaways from that trip," Gabbard said. "I would have been very happy to have a conversation and give them a backbrief. I went with former Congressman Dennis Kucinich, who had been there many times before and who had met with Assad before. A number of topics were covered and discussed. And to directly answer your question, yes. I asked him tough questions about his own regime's actions. The use of chemical weapons and the brutal tactics that were being used against his own people."
"Were you able to extract any concessions from President Assad?" Heinrich asked Gabbard.
"No, and I didn't expect to, but I felt these issues were important to address," she said.
Heinrich continued to press whether now Gabbard considers "this trip as good judgment?"
"Yes, Senator. And I believe that leaders, whether you be in Congress or the president of the United States, can benefit greatly by going and engaging boots on the ground, learning and listening and meeting directly with people, whether they be adversaries or friends," Gabbard said.
Gabbard vowed that she would cut redundancies from the office of the director of national intelligence in an effort to streamline efficiency and prevent intelligence failures that can lead to devastation and tragedy.
"I'll work to assess and address efficiencies, redundancies and effectiveness across ODNI to ensure focus of personnel and resources is on our core mission of national security," she said as part of her opening remarks on Thursday. "In my meetings that I've had with many of you, you expressed bipartisan frustration about recent intelligence failures as well as the lack of responsiveness to your requests for information, whether it's the surprise Oct. 7th Hamas terrorist attack to the sudden takeover of Syria by Islamist extremists, failures to identify the source of COVID, anomalous health incidents, UAPs, drones and more. If confirmed, I look forward to working with you to address these issues."
The chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Republican Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., asked Gabbard to elaborate on her mission of cutting government fat from the office, including asking her if she would restore it to "its original size, scope and function."
"Over the years, however, the ODNI has strayed from this vision to an organization that now publicly boasts nearly 2,000 people, more than half of whom are not detailed from an intelligence agency but rather are career ODNI bureaucrats," Cotton said. "They've even developed centers that are producing their own analysis. Will you commit today to working with this committee, to restoring the ODNI to its original size, scope and function?"
"Yes, Senator," Gabbard responded. "I look forward to working with you and the committee as I, if confirmed, assess the current status of who is working in the ODNI and the function that they fulfill to make sure of its effectiveness and elimination of redundancies and bloating."
Gabbard has served as a lieutenant colonel in the Army Reserves since 2021 after previously serving in the Hawaii Army National Guard for about 17 years. She was elected to the U.S. House representing Hawaii during the 2012 election cycle, serving as a Democrat until 2021. She did not seek re-election to that office after throwing her hat in the 2020 White House race.
Gabbard left the Democratic Party in 2022, registering as an independent, before becoming a member of the Republican Party in 2024 and offering her full endorsement of Trump in his presidential campaign.
Gabbard has been outspoken against creating new wars, declaring in her speech in October 2024 during Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally that a vote for Harris was a vote for "war."
"I've served now for over 21 years," she said. "I've deployed to different war zones three times over that period, and I've seen the cost of war for my brothers and sisters who paid the ultimate price. I carry their memories and their sacrifice in my heart every day. So, this choice that we have before us as Americans is critical. It's important to us. It's important to those of us who serve, who have volunteered to put our lives on the line for the safety, security and freedom of our country and our people."
"A vote for Kamala Harris is a vote for Dick Cheney," she said at the time. "And it's a vote for war, more war, likely World War III and nuclear war. A vote for Donald Trump is a vote for a man who wants to end wars, not start them, and who has demonstrated already that he has the courage and strength to stand up and fight for peace."
Fox News Digital's Morgan Phillips and Julia Johnson contributed to this report.
But Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Donald Trump's nominee for secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), still faces crucial committee and full Senate confirmation votes in his mission to lead 18 powerful federal agencies that oversee the nation's food and health.
Testifying in front of the Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday and the Health Committee on Thursday, the vaccine skeptic and environmental crusader who ran for the White House in 2024 before ending his bid and endorsing Trump faced plenty of verbal fireworks over past controversial comments.
And while most of the tough questions and sparring over his stances on vaccines, abortion, Medicaid and other issues, came from Democrats on the two committees, Thursday's hearing ended with the top Republican on the Health panel saying he was "struggling" with Kennedy's nomination.
"Your past of undermining confidence in vaccines with unfounded or misleading arguments concerns me," GOP Sen. Bill Cassidy told the nominee.
The physician from Louisiana, who is a crucial vote and who has voiced concerns over Kennedy's past stance on vaccines, asked whether Kennedy can "be trusted to support the best public health."
And the senator told Kennedy, who seeks to lead key health agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, that "you may be hearing from me over the weekend."
Kennedy faced two days of grilling over his controversial past comments, including his repeated claims in recent years linking vaccines to autism, which have been debunked by scientific research.
And Democrats have also spotlighted Kennedy's service for years as chair or chief legal counsel for Children's Health Defense, the nonprofit organization he founded that has advocated against vaccines and sued the federal government numerous times, including a challenge over the authorization of the COVID vaccine for children.
One of Thursday's most heated exchanges came as independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont pushed Kennedy over his past of linking vaccines to autism.
Sanders stated that "vaccines do not cause autism" and asked Kennedy "do you agree with that?"
After the nominee didn't answer, Sanders responded, "I asked you a simple question, Bobby."
Kennedy replied, "Senator, if you show me those studies, I will absolutely … apologize."
"That is a very troubling response because the studies are there. Your job was to have looked at those studies as an applicant for this job," Sanders said.
Later in the hearing, the two also clashed over political contributions to the pharmaceutical industry, with Kennedy referring to Sanders simply as "Bernie."
"Almost all the members of this panel, including yourself, are accepting millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry and protecting their interests," Kennedy said.
Sanders immediately pushed back, "I ran for president like you. I got millions and millions of contributions. They did not come from the executives, not one nickel of PAC [political action committee] money from the pharmaceutical [companies]. They came from workers."
Another fiery moment came as Democrat Sen. Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire appeared to fight back tears as she noted her son's struggles with cerebral palsy amid accusations that "partisanship" was behind the Democrats' blistering questions to Kennedy.
Hassan, who at Wednesday's hearing charged that Kennedy "sold out" to Trump by altering his position on abortion, on Thursday accused the nominee of "relitigating settled science."
But many of the Republicans on the panel came to Kennedy's defense, including conservative Sen. Rand Paul.
The ophthalmologist from Kentucky defended Kennedy and took aim at comments about vaccines not causing autism.
"We don’t know what causes autism, so we should be more humble," Paul said to applause from Kennedy supporters in the committee room audience wearing "Make America Healthy Again" garb.
The 71-year-old Kennedy, a scion of the nation's most storied political dynasty, launched a long-shot campaign for the Democrat presidential nomination against President Joe Biden in April 2023. But six months later, he switched to an independent run for the White House.
Kennedy made major headlines again last August when he dropped his presidential bid and endorsed Trump. While Kennedy had long identified as a Democrat and repeatedly invoked his late father, former Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, and his late uncle, former President John F. Kennedy – who were both assassinated in the 1960s – Kennedy in recent years built relationships with far-right leaders due in part to his high-profile vaccine skepticism.
Trump announced soon after the November election that he would nominate Kennedy to his Cabinet to run HHS.
Kennedy, whose outspoken views on Big Pharma and the food industry have also sparked controversy, has said he aims to shift the focus of the agencies he would oversee toward promotion of a healthy lifestyle, including overhauling dietary guidelines, taking aim at ultra-processed foods and getting to the root causes of chronic diseases.
"Our country is not going to be destroyed because we get the marginal tax rate wrong. It is going to be destroyed if we get this issue wrong," Kenendy said Thursday as he pointed to chronic diseases. "And I am in a unique position to be able to stop this epidemic."
The Finance Committee, which will decide on whether to send Kennedy's nomination to the full Senate, has yet to schedule a date for a confirmation vote.
With Republicans controlling the Senate by a 53-47 majority, Kennedy can only afford to lose the support of three GOP senators if Democrats unite against his confirmation.
And besides Cassidy, two other Republicans on the Health Committee – Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska – are potential "no" votes on Kennedy.
Collins on Thursday questioned Kennedy about vaccines, herd immunity as well as his views on Lyme disease. Kenendy pledged that there's "nobody who will fight harder for a treatment for Lyme disease."
A 50-50 vote in the full Senate would force Vice President JD Vance to serve as the tiebreaker to push the Kennedy nomination over the top, as the vice president did last week with the confirmation of another controversial nominee, now-Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
President Donald Trump's FBI director nomineeKash Patel sparredwith Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday in his lengthy confirmation hearing, where he faced off with lawmakers on issues ranging from Trump's pardoning of Jan. 6 rioters, his role in elevating a song released by the Jan. 6 inmate choir, and his previous call to shut down the FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C.
He also answered questions about his views on QAnon and on his book, "Government Gangsters."
Here were the four biggest clashes of the day.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., blasted Patel for refusing to share his grand jury testimony from the probe into Trump’shandling of classifieddocuments after leaving the White House.
The charges against Trump were dropped in Florida and New York after he won the presidential election, in keeping with a long-standing DOJ policy against prosecuting a sitting president.
Blumenthal told Patel on Thursday that refusing to share his remarks with the panel gave "the appearance" that he is being less than transparent.
"The appearance here is that you have something to hide," Blumenthal told him. "I submit to my colleagues on the committee, we need to know what the grand jury testimony is ... and you have no objection to our seeking it, but you won't tell us."
"Even in a classified, confidential setting, I think that position is disqualifying," he said, before adding, "What are you hiding?" "Why won't you tell us?"
Patel declined to give a satisfactory answer.
"The appearance here is that you have something to hide," Blumenthal said.
Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., also traded barbs with Patel on Thursday over the president’s sweeping pardon and sentence commutations to the more than 1,500 defendants charged in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riots.
Durbin, the ranking Democrat on the panel, asked whether Patel believed the U.S. is "safer" after the mass pardons were granted, to which Patel attempted to equivocate the action to pardons issued by former President Joe Biden.
He told Durbin that he has "not looked at all 1,600 individual cases" before adding, "I also believe America is not safer because of President Biden's commutation of a man who murdered two FBI agents," Patel said, referencing Biden’s decision to commute the sentence of Leonard Peltier, a Native American activist convicted of murdering two FBI agents on a South Dakota reservation.
The agents' families, he said, "[D]eserve better than to have the man that point-blank range fired a shotgun into their heads and murdered them released from prison."
"So it goes both ways."
The January 6 rioters, and their pardons, were a frequent topic of the hearing.
Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., hit Patel with rapid-fire questions regarding his involvement in and promotion of a song recorded by the "J6 Prison Choir," a group of Capitol rioters, during their incarceration.
Patel shared the song, "Justice for All," on social media. He said that at the time he "did not know about the violent offenders," noting that he "did not participate in any of the violence in and around Jan. 6."
In response, Schiff gave Patel a harsh public dressing-down over the violence and assault endured by the Capitol Police on Jan. 6, 2021.
"Turn around and look at them," Schiff told Patel before motioning to the officers lined up for protection along the back of the room.
Patel declined to do so.
"I want you to look at them if you can, if you have the courage to look them in the eye, Mr. Patel. Tell them you're proud of what you did," Schiff said.
"Tell them you're proud that you raised money off of people that assaulted their colleagues, that pepper sprayed them, that beat them with poles. Tell them you're proud of what you did," Schiff said, adding, "They're right there. They are guarding you today."
New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker's questions to Patel regarding any efforts by Trump to declassify documents after leaving the White House were among the most heated moments of the hearing.
Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, asked Patel repeatedly whether he witnessed Trump handling documents marked as classified or moving to declassify them after leaving the Oval Office.
"In the name of all the values you have said today, did you or did you not testify to witnessing the president of the United States declassify documents?" Booker asked, his voice rising several octaves.
Patel told Booker he did not know if the documents he saw being declassified at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida were seized by FBI agents in the special counsel probe, and he urged Booker to obtain them legally.
"The question is: Will you lie for the president of the United States?" Booker said. "Would you lie for Donald Trump?"
Booker urged Patel to testify to the Senate over what he said to the grand jury.
It "would be utterly irresponsible for this committee to move forward with his nomination … if we do not know that the future head of the FBI would break the law and lie for the president of the United States," Booker said.
"He's refusing the transparency that he claims to adhere to. He is refusing to be direct with the United States Senate," he continued.
"Did he or did he not lie for the president? That is the question."
The Trump administration has told top officials at the FBI to resign or lose their jobs, Fox News has learned.
The exact number has not been disclosed, but the ultimatum was allegedly given to senior employees promoted under former director, Christopher A. Wray.
President Donald Trump’s administration took these steps as his nominee to lead the bureau, Kash Patel, said he would not begin his tenure with retribution or focus on past transgressions.
"I have no interest, no desire and will not, if confirmed, go backwards. There will be no politicization at the FBI. There will be no retributive actions taken," Patel said at the Senate Judiciary Committee.
According to reporting from The New York Times, an email to colleagues from one of the senior agents outlined that he had learned he would be dismissed "from the rolls of the F.B.I." as soon as Monday morning.
"I was given no rationale for this decision, which, as you might imagine, has come as a shock," he wrote.
During the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Patel said he is unaware of any plans of retribution by the Trump administration.
"Are you aware of any plans or discussions to punish in any way, including termination, FBI agents or personnel associated with Trump investigations?" asked Democratic Sen. Cory Booker.
Although Patel has been nominated, a director has not been officially confirmed to take charge, so the news of the ultimatum was alarming for those involved.
Until the vote comes to a close, Brian Driscoll remains the bureau’s acting director.
The FBI declined to comment when reached by Fox News.
